CONNECT: Characterizing Guideline Adoption and Treatment Quality in Clinical Routine of German HFrEF Care

Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals (Industry)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06004453
Collaborator
(none)
1,250
70
20.9
17.9
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a multicenter, non-randomized, non-interventional cohort study with prospective and retrospective collection of primary data on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patient treatment and care following a decompensation event in different types of Heart Failure Unit (HFU) or non-HFU centers across Germany.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Heart Failure medications

Detailed Description

This study aims to describe quality of care of HFrEF patients following a decompensation event in different center types (=settings) utilizing the quality indicators for the care and outcomes of adults with heart failure as specified by the Heart Failure Association in 2022.

No strict visit schedule will be imposed on participants to avoid interference with routine clinical care. HFrEF patients will be treated according to the local routine in terms of medication, visit frequency and types of assessments performed and only these data will be collected as part of the study from patient files.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
1250 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Other
Official Title:
Characterizing Guideline Adoption and Treatment Quality in Clinical Routine of German HFrEF Care in Heart Failure Units and Independent Centers Utilizing Established Quality Indicators
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 5, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Cohort A

Supra-regional HFU Centers and HFU Focus Hospitals

Other: Heart Failure medications
There is no treatment allocation. Patients are allocated to the respective cohort based on the treating physician enrolling them in the study. Patients are treated according to the local prescribing information and routine medical practice.

Cohort B

Non-HFU Hospitals

Other: Heart Failure medications
There is no treatment allocation. Patients are allocated to the respective cohort based on the treating physician enrolling them in the study. Patients are treated according to the local prescribing information and routine medical practice.

Cohort C

HFU Residential Cardiologists

Other: Heart Failure medications
There is no treatment allocation. Patients are allocated to the respective cohort based on the treating physician enrolling them in the study. Patients are treated according to the local prescribing information and routine medical practice.

Cohort D

Non-HFU Residential Cardiologists

Other: Heart Failure medications
There is no treatment allocation. Patients are allocated to the respective cohort based on the treating physician enrolling them in the study. Patients are treated according to the local prescribing information and routine medical practice.

Cohort E

General practitioners

Other: Heart Failure medications
There is no treatment allocation. Patients are allocated to the respective cohort based on the treating physician enrolling them in the study. Patients are treated according to the local prescribing information and routine medical practice.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Quality of care and guideline adoption score in different structural settings as assessed by an opportunity-based quality indicator (QI) composite endpoint [6 months]

    Quality of care and guideline adoption score in different structural settings as assessed by an opportunity-based QI composite endpoint defined by the number of times each of secondary endpoints has been accomplished divided by chances to accomplish them as average per center type. To describe the quality of Heart Failure (HF) patient care in Heart Failure Unit (HFU) and non-HFU centers utilizing QIs as suggested by the 2021 European Society of Cardiology HF guideline.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Proportion of sites with a dedicated multidisciplinary team to manage patients with HF [Baseline]

    To describe the structural framework of the participating centers.

  2. Percentage of sites with dedicated trained healthcare professionals to deliver HF specific education to facilitate patient self-care. [Baseline]

    To describe the structural framework of the participating centers.

  3. (A) Proportion of patients with HF who have a documentation of their HF clinical type [Baseline]

    HF clinical type: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with a midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF), HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  4. (B) Proportion of patients with a documentation of their electrocardiogram findings [6 months]

    To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  5. (C) Proportion of patients who have their natriuretic peptides (NPs) measured (within a 3-month period from the time of decompensation) [3 months]

    To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  6. (D) Proportion of patients who have their blood tests documented [3 months]

    To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  7. (E) Proportion of patients hospitalized with HF who have been referred for a cardiac rehabilitation program [6 months]

    To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  8. (F) Proportion of patients hospitalized with HF who have a follow-up review by a healthcare professional within 4 weeks of hospital discharge [4 weeks]

    To describe the patient assessment in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  9. (G) Proportion of patients treated with beta-blocker bisoprolol, carvedilol, sustained-release metoprolol succinate, or nebivolol in the absence of any contraindications as defined by Aktaa et al 2022 [6 months]

    To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  10. (H) Proportion of patients treated with an Angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE) inhibitor, Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) in the absence of any contraindications [6 months]

    To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  11. (I) Proportion of patients treated with an Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) in the absence of any contraindications [6 months]

    To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  12. (J) Proportion of patients treated with a Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor in the absence of any contraindications [6 months]

    To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  13. Proportion of patients receiving ARNI instead of ACEi/ARB as first-line treatment [6 months]

    To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  14. Proportion of patients with HF who are prescribed loop diuretic therapy if they have evidence of fluid retention [6 months]

    To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  15. Time to treatment of the above 4 individual treatment classes and time to treatment with all four classes together [6 months]

    To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  16. Percentage of days covered with all four treatment classes [6 months]

    To describe the initial treatment algorithm of HFrEF patients following a decompensation in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  17. (K) Proportion of symptomatic patients with HFrEF in sinus rhythm with a QRS duration ≥150ms and left bundle branch block QRS morphology and with LVEF ≤35% despite ≥3 months optimal medical therapy who are offered cardiac resynchronization therapy [6 months]

    To describe the therapy optimization in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  18. (L) Proportion of symptomatic patients with HF, LVEF ≤35% despite ≥3 months of optimal medical therapy, and ischemic heart disease (IHD) who are offered primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator [6 months]

    To describe the therapy optimization in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  19. Proportion of patients who have an assessment of their Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using a validated tool [6 months]

    To describe the utilization of HRQoL assessments in different types of HFU and non-HFU centers.

  20. Number of patients who are eligible for and have accomplished secondary endpoint g-j divided by the number of patients who are eligible for g-j [6 months]

    To describe quality of treatment utilizing an all-or-none composite QI.

  21. Number of HF hospitalizations, stratified by bed type [6 months]

    Where a patient has multiple HF hospitalization stays, each hospitalization will be counted. To describe healthcare resource utilization in patients hospitalized with HF during 6 months follow-up.

  22. Length of hospital stay [6 months]

    Length of hospital stay will be considered as the time from admission date until discharge for each HF hospitalization. To describe healthcare resource utilization in patients hospitalized with HF during 6 months follow-up.

  23. Number of HF hospitalizations per patient [6 months]

    To describe healthcare resource utilization in patients hospitalized with HF during 6 months follow-up.

  24. Number of newly implanted devices [6 months]

    implanted devices: implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), combination of ICD and CRT (CRT-D). To describe healthcare resource utilization in patients hospitalized with HF during 6 months follow-up.

  25. Number of valve interventions [6 months]

    To describe healthcare resource utilization in patients hospitalized with HF during 6 months follow-up.

  26. Number of participants with medical history of selected comorbidities [Baseline]

    To describe the HFrEF patient population with a recent decompensation

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients who provide written informed consent to participate in the study

  2. Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age

  3. Patients with diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF treatment according to the summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs)

  4. Decompensation event up to three months prior to inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Simultaneous or planned participation in an interventional research study

  2. Participation in this study at another site e.g. in a HFU network

  3. Patients incapable of understanding and signing the informed consent form

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Novartis Investigative Site Winsen Lower Saxony Germany 21423
2 Novartis Investigative Site Braunschschweig Niedersachsen Germany 38126
3 Novartis Investigative Site Frankenthal Pfalz Germany 67227
4 Novartis Investigative Site Kaiserslautern Rhineland-Palatinate Germany 67655
5 Novartis Investigative Site Chemnitz Saxony Germany 09113
6 Novartis Investigative Site Pirna Saxony Germany 01796
7 Novartis Investigative Site Bad Neustadt Germany 97616
8 Novartis Investigative Site Bechhofen Germany 66894
9 Novartis Investigative Site Berlin Germany 13053
10 Novartis Investigative Site Berlin Germany D 10559
11 Novartis Investigative Site Bexbach Germany 66450
12 Novartis Investigative Site Biedenkopf Germany 35216
13 Novartis Investigative Site Breuberg Germany 64747
14 Novartis Investigative Site Brilon Germany 59929
15 Novartis Investigative Site Brueel Germany 19412
16 Novartis Investigative Site Chemnitz Germany 09116
17 Novartis Investigative Site Coburg Germany 96450
18 Novartis Investigative Site Dessau-Rosslau Germany 06847
19 Novartis Investigative Site Dinkelsbuhl Germany 91550
20 Novartis Investigative Site Dresden Germany 01277
21 Novartis Investigative Site Dresden Germany 01397
22 Novartis Investigative Site Duesseldorf Germany 40225
23 Novartis Investigative Site Ehingen Germany 89584
24 Novartis Investigative Site Ehringshausen Germany 35630
25 Novartis Investigative Site Farchant Germany 82490
26 Novartis Investigative Site Frankfurt Germany 60316
27 Novartis Investigative Site Freiberg Germany 09559
28 Novartis Investigative Site Giengen Germany 89537
29 Novartis Investigative Site Goeppingen Germany 73033
30 Novartis Investigative Site Halle S Germany 06120
31 Novartis Investigative Site Hamburg Germany 20095
32 Novartis Investigative Site Heidelberg Germany 69115
33 Novartis Investigative Site Heidelberg Germany 69120
34 Novartis Investigative Site Hoppegarten Germany 15366
35 Novartis Investigative Site Hoyerswerda Germany 02977
36 Novartis Investigative Site Ingelheim Germany 55218
37 Novartis Investigative Site Jerichow Germany 39319
38 Novartis Investigative Site Kassel Germany 34121
39 Novartis Investigative Site Kiel Germany 24106
40 Novartis Investigative Site Kitzingen Germany 97318
41 Novartis Investigative Site Lahnau Germany 35633
42 Novartis Investigative Site Limbach-Oberfrohna Germany 09212
43 Novartis Investigative Site Ludwigshafen Germany 67067
44 Novartis Investigative Site Lutherstadt Wittenberg Germany 06886
45 Novartis Investigative Site Markkleeberg Germany 04416
46 Novartis Investigative Site Moers Germany 47441
47 Novartis Investigative Site Muellheim Germany 79379
48 Novartis Investigative Site Nuernberg Germany 90461
49 Novartis Investigative Site Oberhausen Germany 46149
50 Novartis Investigative Site Osnabrueck Germany 49074
51 Novartis Investigative Site Papenburg Germany 26871
52 Novartis Investigative Site Peine Germany 31224
53 Novartis Investigative Site Potsdam Germany 14471
54 Novartis Investigative Site Radebeul Germany 01445
55 Novartis Investigative Site Rastatt Germany 76437
56 Novartis Investigative Site Remscheid Germany 42859
57 Novartis Investigative Site Rostock Germany 18107
58 Novartis Investigative Site Rotenburg an der Fulda Germany 36199
59 Novartis Investigative Site Saarlouis Germany 66740
60 Novartis Investigative Site Schoenebeck Germany 39218
61 Novartis Investigative Site Schwandorf Germany 92421
62 Novartis Investigative Site Siegen Germany 57072
63 Novartis Investigative Site Speyer Germany 67346
64 Novartis Investigative Site Stadtbergen Germany 86391
65 Novartis Investigative Site Stahnsdorf Germany 14532
66 Novartis Investigative Site Ulm Germany 89077
67 Novartis Investigative Site Wedemark Germany 30900
68 Novartis Investigative Site Wenden Germany 57482
69 Novartis Investigative Site Winsen Germany 21423
70 Novartis Investigative Site Wismar Germany 23966

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Investigators

  • Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06004453
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CLCZ696BDE06
First Posted:
Aug 22, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Aug 22, 2023
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 22, 2023