Study Comparing Short Term Efficacy of Dysport and Dysport NG to Placebo, and to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Dysport NG of Subjects With Cervical Dystonia
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well a new drug called Dysport NG works and how safe it is, when it is used for the treatment of cervical dystonia. Dysport NG will be compared to an approved drug called Dysport.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
The primary study objectives will be assessed in terms of improvement of the subject's CD at a pre-defined time point after treatment. The primary study objectives are to demonstrate the superiority of Dysport NG to placebo in terms of efficacy and to test the non-inferior efficacy of Dysport NG, when compared to Dysport, in CD subjects. In addition to testing for the primary study objectives, the superiority in terms of efficacy of Dysport versus placebo, will be assessed.
This clinical study was designed and implemented and reported in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP), with applicable local regulations (including European Directive 2001/20/EC, US Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, and with the ethical principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki.
A large body of evidence demonstrates the safety and efficacy of Dysport across several clinical indications. This study was the first use of Dysport NG in humans with CD. The active substance (BTX-A-HAC) in Dysport NG was the same as in the currently marketed Dysport product and had the same mechanism of action. Dysport NG was, therefore, expected to have the same efficacy and safety profile in humans as Dysport, with the advantage of eliminating the potential risk of transmission of infective agents, by the substitution of plant and synthetic products for human and animal-derived products. However, due to the change of excipient, thorough assessment of the safety and efficacy of Dysport NG is necessary. Previous clinical studies indicate that the maximum effect of Dysport and maximum improvements in CD are observed approximately 4 weeks post treatment, after which there is a gradual return to baseline disease status. The Week 4 follow up visit after the first treatment cycle was therefore, chosen as the primary time point of interest. Retreatment is necessary in order to maintain the beneficial effect and the long term treatment of CD. Previously conducted long term studies demonstrate the maintenance of the therapeutic effect of Dysport following repeated treatments, with a favourable short and long term safety and immunogenicity profile.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Dysport NG 500U (1mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1 and 2. 250U (0.5mL), 500U (1mL) or 750U (1.5mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 3. 250U (0.5mL), 500U (1mL), 750U (1.5mL) or 1000U (2mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 4 and 5. |
Biological: Botulinum toxin type A
I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of up to 5 treatment cycles.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Dysport 500U (1mL) injected as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1. |
Biological: Botulinum toxin type A
I.M. injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1.
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo 1mL administered as, intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1. |
Drug: Placebo
I.M. injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total Score Following First Treatment Cycle [Baseline and Week 4]
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle [Baseline and Week 4]
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Severity subscale. TWSTRS Severity subscale scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
- Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Disability Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle [Baseline and Week 4]
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Disability subscale. TWSTRS Disability subscale scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
- Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Pain Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle [Baseline and Week 4]
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Pain subscale. TWSTRS Pain subscale scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
- Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Pain From Cervical Dystonia Following First Treatment Cycle [Baseline and Week 4]
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).
- Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Symptoms of Cervical Dystonia Following First Treatment Cycle [Baseline and Week 4]
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no symptoms) to 100 mm (worst possible symptoms).
- Percentage of Treatment Responders Following First Treatment Cycle [Baseline and Week 4]
A treatment responder was defined as a patient with >30% improvement in TWSTRS Total score compared to baseline. TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
- Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 [Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4]
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
- Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 [Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4]
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Severity subscale. TWSTRS Severity subscale scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
- Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Disability Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 [Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4]
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Disability subscale. TWSTRS Disability subscale scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
- Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Pain Subscale Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 [Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4]
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Pain subscale. TWSTRS Pain subscale scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
- Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Pain From Cervical Dystonia for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 [Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4]
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).
- Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Symptoms of Cervical Dystonia for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 [Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4]
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale of 0 mm (no symptoms) to 100 mm (worst possible symptoms).
- Percentage of Treatment Responders for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 [Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4]
A treatment responder was defined as a patient with >30% improvement in TWSTRS Total score compared to baseline. TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Dystonia with at least 18 months duration since onset.
-
Previously untreated with Botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) or -B or a minimum of 14 weeks since the last injection.
-
TWSTRS score at baseline of: Total score ≥ 30, Severity Sub-Scale score ≥ 15, Disability Sub-Scale score ≥ 3, Pain Sub-Scale score ≥ 2.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Known hypersensitivity to Botulinum toxin (BTX) or related compounds or any component in the study drug formulation (including cow milk protein).
-
Pure anterocollis or pure retrocollis.
-
In apparent remission from Cervical Dystonia.
-
Known clinically significant underlying swallowing or respiratory abnormality which might be exacerbated by BTX treatment.
-
Previous poor response to BTX treatment or known presence of BTX neutralising antibodies.
-
Previous phenol or alcohol injections into the neck muscles.
-
Previous myotomy or denervation surgery involving the neck or shoulder region.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Monash Medical Centre | Clayton | Australia | ||
2 | Austin Hospital | Heidelberg | Australia | ||
3 | Department of Neurosciences Alfred Hospital | Prahran | Australia | ||
4 | Westmead Hospital | Westmead | Australia | ||
5 | Univ.-Klinik für Neurologie | Innsbruck | Austria | ||
6 | Univ.-Klinik für Neurologie | Wien | Austria | ||
7 | AZ St. Jan | Brugge | Belgium | ||
8 | Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen | Edegem | Belgium | ||
9 | AZ Sint Lucas | Gent | Belgium | ||
10 | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège | Liège | Belgium | ||
11 | HH Ziekenhuis | Roeselare | Belgium | ||
12 | Fakultni nemocnice Brno | Brno | Czechia | ||
13 | Pardubicka krajska nemocnice | Pardubice | Czechia | ||
14 | RESEARCH SITE s.r.o. | Plzen | Czechia | ||
15 | Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze | Praha | Czechia | ||
16 | CHU Amiens | Amiens | France | ||
17 | Hopital Neurologique | Bron | France | ||
18 | CHU Caremeau | Nîmes | France | ||
19 | CHU Bordeaux | Pessac | France | ||
20 | CHU Strasbourg | Strasbourg | France | ||
21 | Hopital Purpan | Toulouse | France | ||
22 | Neurologische Klinik u. Poliklinik | Berlin | Germany | ||
23 | Neurologische Klinik u. Poliklinik | Bonn | Germany | ||
24 | Neurologische Klinik | Düsseldorf | Germany | ||
25 | Neurologische Klinik | Halle | Germany | ||
26 | Neurologische Klinik | Hannover | Germany | ||
27 | Neurologische Klinik | Leipzig | Germany | ||
28 | Neurologische Klinik | München | Germany | ||
29 | Neurologische Klinik | Tübingen | Germany | ||
30 | Neurologische Klinik | Wiesbaden | Germany | ||
31 | Neurologische Klinik | Würzburg | Germany | ||
32 | Semmelweis Egyetem | Budapest | Hungary | ||
33 | Jósa András Oktató Kórház Nonprofit Kft. | Nyíregyháza | Hungary | ||
34 | Pécsi Tudományegyetem | Pécs | Hungary | ||
35 | Szegedi Tudományegyetem Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinikai Központ | Szeged | Hungary | ||
36 | Pomorskie Centrum Traumatologii im. M. Kopernika w Gdansku | Gdansk | Poland | ||
37 | Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska | Katowice | Poland | ||
38 | Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne | Krakow | Poland | ||
39 | Gabinet Lekarski | Lodz | Poland | ||
40 | Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej | Poznan | Poland | ||
41 | Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny | Warszawa | Poland | ||
42 | Hospital Santa Maria | Lisboa | Portugal | ||
43 | Hospital Geral de Santo Antonio | Porto | Portugal | ||
44 | Research Medical Complex "Vashe Zdorovie" | Kazan | Russian Federation | ||
45 | Research Center of Neurology of RAMS | Moscow | Russian Federation | ||
46 | Nizhniy Novgorod Research Institute for Traumatology and Orthopaedics | Nizhniy Novgorod | Russian Federation | ||
47 | Samara Regional Clinical Hospital | Samara | Russian Federation | ||
48 | Smolensk State Medical Academy Smolensk Regional Clinical Hospital | Smolensk | Russian Federation | ||
49 | Russian Medical Military Academy n.a. S.M.Kirov | St. Petersburg | Russian Federation | ||
50 | Bukovinian Medical State University | Chernivtsi | Ukraine | ||
51 | Ukrainian State Institute of Medical and Social Problems of Disability | Dnipropetrovsk | Ukraine | ||
52 | Donetsk Railroad Clinical Hospital | Donetsk | Ukraine | ||
53 | Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology AMS of Ukraine | Kharkiv | Ukraine | ||
54 | Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital | Lviv | Ukraine | ||
55 | Municipal Institution "Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital" | Odessa | Ukraine | ||
56 | Uzhgorod National University | Uzhgorod | Ukraine | ||
57 | Vinnytsya National Medical University | Vinnytsya | Ukraine |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ipsen
Investigators
- Study Director: Ipsen Medical Director, Ipsen
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Y-52-52120-134
- 2010-019907-43
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Subjects recruited at 61 centres in Australia (2 subjects), Austria (9 subjects), Belgium (9 subjects), Czech Republic (58 subjects), France (31 subjects), Germany (38 subjects), Hungary (44 subjects), Poland (68 subjects), Portugal (12 subjects), Russia (36 subjects) and Ukraine (62 subjects). |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 382 subjects screened, 369 randomised due to 13 screen failures. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG | Dysport | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Up to 5 treatment cycles of Dysport NG | 1 treatment cycle of Dysport | 1 treatment cycle of placebo |
Period Title: Treatment Cycle 1 | |||
STARTED | 156 | 159 | 54 |
COMPLETED | 152 | 156 | 52 |
NOT COMPLETED | 4 | 3 | 2 |
Period Title: Treatment Cycle 1 | |||
STARTED | 359 | 0 | 0 |
COMPLETED | 346 | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Treatment Cycle 1 | |||
STARTED | 346 | 0 | 0 |
COMPLETED | 316 | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 30 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Treatment Cycle 1 | |||
STARTED | 316 | 0 | 0 |
COMPLETED | 220 | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 96 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Treatment Cycle 1 | |||
STARTED | 220 | 0 | 0 |
COMPLETED | 217 | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG | Dysport | Placebo | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 500U (1mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1 and 2. 250U (0.5mL), 500U (1mL) or 750U (1.5mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 3. 250U (0.5mL), 500U (1mL), 750U (1.5mL) or 1000U (2mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 4 and 5. Botulinum type A toxin (Dysport NG): I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of up to 5 treatment cycles. | 500U (1mL) injected as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1. Botulinum type A toxin (Dysport®): I.M. injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1. | 1mL administered as, intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1. Placebo: I.M. injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 156 | 159 | 54 | 369 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
51.6
(12.4)
|
49.1
(12.0)
|
49.7
(10.8)
|
50.3
(12.1)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
100
64.1%
|
101
63.5%
|
34
63%
|
235
63.7%
|
Male |
56
35.9%
|
58
36.5%
|
20
37%
|
134
36.3%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | ||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
1.9%
|
1
0.3%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
1
0.6%
|
1
1.9%
|
2
0.5%
|
White |
154
98.7%
|
154
96.9%
|
49
90.7%
|
357
96.7%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
2
1.3%
|
4
2.5%
|
3
5.6%
|
9
2.4%
|
Time since diagnosis of CD, years (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
7.13
(7.95)
|
6.88
(7.49)
|
6.25
(7.31)
|
6.84
(7.63)
|
Baseline Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total score (Units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Units on a scale] |
44.56
(9.20)
|
46.23
(8.82)
|
47.02
(9.19)
|
45.64
(9.06)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total Score Following First Treatment Cycle |
---|---|
Description | TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered). The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG | Dysport | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 500U | 500U | |
Measure Participants | 153 | 156 | 53 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Units on a scale] |
-12.46
|
-13.99
|
-3.93
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Dysport NG, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | A pre-specified analysis of the LS mean difference between the Dysport NG and Placebo arms was performed. A total of 210 subjects were included in the analysis. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | An ANCOVA on the change from baseline, baseline TWSTRS Total score, baseline BTX status and pooled centre as explanatory variables was performed. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Dysport, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | A pre-specified analysis of the LS mean difference between the Dysport and Placebo arms was performed. A total of 213 subjects were included in the analysis. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | An ANCOVA on the change from baseline, baseline TWSTRS Total score, baseline BTX status and pooled centre as explanatory variables was performed. |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Dysport NG, Dysport |
---|---|---|
Comments | A pre-specified analysis of the LS mean difference between the Dysport NG and Dysport arms was performed. A total of 315 subjects were included in the analysis. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | |
Comments | An ANCOVA on the change from baseline with treatment, baseline TWSTRS Total score, BTX status at baseline and pooled centre as explanatory variables had been performed. The non-inferiority margin was 3 points. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS mean difference |
Estimated Value | 1.532 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.819 to 3.883 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle |
---|---|
Description | TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Severity subscale. TWSTRS Severity subscale scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered). The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG | Dysport | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 500U | 500U | |
Measure Participants | 153 | 156 | 53 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Units on a scale] |
-6.2
|
-6.6
|
-1.9
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Disability Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle |
---|---|
Description | TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Disability subscale. TWSTRS Disability subscale scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered). The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG | Dysport | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 500U | 500U | |
Measure Participants | 153 | 156 | 53 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Units on a scale] |
-3.3
|
-3.9
|
-0.8
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Pain Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle |
---|---|
Description | TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Pain subscale. TWSTRS Pain subscale scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered). The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG | Dysport | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 500U | 500U | |
Measure Participants | 153 | 156 | 53 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Units on a scale] |
-3.10
|
-3.44
|
-1.21
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Pain From Cervical Dystonia Following First Treatment Cycle |
---|---|
Description | The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain). |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered). The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG | Dysport | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 500U | 500U | |
Measure Participants | 153 | 156 | 53 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Units on a scale] |
-14.8
|
-19.2
|
-3.4
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Symptoms of Cervical Dystonia Following First Treatment Cycle |
---|---|
Description | The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no symptoms) to 100 mm (worst possible symptoms). |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered). The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG | Dysport | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 500U | 500U | |
Measure Participants | 152 | 156 | 53 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Units on a scale] |
-18.7
|
-23.6
|
-3.3
|
Title | Percentage of Treatment Responders Following First Treatment Cycle |
---|---|
Description | A treatment responder was defined as a patient with >30% improvement in TWSTRS Total score compared to baseline. TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered). The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG | Dysport | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 500U | 500U | |
Measure Participants | 153 | 156 | 53 |
Number [Percentage of participants] |
45.8
29.4%
|
55.8
35.1%
|
20.8
38.5%
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 |
---|---|
Description | TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms. |
Time Frame | Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered) in each cycle. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All doses |
Measure Participants | 359 |
Cycle 2 |
-15.35
|
Cycle 3 |
-14.85
|
Cycle 4 |
-15.58
|
Cycle 5 |
-15.28
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 |
---|---|
Description | TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Severity subscale. TWSTRS Severity subscale scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms. |
Time Frame | Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered) in each cycle. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All doses |
Measure Participants | 359 |
Cycle 2 |
-7.2
|
Cycle 3 |
-7.1
|
Cycle 4 |
-7.3
|
Cycle 5 |
-7.0
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Disability Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 |
---|---|
Description | TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Disability subscale. TWSTRS Disability subscale scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms. |
Time Frame | Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered) in each cycle. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All doses |
Measure Participants | 359 |
Cycle 2 |
-4.7
|
Cycle 3 |
-4.6
|
Cycle 4 |
-5.0
|
Cycle 5 |
-4.9
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Pain Subscale Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 |
---|---|
Description | TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Pain subscale. TWSTRS Pain subscale scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms. |
Time Frame | Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered) in each cycle. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All doses |
Measure Participants | 359 |
Cycle 2 |
-3.45
|
Cycle 3 |
-3.21
|
Cycle 4 |
-3.34
|
Cycle 5 |
-3.41
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Pain From Cervical Dystonia for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 |
---|---|
Description | The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain). |
Time Frame | Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered) in each cycle. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All doses |
Measure Participants | 359 |
Cycle 2 |
-20.1
|
Cycle 3 |
-17.8
|
Cycle 4 |
-18.0
|
Cycle 5 |
-16.1
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Symptoms of Cervical Dystonia for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 |
---|---|
Description | The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale of 0 mm (no symptoms) to 100 mm (worst possible symptoms). |
Time Frame | Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered) in each cycle. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All doses |
Measure Participants | 359 |
Cycle 2 |
-24.0
|
Cycle 3 |
-18.9
|
Cycle 4 |
-21.0
|
Cycle 5 |
-18.2
|
Title | Percentage of Treatment Responders for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5 |
---|---|
Description | A treatment responder was defined as a patient with >30% improvement in TWSTRS Total score compared to baseline. TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms. |
Time Frame | Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on number (n) of subjects in the ITT population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment regardless of the amount of study treatment administered) in each cycle. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Missing data were not imputed. |
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All doses |
Measure Participants | 359 |
Cycle 2 |
58.5
37.5%
|
Cycle 3 |
56.8
36.4%
|
Cycle 4 |
63.5
40.7%
|
Cycle 5 |
57.5
36.9%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 2 years | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Analysis based on number of subjects in the safety population (all randomised subjects who received at least one injection of study treatment). One subject was randomised to Dysport 500 U but actually received placebo; therefore, this subject was counted in the placebo group for the safety population analysis (n=55 not n=54). Data are broken down by dose across all treatment cycles and the denominator (total number of patients at risk) for each group could not be reported in participant flow. | |||||||||||
Arm/Group Title | Dysport NG, 250U | Dysport NG, 500U | Dysport NG, 750U | Dysport NG, 1000U | Dysport, 500U | Placebo | ||||||
Arm/Group Description | Subjects in the safety population were analysed as treated. | Subjects in the safety population were analysed as treated. | Subjects in the safety population were analysed as treated. | Subjects in the safety population were analysed as treated. | The safety population was analysed using subjects as treated. One subject was randomised to Dysport 500 U but actually received placebo; therefore, this subject was counted in the placebo group for the safety population, and the Dysport group for the ITT population. | The safety population was analysed using subjects as treated. One subject was randomised to Dysport 500 U but actually received placebo; therefore, this subject was counted in the placebo group for the safety population, and the Dysport group for the ITT population. | ||||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||||||
Dysport NG, 250U | Dysport NG, 500U | Dysport NG, 750U | Dysport NG, 1000U | Dysport, 500U | Placebo | |||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||||||
Dysport NG, 250U | Dysport NG, 500U | Dysport NG, 750U | Dysport NG, 1000U | Dysport, 500U | Placebo | |||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/4 (0%) | 16/363 (4.4%) | 3/210 (1.4%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 3/156 (1.9%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||||||||
Acute coronary syndrome | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Endocrine disorders | ||||||||||||
Thyroid cyst | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||||||
Gastric ulcer haemorrhage | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Dysphagia | 0/4 (0%) | 0/363 (0%) | 1/210 (0.5%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Gastritis haemorrhagic | 0/4 (0%) | 0/363 (0%) | 0/210 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Gastrooesphageal reflux disease | 0/4 (0%) | 0/363 (0%) | 0/210 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Rectal perforation | 0/4 (0%) | 0/363 (0%) | 1/210 (0.5%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||||||||
Cholelithiasis | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||||
Pneumonia streptococcal | 0/4 (0%) | 0/363 (0%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 1/156 (0.6%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Proctitis infectious | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Vaginal abscess | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||||||
Clavicle fracture | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Fibula fracture | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Meniscus injury | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Upper limb fracture | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||||||||
Adenocarcinoma | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Lung adenocarcinoma | 0/4 (0%) | 0/363 (0%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 1/156 (0.6%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Malignant pleural effusion | 0/4 (0%) | 0/363 (0%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 1/156 (0.6%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Pericardial effusion malignant | 0/4 (0%) | 0/363 (0%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 1/156 (0.6%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||||
Cerebrovascular accident | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||||||||
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Completed suicide | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||||||||||
Uterine polyp | 0/4 (0%) | 0/363 (0%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 1/156 (0.6%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||||||
Pulmonary embolism | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Vascular disorders | ||||||||||||
Paget-Schroetter syndrome | 0/4 (0%) | 1/363 (0.3%) | 0/210 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Aortic dissection | 0/4 (0%) | 0/363 (0%) | 1/210 (0.5%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/156 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | ||||||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||||||
Dysport NG, 250U | Dysport NG, 500U | Dysport NG, 750U | Dysport NG, 1000U | Dysport, 500U | Placebo | |||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/4 (25%) | 59/363 (16.3%) | 29/210 (13.8%) | 7/57 (12.3%) | 15/156 (9.6%) | 1/55 (1.8%) | ||||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||||||
Dysphagia | 0/4 (0%) | 0 | 38/363 (10.5%) | 54 | 20/210 (9.5%) | 25 | 5/57 (8.8%) | 5 | 11/156 (7.1%) | 11 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||||
Nasopharyngitis | 0/4 (0%) | 0 | 21/363 (5.8%) | 26 | 9/210 (4.3%) | 9 | 2/57 (3.5%) | 2 | 4/156 (2.6%) | 4 | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||||||
Muscular weakness | 1/4 (25%) | 1 | 11/363 (3%) | 15 | 13/210 (6.2%) | 14 | 6/57 (10.5%) | 6 | 0/156 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Medical Director, Neurology |
---|---|
Organization | Ipsen Innovation |
Phone | clinical.trials@ipsen.com |
clinical.trials@ipsen.com |
- Y-52-52120-134
- 2010-019907-43