Women With Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Arteries Study

Sponsor
Anna Huskin (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT00743197
Collaborator
Astellas Pharma US, Inc. (Industry)
3
1
2
24
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standard medical therapy versus usual care in women with chest pain, coronary endothelial dysfunction and unblocked coronary arteries.

Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) is a condition in which the layers of cells around the heart do not function properly and is believed to be key factor in the development of atherosclerosis (fat deposits in arteries). In addition, CED is associated with an increased risk for future cardiovascular events, such as heart attack and stroke.

A coronary angiogram allows physicians to see if any of the arteries in the heart are blocked, usually by fatty plaque. In many instances, angiograms in women experiencing chest pain do not show evidence of coronary disease (free of significant plaque build-up). Currently, there is no standard of care treatment plan for patients with normal coronary arteries, despite symptoms of chest pain, and as a result these patients may not receive medical treatment. However, these women often return to their physicians more than once with chest pain and go through a similar battery of tests.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

Endothelial function testing will be performed on women without significant coronary disease in order to help identify women who may be likely to develop coronary artery disease (CAD) and who would benefit from aggressive lifestyle (dietary counseling, exercise) or medical (treatment with aspirin and cholesterol and blood pressure lowering medications) interventions.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
3 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Women With Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Arteries Study: A Randomized Study of Medical Treatment and Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care Group

USUAL CARE GROUP-therapy in this group will be no dictated medical therapy, but usual care, as dictated by their referring physician.

Active Comparator: Medical Treatment Group

TREATMENT GROUP-therapy in this group will be conventional treatment for CAD but targeting endothelial function, which will include aspirin, ACE-inhibitor and statin therapy, and therapeutic lifestyle changes.

Drug: Aspirin
Aspirin 81 mg daily

Drug: Lisinopril
Lisinopril 10 mg every night

Drug: Simvastatin
Simvastatin 20 mg every night
Other Names:
  • Zocor
  • Drug: Lovaza
    Lovaza 1 gram daily
    Other Names:
  • Fish Oil, Omega-3
  • Behavioral: Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes
    Therapeutic lifestyle changes will be initiated with the assistance of a dietician, including diet counseling, exercise recommendation, and weight maintenance/weight loss.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Effectiveness of Therapy Compared to Usual Care, in Those Women With Chest Pain (CP), Reversible Ischemia by Stress Testing and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) by Angiography Who Are Found to Have Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction (CED). [1 year]

      The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standard medical therapy versus usual care in women with chest pain (CP), coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) and unblocked coronary arteries. CED is a condition in which the layers of cells around the heart do not function properly and is believed to be a key factor in the development of atherosclerosis (fat deposits in arteries). In addition, CED is associated with an increased risk for suture cardiovascular events, such as heart attack and stroke.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. The Role and Function of Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) in the Presence of Proven Endothelial Dysfunction and the Response of EPCs to Medical Therapy for Endothelial Dysfunction. [1 year]

      no analyses were conducted due to the PI's departure from the institution; all work including analyses ceased upon departure- the study was not transferred with the PI. In addition, the study end points were based on changes between groups (treatment vs. usual care group) at 12 month follow up for both groups - none of the enrolled subjects made it to the final (month 12) visit.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    30 Years to 90 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Female gender

    2. Age 30 or greater

    3. Present with symptoms suggestive of Angina (Typical or "Atypical")

    4. Abnormal myocardial perfusion scan

    5. Referred for angiography

    6. Normal (0% stenosis) versus Nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (<50% stenosis)

    7. Evidence of endothelial dysfunction.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Coronary vasospasm known or documented in cardiac catheterization

    2. Obstructive CAD (greater than 50% stenosis) known or documented in cardiac catheterization

    3. Pregnancy

    4. Established CAD, history of revascularization with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)/stent or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)

    5. Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

    6. Cardiac catheterization for valvular disease

    7. Cardiac catheterization for heart failure assessment/biopsy

    8. Known congestive heart failure (CHF)/hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM)/dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM)

    9. Acute Renal Failure

    10. Chronic renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rare (eGFR) <30 ml/min/1.73m^2) or on hemodialysis

    11. Known single kidney

    12. History of peptic ulcer disease, known gastrointestinal bleed, known contraindication to aspirin

    13. Known contraindication to statin

    14. Known contraindication to adenosine (asthma, high degree atrial ventricular (AV) block)

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Northwestern University Chicago Illinois United States 60611

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Anna Huskin
    • Astellas Pharma US, Inc.

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Martha Gulati, MD, Northwestern University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Anna Huskin, Clinical Design Manager, Northwestern University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00743197
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AB-08-002
    First Posted:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 4, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2022
    Keywords provided by Anna Huskin, Clinical Design Manager, Northwestern University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Usual Care Group Medical Treatment Group
    Arm/Group Description USUAL CARE GROUP-therapy in this group will be no dictated medical therapy, but usual care, as dictated by their referring physician. TREATMENT GROUP-therapy in this group will be conventional treatment for CAD but targeting endothelial function, which will include aspirin, ACE-inhibitor and statin therapy, and therapeutic lifestyle changes.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 1 2
    COMPLETED 0 0
    NOT COMPLETED 1 2

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Usual Care Group Medical Treatment Group Total
    Arm/Group Description USUAL CARE GROUP-therapy in this group will be no dictated medical therapy, but usual care, as dictated by their referring physician. TREATMENT GROUP-therapy in this group will be conventional treatment for CAD but targeting endothelial function, which will include aspirin, ACE-inhibitor and statin therapy, and therapeutic lifestyle changes. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 1 2 3
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    1
    100%
    2
    100%
    3
    100%
    >=65 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    1
    100%
    2
    100%
    3
    100%
    Male
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    1
    100%
    2
    100%
    3
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Effectiveness of Therapy Compared to Usual Care, in Those Women With Chest Pain (CP), Reversible Ischemia by Stress Testing and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) by Angiography Who Are Found to Have Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction (CED).
    Description The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standard medical therapy versus usual care in women with chest pain (CP), coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) and unblocked coronary arteries. CED is a condition in which the layers of cells around the heart do not function properly and is believed to be a key factor in the development of atherosclerosis (fat deposits in arteries). In addition, CED is associated with an increased risk for suture cardiovascular events, such as heart attack and stroke.
    Time Frame 1 year

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    no analyses were conducted due to PI's departure from institution;all work including analyses ceased upon departure-the study was not transferred with the PI. In addition, study end points were based on changes between groups (treatment vs. usual care)at 12-mo follow up for both groups- none of the enrolled subjects completed the month 12 visit.
    Arm/Group Title Usual Care Group Medical Treatment Group
    Arm/Group Description
    Measure Participants 0 0
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Usual Care Group, Medical Treatment Group
    Comments 0
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy)
    Comments 0
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Other
    Estimated Value 0
    Confidence Interval () %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
    Value: 0
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title The Role and Function of Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) in the Presence of Proven Endothelial Dysfunction and the Response of EPCs to Medical Therapy for Endothelial Dysfunction.
    Description no analyses were conducted due to the PI's departure from the institution; all work including analyses ceased upon departure- the study was not transferred with the PI. In addition, the study end points were based on changes between groups (treatment vs. usual care group) at 12 month follow up for both groups - none of the enrolled subjects made it to the final (month 12) visit.
    Time Frame 1 year

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Usual Care Group Medical Treatment Group
    Arm/Group Description USUAL CARE GROUP-therapy in this group will be no dictated medical therapy, but usual care, as dictated by their referring physician. TREATMENT GROUP-therapy in this group will be conventional treatment for CAD but targeting endothelial function, which will include aspirin, ACE-inhibitor and statin therapy, and therapeutic lifestyle changes.
    All Cause Mortality
    Usual Care Group Medical Treatment Group
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Usual Care Group Medical Treatment Group
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Usual Care Group Medical Treatment Group
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/1 (0%) 0/2 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    Study terminated due to departure of PI; all work including analyses ceased upon departure.In addition,study end points were based on changes b/w groups treatment vs. usual care) at 12 mo follow up- none of the subjects completed the Mo 12 visit.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Dr. Martha Gulati, Principal Investigator
    Organization Northwestern University
    Phone 312-695-4965
    Email mgulati@nmh.org
    Responsible Party:
    Anna Huskin, Clinical Design Manager, Northwestern University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00743197
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AB-08-002
    First Posted:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 4, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2022