MEDIATOR: iMproving thE DIagnostics And Treatment Of ceRvical Precancer

Sponsor
University of Aarhus (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05870787
Collaborator
(none)
1,066
7
2
41
152.3
3.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Cervical cancer screening is important as it enables identification of women at increased risk of the disease, but high-quality diagnostics of screen-positive women and effective treatment of those with precancer are critical in preventing progression to cancer. With the current transition from cytology-based to primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-screening and a growing proportion of HPV-vaccinated women, diagnostics of screen-positive women will become more challenging in the decades to come. Thus, there is a need to explore how to improve diagnostics while ensuring a low number of unnecessary procedures such as colposcopy and the collection of multiple cervical biopsies.

The overall purpose is:
  • To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of cervical precancer when using a colposcopic scoring system in the diagnostic work-up of screen-positive women.

  • To investigate the performance of a colposcopic scoring system to identify women without cervical precancer in whom collection of biopsies can be safely omitted.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: Swede score colposcopy
N/A

Detailed Description

Introduction Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Every year, 375 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer in Denmark, and approximately 90 women die from the disease. Cervical cancer is caused by the sexually transmitted virus, human papillomavirus (HPV). When infected about 85-90 % clear the virus within a year or two. The remaining women develop a persistent HPV infection, which is associated with an increased risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), which may progress to cancer if left untreated. Cervical cancer can be prevented through prophylactic HPV vaccination and screening. In Denmark, women aged 23 - 64 years are invited to the screening program. Women who do not participate in regular screening have an increased risk of cervical cancer, however up to 55% of cervical cancers are diagnosed in women who have attended screening. Hence, the performance of diagnostics is crucial.

Diagnostics Women with abnormal screening results may undergo repeat testing or be referred for colposcopy. Colposcopy allows the colposcopist to magnify and visualize the cervix with the transformation zone, where cervical cancer and cervical lesions typically arise. The aim is to make a colposcopic diagnosis and select the most severe area for biopsies, which undergo histopathological examination. Studies have shown considerable inter- and intra-observer variability even among experienced colposcopists, and a variable sensitivity of colposcopy as low as 55-57%. These findings suggest a need to improve the detection rate of CIN2+. A validated colposcopic scoring system, the Swede score, has been designed to improve the detection of high-grade cervical lesions, specified as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) by providing an systematic approach to the colposcopy examination. The Swede score includes five variables (degree of 1) acetowhitening, 2) margins and surface, 3) vessels, 4) lesion size, and 5) iodine staining by using Lugols iodine) with a score from 0 - 2. Conventional colposcopy only utilizes acetic acid. In the original study, the Swede score had a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting high-grade cervical lesions (CIN2+), with an area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of 0.87. Even so, the Swede score is endorsed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO) and by the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC), it has not yet been implemented in Denmark. As previous studies have mostly evaluated the use of the Swede score among expert colposcopists, it is important to assess whether the score may be a valuable tool among non-experts. In Denmark, colposcopy is mostly performed by non-experts gynecologists. As a result of the low performance of colposcopy, and because several studies have shown that the CIN2+ detection rate increases with the number of biopsies collected, the Danish national guidelines recommend that all women should have a minimum of 4 biopsies collected. Biopsies should be collected from abnormal areas of the cervix and, if no lesion is detected, random biopsies should be taken. Our neighboring Scandinavian countries, for example Sweden and Finland, do not recommend collection of random biopsies. If biopsies could be omitted without increasing the risk of missing disease and reducing the harms with pain, bleeding and discomfort, this would benefit the women.

Aim The project aims to explore whether the implementation of a systematic colposcopic scoring system, the Swede score, can improve diagnostic accuracy of cervical lesions with detection of CIN2+ in a Danish clinical setting. Furthermore, we want to evaluate whether the Swede score can be used to assess when random biopsies can be safely omitted.

Data Characteristics of the women will be collected from medical records (previous gynecological historic, parity, smoking status, HPV-vaccination status, hormone use or immunosuppressive treatment). From the Danish Pathology Databank, we will collect data on previous screening history, result of the referral screening test, result of current and subsequent cervical biopsies and/or cervical excision.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
1066 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
In half of the colposcopy clinics (Intervention clinics), evaluation will be performed using the Swede score. In the other half (Reference clinics), evaluation will be made according to conventional colposcopy. The colposcopists' overall evaluation and diagnosis will be registered. All women will have four biopsies collected; biopsies from the most abnormal area (targeted biopsies) as evaluated by Swede score or conventional colposcopy. The other biopsies will be randomly collected from areas that are deemed to be normal or collected from areas that are classified as low-grade disease (random biopsies). If no abnormalities are detected, four random biopsies will be collected according to guidelines. Biopsies will be sent for blinded histopathological examination in separate vials.In half of the colposcopy clinics (Intervention clinics), evaluation will be performed using the Swede score. In the other half (Reference clinics), evaluation will be made according to conventional colposcopy. The colposcopists' overall evaluation and diagnosis will be registered. All women will have four biopsies collected; biopsies from the most abnormal area (targeted biopsies) as evaluated by Swede score or conventional colposcopy. The other biopsies will be randomly collected from areas that are deemed to be normal or collected from areas that are classified as low-grade disease (random biopsies). If no abnormalities are detected, four random biopsies will be collected according to guidelines. Biopsies will be sent for blinded histopathological examination in separate vials.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
iMproving thE DIagnostics And Treatment Of ceRvical Precancer
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2026
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Conventional colposcopy

Conventional colposcopy wirh acetic acid and collection of cervical biopsies

Experimental: Swede score colposcopy

Colposcopy with acetic acid, supplemented with systematic scoringsystem (Swede score) including Lugols iodine.

Diagnostic Test: Swede score colposcopy
Colposcopy with acetic acid, supplemented with systematic scoringsystem (Swede score) including Lugols iodine.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Diagnosis of collected cervical biopsies [When the histological report is available - typically within 12 weeks after the biopsy was taken]

    The number of women diagnosed with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) diagnosed in cervical biopsies

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Women referred to colposcopy due to abnormal smear (HPV-genotype and cytology) in Central Denmark Region or Southern Denmark Region.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Allergic to iodine.

  • Atrophy of cervical epithelium.

  • Women referred to colposcopy with no cervical biopsies taken or invalid cervical biopsies.

  • Women with previous cone biopsy, hysterectomy or without a cervix due to cervical cancer will be excluded.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Guldberg Kvindeklinik Fredericia Denmark 7000
2 Gødstrup Regional Hospital Herning Denmark 7400
3 Horsens Gynækologisk Klinik Horsens Denmark 8700
4 Horsens Regional Hospital Horsens Denmark 8700
5 Odense Univeristy Hospital Odense Denmark 5000
6 Randers Regional Hospital Randers Denmark 8900
7 Viborg Regional Hospital Viborg Denmark 8800

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Aarhus

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Anne Hammer, MD, as.prof, University of Aarhus
  • Study Chair: Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel, MD, prof, Aalborg University Hospital
  • Study Chair: Berit Booth, MD, Ph.d., Randers Regional Hospital
  • Study Chair: Line Winther Gustafson, MD, Ph.d., Aarhus University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University of Aarhus
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05870787
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2022-0367531-3031
First Posted:
May 23, 2023
Last Update Posted:
May 23, 2023
Last Verified:
May 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 23, 2023