High Flow Nasal Oxygenation Versus Non-invasive Ventilation for Patients With Blunt Chest Trauma

Sponsor
Huda Fahmy Mahmoud, PhD (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05342103
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
3
11.9
5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Chest trauma remains an issue for health services for both severe and apparently mild trauma management. Severe chest trauma is associated with high mortality and is liable for 25% of mortality in multiple traumas. Moreover, mild trauma is also associated with significant morbidity, especially in patients with preexisting conditions. Thus, whatever the severity, a fast-acting strategy must be organized. In order to improve the prognosis of patients with severe chest trauma, early and continuous application of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) can indeed reduce the need for intubation and shorten intensive care unit length-of-stay. Among different mechanisms, the early use of positive end-expiratory pressure after chest trauma, when feasible, seems mandatory to optimize oxygenation and improve clinical outcomes. Indeed, interventions aimed at preventing ARDS after chest trauma carry the greatest potential to reduce the substantial morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization associated with this syndrome.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: high flow nasal oxygenation via nasal cannula (HFNC)
N/A

Detailed Description

In the past years, High-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) has gained an important popularity among intensivest to manage patients with acute respiratory failure, filling a gap in the ventilatory support escalation between facemask oxygen and non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation. Interestingly, the use of HFNC was widely and rapidly adopted in ICUs.A unique feature of HFNC is its ability to comfortably deliver high flows of warmed humidified gas, 20-70 L min, with a FiO2 range of 0.21-1.0. Physiological responses to HFNC therapy include increases in airway pressure, end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), and oxygenation which are probably optimal with higher flows (60-70 L/min), while the effects on dead-space washout work of breathing, and respiratory rate may be obtained with intermediate flows (20-45 L/min).

Many studies have found that high flow nasal oxygen is much better tolerated by patients compared to non-invasive ventilation, which may improve compliance. Nevertheless, there is no clear consensus on the treatment outcomes (such as intubation rate, escalated respiratory support rate, and mortality) of high flow nasal oxygenation versus non-invasive ventilation for patients with traumatic chest injuries.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
The patients will be randomly allocated into three groups; patients will receive high flow nasal oxygenation via nasal cannula (HFNC), or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or venturi mask (VM)The patients will be randomly allocated into three groups; patients will receive high flow nasal oxygenation via nasal cannula (HFNC), or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or venturi mask (VM)
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
High Flow Nasal Oxygenation Versus Non-invasive Ventilation for Patients With Blunt Chest Trauma: A Comparative Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) group

All patients will have FiO2 started at 0.4 and titrated to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 95%. The flow rate will be set at 60 L/min

Procedure: high flow nasal oxygenation via nasal cannula (HFNC)
All patients will have FiO2 started at 0.4 and titrated to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 95. The flow rate was set at 60 L/min for patients assigned to HFNC. In the CPAP,, pressure will be set to 3 cm H2O for 5 minutes, then titrated according to patient comfort and tolerance, as well as clinical observation
Other Names:
  • Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
  • Active Comparator: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) group

    All patients will have FiO2 started at 0.4 and titrated to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 95%. Pressure will be set to 3 cm H2O for 5 minutes, then titrated according to patient comfort and tolerance, as well as clinical observation

    Procedure: high flow nasal oxygenation via nasal cannula (HFNC)
    All patients will have FiO2 started at 0.4 and titrated to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 95. The flow rate was set at 60 L/min for patients assigned to HFNC. In the CPAP,, pressure will be set to 3 cm H2O for 5 minutes, then titrated according to patient comfort and tolerance, as well as clinical observation
    Other Names:
  • Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
  • Placebo Comparator: Venturi mask (MV) group

    All patients will have FiO2 started at 0.4 and titrated to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 95%. Patients will receive oxygen at a rate of 10L/min.

    Procedure: high flow nasal oxygenation via nasal cannula (HFNC)
    All patients will have FiO2 started at 0.4 and titrated to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 95. The flow rate was set at 60 L/min for patients assigned to HFNC. In the CPAP,, pressure will be set to 3 cm H2O for 5 minutes, then titrated according to patient comfort and tolerance, as well as clinical observation
    Other Names:
  • Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Tolerance to the therapy [48 hours]

      will be reported by the patient using a simplified visual analogic scale from 0 (maximal imaginable discomfort) to 10 (no discomfort)

    2. The Comfort levels with the different modes of oxygen delivery [48 hours]

      will measured using a 5-point with the Likert Scale (marked improvement, slight improvement, no change, slight deterioration or marked deterioration)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. The rate of intubation for mechanical ventilation [48 hours]

      Intubation criteria included a respiratory rate of >40 breaths per minute, signs of increased breathing effort, SpO2 of <90% despite high FiO2 or acidosis with a pH of <7.35, occurrence of hemodynamic instability or deterioration of neurologic status.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 60 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Rib fractures, pulmonary contusion, and admission within 24 h of injury

    • Hypoxemia (SpO2 90 % while breathing 10 l/min oxygen in the ER), or hypercapnia (PaCO2 45 mm Hg) on study entry

    • respiratory rate 25/ min despite an optimized intravenous analgesia

    • No indication of mechanical ventilation at the time of admission to the intensive care unit

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients < 18 years old

    • Patient already admitted to ICU on mechanical ventilation

    • requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation immediately on admission for any cause

    • facial fractures or base of skull fractures

    • Who did not receive a chest computed tomography (CT) scan

    • Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Huda Fahmy Aswan Egypt 81511

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Huda Fahmy Mahmoud, PhD

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Huda Fahmy Mahmoud, PhD, Assistant professor of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Aswan University Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05342103
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 559/9/2021
    First Posted:
    Apr 22, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 27, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2022
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 27, 2022