Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Cervical cancer represents the second commonest cancer in women worldwide, with 500,000 new cases and 300,000 deaths reported yearly. Among cervical cancer cases, 80% occur in developing countries and about 70% are identified as advanced cancer. According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system, a locally advanced cervical cancer includes stage IB2 to IIB.
Treatment modalities include radical surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) plus radical hysterectomy with or without adjuvant RT, and concomitant chemo radiation. Currently, platinum based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the gold standard for locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has many advantages: decreasing tumor size making surgery easier with improved rate of complete resection, decreased pelvic recurrence rate significantly, decreasing rate of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis, better brachytherapy distribution, minimal radiation toxicity, and 15% absolute increase of 5-year survival.
This study will evaluate various factors i.e. patient related (Age, Menopausal status, HPV, HIV, Comorbidities), Tumor related pathological stages (TNM), grade, lymphovascular perineural invasion, lymph nodes, extranodal extension, tumor margins including radial margin, type of tumor i.e. Adeno vs squamous, mutation profile and Treatment related factors (type of NAC, duration of NAC, no of cycles of NAC).
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
This is a single group prospective study to evaluate factors affecting treatment responses in uterine cervical carcinoma. All patients who will be receiving NAC followed by surgery will be included and assessed for various defined factors influencing response. Responses will be assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria.
-
All patients of cervical growth will be evaluated. Initial clinical evaluation, biopsy and if positive, HPV DNA status will be done. On confirmation of malignancy further staging will be done by FIGO Classification. Imaging will include contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) abdomen or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pelvis and ultrasound (USG) abdomen. Routine blood investigations, chest X-ray (CXR) and Electrocardiography (ECG) will be done.
-
In recruited patients, 3 cycles of NAC consisting of Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and Carboplatin (AUC5) at 21 day intervals were given.
-
Adverse reactions if any were recorded as WHO toxicity grades.
-
Evaluation of response was done after end of 2nd cycle of chemotherapy with clinical examination and Imaging (CT/MRI) by RECIST 1.1 criteria.
-
Response was divided into two groups- 1) Complete/ Partial response 2) Poor response/ Stable disease/ Progressive disease. Patients with Poor response/ stable disease/ progressive disease will undergo concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) while patients with partial/complete response will undergo Wertheim's hysterectomy.
-
After surgery Pathological evaluation will include T, N, M, histological type, Lymphovascular invasion (LVI), Perineural invasion (PNI), Depth of Tumor Invasion, Extra nodal extension (ENE), Grade, (next generation sequencing (NGS)- Mutation Analysis.
-
Post operative external pelvic irradiation was given according to Sedlis criteria in node negative, margin negative, parametria negative cases.
-
Follow up Evaluation was done at 1, 3 & 6 months by clinical examination, Biopsy for any recurrence and Imaging (CECT or MRI pelvis) at 6 months. Follow up was continued every 3 months thereof.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Other: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Patients receiving neoadjuvant paclitaxel 175mg/m2 and carboplatin (AUC5) at three weekly interval by intravenous route |
Drug: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
doublet of taxane and carboplatin
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Clinical Response [21 days after completion of third cycles]
Response to intervention by RACIST criteria 1.1
- Pathological response [6 months]
Pathological response after evaluation of surgical specimen and pathological staging
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
• All patients receiving NACT followed by Surgery/RT and willing to give consent will be included in study
-
FIGO Stage Ib/ IIa/ IIb
-
Age more than 18 yrs
Exclusion Criteria:
-
• FIGO Stage Ia/ III/ IV
-
Patients who received treatment earlier
-
Pregnant/ lactating women
-
Second primary cancer
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banaras Hindu University | Varanasi | UP | India | 221005 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Banaras Hindu University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Manoj Pandey, MS, PhD, Banaras Hindu University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Di Donato V, Schiavi MC, Ruscito I, Visentin VS, Palaia I, Marchetti C, Fischetti M, Monti M, Muzii L, Benedetti Panici P. Effects of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Radical Surgery as Front Line Treatment Strategy in Patients Affected by FIGO Stage III Cervical Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):841-849. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
- Katsumata N, Yoshikawa H, Kobayashi H, Saito T, Kuzuya K, Nakanishi T, Yasugi T, Yaegashi N, Yokota H, Kodama S, Mizunoe T, Hiura M, Kasamatsu T, Shibata T, Kamura T; Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Phase III randomised controlled trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery vs radical surgery alone for stages IB2, IIA2, and IIB cervical cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0102). Br J Cancer. 2013 May 28;108(10):1957-63. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.179. Epub 2013 May 2.
- Koensgen D, Sehouli J, Belau A, Weiss M, Stope MB, Grokopf V, Eichbaum M, Ledwon P, Lichtenegger W, Zygmunt M, Köhler G, Mustea A. Clinical Outcome of Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Results of an Open Prospective, Multicenter Phase 2 Study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Mar;27(3):500-506. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000894.
- Osman M. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced cervix cancer: a systematic review. Oncol Rev. 2014 Sep 23;8(2):250. doi: 10.4081/oncol.2014.250. eCollection 2014 Sep 23. Review.
- Rose PG. Combined-modality therapy of locally advanced cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 15;21(10 Suppl):211s-217s. Review.
- Sardi JE, Giaroli A, Sananes C, Ferreira M, Soderini A, Bermudez A, Snaidas L, Vighi S, Gomez Rueda N, di Paola G. Long-term follow-up of the first randomized trial using neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage Ib squamous carcinoma of the cervix: the final results. Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Oct;67(1):61-9.
- Singh U, Ahirwar N, Rani AK, Singh N, Sankhwar P, Qureshi S. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in treatment of locally advanced carcinoma cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013 Aug;63(4):273-8. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0342-6. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
- Takatori E, Shoji T, Omi H, Kagabu M, Miura F, Takeuchi S, Kumagai S, Yoshizaki A, Sato A, Sugiyama T. Analysis of prognostic factors for patients with bulky squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr;20(2):345-50. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0702-6. Epub 2014 May 14.
- NeoCx