XARA: Dose-response Study of Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A to Treat Spasticity of the Arm(s) or of Arm(s) and Leg(s) in Cerebral Palsy

Sponsor
Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02002884
Collaborator
(none)
351
32
3
53
11
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether injections of Botulinum toxin type A into muscles of one or both arms alone or in combination with injections into one or both legs are effective and safe in treating children/adolescents (age 2-17 years) with increased muscle tension/uncontrollable muscle stiffness (spasticity) due to cerebral palsy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (8 Units per kg body weight)
  • Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (6 Units per kg body weight)
  • Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (2 Units per kg body weight)
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
351 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Dose-response Study of Three Doses Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA, NT 201) for the Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity Alone or Combined Upper and Lower Limb Spasticity in Children and Adolescents (Age 2 - 17 Years) With Cerebral Palsy
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 28, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 4, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 28, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: 8 Units per kg body weight incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)

8 Units per kg body weight (maximum of 200 Units) will be injected per treated upper limb per injection cycle. Additionally, lower limb treatment may be administered, depending on clinical pattern: up to 300 Units per injection cycle. Overall maximum dose per injection cycle: 500 Units.

Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (8 Units per kg body weight)
Active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins. Solution for injection prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl); Mode of administration: intramuscular injection into spastic muscles.
Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • NT 201
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
  • Experimental: 6 Units per kg body weight incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)

    6 Units per kg body weight (maximum of 150 Units) will be injected per treated upper limb per injection cycle. Additionally, lower limb treatment may be administered, depending on clinical pattern: up to 225 Units per injection cycle. Overall maximum dose per injection cycle: 375 Units.

    Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (6 Units per kg body weight)
    Active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins. Solution for injection prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl); Mode of administration: intramuscular injection into spastic muscles.
    Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • NT 201
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
  • Experimental: 2 Units per kg body weight incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)

    2 Units per kg body weight (maximum of 50 Units) will be injected per treated upper limb per injection cycle. Additionally, lower limb treatment may be administered, depending on clinical pattern: up to 75 Units per injection cycle. Overall maximum dose per injection cycle: 125 Units.

    Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (2 Units per kg body weight)
    Active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins. Solution for injection prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl); Mode of administration: intramuscular injection into spastic muscles.
    Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • NT 201
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. MP: Change From Baseline in Ashworth Scale (AS) in UL Primary Clinical Target Pattern at Week 4 [Baseline and Week 4]

      The AS categorizes severity of spasticity by judging resistance to passive movement. Spasticity was assessed by using the 5-point AS with:0 (no increase in tone); 1 (slight increase in tone giving a "catch" when the limb was moved in flexion or extension); 2 (more marked increase in tone, but limb easily flexed); 3 (considerable increase in tone -passive movements difficult); 4 (limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

    2. Co-primary Variable MP: Investigator's Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) at Week 4 [Week 4]

      The GICS was used to measure independently the investigator's impression of change due to treatment. The response option was a common 7-point Likert scale, that ranges from +3 (very much improved); +2 (much improved); +1 (minimally improved); 0 (no change); -1 (minimally worse); -2 (much worse); -3 (very much worse). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. MP: Change From Baseline in AS Score of the Other Treated UL Main Clinical Target Pattern at Week 4 [Baseline and Week 4]

      The AS categorizes the severity of spasticity by judging resistance to passive movement. Spasticity was assessed by 5-point scale at visits, where: 0 (no increase in tone); 1(slight increase in tone giving a "catch" when the limb was moved in flexion or extension); 2(more marked increase in tone, but limb easily flexed); 3(considerable increase in tone - passive movements difficult); 4(limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from MMRM models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

    2. MP: Change From Baseline in AS Score in UL Treated Clenched Fist With Flexed Wrist at Week 4 [Baseline and Week 4]

      The AS categorizes the severity of spasticity by judging resistance to passive movement. Spasticity was assessed by 5-point scale at visits, where: 0 (no increase in tone); 1(slight increase in tone giving a "catch" when the limb was moved in flexion or extension); 2(more marked increase in tone, but limb easily flexed); 3(considerable increase in tone - passive movements difficult); 4(limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from MMRM models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

    3. MP: Change From Baseline in AS Score for Each Treated Clinical Pattern of the UL at Week 4 [Baseline up to Week 4]

      The AS categorizes the severity of spasticity by judging resistance to passive movement. Spasticity was assessed by 5-point scale at visits, where: 0 (no increase in tone); 1(slight increase in tone giving a "catch" when the limb was moved in flexion or extension); 2(more marked increase in tone, but limb easily flexed); 3(considerable increase in tone - passive movements difficult); 4(limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from MMRM models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

    4. MP: Change From Baseline in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) Assessed With 'Questionnaire on Pain Caused by Spasticity (QPS)' [Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 14]

      Pain intensity (from participants) and pain frequency (from parent/caregiver) to be assessed with QPS. The QPS Total Score for pain intensity ranges from 0 ('No Hurt') to 10 ('Hurt Worst'). The QPS Total Score for the observed pain frequency ranges from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from MMRM models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison. P/C = Parent/Caregiver.

    5. MP: Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's GICS in UL at Week 4 [Week 4]

      The GICS was used to measure independently the child's/adolescent's, and parent's or caregiver's impression of change due to treatment. The response option was a common 7-point Likert scale, that ranges from: +3(very much improved); +2(much improved); +1(minimally improved); 0(no change); -1(minimally worse); -2(much worse); -3(very much worse). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.

    6. Number of Participants With Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Treatment Cycle [Baseline up to Week 66]

    7. Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Treatment Cycle [Baseline up to Week 66]

    8. Number of Participants With Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Treatment Cycle [Baseline up to Week 66]

    9. Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment Overall and Per Treatment Cycle [Baseline up to Week 66]

    10. Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Treatment Cycle [Baseline up to Week 66]

    11. Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Causal Relationship Overall and Per Treatment Cycle [Baseline up to Week 66]

    12. Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Treatment Cycle [Baseline up to Week 66]

    13. Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Treatment Cycle [Baseline up to Week 66]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    2 Years to 17 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Female or male subject of 2 to 17 years of age (inclusive).

    • Uni- or bilateral Cerebral Palsy (CP) with clinical need for injections with NT 201 for the treatment of upper limb (UL) spasticity at least unilaterally.

    • Ashworth Scale (AS) score in the main clinical target patterns in this study:

    1. Flexed elbow: AS≥2 in elbow flexors (at least unilaterally). and/or

    2. Flexed Wrist: AS≥2 in wrist flexors (at least unilaterally).

    • Clinical need according to the judgment of the investigator in one out of five treatment combinations (A-E, as shown below). AS score must be ≥2 for each target pattern chosen for injection at the Baseline Injection Visit V2.
    A. UL(s) treatment only (GMFCS I-V):
    A1) Unilateral treatment of UL spasticity with 8 U/kg BW NT 201 (maximum of 200 U) for:
    1. At least one of the main clinical target patterns flexed elbow (4 U/kg BW) and/or flexed wrist (2 U/kg BW).

    and

    1. Additional clinical patterns in the same limb (i.e., clenched fist, thumb in palm, and/or pronated forearm) with the remaining units until maximum dose of 8 U/kg BW (maximum of 200 U) for treatment of a single UL is reached.

    or

    A2) Bilateral treatment of UL spasticity with equal doses of 8 U/kg BW NT 201 (maximum of 200 U) to each UL. Dose per UL must be distributed between:

    1. At least one of the main clinical target patterns flexed elbow (4 U/kg BW) and/or flexed wrist (2 U/kg BW).

    and

    1. Additional clinical patterns in the same limb (i.e., clenched fist, thumb in palm, and/or pronated forearm) with the remaining units until maximum dose of 8 U/kg BW (maximum of 200 U) for treatment of a single UL is reached.
    B. Unilateral UL and unilateral lower limb (LL) treatment (GMFCS I-V):
    B1) Unilateral treatment of UL spasticity with 8 U/kg BW NT 201 (maximum of 200 U) for:
    1. At least one of the main clinical target patterns flexed elbow (4 U/kg BW) and/or flexed wrist (2 U/kg BW).

    and

    1. Additional clinical patterns in the same limb (i.e., clenched fist, thumb in palm, and/or pronated forearm) with the remaining units until maximum dose of 8 U/kg BW (maximum of 200 U) for treatment of a single UL is reached.

    plus

    B2) Ipsilateral unilateral treatment of LL spasticity with 8 U/kg BW NT 201 (maximum of 200 U). Dose to LL must be distributed to at least one of clinical target patterns pes equinus, flexed knee, adducted thigh, and extended great toe as clinically needed.

    1. Unilateral UL and bilateral LL treatment (GMFCS I-III)
    C1) Unilateral treatment of UL spasticity with 8 U/kg BW NT 201 (maximum of 200 U) for:
    1. At least one of the main clinical target patterns flexed elbow (4 U/kg BW) and/or flexed wrist (2 U/kg BW).

    and

    1. Additional clinical patterns in the same limb (i.e., clenched fist, thumb in palm, and/or pronated forearm) with the remaining units until maximum dose of 8 U/kg BW (maximum of 200 U) for treatment of a single UL is reached.

    plus

    C2) Bilateral treatment of LL spasticity with 12 U/kg BW (maximum of 300 U). Dose must be distributed into at least one of clinical target patterns pes equinus, flexed knee, adducted thigh, and extended great toe, on each side. Dose distribution may vary between sides as clinically needed.

    1. Unilateral UL and bilateral LL treatment (GMFCS IV and V)
    D1) Unilateral treatment of UL spasticity with 8 U/kg BW NT 201 (maximum of 200 U) for:
    1. At least one of the main clinical target patterns flexed elbow (4 U/kg BW) and/or flexed wrist (2 U/kg BW).

    and

    1. Additional clinical patterns in the same limb (i.e., clenched fist, thumb in palm, and/or pronated forearm) with the remaining units until maximum dose of 8 U/kg BW (maximum of 200 U) for treatment of a single UL is reached.

    plus

    D2) Bilateral treatment of LL spasticity with 8 U/kg BW (maximum of 200 U). Dose must be distributed into at least one of clinical target patterns pes equinus, flexed knee, adducted thigh, and extended great toe, on each side. Dose distribution may vary between sides as clinically needed.

    1. Bilateral UL treatment and bilateral LL treatment (GMFCS I-III)

    E1) Bilateral treatment of UL spasticity with equal doses of 8 U/kg BW NT 201 (maximum of 200 U) to each UL. Dose per UL must be distributed between

    1. At least one of the main clinical target patterns flexed elbow (4 U/kg BW) and/or flexed wrist (2 U/kg BW) and

    2. Additional clinical patterns in the same limb (i.e., clenched fist, thumb in palm, and/or pronated forearm) with the remaining units until maximum dose of 8 U/kg BW (maximum of 200 U) for treatment of a single UL is reached.

    plus

    E2) Bilateral treatment of LL spasticity with 4 U/kg BW (maximum of 100 U). Dose must be distributed into at least one of clinical target patterns pes equinus, flexed knee, adducted thigh, and extended great toe, on each side. Dose distribution may vary between sides as clinically needed.

    Exclusion Criteria:

    Pre-treated (non-naïve) subjects must not have received BoNT treatment within the last 14 weeks prior to Screening Visit (V1) in any indication.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Merz Investigational Site #001286 Gulf Breeze Florida United States 32561
    2 Merz Investigational Site #001284 Loxahatchee Groves Florida United States 33470
    3 Merz Investigational Site #001285 Savannah Georgia United States 31405
    4 Merz Investigational Site #001186 Chicago Illinois United States 60611
    5 Merz Investigational Site No. #001302 Royal Oak Michigan United States 48073
    6 Merz Investigational Site #001283 Columbia Missouri United States 65212
    7 Merz Investigational Site #054010 Godoy Cruz Provincia De Mendoza Argentina M5501
    8 Merz Investigational Site #054005 Caba Argentina CP 1428
    9 Merz Investigational Site #052023 Aguascalientes Mexico 20127
    10 Merz Investigational Site #052003 Guadalajara Mexico 44280
    11 Merz Investigational Site #052024 Mexico City Mexico 04530
    12 Merz Investigational Site #052022 Mexico City Mexico 06700
    13 Merz Investigational Site #052027 Monterrey Mexico 64060
    14 Merz Investigational Site #052028 Monterrey Mexico 64710
    15 Merz Investigational Site #052026 Zapopan Mexico 45030
    16 Merz Investigational Site #048089 Bialystok Poland 15-274
    17 Merz Investigational Site #048063 Gdansk Poland 80-389
    18 Merz Investigational Site #048059 Krakow Poland 30-539
    19 Merz Investigational Site #048084 Lublin Poland 20-828
    20 Merz Investigational Site #048094 Poznan Poland 60-480
    21 Merz Investigational Site #048075 Sandomierz Poland 27-600
    22 Merz Investigational Site #048060 Wiazowna Poland 05-462
    23 Merz Investigational Site #007014 Kazan Russian Federation 420097
    24 Merz Investigational Site #007015 Khabarovsk Russian Federation 680038
    25 Merz Investigational Site #007018 Novosibirsk Russian Federation 630091
    26 Merz Investigational Site #007298 Saint Petersburg Russian Federation 192148
    27 Merz Investigational Site #007013 Smolensk Russian Federation 214019
    28 Merz Investigational Site #007019 Stavropol Russian Federation 355029
    29 Merz Investigational Site #380001 Dnipropetrovsk Ukraine 49000
    30 Merz Investigational Site #380005 Kharkiv Ukraine 61068
    31 Merz Investigational Site #380002 Kyiv Ukraine 04209
    32 Merz Investigational Site #380003 Odessa Ukraine 65012

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Merz Medical Expert, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02002884
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • MRZ60201_3072_1
    • 2012-005496-14
    First Posted:
    Dec 6, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 5, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details The study was conducted at 28 investigative sites in Mexico, Argentina, Russian federation, Ukraine, United States and Poland.
    Pre-assignment Detail A total of 372 participants were screened, 351 participants were randomized and 350 participants were randomized and treated in the study. 331 participants completed the main period (MP) and moved to the open-label-extension period (OLEX) out of which 281 participants completed the OLEX period.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 Units per kilogram (U/kg) NT 201 (maximum of 50 Units [U] in participants with greater than [>] 25 kilogram [kg] body weight [BW]) into spastic muscles of one of the upper Limb (UL) on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both lower limb (LL) were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants who completed MP and qualified for further participation in the study received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of the UL on Day 1 of each of the three injection cycles of OLEX. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Period Title: Main Period (MP)
    STARTED 87 88 176 0
    Treated 87 87 176 0
    COMPLETED 81 82 168 0
    NOT COMPLETED 6 6 8 0
    Period Title: Main Period (MP)
    STARTED 0 0 0 331
    COMPLETED 0 0 0 281
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0 0 50

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group Total
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 87 88 176 351
    Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
    7.2
    (4.70)
    7.4
    (4.13)
    7.3
    (4.40)
    7.3
    (4.40)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    38
    43.7%
    31
    35.2%
    62
    35.2%
    131
    37.3%
    Male
    49
    56.3%
    57
    64.8%
    114
    64.8%
    220
    62.7%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    16
    18.4%
    26
    29.5%
    45
    25.6%
    87
    24.8%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    71
    81.6%
    62
    70.5%
    131
    74.4%
    264
    75.2%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    Black or African American
    3
    3.4%
    2
    2.3%
    2
    1.1%
    7
    2%
    White
    81
    93.1%
    75
    85.2%
    160
    90.9%
    316
    90%
    Other
    3
    3.4%
    11
    12.5%
    14
    8%
    28
    8%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title MP: Change From Baseline in Ashworth Scale (AS) in UL Primary Clinical Target Pattern at Week 4
    Description The AS categorizes severity of spasticity by judging resistance to passive movement. Spasticity was assessed by using the 5-point AS with:0 (no increase in tone); 1 (slight increase in tone giving a "catch" when the limb was moved in flexion or extension); 2 (more marked increase in tone, but limb easily flexed); 3 (considerable increase in tone -passive movements difficult); 4 (limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 4

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The full analysis set (FAS) was the subset in the safety evaluation set (SES) of the MP for whom the primary efficacy variable or co-primary efficacy variable were available. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176
    High versus low
    -0.93
    (0.078)
    -1.15
    (0.056)
    Mid versus low
    -0.96
    (0.082)
    -1.02
    (0.082)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection MP Low Dose Group, MP High Dose Group
    Comments LS-Means are from mixed model with treatment group, pooled site and pre-treatment status included as fixed factors and AS at baseline, Gross Motor Function Classification System-Extended and Revised (GMFCS-E&R) level at screening included as covariates. For MMRM visit*treatment is interaction term repeated factor.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value = 0.017
    Comments
    Method MMRM
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean difference
    Estimated Value -0.22
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.4 to -0.04
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection MP Low Dose Group, MP Mid Dose Group
    Comments LS-Means are from mixed model with treatment group, pooled site and pre-treatment status included as fixed factors and AS at baseline, GMFCS-E&R level at screening included as covariates. For MMRM visit*treatment is interaction term repeated factor.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value = 0.546
    Comments
    Method MMRM
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS-Mean difference
    Estimated Value -0.07
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.29 to 0.15
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Co-primary Variable MP: Investigator's Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) at Week 4
    Description The GICS was used to measure independently the investigator's impression of change due to treatment. The response option was a common 7-point Likert scale, that ranges from +3 (very much improved); +2 (much improved); +1 (minimally improved); 0 (no change); -1 (minimally worse); -2 (much worse); -3 (very much worse). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
    Time Frame Week 4

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The FAS was the subset in the SES of the MP for whom the primary efficacy variable or co-primary efficacy variable were available (that is, all participants who had at least an AS score in clinical pattern flexed elbow or flexed wrist at baseline [Day 1] or Investigator's GICS at Day 29 [Week 4]).
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176
    High versus low
    1.55
    (0.083)
    1.64
    (0.062)
    Mid versus low
    1.57
    (0.089)
    1.44
    (0.092)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection MP Low Dose Group, MP High Dose Group
    Comments LS-Means are from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group, pooled site and pretreatment status included as fixed factors and maximum AS score of the two possible primary target patterns flexed elbow or flexed wrist baseline, GMFCS-E&R level at screening included as covariates.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value = 0.34
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS-Mean difference
    Estimated Value 0.09
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.1 to 0.28
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection MP Low Dose Group, MP Mid Dose Group
    Comments LS-Means are from ANCOVA with treatment group, pooled site and pre-treatment status included as fixed factors and maximum AS score of the two possible primary target patterns flexed elbow or flexed wrist baseline, GMFCS-E&R level at screening included as covariates.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value = 0.297
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS-Mean difference
    Estimated Value -0.12
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.36 to 0.11
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title MP: Change From Baseline in AS Score of the Other Treated UL Main Clinical Target Pattern at Week 4
    Description The AS categorizes the severity of spasticity by judging resistance to passive movement. Spasticity was assessed by 5-point scale at visits, where: 0 (no increase in tone); 1(slight increase in tone giving a "catch" when the limb was moved in flexion or extension); 2(more marked increase in tone, but limb easily flexed); 3(considerable increase in tone - passive movements difficult); 4(limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from MMRM models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 4

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The FAS was the subset in the SES of the MP for whom the primary efficacy variable or co-primary efficacy variable were available. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176
    High versus low
    -1.03
    (0.083)
    -1.13
    (0.061)
    Mid versus low
    -1.08
    (0.087)
    -1.22
    (0.090)
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title MP: Change From Baseline in AS Score in UL Treated Clenched Fist With Flexed Wrist at Week 4
    Description The AS categorizes the severity of spasticity by judging resistance to passive movement. Spasticity was assessed by 5-point scale at visits, where: 0 (no increase in tone); 1(slight increase in tone giving a "catch" when the limb was moved in flexion or extension); 2(more marked increase in tone, but limb easily flexed); 3(considerable increase in tone - passive movements difficult); 4(limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from MMRM models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
    Time Frame Baseline and Week 4

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The FAS was the subset in the SES of the MP for whom the primary efficacy variable or co-primary efficacy variable were available. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176
    High versus low
    -0.53
    (0.212)
    -1.00
    (0.133)
    Mid versus low
    -0.070
    (0.202)
    -1.04
    (0.176)
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title MP: Change From Baseline in AS Score for Each Treated Clinical Pattern of the UL at Week 4
    Description The AS categorizes the severity of spasticity by judging resistance to passive movement. Spasticity was assessed by 5-point scale at visits, where: 0 (no increase in tone); 1(slight increase in tone giving a "catch" when the limb was moved in flexion or extension); 2(more marked increase in tone, but limb easily flexed); 3(considerable increase in tone - passive movements difficult); 4(limb rigid in flexion or extension). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from MMRM models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 4

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The FAS was the subset in the SES of the MP for whom the primary efficacy variable or co-primary efficacy variable were available. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176
    Flexed elbow: High versus Low
    -0.99
    (0.076)
    -1.18
    (0.056)
    Flexed elbow: Mid versus Low
    -1.01
    (0.081)
    -1.17
    (0.082)
    Flexed wrist: High versus Low
    -0.96
    (0.085)
    -1.08
    (0.061)
    Flexed wrist: Mid versus Low
    -1.01
    (0.087)
    -1.05
    (0.087)
    Clenched fist: High versus Low
    -0.64
    (0.136)
    -1.09
    (0.096)
    Clenched fist: Mid versus Low
    -0.58
    (0.145)
    -0.87
    (0.141)
    Thumb in palm: High versus Low
    -0.88
    (0.116)
    -1.11
    (0.083)
    Thumb in palm: Mid versus Low
    -0.93
    (0.131)
    -1.14
    (0.123)
    Pronated forearm: High versus Low
    -0.88
    (0.080)
    -1.02
    (0.058)
    Pronated forearm: Mid versus Low
    -0.87
    (0.086)
    -0.94
    (0.088)
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title MP: Change From Baseline in Scores of Pain Intensity (From Participants) and Pain Frequency (From Parent/Caregiver) Assessed With 'Questionnaire on Pain Caused by Spasticity (QPS)'
    Description Pain intensity (from participants) and pain frequency (from parent/caregiver) to be assessed with QPS. The QPS Total Score for pain intensity ranges from 0 ('No Hurt') to 10 ('Hurt Worst'). The QPS Total Score for the observed pain frequency ranges from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from MMRM models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison. P/C = Parent/Caregiver.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 14

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The FAS was the subset in the SES of the MP for whom the primary efficacy variable or co-primary efficacy variable were available. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176
    UL, Participant, Week 4 High versus low
    -0.42
    (0.217)
    -0.75
    (0.199)
    UL, Participant, Week 4 Mid versus low
    -0.39
    (0.256)
    -0.67
    (0.289)
    UL, Participant, Week 8 High versus low
    -0.52
    (0.206)
    -0.64
    (0.188)
    UL, Participant, Week 8 Mid versus low
    -0.63
    (0.259)
    -0.55
    (0.290)
    UL, Participant, Week 14 High versus low
    -0.56
    (0.217)
    -0.59
    (0.202)
    UL, Participant, Week 14 Mid versus low
    -0.66
    (0.327)
    -0.59
    (0.361)
    UL, P/C, Week 4 High versus low
    -0.46
    (0.102)
    -0.44
    (0.076)
    UL, P/C, Week 4 Mid versus low
    -0.43
    (0.106)
    -0.28
    (0.115)
    UL, P/C, Week 8 High versus low
    -0.40
    (0.095)
    -0.44
    (0.070)
    UL, P/C, Week 8 Mid versus low
    -0.43
    (0.100)
    -0.34
    (0.109)
    UL, P/C, Week 14 High versus Low
    -0.23
    (0.105)
    -0.24
    (0.071)
    UL, P/C, Week 14 Mid versus Low
    -0.31
    (0.100)
    -0.25
    (0.107)
    LL, Participant, Week 4 High versus Low
    -0.74
    (0.282)
    -0.62
    (0.250)
    LL, Participant, Week 4 Mid versus Low
    -0.46
    (0.305)
    -0.55
    (0.321)
    LL, Participant, Week 8 High versus Low
    -1.04
    (0.241)
    -0.69
    (0.218)
    LL, Participant, Week 8 Mid versus Low
    -0.90
    (0.261)
    -0.81
    (0.284)
    LL, Participant, Week 14 High versus Low
    -0.71
    (0.275)
    -0.57
    (0.245)
    LL, Participant, Week 14 Mid versus Low
    -0.67
    (0.315)
    -0.63
    (0.335)
    LL, P/C, Week 4 High versus Low
    -0.50
    (0.105)
    -0.52
    (0.077)
    LL, P/C, Week 4 Mid versus Low
    -0.46
    (0.103)
    -0.42
    (0.111)
    LL, P/C, Week 8 High versus Low
    -0.56
    (0.098)
    -0.51
    (0.074)
    LL, P/C, Week 8 Mid versus Low
    -0.52
    (0.102)
    -0.36
    (0.111)
    LL, P/C, Week 14 High versus Low
    -0.33
    (0.108)
    -0.32
    (0.078)
    LL, P/C, Week 14 Mid versus Low
    -0.37
    (0.086)
    -0.31
    (0.090)
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title MP: Child's/Adolescent's, and Parent's/Caregiver's GICS in UL at Week 4
    Description The GICS was used to measure independently the child's/adolescent's, and parent's or caregiver's impression of change due to treatment. The response option was a common 7-point Likert scale, that ranges from: +3(very much improved); +2(much improved); +1(minimally improved); 0(no change); -1(minimally worse); -2(much worse); -3(very much worse). Values represent LS mean differences between baseline and Week 4 resulting from ANCOVA models comparing high versus low and in a second step mid versus low dose groups, respectively. Values for the low group may differ slightly depending on the comparison and are therefore provided separately for each comparison.
    Time Frame Week 4

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The FAS was the subset in the SES of the MP for whom the primary efficacy variable or co-primary efficacy variable were available. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176
    Participant: High versus Low
    1.51
    (0.153)
    1.63
    (0.139)
    Participant: Mid versus Low
    1.53
    (0.180)
    1.48
    (0.190)
    Parent/Caregiver: High versus Low
    1.41
    (0.087)
    1.60
    (0.065)
    Parent/Caregiver: Mid versus Low
    1.36
    (0.094)
    1.29
    (0.097)
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Treatment Cycle
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 66

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The SES was the subset of all participants treated in the MP and OLEX with study medication at least once. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants who completed MP and qualified for further participation in the study received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of the UL on Day 1 of each of the three injection cycles of OLEX. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176 331
    Overall
    21
    24.1%
    13
    14.8%
    42
    23.9%
    114
    32.5%
    First injection cycle (MP)
    21
    24.1%
    13
    14.8%
    42
    23.9%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX)
    64
    73.6%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX)
    42
    48.3%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX)
    48
    55.2%
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs of Special Interest (TEAESIs) Overall and Per Treatment Cycle
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 66

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The SES was the subset of all participants treated in the MP and OLEX with study medication at least once. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants who completed MP and qualified for further participation in the study received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of the UL on Day 1 of each of the three injection cycles of OLEX. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176 331
    Overall
    1
    1.1%
    1
    1.1%
    1
    0.6%
    5
    1.4%
    First injection cycle (MP)
    1
    1.1%
    1
    1.1%
    1
    0.6%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX)
    2
    2.3%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX)
    3
    3.4%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX)
    1
    1.1%
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Occurrence of Serious TEAEs (TESAEs) Overall and Per Treatment Cycle
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 66

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The SES were the subset of all participants treated in the MP and OLEX with study medication at least once. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants who completed MP and qualified for further participation in the study received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of the UL on Day 1 of each of the three injection cycles of OLEX. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176 331
    Overall
    2
    2.3%
    1
    1.1%
    2
    1.1%
    16
    4.6%
    First injection cycle (MP)
    2
    2.3%
    1
    1.1%
    2
    1.1%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX)
    7
    8%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX)
    9
    10.3%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX)
    3
    3.4%
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment Overall and Per Treatment Cycle
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 66

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The SES was the subset of all participants treated in MP and OLEX with study medication at least once. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants who completed MP and qualified for further participation in the study received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of the UL on Day 1 of each of the three injection cycles of OLEX. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176 331
    Overall
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    3
    1.7%
    5
    1.4%
    First injection cycle (MP)
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    3
    1.7%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX)
    2
    2.3%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX)
    2
    2.3%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX)
    1
    1.1%
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Intensity Overall and Per Treatment Cycle
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 66

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The SES was the subset of all participants treated in the MP and OLEX with study medication at least once. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants who completed MP and qualified for further participation in the study received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of the UL on Day 1 of each of the three injection cycles of OLEX. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176 331
    Overall: Mild
    15
    17.2%
    10
    11.4%
    33
    18.8%
    62
    17.7%
    Overall: Moderate
    6
    6.9%
    2
    2.3%
    7
    4%
    44
    12.5%
    Overall: Severe
    0
    0%
    1
    1.1%
    2
    1.1%
    8
    2.3%
    First injection cycle (MP): Mild
    15
    17.2%
    10
    11.4%
    33
    18.8%
    First injection cycle (MP): Moderate
    6
    6.9%
    2
    2.3%
    7
    4%
    First injection cycle (MP): Severe
    0
    0%
    1
    1.1%
    2
    1.1%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX): Mild
    43
    49.4%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX): Moderate
    18
    20.7%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX): Severe
    3
    3.4%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX): Mild
    23
    26.4%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX): Moderate
    15
    17.2%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX): Severe
    4
    4.6%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX): Mild
    28
    32.2%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX): Moderate
    19
    21.8%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX): Severe
    1
    1.1%
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs by Worst Causal Relationship Overall and Per Treatment Cycle
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 66

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The SES were the subset of all participants treated in the MP and OLEX with study medication at least once. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants who completed MP and qualified for further participation in the study received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of the UL on Day 1 of each of the three injection cycles of OLEX. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176 331
    Overall: Related
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    3
    1.7%
    5
    1.4%
    Overall: Not related
    21
    24.1%
    13
    14.8%
    39
    22.2%
    109
    31.1%
    First injection cycle (MP): Related
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    3
    1.7%
    First injection cycle (MP): Not related
    21
    24.1%
    13
    14.8%
    39
    22.2%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX): Related
    2
    2.3%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX): Not related
    62
    71.3%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX): Related
    2
    2.3%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX): Not related
    40
    46%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX): Related
    1
    1.1%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX): Not related
    47
    54%
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs by Final Outcome Overall and Per Treatment Cycle
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 66

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The SES were the subset of all participants treated in the MP and OLEX with study medication at least once. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants who completed MP and qualified for further participation in the study received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of the UL on Day 1 of each of the three injection cycles of OLEX. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176 331
    Overall: Resolved
    18
    20.7%
    10
    11.4%
    39
    22.2%
    96
    27.4%
    Overall: Resolved with sequelae
    1
    1.1%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.3%
    Overall: Resolving
    0
    0%
    2
    2.3%
    1
    0.6%
    7
    2%
    Overall: Not resolved
    2
    2.3%
    1
    1.1%
    1
    0.6%
    8
    2.3%
    Overall: Unknown
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.6%
    2
    0.6%
    Overall: Fatal
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    First injection cycle (MP): Resolved
    18
    20.7%
    10
    11.4%
    39
    22.2%
    First injection cycle (MP): Resolved with sequelae
    1
    1.1%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    First injection cycle (MP): Resolving
    0
    0%
    2
    2.3%
    1
    0.6%
    First injection cycle (MP): Not resolved
    2
    2.3%
    1
    1.1%
    1
    0.6%
    First injection cycle (MP): Unknown
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.6%
    First injection cycle (MP): Fatal
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX): Resolved
    57
    65.5%
    Secondinjection cycle(OLEX):Resolved with sequelae
    0
    0%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX): Resolving
    3
    3.4%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX): Not resolved
    4
    4.6%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX): Unknown
    0
    0%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX): Fatal
    0
    0%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX): Resolved
    37
    42.5%
    Third injection cycle(OLEX):Resolved with sequelae
    0
    0%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX): Resolving
    0
    0%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX): Not resolved
    4
    4.6%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX): Unknown
    1
    1.1%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX): Fatal
    0
    0%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX): Resolved
    39
    44.8%
    Fourthinjection cycle(OLEX):Resolved with sequelae
    1
    1.1%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX): Resolving
    4
    4.6%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX): Not resolved
    2
    2.3%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX): Unknown
    2
    2.3%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX): Fatal
    0
    0%
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and Per Treatment Cycle
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 66

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The SES was the subset of all participants treated in the MP and OLEX with study medication at least once. Number of participants who were evaluable for this measure at a given time period and were included in the assessment.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants who completed MP and qualified for further participation in the study received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of the UL on Day 1 of each of the three injection cycles of OLEX. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    Measure Participants 87 87 176 331
    Overall
    0
    0%
    1
    1.1%
    1
    0.6%
    5
    1.4%
    First injection cycle (MP)
    0
    0%
    1
    1.1%
    1
    0.6%
    Second injection cycle (OLEX)
    3
    3.4%
    Third injection cycle (OLEX)
    2
    2.3%
    Fourth injection cycle (OLEX)
    0
    0%

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 66
    Adverse Event Reporting Description The investigator asked the participant for adverse events (AEs) systematically at each visit.
    Arm/Group Title MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Arm/Group Description Participants in low dose group received intramuscular injections of 2 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 50 U in participants with >25 kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 2 U/kg (50 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 5 U/kg (125 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in mid dose group received intramuscular injections of 6 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 150 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 6 U/kg (150 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 15 U/kg (375 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants in high dose group received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of one of the UL on Day 1 of MP. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level. Participants who completed MP and qualified for further participation in the study received intramuscular injections of 8 U/kg NT 201 (maximum of 200 U in participants with >25kg BW) into spastic muscles of the UL on Day 1 of each of the three injection cycles of OLEX. If the contralateral UL or one or both LL were also treated, participants received additional doses of NT 201. The total body dose ranged from 8 U/kg (200 U for participants with >25kg BW) to 20 U/kg (500 U for participants with >25kg BW) depending on the combination of treated limbs and the participant's GMFCS level.
    All Cause Mortality
    MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/87 (0%) 0/87 (0%) 0/176 (0%) 0/331 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 2/87 (2.3%) 1/87 (1.1%) 2/176 (1.1%) 16/331 (4.8%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Hiatus hernia 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 2/331 (0.6%) 2
    Cyclic vomiting syndrome 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Gastrooesophageal reflux disease 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Vomiting 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    General disorders
    Influenza like illness 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Infections and infestations
    Bronchitis 2/87 (2.3%) 2 0/87 (0%) 0 1/176 (0.6%) 1 0/331 (0%) 0
    Pneumonia 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 2/176 (1.1%) 3 0/331 (0%) 0
    Appendicitis 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Bronchitis bacterial 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Influenza 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Peritonitis 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Pertussis 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Pharyngitis 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 2
    Pneumonia bacterial 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 2
    Upper respiratory tract infection 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Urinary tract infection 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Shunt malfunction 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 2
    Thermal burn 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Investigations
    Electroencephalogram 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 2
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Spinal cord neoplasm 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Nervous system disorders
    Brain oedema 0/87 (0%) 0 1/87 (1.1%) 1 0/176 (0%) 0 0/331 (0%) 0
    Epilepsy 1/87 (1.1%) 1 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Seizure 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 2/331 (0.6%) 2
    Generalised tonic-clonic seizure 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Status epilepticus 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Aspiration 0/87 (0%) 0 1/87 (1.1%) 1 0/176 (0%) 0 0/331 (0%) 0
    Respiratory arrest 0/87 (0%) 0 1/87 (1.1%) 1 0/176 (0%) 0 0/331 (0%) 0
    Pneumonia aspiration 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Angioedema 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Surgical and medical procedures
    CSF shunt operation 0/87 (0%) 0 0/87 (0%) 0 0/176 (0%) 0 1/331 (0.3%) 1
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    MP Low Dose Group MP Mid Dose Group MP High Dose Group OLEX (3 Injections)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 5/87 (5.7%) 3/87 (3.4%) 6/176 (3.4%) 18/331 (5.4%)
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis 5/87 (5.7%) 5 3/87 (3.4%) 5 6/176 (3.4%) 6 18/331 (5.4%) 22

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    Publication of study information usually requires agreement with the sponsor. In case of justified doubts by the sponsor, the INVESTIGATOR will consider these doubts in the publication as long as the scientific neutrality is not affected.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Public Disclosure Manager
    Organization Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
    Phone +49 69 1503 1
    Email clinicaltrials@merz.com
    Responsible Party:
    Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02002884
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • MRZ60201_3072_1
    • 2012-005496-14
    First Posted:
    Dec 6, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 5, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2020