TENecteplase in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion Stuy (TenCRAOS)

Sponsor
Oslo University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04526951
Collaborator
(none)
78
25
2
39
3.1
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

TENecteplase in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion (TenCRAOS): A Prospective, randomized-controlled, double-dummy, double-blind phase 3 multi-centre trial of TNK 0.25 mg/kg + placebo vs. ASA + placebo (2 arms with 1:1 block randomization).

A Prospective, randomized-controlled, double-dummy, double-blind phase 3 multi-centre trial of TNK 0.25 mg/kg + placebo vs. ASA + placebo (2 arms with 1:1 block randomization). At all participating centers, ophthalmologists are involved in the diagnosis and visual outcome measurements using a standardized protocol. The patients will be promptly examined by the ophthalmologist. As soon as the CRAO is diagnosed by the ophthalmologist, the patients will be managed in the stroke unit during treatment, monitoring, and medical investigations. After treatment in the stroke unit, the patients will be re-examined by an ophthalmologist and a neurologist as an out-patient at (30 ±5) and 90 (±15) days

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Intravenous injection of Tenecteplase and one dose of placebo tablet
  • Drug: One tablet of Acetylsalicylic Acid and one dose of IV placebo
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is an ophthalmologic emergency that, without prompt revascularization, bears high risk of permanent blindness. The condition is typically the result of an artery-to-artery embolism from a carotid plaque or cardio embolism. A recent meta-analysis of observational data indicates that prompt revascularization with systemic thrombolysis might improve outcome. A randomized controlled trial of early systemic thrombolysis for CRAO is therefore warranted. The aim of this project is to assess the effect of systemic tissue plasminogen activator tenecteplase versus placebo administered within 4.5 hours of CRAO onset in patients admitted to the participating hospitals in Europe. The main endpoint is the proportion of patients with ≤ 0.7 logMAR visual acuity 30 (±5) days after treatment, representing an improvement in visual acuity of at least 0.3 logMAR, equal to at least 15 letters/three lines on a visual acuity chart. In addition, we will access differences in visual field parameters and patient reported outcome measures between the groups. This study is based on a broad collaboration and interaction between leading ophthalmologists and neurologists in European centres.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
78 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
A prospective, randomized-controlled, double-dummy, double-blind phase 3 multi-centre trial of TNK 0.25 mg/kg + placebo vs. ASA + placebo (2 arms with 1:1 block randomisation). At all participating centers, ophthalmologists are involved in the diagnosis and visual outcome measurements using a standardized protocol. The patients will be promptly examined by the ophthalmologist. As soon as the CRAO is diagnosed by the ophthalmologist, the patients will be managed in the stroke unit during treatment, monitoring, and medical investigations. After treatment in the stroke unit, the patients will be re-examined by an ophthalmologist and a neurologist as an out-patient at (30 ±5) and 90 (±15) days.A prospective, randomized-controlled, double-dummy, double-blind phase 3 multi-centre trial of TNK 0.25 mg/kg + placebo vs. ASA + placebo (2 arms with 1:1 block randomisation). At all participating centers, ophthalmologists are involved in the diagnosis and visual outcome measurements using a standardized protocol. The patients will be promptly examined by the ophthalmologist. As soon as the CRAO is diagnosed by the ophthalmologist, the patients will be managed in the stroke unit during treatment, monitoring, and medical investigations. After treatment in the stroke unit, the patients will be re-examined by an ophthalmologist and a neurologist as an out-patient at (30 ±5) and 90 (±15) days.
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
TENecteplase in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion Study (TenCRAOS): A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Early Systemic Tenecteplase Treatment in Patients With Central Retinal Artery Occlusion.
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 30, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 31, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Tenecteplase

The total dose of tenecteplase is 0.25 mg/kg body weight, maximum 25 mg. The total dose will be given as an intravenous bolus

Drug: Intravenous injection of Tenecteplase and one dose of placebo tablet
Drug: Tenecteplase Tenecteplase administered as an intravenous injection (0.25 mg/kg body weigh; maximum 25 mg)
Other Names:
  • Metalyse
  • Active Comparator: acetylsalicylic acid

    one tablet of aspirin 300 mg Other Name: Aspirin

    Drug: One tablet of Acetylsalicylic Acid and one dose of IV placebo
    300 mg Acetylsalisylic acid
    Other Names:
  • Aspirin
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Proportion of patients with ≤ 0.7 logMAR visual acuity in the affected eye at 30 (±5) days after treatment, representing an improvement in visual acuity of at least 0.3 logMAR (intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis). [30 (±5) days]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Proportion of patients with ≤ 0.5 logMAR visual acuity in the affected eye at 30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days. [30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days]

    2. Mean improvement in logMAR visual acuity in the affected eye from baseline to 30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days. [30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days]

    3. Proportion of patients with visual recovery (logMAR ≤ 0.7) and (logMAR ≤ 0.5) in the affected eye 30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days in patients who were treated with tenecteplase within 3 hours of onset [30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days]

    4. Number of test points seen (of 100) on monocular Esterman perimetry at 30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days [30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days]

    5. Acute ischemic lesions on follow-up on diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI or on brain CT at baseline and 24hrs. [24 hours]

    6. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) at 24hrs and discharge. [24 hours]

    7. Modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) at discharge, 30 (±5) and 90 days (±15) days. [Discharge, 30 (±5) and 90 days (±15) days.]

    8. Mean score on National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) at 30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days [30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days]

      Visual function related quality of life at 30 and 90 days. Measures the dimensions of self-reported vision-targeted health status that are most important for persons who have chronic eye diseases. 100 = best possible, 0 = worst possible

    9. Mean score on EQ-5D at 30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days [30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days]

      Quality of life reported at 30 and 90 days. Health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.

    10. Presence of ocular neovascularisation at 30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days [30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days]

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. All-cause and stroke-related death at discharge, 30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days. [Discharge assessed up to 7 days , 30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days]

    2. Proportion of patients with any intracranial haemorrhage at 24 hrs [24 hours]

    3. Proportion of patients with symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage until discharge. [at discharge, assessed up to 7 days]

    4. Proportion of patients with complications such as systemic bleeding at 24 hrs, discharge and 30 (±5) days [24 hours, at discharge assessed up to 7 days and 30 (±5) days]

    5. Other serious adverse events [24 hours, at discharge, 30 (±5) days and 90 days (±15) days.]

    6. Occurrence of adverse events [24 hours, at discharge assessed up to 7 days, 30 (±5) days and 90 days (±15) days.]

    7. Retrobulbar spot sign detection using Duplex/Doppler ultrasound at baseline, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) [30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days]

    8. Retrobulbar spot sign and central retinal artery recanalisation using Duplex/Doppler ultrasound at 24h and discharge [24 hours and at discharge assessed up to 7 days]

    9. Macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) volume scans and macular OCT angiography (OCT-A) at 30 and 90 days [30 (±5) and 90 (±15) days]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion with ≥ 1.0 logMAR visual acuitiy and symptoms lasting less than 4.5 hours.

    2. Ability to administer the Investigator Medicinal Product (IMP) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.

    3. Age ≥18 years.

    4. Informed written consent of the patient.

    5. A woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must confirm that in her opinion, she cannot be pregnant, OR if there is a possibility that she is pregnant, a negative pregnancy test must be confirmed before any IMP is given.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. No other active intervention targeting CRAO.

    2. Branch retinal artery occlusion, cilioretinal artery supplying the macula, combined arterial-venous occlusion, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, elevated intraocular pressure (> 30 mmHg) or clinical suspicion of ophthalmic artery occlusion occlusion (e.g. choroidal nonperfusion, absence of cherry red spot, no light perception).

    3. Systemic diseases; severe general diseases, systemic arterial hypertension (blood pressure >185/110 mmHg), despite medical therapy, or clinical suspicion of acute systemic inflammation.

    4. Presence of intracranial haemorrhage on brain MRI/CT.

    5. Medical history: heart attack within the last 6 weeks, intracerebral bleeding or neurosurgical operation within the last 4 weeks, therapy with anticoagulation, allergic reaction to contrast agent, hemorrhagic diathesis, aneurysms, inflammatory vascular diseases (eg, giant cell arteritis, granulomatosis with polyangitis), endocarditis, or gastric ulcer.

    6. No willingness and ability of the patient to participate in all follow-up examinations.

    7. Pregnancy (if suspicion of pregnancy s-hCG or u-hCG must be negative).

    8. Allergy or intolerance to any ingredients of IMP or placebo or gentamicin.

    9. Other conditions / circumstances likely to lead to poor treatment adherence (eg, history of poor compliance, alcohol or drug dependency, no fixed abode).

    10. Significant bleeding disorder either at present or within the past 6 months.

    11. Effective oral anticoagulant treatment, eg, warfarin sodium (INR >1.3).

    12. Effective anticoagulant treatment with heparin or low molecular weight heparin the last 48 hours.

    13. Any history of central nervous system damage (ie, neoplasm, aneurysm, intracranial or spinal surgery).

    14. Known hemorrhagic diathesis.

    15. Major surgery, biopsy of a parenchymal organ, or significant trauma within the past 2 months (this includes any trauma associated with acute myocardial infarction).

    16. Recent non-compressible vessel puncture within 2 weeks.

    17. Recent trauma to the head or cranium.

    18. Prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (>2 minutes) within the past 2 weeks.

    19. Acute pericarditis and/or subacute bacterial endocarditis.

    20. Acute pancreatitis.

    21. Severe hepatic dysfunction, including hepatic failure, cirrhosis, portal hypertension (oesophageal varices) and active hepatitis.

    22. Active peptic ulceration.

    23. Arterial aneurysm and known arterial/venous malformation.

    24. Neoplasm with increased bleeding risk.

    25. Any known history of hemorrhagic stroke or stroke of unknown origin.

    26. Known history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in the preceding 3 months.

    27. Dementia.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University Hospital Antwerp Antwerp Belgium
    2 Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark
    3 Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
    4 Rigshospitalet University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
    5 Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
    6 Helsinki University Hospita Helsinki Finland
    7 Turku University Hospital Turku Finland
    8 Mater Misericordiae University Hospital Dublin Ireland
    9 Vilnius University Hospital Vilnius Lithuania
    10 Sørlandet Hospital Trust Arendal Norway
    11 Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway
    12 Nordland Hospital Trust Bodø Norway
    13 Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Drammen Drammen Norway
    14 Østfold Hospital Trust Kalnes Grålum Norway
    15 Innlandet Hospital Trust Lillehammer Norway
    16 Nordmøre and Romsdal Regional Hospital Molde Norway
    17 Helse Nord Trøndelag Trust Namsos Norway
    18 Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway 0424
    19 Telemark Hospital Trust Skien Norway
    20 Stavanger University Hospital Stavanger Norway
    21 University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø Tromsø Norway
    22 St Olav University Hospital Trondheim Norway
    23 Vestfold Hospital Trust Tønsberg Norway
    24 Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João Porto Portugal
    25 Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Oslo University Hospital

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Anne Hege Aamodt, Senior Consultant, MD, PhD, Oslo University Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04526951
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Oslo UH
    • 2018-002546-36
    • 2019/327
    First Posted:
    Aug 26, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 3, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Anne Hege Aamodt, Senior Consultant, MD, PhD, Oslo University Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 3, 2021