Peripheral Sensory Input in Central Post Stroke Pain (CPSP)

Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02148588
Collaborator
Aarhus University Hospital (Other)
8
1
1
29.8
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Prospective, open-label study in 10 patients with Central Post Stroke Pain (CPSP). The study will evaluate the effects of peripheral nerve blockade on spontaneous pain and evoked thermal and mechanical responses in CPSP, and assesses the associated local anesthetic pharmacokinetics.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block with 2% lidocaine
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
8 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
How "Central" is Central Post-stroke Pain? Investigating the Role of Peripheral Sensory Input in Maintaining Central Pain
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 15, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 25, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Pain testing

Completion of NPSI questionnaire Sensory mapping of the affected limb Quantitative Sensory Testing Patients will have a peripheral nerve blockade

Drug: Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block with 2% lidocaine
Patients will have a peripheral nerve blockade with a local anesthetic (lidocaine) Assessment of spontaneous and evoked pain responses Completion of NPSI questionnaire Mapping of the affected limb

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Reduction in Spontaneous Pain Intensity After a Peripheral Nerve Block. [baseline and 30 minutes]

    Reduction in spontaneous pain intensity in the painful extremity from baseline to 30 minutes after a peripheral nerve block.Spontaneous pain intensity was measured on 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 represents "no pain", and 10 represents "worst pain imaginable"

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in the Intensity of Cold Sensation [baseline and 30 min]

    The intensity of cold sensation (application of roller cooled down to 20 degrees Celsius) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful cold); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no cold sensation)

  2. Change in the Intensity of Warm Sensation [baseline and 30 min]

    The intensity of warm sensation (application of roller heated up to 40 degrees Celsius) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful hot); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no warmth sensation)

  3. Change in the Intensity of Pinprick Sensation [baseline and 30 min]

    The intensity of pinprick sensation (application of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament #6.1, ~100g target force) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful sharp); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no pricking sensation)

  4. Change in the Intensity of Brush Sensation [baseline and 30 min]

    The intensity of brush sensation (application of SENSELab Brush-05) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful brushing sensation); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no brushing sensation)

  5. Reported Pain/Dysesthesia Descriptors on NPSI Questionnaire [baseline and 40 min]

    Composite scores on NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) questionnaire before and 40 minutes after the peripheral nerve block. The NPSI assesses participant ranking of specific neuropathic pain descriptors, each ranked on a 0-10 scale, where 0 represents no burning/squeezing/electric shocks (etc), and 10 represents worst burning/squeezing/electric shocks (etc). The scores on individual questions are grouped (averaged) into the three following subscales (each subscale scores ranging from 0 to 10): Burning pain Paroxysmal pain Paresthesia/dysesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Each subject must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Age ≥18;

  • CPSP affecting an upper or a lower limb, in a distribution that may be completely covered by a peripheral nerve block;

  • Patient fulfills all mandatory criteria for CPSP, fulfills at least one supportive criteria, and has definite CPSP by probability grading.

  • Pain duration at least 3 months;

  • Spontaneous pain intensity (average pain in past week) of ≥ 4 on 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects will not be enrolled if any of the following criteria exist:
  • Not giving consent to participate in the study;

  • Significant psychiatric or cognitive impairment;

  • Moderate to severe renal or liver failure;

  • Concomitant treatment with warfarin or other anticoagulants;

  • Pregnancy or lactation.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Washington University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Washington University School of Medicine
  • Aarhus University Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Simon Haroutounian, PHD, Washington Univesity School of Medicine

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
simon.haroutounian, Assistant Professor, Washington University School of Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02148588
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 201405121
First Posted:
May 28, 2014
Last Update Posted:
May 2, 2018
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2018
Keywords provided by simon.haroutounian, Assistant Professor, Washington University School of Medicine
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title The Entire Cohort
Arm/Group Description All participants received a peripheral nerve block
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 8
COMPLETED 8
NOT COMPLETED 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title The Entire Cohort
Arm/Group Description All participants received a peripheral nerve block
Overall Participants 8
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
51.6
(7.4)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
4
50%
Male
4
50%
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
0%
Asian
0
0%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
Black or African American
5
62.5%
White
3
37.5%
More than one race
0
0%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
United States
7
87.5%
Denmark
1
12.5%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Reduction in Spontaneous Pain Intensity After a Peripheral Nerve Block.
Description Reduction in spontaneous pain intensity in the painful extremity from baseline to 30 minutes after a peripheral nerve block.Spontaneous pain intensity was measured on 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 represents "no pain", and 10 represents "worst pain imaginable"
Time Frame baseline and 30 minutes

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT
Arm/Group Title The Entire Cohort
Arm/Group Description All participants received a peripheral nerve block
Measure Participants 8
Baseline pain intensity
6.5
Pain intensity after the block
0.0
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in the Intensity of Cold Sensation
Description The intensity of cold sensation (application of roller cooled down to 20 degrees Celsius) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful cold); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no cold sensation)
Time Frame baseline and 30 min

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The entire cohort
Arm/Group Title The Entire Cohort
Arm/Group Description All participants received a peripheral nerve block
Measure Participants 8
Baseline
7
30 min after the block
0.0
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in the Intensity of Warm Sensation
Description The intensity of warm sensation (application of roller heated up to 40 degrees Celsius) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful hot); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no warmth sensation)
Time Frame baseline and 30 min

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The entire cohort
Arm/Group Title The Entire Cohort
Arm/Group Description All participants received a peripheral nerve block
Measure Participants 8
Baseline
5.9
(1.4)
30 min after the block
0.5
(1.1)
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in the Intensity of Pinprick Sensation
Description The intensity of pinprick sensation (application of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament #6.1, ~100g target force) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful sharp); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no pricking sensation)
Time Frame baseline and 30 min

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The entire cohort
Arm/Group Title The Entire Cohort
Arm/Group Description All participants received a peripheral nerve block
Measure Participants 8
Baseline
5.0
(2.1)
30 min after block
1.1
(2.2)
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in the Intensity of Brush Sensation
Description The intensity of brush sensation (application of SENSELab Brush-05) was measured on 0-10 scale, where 5 represents "normal" sensation (comparable to contralateral non-painful extremity). Higher scores indicate increased sensitivity (10= painful brushing sensation); lower scores represent reduced sensitivity (0=no brushing sensation)
Time Frame baseline and 30 min

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The entire cohort
Arm/Group Title The Entire Cohort
Arm/Group Description All participants received a peripheral nerve block
Measure Participants 8
Baseline
4.5
(1.9)
30 min after block
1.0
(1.4)
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Reported Pain/Dysesthesia Descriptors on NPSI Questionnaire
Description Composite scores on NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) questionnaire before and 40 minutes after the peripheral nerve block. The NPSI assesses participant ranking of specific neuropathic pain descriptors, each ranked on a 0-10 scale, where 0 represents no burning/squeezing/electric shocks (etc), and 10 represents worst burning/squeezing/electric shocks (etc). The scores on individual questions are grouped (averaged) into the three following subscales (each subscale scores ranging from 0 to 10): Burning pain Paroxysmal pain Paresthesia/dysesthesia
Time Frame baseline and 40 min

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title The Entire Cohort
Arm/Group Description All participants received a peripheral nerve block
Measure Participants 8
Burning pain- baseline
4.1
(3.7)
burning pain - 40 min after block
0.0
(0.0)
paroxysmal pain - baseline
2.6
(2.1)
Paroxysmal pain - 40 min after block
0.0
(0.0)
paresthesia/dysesthesia - baseline
3.6
(3.3)
paresthesia/dysesthesia - 40 min after block
0.9
(1.3)

Adverse Events

Time Frame 48 hours
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title The Entire Cohort
Arm/Group Description All participants received a peripheral nerve block
All Cause Mortality
The Entire Cohort
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/8 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
The Entire Cohort
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/8 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
The Entire Cohort
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 4/8 (50%)
Nervous system disorders
Perioral numbness 2/8 (25%) 2
Dizziness 1/8 (12.5%) 1
Vasovagal response 1/8 (12.5%) 1

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Simon Haroutounian
Organization Washington University School of Medicine
Phone 3142861715 ext 314
Email simon.haroutounian@wustl.edu
Responsible Party:
simon.haroutounian, Assistant Professor, Washington University School of Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02148588
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 201405121
First Posted:
May 28, 2014
Last Update Posted:
May 2, 2018
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2018