Ketamine-midazolam as a Sedative Agent in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Does Ketamine-Midazolam have a better efficacy and safety profile compared to Midazolam - Pethidine in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
Ketamine- Midazolom is more efficacious in producing desired sedative state and have a better safety profile as a sedative agent in ERCP compared to Midazolam- Pethidine. The usage of sedative agent in ERCP depends on surgeon's preferences and availability of the drugs. The most commonly used sedatives in ERCP is Midazolam with pethidine. The use of Midazolam , however, is related to:
-
20-45% failure of sedation during ERCP
-
Cardio-respiratory depression - apnoea: 15.4%, hypotension: 15.7%, bradycardia: 6.8%
Due to the proven efficacy and safety profile of ketamine-midazolam as a sedative agent in procedural sedation, the investigators propose that the use of ketamine-midazolam as a sedative agent in ERCP is more effective and better safety profile when compared to Midazolam- Pethidine. The synergistic effect means to reduce the total dose of midazolam used.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Ketamine - Midazolam arm Initial IV Ketamine of 0.5mg/kg with IV Midazolam 0.02mg/kg given over 1 minute. If depth of sedation not adequate, to give another bolus of IV ketamine 0.25mg/kg after 2 minutes with IV Midazolam 0.01mg/kg. If depth of sedation not adequate, to give another bolus of IV Ketamine 0.25mg/kg after 2 minutes and IV Midazolam 0.01mg/kg. Failure of sedation: inadequate sedation for the intention to treat: patient will be arranged for MAC (monitored anaesthesia care) with anaesthesia team |
Drug: Ketamine
Administration described in arm/ group description
Other Names:
Drug: Midazolam
Administration described in arm/ group description
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Midazolam - Pethidine arm Initial IV Midazolam 0.05mg/kg given over 1 minute with IV Pethidine 0.7mcg/kg. If depth of sedation not If adequate, to give another bolus of IV Midazolam 0.02mg/kg after 2 minutes and IV Pethidine 0.7mcg/kg. If depth of sedation not adequate, to give another bolus of IV Midazolam 0.02mg/kg after 2 minutes. Failure of sedation: inadequate sedation for the intention to treat: patient will be arranged for MAC (monitored anaesthesia care) with anaesthesia team. |
Drug: Midazolam
Administration described in arm/ group description
Other Names:
Drug: Pethidin
Administration described in arm/ group description
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- To evaluate the efficacy of Ketamine- Midazolam as a sedative agent in ERCP in terms of sedation failure rate. [Evaluated at specific timepoints during the procedure which are: introduction of scope, canulation of bile duct, during sphincerotomy, trawling of stones, removal of stent and removal of scope]
Sedation failure rate is defined as inability of the sedation used to adequately sedate a patient for initiation and completion of procedure using ramsay sedation scale where the scale is 1 to 6, where higher score is better. Score of 1 is determined as sedation failure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- To compare pre and post procedure mean arterial pressure (MAP) [Measured at specific time-pointswhich are: pre-sedation, 2 minutes after initiation of sedation and 5 minutes after the procedure is completed]
To detect if there are changes in MAP calculated from participants blood pressure readings
- To compare surgeon satisfaction in terms of sedation quality between both arms using a likert scale of 1 to 5 where a higher score is better [Single point asessment at the end of the procedure]
Measured using likert scale
- To compare participant satisfaction in terms of procedure experience between both groups using likert scale of 1 to 10 where the higher score is better [Single point asessment at 2 hours after completion of procedure]
Measured using likert scale
- To compare the number of participants that developed an adverse event that led to abandonment of procedure [Evaluated at specific timepoints during the procedure which are: introduction of scope, canulation of bile duct, during sphincerotomy, trawling of stones, removal of stent and removal of scope]
Adverse event by monitoring patient vital signs including blood pressure, pulse rate, oxygen saturation and procedure will be abandoned if the parameters reach a pre-set cut-off point. Systolic blood pressure <90mmHg or >180mmHg, Pulse rate of <60/min or >150/min and oxygen saturation <95% despite supplemental oxygen therapy via nasal canula.
- To compare the depth of sedation [Evaluated at specific timepoints during the procedure whch are: introduction of scope, canulation of bile duct, during sphincerotomy, trawling of stones, removal of stent and removal of scope]
The depth of sedation is evaluated using ramsay sedation scale where the scale is 1 to 6, where higher score is better
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Adults > 18 years old which able to give valid consent
-
Patient planned for ERCP (either emergency or elective)
-
American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) score of I-III
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Known hypersensitivity towards Ketamine or Midazolam
-
Increased intracranial pressure, acute stroke (<3 months), intracranial haemorrhage (<3 months)
-
Severe hypertension (BP>170/110) and tachycardia (Heart rate >110)
-
Acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome (< 6 months)
-
Tachyarrhythmia
-
Pregnancy
-
Intravenous drug user (IVDU) or substance abuse patient
-
History of hallucination
-
Child's Pugh class C
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM | Cheras | Kuala Lumpur | Malaysia | 56000 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- National University of Malaysia
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Azlanudin Azman, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Goudra B, Nuzat A, Singh PM, Borle A, Carlin A, Gouda G. Association between Type of Sedation and the Adverse Events Associated with Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: An Analysis of 5 Years' Data from a Tertiary Center in the USA. Clin Endosc. 2017 Mar;50(2):161-169. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.019. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
- Jung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R, Brackertz A. Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam. Endoscopy. 2000 Mar;32(3):233-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-96.
- Narayanan S, Shannon A, Nandalan S, Jaitly V, Greer S. Alternative sedation for the higher risk endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial of ketamine use in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(10):1293-303. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1036113. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
- Tobias JD, Leder M. Procedural sedation: A review of sedative agents, monitoring, and management of complications. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;5(4):395-410. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.87270.
- Tokmak S, Cetin MF, Torun S. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the very elderly by using a combination of intravenous midazolam, ketamine and pethidine. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Oct;21(10):887-892. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14252. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
- JEP-2023-272