Cerebral Oximetry As an Auxiliary Diagnostic Tool in the Diagnosis of Brain Death

Sponsor
Karadeniz Technical University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02741375
Collaborator
(none)
78
1
17.9
4.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of cerebral oximetry (CO) as an auxiliary diagnostic tool in confirming brain death (BD).

Materials and Methods: This observational and interventional study was performed on patients with suspected BD in emergency departments and intensive care units. CO monitoring was performed for at least 6 h, and cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (ScO2) was recorded. Basal ScO2 values (basal ScO2), ScO2 values after 6 h (end ScO2), mean ScO2 values during monitoring (mean ScO2), and minimum (min ScO2) and maximum (max ScO2) ScO2 values observed during monitoring were recorded for all patients. Patients with diagnosis of BD confirmed by the organ transplantation and brain death committee were enrolled as the BD group and other patients as the non-BD group, and cerebral oxygen parameters were compared.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Somanetics 5100c (Invos oximeter cerebral/somatic Troy, MI, USA)

Detailed Description

Brain death (BD) means the irreversible loss of all brain and brain stem functions and physiopathologically the cessation of intracranial circulation. BD is a clinical diagnosis that can be made with various clinical tests. However, in order for BD to be definitely established, clinical tests performed initially need to be repeated after 24 h or to be confirmed by corroboratory tests. In addition, the obligation to confirm BD using corroboratory tests varies in current guidelines from country to country but has been eliminated except for certain specific circumstances. However, considering the adverse effects on patients awaiting donor and organ donations of the time lapse between initial and repeat tests in order to confirm BD, more rapid confirmation of definite BD is commonly made using corroboratory tests.

This study was planned with the hypothesis that this non-invasive technique using NIRS technology can be an auxiliary tool in the diagnosis of BD.

This study was performed with patients with suspected BD in emergency departments and intensive care units and was intended to evaluate the effectiveness of cerebral oximetry as an auxiliary diagnostic tool in patients with suspected BD.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
78 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Cerebral Oximetry As an Auxiliary Diagnostic Tool in the Diagnosis of Brain Death
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Brain Death Group (BD group)

Patients assessed as brain-dead at the first clinical evaluation by the OTBD committee were definitively diagnosed with BD through repeat clinical evaluation after 24 h or through CT angiography as a corroboratory test. Patients regarded as definitely brain-dead on the basis of this evaluation were classified as the BD group.

Device: Somanetics 5100c (Invos oximeter cerebral/somatic Troy, MI, USA)
All patients underwent at least 6-h NIRS monitoring using a Somanetics 5100c (Invos oximeter cerebral/somatic Troy, MI, USA) cerebral oximeter in order to determined cerebral oximetry changes.

Non-Brain Death Group (Non BD group)

Patients assessed as brain-dead at the first clinical evaluation by the OTBD committee were definitively diagnosed with BD through repeat clinical evaluation after 24 h or through CT angiography as a corroboratory test. Patients regarded as definitely not brain-dead on the basis of this evaluation were classified as the non-BD group.

Device: Somanetics 5100c (Invos oximeter cerebral/somatic Troy, MI, USA)
All patients underwent at least 6-h NIRS monitoring using a Somanetics 5100c (Invos oximeter cerebral/somatic Troy, MI, USA) cerebral oximeter in order to determined cerebral oximetry changes.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Basal ScO2 (Cerebral oxygen saturation) (%) [Measured at the beginning of 6 hours cerebral oximetry monitoring]

  2. End ScO2 (Cerebral oxygen saturation) (%) [Measured at the end of 6 hours cerebral oximetry monitoring]

  3. Mean ScO2 (Cerebral oxygen saturation) (%) [Measured during 6 hours cerebral oximetry monitoring]

  4. Min ScO2 (Cerebral oxygen saturation) (%) [Measured during 6 hours cerebral oximetry monitoring]

  5. Max ScO2 (Cerebral oxygen saturation) (%) [Measured during 6 h cerebral oximetry monitoring]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Decrease in ScO2 [Measured during 6 hours cerebral oximetry monitoring]

    Difference between basal ScO2 and end ScO2

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. All patients monitored and treated in the emergency department of intensive care units with a GCS score of 3 and evaluated as brain-dead at consultation with the Organ Transplantation Brain Death Committee on suspicion of BD

  2. Aged over 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Cause of coma being undetermined

  2. Lack of confirmation of brain injury being diffuse and irreversible

  3. Central body temperature being lower than 32°C

  4. Presence of a picture of hypotensive shock

  5. Coma after drug effects and intoxications

  6. Presence of metabolic, electrolyte or acid-alkaline disorders

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine Trabzon Turkey 61080

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Karadeniz Technical University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Suleyman Turedi, Assoc. Prof., M.D., Karadeniz Technical University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02741375
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2014/05
First Posted:
Apr 18, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Apr 18, 2016
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 18, 2016