RANDOMET: Clinical Trial for Patients With a Stage IV Childhood Renal Tumor, Comparing Upfront Vincristine, Actinomycin-D and Doxorubicin (Standard Arm) With Upfront Vincristine, Carboplatin and Etoposide (Experimental Arm)

Sponsor
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03669783
Collaborator
(none)
110
2
96

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Nephroblastoma (Wilms tumor, WT) is the most common renal tumor of childhood representing ± 6% of all childhood malignancies. The diagnosis is established on clinical and radiological grounds. Metastases are visible on conventional imaging in at least 12% of nephroblastoma patients; however, an additional ~15% of patients have nodules on CT-scan only. The treatment consists of neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemotherapy, nephrectomy and risk-based adjuvant chemotherapy ± radiation therapy (RT) to the flank and/or metastases. For truly localized tumors, overall survival is > 85% (high risk histology excluded). Several high risk biological characteristics have been identified: diffuse anaplasia, gain of 1q chromosome, loss of heterozygosity 1p + 16q, blastemal residual volume.

For metastatic nephroblastoma, the standard neo-adjuvant chemotherapy includes 3 drugs:

vincristine, actinomycin-D and doxorubicin (VAD). Long-term survival is 82% (1). However, two issues arise. First, the use of doxorubicin ± concomitant RT might be associated with cardiac and pulmonary sequelae (4-17% of congestive heart failure) (2), and actinomycin-D is associated with hepatic toxicity (3). Second, patients with "CT-only" nodules are treated according to "localized disease". However, their outcome is poorer than that of truly "localized disease" (4-6).

The efficacy of carboplatin and etoposide is known for a long time; these drugs are used as second line treatment or for high-risk histology nephroblastoma. Therefore, an alternate chemotherapy has been designed that combines drugs shown as highly efficacious in nephroblastoma, i.e., Vincristine, Carboplatin and Etoposide (VCE). VCE has been used for the treatment of other pediatric malignancies. For metastatic nephroblastoma, the switch from VAD to VCE and the associated reduction of actinomycin-D and doxorubicin is expected to reduce the chemotherapy-related long-term toxicity. In addition, VCE could potentially decrease the rate of patients requiring pulmonary RT. Finally VCE may have a beneficial effect on tumor high risk biological characteristics.

French patients with nephroblastoma have been treated for > 40 years according to SIOP protocols collaborating in the SIOP Renal Tumour Study Group (SIOP-RTSG). This group has designed an international randomized phase III clinical trial for the evaluation of VCE versus VAD in patients with metastatic renal tumors (>>90% having nephroblastoma), in order to decrease the long-term toxicity while at least preserving, if not improving, the treatment efficacy. In addition, the issue of "CT-only" nodules and their adequate treatment needs to be solved. In previous protocols, the treatment strategy was based on the diagnosis of pulmonary metastases (~90% of all metastases) by conventional pulmonary X-ray. Central Radiological Review (CRR) is planned for the initial staging using CT ± MRI, as it is expected to more accurately detect patients with metastatic disease, including patients with "CT-only" nodules. In addition, CRR will be set up for real-time response assessment during treatment, in order to reliably determine who require pulmonary RT and which postoperative chemotherapy.

Therefore, the main trial objectives are:
  • Explore the non-inferiority (efficacy) of neoadjuvant VCE chemotherapy (experimental arm) as compared to the standard arm with VAD.

  • Provide central radiological review (CRR) at diagnosis and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in order to determine more precisely the appropriate treatment for each patient.

The primary objective of the RCT is to investigate the metastatic complete response rate (MetCR, including very good partial response (VGPR)) of neoadjuvant 6 weeks of VAD as compared to neoadjuvant VCE in stage IV renal tumours using CRR. Several international studies have shown that MetCR is a good surrogate endpoint for survival.

The postoperative treatment, secondary objectives as well as the intended methodology are detailed in the research project.

The total number of patients is 406 patients for the entire phase III trial running in the 12 major SIOP countries (max 110 patients in France).

The expected trial duration is 5 years for accrual + 2 years follow-up (the overall 10-year follow-up for long-term toxicity will be an independently funded ancillary study. This duration is required for a reliable evaluation of the cardiac toxicity).

The results of the current trial should be useful for the future protocols for the treatment of all patients with nephroblastoma (metastatic but also localized and bilateral).

The results of this RCT will be worthy for the entire international pediatric oncology community and future patients throughout the world and will be communicated in scientific congresses and high-level peer-reviewed journals.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: treatment Vincristin
  • Drug: treatment Actinomycin-D
  • Drug: treatment Doxorubicin
  • Drug: treatment Carboplatin
  • Drug: Etoposide
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
110 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Randomized Open-label Non-inferiority Phase 3 Clinical Trial for Patients With a Stage IV Childhood Renal Tumor, Comparing Upfront Vincristine, Actinomycin-D and Doxorubicin (Standard Arm) With Upfront Vincristine, Carboplatin and Etoposide (Experimental Arm)
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2026
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: treatment VAD

Vincristin, Actinomycin-D and Doxorubicin

Drug: treatment Vincristin
1 x Vincristin 1,5mg/m² iv bolus day 1 in week 1,2,3,4,5,6

Drug: treatment Actinomycin-D
1 x Actinomycin D 45µg/kg iv bolus day 1 in week 1, 3, 5

Drug: treatment Doxorubicin
1 x Doxorubicin 50mg/m² 6h Infusion day 1 in week 1,5

Experimental: treatment VCE

Vincristin, Carboplatin and Etoposide

Drug: treatment Vincristin
1 x Vincristin 1,5mg/m² iv bolus day 1 in week 1,2,3,4,5,6

Drug: treatment Carboplatin
1 x Carboplatin 200 mg/m² 1h infusion day 1,2,3 in week 1,4

Drug: Etoposide
1 x Etoposide 100mg/m² 1h infusion day 1,2,3 in week 1,4

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Metastatic response assessment by neoadjuvant chemotherapy only [6 weeks]

    percentage of patients with complete response (CR) or Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) of metastasis of nephroblastoma after 6 weeks of preoperative chemotherapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Secondary metastatic response assessment [6 weeks]

    percentage of patients after 6 weeks of preoperative chemotherapy achieving a CR after surgery of metastasis at time of nephrectomy

  2. Clinical outcome after treatment [2 and 5 years]

    stage of local tumor (for each arm)

  3. Histological response to preoperative treatment [6 weeks]

    stage distribution of local tumor histological subtype distribution of local tumor (low, intermediate or high risk (LR, IR, HR))

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A to 17 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • suffering from metastatic renal tumour at initial diagnosis

  • having at least one circumscript, non-calcified (pulmonary) nodule (or other lesion highly suspicious of metastasis according to criteria for metastatic disease) ≥ 3 mm as determined by chest CT-scan and abdominal CT-scan/MRI.

  • Metastatic disease must be confirmed by central review.

Exclusion Criteria:

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jean Olivier ARNAUD, Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03669783
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2018-07
First Posted:
Sep 13, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Sep 13, 2018
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2018
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 13, 2018