Camellia: Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections Versus Sham Control in Patients With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Provide efficacy and safety data on intravitreal injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in patients with visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to CRVO
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injection |
Drug: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Ranibizumab solution for injection was supplied in vials. Each vial contained ranibizumab concentration of 10mg/mL labeled as 0.5 mg/0.5 mL, corresponding to a 0.5 mg dose level. Ranibizumab was formulated as a sterile solution aseptically filled in a sterile glass vial for single use only
Other Names:
|
Sham Comparator: Sham injection As of Month 3, ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injections |
Other: Sham injection
Sham injections referred to the imitation of an intravitreal injection using an injection syringe without needle.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Average Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 3 [Baseline, 3 Months]
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Mean Visual Acuity was averaged over all monthly assessments from month 1 to month 3 and compared to Baseline.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Average Change of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 12 [Baseline, 12 months]
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Mean Visual Acuity was averaged over all monthly assessments from month 1 to month 12 and compared to Baseline
- Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Change From Baseline Over Time [Month 1 to 12 months]
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes the change in visual acuity at each visit compared to baseline
- Change From Baseline in Central-Sub-Field- Thickness (CSFT) Over Time [Month 1 to month 12]
OCT (optical coherence tomography) was used to assess CSFT (Central Sub-Field Thickness) representing the average retinal thickness of the circular area within 1 mm diameter around the foveal center.
- Number of Participants With a Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters Over Time [Month 1 to month 12]
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.
- Number of Participants With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Loss of <15 Letters in the Study Eye Over Time [Month 1 to 12 months]
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed at every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes for each post-baseline month whether or not a patient lost less than 15 letters of VA as compared with baseline.
- The Change in Patient Reported Outcomes in NEI-VFQ-25 Score (Composite Score and Subscales) at Month 3, 6 and 12 Compared to Baseline [Month 3,6 and 12]
The VFQ-25 consists of 25 vision related questions across 11 vision related subscales, including general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision and peripheral vision, and a general health rating. Items are converted to a 0-100 scale on each subscale and for the composite score where higher scores represents better functioning.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria for study and fellow eye:
• Patients with visual impairment secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with a BCVA between 24 and 73 letters in one eye and at least 35 letters in the other eye.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Pregnant or nursing women or women of child bearing potential unless using an effective contraception
-
Stroke or myocard infarction within 3 months prior to study
-
History of malignancy within the past 5 years
-
Uncontrolled hypertension
-
Active infection or inflammation in any eye
-
use of corticosteroids for at least 30 days in the last 6 months
-
treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs in any eye within last 3 months
-
Panretinal or focal/drid laser photocoagulation within the last 3 and 4 months respectively
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Novartis Investigative Site | Beijing | Beijing | China | 100191 |
2 | Novartis Investigative Site | Beijing | Beijing | China | 100730 |
3 | Novartis Investigative Site | Chongqing | Chongqing | China | 400042 |
4 | Novartis Investigative Site | Guangzhou | Guangdong | China | 510060 |
5 | Novartis Investigative Site | Shantou | Guangdong | China | 515041 |
6 | Novartis Investigative Site | Harbin | Heilongjiang | China | 150001 |
7 | Novartis Investigative Site | Wuhan | Hubei | China | 430070 |
8 | Novartis Investigative Site | Changsha | Hunan | China | 410011 |
9 | Novartis Investigative Site | Nanjing | Jiangsu | China | 210006 |
10 | Novartis Investigative Site | Nanjing | Jiangsu | China | 210029 |
11 | Novartis Investigative Site | Nantong | Jiangsu | China | 226000 |
12 | Novartis Investigative Site | Nanchang | Jiangxi | China | 330006 |
13 | Novartis Investigative Site | Qingdao | Shandong | China | 266011 |
14 | Novartis Investigative Site | Chengdu | Sichuan | China | 610041 |
15 | Novartis Investigative Site | Tianjin | Tianjin | China | 300020 |
16 | Novartis Investigative Site | Tianjin | Tianjin | China | 300070 |
17 | Novartis Investigative Site | Wenzhou | Zhejiang | China | 325027 |
18 | Novartis Investigative Site | Beijing | China | 100034 | |
19 | Novartis Investigative Site | Beijing | China | 100176 | |
20 | Novartis Investigative Site | Beijing | China | 100730 | |
21 | Novartis Investigative Site | Chongqing | China | 400038 | |
22 | Novartis Investigative Site | Shanghai | China | 200080 | |
23 | Novartis Investigative Site | Shanghai | China | 200092 | |
24 | Novartis Investigative Site | Hongkong | Hong Kong | ||
25 | Novartis Investigative Site | Ahmedabad | Gujarat | India | 380 016 |
26 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bhubaneswar | Orissa | India | 751 024 |
27 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bandung | Jawa Barat | Indonesia | 40117 |
28 | Novartis Investigative Site | Jakarta | Indonesia | 10430 | |
29 | Novartis Investigative Site | Manila | Metro Manila | Philippines | 1000 |
30 | Novartis Investigative Site | San Juan City | Philippines | 1500 | |
31 | Novartis Investigative Site | Lin-Kou | Taiwan | 33305 | |
32 | Novartis Investigative Site | Taipei | Taiwan | ||
33 | Novartis Investigative Site | Hanoi | Vietnam | 10000 | |
34 | Novartis Investigative Site | Ho Chi Minh City | Vietnam | 70000 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Investigators
- Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CRFB002E2302
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | A total of 253 patients were randomized to this study, 191 patients to the ranibizumab group and 62 patients to the sham group. One patient randomized to the ranibizumab group was excluded from all analyses as informed consent was obtained after first study procedures were performed. Therefore, this patient not included in randomized set. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | This study consisted of the 3 periods (Screening period: Day -14 to Day -1; treatment period: Day 1 to Month 11; post-treatment period: Month 11 to Month 12). At Baseline (Visit 2, Day 1), eligible patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to one of the treatment arms |
Arm/Group Title | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Injection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | PRN intravitreal injection | As of Month 3, ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injections |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 190 | 62 |
Completed 3 Months | 186 | 60 |
Discontinued Study Prior to 3 Months | 4 | 2 |
COMPLETED | 173 | 53 |
NOT COMPLETED | 17 | 9 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Injection | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | PRN intravitreal injection | As of Month 3, ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injections | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 190 | 62 | 252 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
54.1
(12.64)
|
54.1
(13.29)
|
54.1
(12.77)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
88
46.3%
|
29
46.8%
|
117
46.4%
|
Male |
102
53.7%
|
33
53.2%
|
135
53.6%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Average Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 3 |
---|---|
Description | Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Mean Visual Acuity was averaged over all monthly assessments from month 1 to month 3 and compared to Baseline. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 3 Months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients to whom study treatment had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment group they had been assigned to at randomization. (MV-LOCF)=Mean value interpolation and last observation carried forward |
Arm/Group Title | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Injection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | PRN intravitreal injection | As of Month 3, ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injections |
Measure Participants | 188 | 62 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Letters] |
11.3
(10.77)
|
-2.7
(13.92)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg, Sham Injection |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | |
Comments |
Title | Average Change of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Mean Visual Acuity was averaged over all monthly assessments from month 1 to month 12 and compared to Baseline |
Time Frame | Baseline, 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients to whom study treatment had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment group they had been assigned to at randomization. (MV-LOCF)=Mean value interpolation and last observation carried forward |
Arm/Group Title | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Injection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | PRN intravitreal injection | As of Month 3, ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injections |
Measure Participants | 188 | 62 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Letters] |
12.4
(11.43)
|
3.2
(14.62)
|
Title | Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Change From Baseline Over Time |
---|---|
Description | Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes the change in visual acuity at each visit compared to baseline |
Time Frame | Month 1 to 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients to whom study treatment had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment group they had been assigned to at randomization. (MV-LOCF)=Mean value interpolation and last observation carried forward |
Arm/Group Title | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Injection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | PRN intravitreal injection | As of Month 3, ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injections |
Measure Participants | 188 | 62 |
Month 1 |
9.6
(10.2)
|
-0.9
(12.17)
|
Month 2 |
11.6
(12.39)
|
-3.4
(16.04)
|
Month 3 |
12.6
(12.01)
|
-3.8
(17.02)
|
Month 4 |
10.7
(12.56)
|
2.8
(15.26)
|
Month 5 |
11.7
(12.62)
|
3.9
(15.26)
|
Month 6 |
12.3
(13.10)
|
3.8
(17.20)
|
Month 7 |
12.9
(13.36)
|
5.0
(16.71)
|
Month 8 |
12.4
(14.01)
|
6.0
(16.01)
|
Month 9 |
13.1
(15.10)
|
5.6
(16.95)
|
Month 10 |
13.5
(14.13)
|
5.9
(16.77)
|
Month 11 |
14.2
(13.15)
|
6.8
(16.30)
|
Month 12 |
14.5
(14.25)
|
6.5
(17.10)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Central-Sub-Field- Thickness (CSFT) Over Time |
---|---|
Description | OCT (optical coherence tomography) was used to assess CSFT (Central Sub-Field Thickness) representing the average retinal thickness of the circular area within 1 mm diameter around the foveal center. |
Time Frame | Month 1 to month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients to whom study treatment had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment group they had been assigned to at randomization. (MV-LOCF)=Mean value interpolation and last observation carried forward |
Arm/Group Title | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Injection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | PRN intravitreal injection | As of Month 3, ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injections |
Measure Participants | 188 | 62 |
Month 1 |
-393.7
(275.13)
|
-13.3
(207.55)
|
Month 2 |
-412.6
(297.50)
|
-7.9
(196.65)
|
Month 3 |
-433.3
(290.84)
|
-84.4
(274.98)
|
Month 4 |
-367.8
(305.26)
|
-364.8
(250.48)
|
Month 5 |
-407.0
(309.58)
|
-369.6
(273.92)
|
Month 6 |
-426.6
(294.63)
|
-372.3
(301.24)
|
Month 7 |
-421.5
(316.14)
|
-392.7
(288.74)
|
Month 8 |
-398.9
(299.67)
|
-405.2
(289.49)
|
Month 9 |
-422.1
(311.57)
|
-393.5
(323.50)
|
Month 10 |
-431.7
(300.95)
|
-395.2
(309.67)
|
Month 11 |
-438.1
(295.53)
|
-417.4
(288.08)
|
Month 12 |
-441.7
(306.53)
|
-416.4
(294.08)
|
Title | Number of Participants With a Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters Over Time |
---|---|
Description | Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. |
Time Frame | Month 1 to month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients to whom study treatment had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment group they had been assigned to at randomization. (MV-LOCF)=Mean value interpolation and last observation carried forward |
Arm/Group Title | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Injection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | PRN intravitreal injection | As of Month 3, ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injections |
Measure Participants | 188 | 62 |
Month 1 Gain of >=5 letters |
141
74.2%
|
17
27.4%
|
Month 1 Gain of >=10 letters |
94
49.5%
|
6
9.7%
|
Month 1 Gain of >=15 letters |
56
29.5%
|
2
3.2%
|
Month 1 Gain of >=30 letters |
3
1.6%
|
0
0%
|
Month 2 Gain of >=5 letters |
150
78.9%
|
18
29%
|
Month 2 Gain of >=10 letters |
119
62.6%
|
11
17.7%
|
Month 2 Gain of >=15 letters |
74
38.9%
|
3
4.8%
|
Month 2 Gain of >=30 letters |
9
4.7%
|
0
0%
|
Month 3 Gain of >=5 letters |
153
80.5%
|
19
30.6%
|
Month 3 Gain of >=10 letters |
117
61.6%
|
11
17.7%
|
Month 3 Gain of >=15 letters |
76
40%
|
4
6.5%
|
Month 3 Gain of >=30 letters |
12
6.3%
|
0
0%
|
Month 4 Gain of >=5 letters |
138
72.6%
|
31
50%
|
Month 4 Gain of >=10 letters |
107
56.3%
|
21
33.9%
|
Month 4 Gain of >=15 letters |
68
35.8%
|
11
17.7%
|
Month 4 Gain of >=30 letters |
14
7.4%
|
2
3.2%
|
Month 5 Gain of >=5 letters |
143
75.3%
|
34
54.8%
|
Month 5 Gain of >=10 letters |
116
61.1%
|
23
37.1%
|
Month 5 Gain of >=15 letters |
80
42.1%
|
13
21%
|
Month 5 Gain of >=30 letters |
13
6.8%
|
1
1.6%
|
Month 6 Gain of >=5 letters |
147
77.4%
|
39
62.9%
|
Month 6 Gain of >=10 letters |
121
63.7%
|
28
45.2%
|
Month 6 Gain of >=15 letters |
87
45.8%
|
12
19.4%
|
Month 6 Gain of >=30 letters |
14
7.4%
|
13
21%
|
Month 7 Gain of >=5 letters |
152
80%
|
37
59.7%
|
Month 7 Gain of >=10 letters |
121
63.7%
|
29
46.8%
|
Month 7 Gain of >=15 letters |
91
47.9%
|
14
22.6%
|
Month 7 Gain of >=30 letters |
14
7.4%
|
3
4.8%
|
Month 8 Gain of >=5 letters |
143
75.3%
|
39
62.9%
|
Month 8 Gain of >=10 letters |
127
66.8%
|
28
45.2%
|
Month 8 Gain of >=15 letters |
95
50%
|
19
30.6%
|
Month 8 Gain of >=30 letters |
16
8.4%
|
3
4.8%
|
Month 9 Gain of >=5 letters |
147
77.4%
|
40
64.5%
|
Month 9 Gain of >=10 letters |
126
66.3%
|
26
41.9%
|
Month 9 Gain of >=15 letters |
94
49.5%
|
17
27.4%
|
Month 9 Gain of >=30 letters |
17
8.9%
|
3
4.8%
|
Month 10 Gain of >=5 letters |
152
80%
|
39
62.9%
|
Month 10 Gain of >=10 letters |
128
67.4%
|
29
46.8%
|
Month 10 Gain of >=15 letters |
95
50%
|
16
25.8%
|
Month 10 Gain of >=30 letters |
18
9.5%
|
4
6.5%
|
Month 11 Gain of >=5 letters |
153
80.5%
|
40
64.5%
|
Month 11 Gain of >=10 letters |
134
70.5%
|
29
46.8%
|
Month 11 Gain of >=15 letters |
101
53.2%
|
19
30.6%
|
Month 11 Gain of >=30 letters |
18
9.5%
|
4
6.5%
|
Month 12 Gain of >=5 letters |
151
79.5%
|
39
62.9%
|
Month 12 Gain of >=10 letters |
131
68.9%
|
30
48.4%
|
Month 12 Gain of >=15 letters |
99
52.1%
|
21
33.9%
|
Month 12 Gain of >=30 letters |
24
12.6%
|
3
4.8%
|
Title | Number of Participants With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Loss of <15 Letters in the Study Eye Over Time |
---|---|
Description | Visual acuity (VA) was assessed at every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes for each post-baseline month whether or not a patient lost less than 15 letters of VA as compared with baseline. |
Time Frame | Month 1 to 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients to whom study treatment had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment group they had been assigned to at randomization. (MV-LOCF)=Mean value interpolation and last observation carried forward |
Arm/Group Title | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Injection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | PRN intravitreal injection | As of Month 3, ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injections |
Measure Participants | 188 | 62 |
Month 1, Loss of < 15 letters |
185
97.4%
|
57
91.9%
|
Month 2, Loss of < 15 letters |
182
95.8%
|
53
85.5%
|
Month 3, Loss of < 15 letters |
182
95.8%
|
51
82.3%
|
Month 4, Loss of < 15 letters |
179
94.2%
|
55
88.7%
|
Month 5, Loss of < 15 letters |
182
95.8%
|
56
90.3%
|
Month 6, Loss of < 15 letters |
180
94.7%
|
53
85.5%
|
Month 7, Loss of < 15 letters |
181
95.3%
|
55
88.7%
|
Month 8, Loss of < 15 letters |
177
93.2%
|
55
88.7%
|
Month 9, Loss of < 15 letters |
177
93.2%
|
56
90.3%
|
Month 10, Loss of < 15 letters |
180
94.7%
|
56
90.3%
|
Month 11, Loss of < 15 letters |
183
96.3%
|
56
90.3%
|
Month 12, Loss of < 15 letters |
182
95.8%
|
55
88.7%
|
Title | The Change in Patient Reported Outcomes in NEI-VFQ-25 Score (Composite Score and Subscales) at Month 3, 6 and 12 Compared to Baseline |
---|---|
Description | The VFQ-25 consists of 25 vision related questions across 11 vision related subscales, including general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision and peripheral vision, and a general health rating. Items are converted to a 0-100 scale on each subscale and for the composite score where higher scores represents better functioning. |
Time Frame | Month 3,6 and 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients to whom study treatment had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment group they had been assigned to at randomization. n= is the number of patients with a value for both baseline and the specific post-baseline visit. |
Arm/Group Title | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Injection |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | PRN intravitreal injection | As of Month 3, ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injections |
Measure Participants | 190 | 62 |
Month 3 |
4.4
(12.54)
|
0.1
(13.78)
|
Month 6 |
6.7
(15.02)
|
2.9
(13.33)
|
Month 12 |
8.2
(13.70)
|
3.2
(15.34)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | The Safety Set consisted of all patients who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-Baseline safety assessment. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment received. The statement that a patient had no AEs also constituted a safety assessment. | |||||
Arm/Group Title | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham With Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Without Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | |||
Arm/Group Description | PRN intravitreal injection | As of Month 3, ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN intravitreal injections | Sham without Ranibizumab 0.5mg(hereafter referred to as sham group up to Month 3 and sham without ranibizumab after Month 3 | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham With Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Without Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham With Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Without Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 11/190 (5.8%) | 5/56 (8.9%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||
Acute myocardial infarction | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Left ventricular dysfunction | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Eye disorders | ||||||
Angle closure glaucoma | 2/190 (1.1%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Keratitis | 1/190 (0.5%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Macular fibrosis | 0/190 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Gastric ulcer | 1/190 (0.5%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Endophthalmitis | 1/190 (0.5%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Herpes zoster | 1/190 (0.5%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Urinary tract infection | 1/190 (0.5%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||
Wrist fracture | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||
Diabetes mellitus | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||
Inflammatory pseudotumour | 1/190 (0.5%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Schwannoma | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Haemorrhage intracranial | 1/190 (0.5%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Transient ischaemic attack | 1/190 (0.5%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||
Mediastinal cyst | 1/190 (0.5%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Pulmonary arterial hypertension | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham With Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | Sham Without Ranibizumab 0.5 mg | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 96/190 (50.5%) | 32/56 (57.1%) | 3/5 (60%) | |||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||
Cardiovascular insufficiency | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Eye disorders | ||||||
Asthenopia | 2/190 (1.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Cataract | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Conjunctival haemorrhage | 17/190 (8.9%) | 3/56 (5.4%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Conjunctival hyperaemia | 3/190 (1.6%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Conjunctival oedema | 2/190 (1.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Cystoid macular oedema | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Dry eye | 7/190 (3.7%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Eye discharge | 1/190 (0.5%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Eye irritation | 4/190 (2.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Eye pain | 4/190 (2.1%) | 2/56 (3.6%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Eye pruritus | 2/190 (1.1%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Eye swelling | 4/190 (2.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Foreign body sensation in eyes | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Glaucoma | 2/190 (1.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Iris neovascularisation | 0/190 (0%) | 2/56 (3.6%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Lacrimation increased | 2/190 (1.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Macular fibrosis | 2/190 (1.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Macular oedema | 1/190 (0.5%) | 3/56 (5.4%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Ocular discomfort | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Ocular hyperaemia | 9/190 (4.7%) | 2/56 (3.6%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Ocular hypertension | 2/190 (1.1%) | 4/56 (7.1%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Retinal haemorrhage | 1/190 (0.5%) | 5/56 (8.9%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Retinal ischaemia | 2/190 (1.1%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Retinal neovascularisation | 1/190 (0.5%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Retinal vein occlusion | 2/190 (1.1%) | 2/56 (3.6%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Vision blurred | 9/190 (4.7%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Visual acuity reduced | 9/190 (4.7%) | 3/56 (5.4%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Vitreal cells | 2/190 (1.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Vitreous detachment | 1/190 (0.5%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Vitreous floaters | 3/190 (1.6%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Vitreous haemorrhage | 1/190 (0.5%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Abdominal distension | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Abdominal pain upper | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Constipation | 2/190 (1.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Diarrhoea | 4/190 (2.1%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Gastritis | 3/190 (1.6%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
General disorders | ||||||
Malaise | 2/190 (1.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Conjunctivitis | 9/190 (4.7%) | 4/56 (7.1%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Dacryocystitis | 0/190 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Hordeolum | 1/190 (0.5%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Nasopharyngitis | 19/190 (10%) | 5/56 (8.9%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Pharyngitis | 5/190 (2.6%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 13/190 (6.8%) | 2/56 (3.6%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Urinary tract infection | 4/190 (2.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||
Fall | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Ligament sprain | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Spinal compression fracture | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Wrist fracture | 1/190 (0.5%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Investigations | ||||||
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged | 1/190 (0.5%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Intraocular pressure increased | 10/190 (5.3%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Platelet count decreased | 1/190 (0.5%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||
Diabetes mellitus | 3/190 (1.6%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Type 2 diabetes mellitus | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||
Arthritis | 2/190 (1.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Back pain | 2/190 (1.1%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Neck pain | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Osteoporosis | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Dizziness | 1/190 (0.5%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Headache | 2/190 (1.1%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Paraesthesia | 0/190 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||
Insomnia | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||
Cough | 6/190 (3.2%) | 3/56 (5.4%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Oropharyngeal pain | 2/190 (1.1%) | 2/56 (3.6%) | 1/5 (20%) | |||
Throat irritation | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||||
Pruritus | 0/190 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/5 (0%) | |||
Vascular disorders | ||||||
Hypertension | 11/190 (5.8%) | 4/56 (7.1%) | 0/5 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Study Director |
---|---|
Organization | Novartis |
Phone | 862-778-8300 |
- CRFB002E2302