Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Early-stage Cervical Cancer (PHENIX/CSEM 010)

Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT02642471
Collaborator
(none)
1,080
1
4
84
12.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer has been well studied. However, there were no randomized controlled study on comparing the long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy and conventional procedure. The investigators perform a phase III, randomized controlled trial to determine whether pelvic lymphadenectomy can be replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy in surgical treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy
N/A

Detailed Description

This study comprises two parts: PHENIX-I: To compare the outcomes of managements with and without pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with negative sentinel lymph node; PHENIX-II: To compare the outcomes of managements with and without pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with positive sentinel lymph node. Patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA1 (lymphovascular space involvement), IA2, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer are eligible for our study. The tumor diameter should be less than 3cm. Sentinel lymph node biopsy will be performed at the beginning of operations. After pathological examination of frozen section, patients will be assigned to PHENIX-I or PHENIX-II study according to their status of sentinel nodes. In both parts of this trail, patients have equal chance to be randomly assigned to experimental arms (radical hysterectomy only) and reference arms (radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy).Adjuvant treatments will be planned according to postoperative pathological factors. The primary objective is disease-free survival at 3 years for PHENIX-I and 2 years for PHENIX-II. The secondary end points are overall survival, long-term outcome of sentinel lymph node biopsy and the quality of life.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
1080 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Early-stage Cervical Cancer (PHENIX/CSEM 010)
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2015
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1

patients with negative sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 1 or Arm 2 Arm 1: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 2: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection

Procedure: no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy
systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy is omitted in surgical treatment

No Intervention: Arm 2

patients with negative sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 1 or Arm 2 Arm 1: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 2: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection

Experimental: Arm 3

patients with positive sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 3 or Arm 4 Arm 3: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 4: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection

Procedure: no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy
systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy is omitted in surgical treatment

No Intervention: Arm 4

patients with positive sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 3 or Arm 4 Arm 3: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 4: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Disease free survival in PHENIX-I [3 years]

  2. Disease free survival in PHENIX-II [2 years]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Surgical morbidity [3 years]

  2. Rate of retroperitoneal node recurrence [3 years]

  3. Overall survival [5 years]

  4. Patients' quality of life [5 years]

  5. Performance of SLN detection [3 years]

  6. Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section examination [3 years]

  7. Anatomic distribution of SLNs [3 years]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with newly histologically confirmed cervical carcinoma

  • Histopathology squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adeno-squamous carcinoma

  • Original clinical stage must be FIGO (2018) stage IA1 (lymphovascular space involvement), IA2, IB1, and IB2

  • No suspected node should be found on imaging examination (RESIST 1.1)

  • Age between 18-65

  • Patients must give signed informed consent

  • P.S status: 0-1

  • Estimated survival time > 3 months

  • Tumor diameter ≤ 3 cm

Exclusion Criteria:
  • The presence of uncontrolled life-threatening illness

  • Receiving other ways of anti-cancer therapy

  • Investigator consider the patients can't finish the whole study

  • With normal liver function test (ALT、AST>2.5×ULN)

  • With normal renal function test (Creatinine>1.5×ULN)

  • WBC<4,000/mm3 or PLT<100,000/mm

  • The whole cervix has been occupied by tumor and there is no normal surface left for tracer injection

  • History of severe heart disease or deep venous thrombosis; 4) Presence or history of other malignant disease

  • Gestation or perinatal period

  • Intention to fertility preservation.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou Guangdong China 510060

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Sun Yat-sen University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jihong Liu, Ph. D, Sun Yat-sen University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jihong Liu, Prof., Sun Yat-sen University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02642471
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2015-FXY-073
First Posted:
Dec 30, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Jul 14, 2020
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2020
Keywords provided by Jihong Liu, Prof., Sun Yat-sen University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 14, 2020