Transarterial Chemoembolization Compared With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy or Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Residual or Recurrent Liver Cancer Undergone Initial Transarterial Chemoembolization

Sponsor
Stanford University (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT02762266
Collaborator
National Cancer Institute (NCI) (NIH)
13
2
2
81.1
6.5
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This randomized phase III trial studies how well transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) works compared to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) in patients with liver cancer that remain after attempts to remove the cancer have been made (residual) or has come back (recurrent). TACE is a minimally invasive, image-guided treatment procedure that uses a catheter to deliver both chemotherapy medication and embolization materials into the blood vessels that lead to the tumors. SBRT or SABR may be able to send radiation directly to the tumor and cause less damage to normal liver tissue. It is not yet known whether TACE is more effective than SBRT or SABR in treating patients with persistent or recurrent liver cancer who have undergone initial TACE.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
  • Procedure: Transarterial Chemoembolization
  • Drug: embolic agent
  • Drug: lipiodol
Phase 3

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
  1. To determine the freedom from local progression (FFLP) of TACE versus (vs) SABR in patients with persistent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after TACE.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
  1. To determine the progression-free survival (PFS) of TACE vs SABR in patients with persistent HCC after initial TACE.

  2. To determine the overall survival (OS) of TACE vs SABR for persistent HCC. III. To determine the toxicities associated with TACE or SABR for persistent HCC.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

Arm I: Patients undergo TACE.

ARM II: Beginning within 2 weeks of the radiation set-up scan and within 4 weeks of fiducial seed implantation (if applicable), patients undergo image guided SBRT 3 fractions within 1 week or 5 fractions within 2 weeks.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 1-2 weeks, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months, and every 6 months up to 3 years.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
13 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
International Randomized Study of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) / Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) for Residual or Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Initial TACE
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 27, 2016
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm I (TACE)

Patients undergo TACE.

Procedure: Transarterial Chemoembolization
Undergo TACE
Other Names:
  • TACE
  • Drug: embolic agent
    . Acceptable embolic agents include: Gelatin sponge (gelfoam) Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles Microspheres / Embolic beads

    Drug: lipiodol

    Experimental: Arm II (SBRT)

    Beginning within 2 weeks of the radiation set-up scan and within 4 weeks of fiducial seed implantation (if applicable), patients undergo image guided SBRT 3 fractions within 1 week or 5 fractions within 2 weeks.

    Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
    Undergo SBRT
    Other Names:
  • SBRT
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Median FFLP [Up to 12 months]

      The time to freedom from local progression will be estimated by competing risk models with death and regional or distant progression as competing risks. Risk factors such as tumor size and institution will be tested in a multivariate Cox regression model adjusting for the competing risks.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Comparison of median freedom from extra hepatic progression [Up to 16 weeks]

      The time to freedom from extra hepatic progression will be estimated by competing risk models with death as a competing risk. Risk factors such as tumor size and institution will be tested in a multivariate Cox regression model adjusting for the competing risks.

    2. Median extra hepatic PFS for patients with tumors smaller than 3 cm and greater than 3 cm per treatment group [At 18 months]

      Extra hepatic PFS within each subgroup will be summarized by cumulative incidence function estimators adjusted for the competing risk of death or regional or distant progression.

    3. Median FFLP for patients with tumors smaller than 3 cm and with tumors greater than 3 cm per treatment group [At 18 months]

      FFLP within each subgroup will be summarized by cumulative incidence function estimators adjusted for the competing risk of death or regional or distant progression.

    4. Median OS [Time from randomization until death from any cause, assessed up to 3 years]

      Overall survival will be summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves and medians with 95% confidence intervals calculated using Greenwood's formula. Log rank tests will be used to compare treatment groups. Cox proportional hazard models will be used to estimate hazard ratios between treatment groups and to assess other risk factors, in particular the effect of tumor size and the impact of the different institutions.

    5. Median OS for patients with tumors smaller than 3 cm and greater than 3 cm per treatment group [At 18 months]

      Within each subgroup OS will be summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves and medians with 95% confidence intervals calculated using Greenwood's formula.

    6. Median PFS [Time from randomization until death or any progression including local, regional or distant progression, assessed up to 3 years]

      Progression free survival will be summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves and medians with 95% confidence intervals calculated using Greenwood's formula. Log rank tests will be used to compare treatment groups. Cox proportional hazard models will be used to estimate hazard ratios between treatment groups and to assess other risk factors, in particular the effect of tumor size and the impact of the different institutions.

    7. Median PFS for patients with tumors smaller than 3 cm and greater than 3 cm per treatment group [At 18 months]

      Within each subgroup PFS will be summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves and medians with 95% confidence intervals calculated using Greenwood's formula.

    8. Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein level (AFP) [Up to 18 months]

      The impact of elevated AFP level on time to event endpoints: FFLP, PFS, extra hepatic PFS and OS will be evaluated both in terms of the initial AFP level and on-study levels in a Cox proportional hazards model.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by one of the following:

    • Histopathology

    • One radiographic technique that confirms a lesion >= 1 cm with arterial hypervascularization with washout on delayed phase

    • Radiographic evidence of persistent, progressive, or recurrent disease in an area previously treated with TACE and determined from 3 months after initial TACE; this evaluation should be within 6 weeks of date of study eligibility

    • Unifocal liver tumors not to exceed 7.5 cm in greatest axial dimension; multifocal lesions will be restricted to lesions that can be treated within a single target volume within the same liver segment and to an aggregate of 10 cm as long as the dose constraints to normal tissue can be met

    • Eastern Clinical Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2

    • Patients with liver disease classified as Child Pugh class A or B, with score =< 9 ((within 4 weeks of treatment)

    • Life expectancy >= 6 months

    • Ability of the research subject or authorized legal representative to understand and have the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Prior radiotherapy to the upper abdomen

    • Prior radioembolization to the liver

    • Prior radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to index lesion

    • Liver transplant

    • Active gastrointestinal bleed within 2 weeks of study enrollment

    • Ascites refractory to medical therapy (mild to moderate ascites is allowed)

    • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

    • Administration of chemotherapy within the last 1 month

    • Extrahepatic metastases

    • Participation in another concurrent treatment protocol

    • Prior history of malignancy other than HCC, dermatologic basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Stanford University, School of Medicine Palo Alto California United States 94304
    2 Hokkaido University Hospital Sapporo Hokkaido Japan 060-8648

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Stanford University
    • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Daniel Chang, Stanford University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Stanford University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02762266
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • IRB-35937
    • NCI-2016-00418
    • P30CA124435
    • HEP0052
    First Posted:
    May 4, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 3, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 3, 2021