Ketamine-midazolam as a Sedative Agent in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Sponsor
National University of Malaysia (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06111872
Collaborator
(none)
90
1
2
11.4
7.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Does Ketamine-Midazolam have a better efficacy and safety profile compared to Midazolam - Pethidine in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?

Detailed Description

Ketamine- Midazolom is more efficacious in producing desired sedative state and have a better safety profile as a sedative agent in ERCP compared to Midazolam- Pethidine. The usage of sedative agent in ERCP depends on surgeon's preferences and availability of the drugs. The most commonly used sedatives in ERCP is Midazolam with pethidine. The use of Midazolam , however, is related to:

  1. 20-45% failure of sedation during ERCP

  2. Cardio-respiratory depression - apnoea: 15.4%, hypotension: 15.7%, bradycardia: 6.8%

Due to the proven efficacy and safety profile of ketamine-midazolam as a sedative agent in procedural sedation, the investigators propose that the use of ketamine-midazolam as a sedative agent in ERCP is more effective and better safety profile when compared to Midazolam- Pethidine. The synergistic effect means to reduce the total dose of midazolam used.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
90 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Patients will be randomized into the intervention or control group (Intervention group will receive Ketamine - Midazolam and control group will receive Midazolam- Pethidine as a sedative agent in ERCPPatients will be randomized into the intervention or control group (Intervention group will receive Ketamine - Midazolam and control group will receive Midazolam- Pethidine as a sedative agent in ERCP
Masking:
Single (Care Provider)
Masking Description:
Care provider is blinded from knowing the group of the study. However patients are informed regarding the drugs received
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Combination Use of Intravenous Ketamine-midazolam as a Sedative Agent in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ; A Randomized Control Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 18, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Ketamine - Midazolam arm

Initial IV Ketamine of 0.5mg/kg with IV Midazolam 0.02mg/kg given over 1 minute. If depth of sedation not adequate, to give another bolus of IV ketamine 0.25mg/kg after 2 minutes with IV Midazolam 0.01mg/kg. If depth of sedation not adequate, to give another bolus of IV Ketamine 0.25mg/kg after 2 minutes and IV Midazolam 0.01mg/kg. Failure of sedation: inadequate sedation for the intention to treat: patient will be arranged for MAC (monitored anaesthesia care) with anaesthesia team

Drug: Ketamine
Administration described in arm/ group description
Other Names:
  • KETAMINE- MIDAZOLAM
  • Drug: Midazolam
    Administration described in arm/ group description
    Other Names:
  • KETAMINE-MIDAZOLAM
  • Active Comparator: Midazolam - Pethidine arm

    Initial IV Midazolam 0.05mg/kg given over 1 minute with IV Pethidine 0.7mcg/kg. If depth of sedation not If adequate, to give another bolus of IV Midazolam 0.02mg/kg after 2 minutes and IV Pethidine 0.7mcg/kg. If depth of sedation not adequate, to give another bolus of IV Midazolam 0.02mg/kg after 2 minutes. Failure of sedation: inadequate sedation for the intention to treat: patient will be arranged for MAC (monitored anaesthesia care) with anaesthesia team.

    Drug: Midazolam
    Administration described in arm/ group description
    Other Names:
  • KETAMINE-MIDAZOLAM
  • Drug: Pethidin
    Administration described in arm/ group description
    Other Names:
  • MIDAZOLAM-PETHIDIN
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. To evaluate the efficacy of Ketamine- Midazolam as a sedative agent in ERCP in terms of sedation failure rate. [Evaluated at specific timepoints during the procedure which are: introduction of scope, canulation of bile duct, during sphincerotomy, trawling of stones, removal of stent and removal of scope]

      Sedation failure rate is defined as inability of the sedation used to adequately sedate a patient for initiation and completion of procedure using ramsay sedation scale where the scale is 1 to 6, where higher score is better. Score of 1 is determined as sedation failure.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. To compare pre and post procedure mean arterial pressure (MAP) [Measured at specific time-pointswhich are: pre-sedation, 2 minutes after initiation of sedation and 5 minutes after the procedure is completed]

      To detect if there are changes in MAP calculated from participants blood pressure readings

    2. To compare surgeon satisfaction in terms of sedation quality between both arms using a likert scale of 1 to 5 where a higher score is better [Single point asessment at the end of the procedure]

      Measured using likert scale

    3. To compare participant satisfaction in terms of procedure experience between both groups using likert scale of 1 to 10 where the higher score is better [Single point asessment at 2 hours after completion of procedure]

      Measured using likert scale

    4. To compare the number of participants that developed an adverse event that led to abandonment of procedure [Evaluated at specific timepoints during the procedure which are: introduction of scope, canulation of bile duct, during sphincerotomy, trawling of stones, removal of stent and removal of scope]

      Adverse event by monitoring patient vital signs including blood pressure, pulse rate, oxygen saturation and procedure will be abandoned if the parameters reach a pre-set cut-off point. Systolic blood pressure <90mmHg or >180mmHg, Pulse rate of <60/min or >150/min and oxygen saturation <95% despite supplemental oxygen therapy via nasal canula.

    5. To compare the depth of sedation [Evaluated at specific timepoints during the procedure whch are: introduction of scope, canulation of bile duct, during sphincerotomy, trawling of stones, removal of stent and removal of scope]

      The depth of sedation is evaluated using ramsay sedation scale where the scale is 1 to 6, where higher score is better

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Adults > 18 years old which able to give valid consent

    • Patient planned for ERCP (either emergency or elective)

    • American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) score of I-III

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Known hypersensitivity towards Ketamine or Midazolam

    • Increased intracranial pressure, acute stroke (<3 months), intracranial haemorrhage (<3 months)

    • Severe hypertension (BP>170/110) and tachycardia (Heart rate >110)

    • Acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome (< 6 months)

    • Tachyarrhythmia

    • Pregnancy

    • Intravenous drug user (IVDU) or substance abuse patient

    • History of hallucination

    • Child's Pugh class C

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM Cheras Kuala Lumpur Malaysia 56000

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • National University of Malaysia

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Azlanudin Azman, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Prof Madya Dr. Azlanudin Azman, Associate Professor, National University of Malaysia
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT06111872
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • JEP-2023-272
    First Posted:
    Nov 1, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 1, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2023
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Prof Madya Dr. Azlanudin Azman, Associate Professor, National University of Malaysia
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Nov 1, 2023