Collaborative Problem Solving vs. Positive Solutions for Families in Preschool Parent Groups

Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT02896426
Collaborator
Caplan Foundation for Early Childhood (Other)
22
2
10.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The main objectives of this study are to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of a CPS parent group on outcomes for a sample of parents of children ages 3 to 5 compared to outcomes after attending a parenting group that promotes behavioral (operant) parenting. We hypothesize that guardians in the CPS group will report a better understanding of how neurocognitive skills relate to children's behaviors, greater improvements in child functioning and behavior, and greater reductions in parents' stress than those in the comparison group.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Collaborative Problem Solving
  • Behavioral: Positive Solutions For Families
N/A

Detailed Description

Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) is an evidence-based approach for treating children with behavioral challenges. Unlike traditional models of discipline that use power, control and incentives to facilitate compliance, CPS does not assume that a challenging child lacks motivation for compliance, but instead that the child is motivated to behave well, but simply cannot consistently do so, due to lagging skills in one or more critical neurocognitive domains, such as those related to language and communication skills, attention and working memory skills, emotion- and self-regulation skills, cognitive flexibility skills, and/or social thinking skills. The goal of the intervention is to improve these lagging neurocognitive skills by helping adults and children work toward mutually satisfactory solutions to problems, thereby enhancing flexibility and frustration tolerance in both interaction partners. Any caregiver can use CPS with any child, and CPS can be taught to mental health providers (e.g., therapists, direct care staff), educators (e.g., teachers, administrators), or parents. Common ways to teach CPS to parents include family therapy (one provider teaching one family) or in parent group training (one provider teaching six to ten parents).

Although preschool-aged children have been included in past CPS-related research, they have not been studied separately, and research has not assessed the appropriateness of the current CPS approach for very young children. To address this gap in research, this study will support the development of a parent group curriculum specifically targeting guardians of preschool-aged children, as well as a randomized efficacy trial to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of a CPS parent group. Outcome measures from the CPS group will be compared with those from a group that promotes operant behavioral parenting.

Approximately sixty participating guardians will be randomly assigned to attend one of two types of weekly 2-hour groups, each lasting six weeks: either a Collaborative Problem Solving group (N=30; 3 groups) or a Positive Solutions for Families group, a group routinely offered at Head Start programs (N=30; 3 groups). Participants will complete surveys prior to beginning the groups (baseline), upon completion of the group sessions (discharge), and six months after the conclusion of the groups (follow up). Results from these surveys will be compared between groups.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
22 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) and Positive Solutions for Families Groups for Parents of Head Start Preschoolers
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 25, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 25, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Collaborative Problem Solving

Participants will attend parent group sessions led by trained group leaders and learn the Collaborative Problem Solving approach.

Behavioral: Collaborative Problem Solving
CPS is an approach for understanding and reducing challenging behavior in youth. Under CPS, caregivers are taught to understand and identify the specific neurocognitive skill deficits that underlie their child's challenging behavior. Then the caregivers are taught to interact with the child in a way that solves chronic behavior problems while building the lagging neurocognitive skills to avoid future problems.
Other Names:
  • CPS
  • Active Comparator: Positive Solutions For Families

    Participants will attend parent group sessions and learn the Positive Solutions for Families approach, a group that is usually offered by Head Start.

    Behavioral: Positive Solutions For Families
    Positive Solutions for Families groups provide information for families on how to promote children's social and emotional skills, understand their problem behavior, and use positive approaches to help children learn appropriate behavior.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Feasibility of a CPS group for parents of preschool-age children [6 months (immediately after group and 6 months after the group)]

      Therapy Attitude Inventory (The TAI is a self-report questionnaire that we will use to measure satisfaction with the parenting groups. We will compare the scores on this measure between the two groups.)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Impact of parenting groups on parenting style [8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)]

      Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (Measures parenting philosophy and includes scores for authoritative style, authoritarian style, and permissive style.)

    2. Impact of parenting groups on parent emotion regulation [8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)]

      Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (Measures emotion regulation skills including nonacceptance of emotional responses, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors, impulse control difficulties, lack of emotional awareness, limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and lack of emotional clarity.)

    3. Impact of parenting groups on the parent child relationship [8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)]

      Parent Child Relationship Inventory (Measures how parents view the task of parenting and how they feel about their children. Measures parental support, satisfaction with parenting, communication, limit setting, parent response consistency, and parent social desirability.)

    4. Impact of parenting groups on the parent philosophy [8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)]

      Think:Kids Measure of Change Over Time (Measures perceptions of parent-child relationship quality, parenting philosophy, and predictability of youth's challenging behavior.)

    5. Acceptability of a CPS group for parents of preschool-age children [8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)]

      Qualitative interviews at each time point

    6. Parent satisfaction with a CPS group for preschool-aged children [8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)]

      Qualitative interviews at each time point

    7. Parent satisfaction with a CPS group for preschool-aged children [8 weeks (immediately after conclusion of group)]

      Quantitative parent report of group acceptability at the conclusion of the groups

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Guardian of a child between the ages of three and five currently enrolled at participating Head Start center

    • Speaking and writing English at level necessary to complete study requirements

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • A diagnosis of significant Autism that currently impacts day to day functioning

    • A diagnosis of a psychotic disorder including schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder

    • An intellectual disability that impairs day to day functioning

    • Participation in a similar parenting group at the Head Start site within the last year

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Caplan Foundation for Early Childhood

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Alisha R Pollastri, Ph. D., Think:Kids at Massachusetts General Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Alisha R Pollastri, Director of Research and Evaluation, Think:Kids, Massachusetts General Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02896426
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2016000948/MGH
    First Posted:
    Sep 12, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 1, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2018
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by Alisha R Pollastri, Director of Research and Evaluation, Think:Kids, Massachusetts General Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 1, 2018