Etomidate vs. Midazolam for Sedation During ERCP
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Recently up-coming drug, etomidate which is a modulator of GABA(gamma-Aminobutyric acid)-A receptor has been known that it maintains the appropriate sedative levels and affects little effects on respiratory system.
The investigators are now trying to investigate that etomidate with meperidine combination regimen is superior to the midazolam with meperidine more effective and less harm on sedation during the ERCP procedure.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram) is an uncomfortable and time-consuming procedure compared to other endoscopic procedures. Most ERCP procedure had been performed in sedation using tranquilizers and pain-killers.
Until recently, midazolam and opioid combination regimen recognized as a standard therapy is widely used, but the sedative effect is insufficient and intermittent paradoxical reaction has been questioned. Another drug, such as propofol, has been known that the sedative effect is superior one of the midazolam but disappointed due to narrow therapeutic range of respiratory distress and absence of antagonist. Meanwhile, recently up-coming drug, etomidate which is a modulator of GABA-A receptor has been known that it maintains the appropriate sedative levels and affects little effects on respiratory system.
For these advantages, this short acting sedative drug has been widely used in the emergency room during minor operation and in the operation room for induction. However, research on the efficacy during ERCP was not yet published.
In this regards, the purpose of the investigators study is to prove the efficacy of etomidate for sedation and to establish new evidence based sedation guidelines during ERCP procedure.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Etomidate This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. |
Drug: Etomidate
This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted.
Other Names:
Drug: Meperidine
Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Midazolam This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. |
Drug: Midazolam
This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%.
Drug: Meperidine
Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Intervention [Throughout the whole ERCP procedure]
The frequency of intervention which was defined as any restraint of the patient's head, arms, or legs if they became agitated, or if patient movement was not controlled with verbal instruction from the endoscopist during the whole intraoperative phases.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Event of Hypoxia [Every 5min in Preoperative, intraoperative phase and 15 min in Recovery phase]
Hypoxia defined as peripheral blood oxygen saturation measured by pulse oxymeter < 90%
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
All patients who are scheduled diagnositic or therapeutic ERCP.
-
Age : more than 20 and less than 90 years old
-
ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists) classificiation : I, II, III
Exclusion Criteria:Patients following
-
Refuse to be enrolled
-
ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists)classification IV, V
-
Breast feeder
-
The mentally ill
-
Drug abuser
-
Hypersensitivity to sedative or opioids
-
Alcohol intoxication or dependency
-
Body mass index (BMI) 36kg/m2 or more
-
Unstable vital sign
-
tachypnea, respiration rate more than 25/min or less than 10/min
-
Oxygen saturation : 90% or less
-
Systolic blood pressure : less than 90 mmHg or more than 180 mmHg
-
Diastolic blood pressure : less than 50 mmHg or more than 100 mmHg
-
Heart rate : more than 120 beat/min or less than 50 beat/min.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1Digestive Disease Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Cheju Halla General Hospital | Jeju-si | Jeju Special Self-Governing Province | Korea, Republic of | 690-766 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Cheju Halla General Hospital
Investigators
- Study Chair: BYUNG HYO CHA, Dr., Cheju Halla General Hospital, Doreongno 65, Jeju-si Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, Korea 690-766
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Bell GD. Review article: premedication and intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1990 Apr;4(2):103-22. Review.
- Carrasco G. Instruments for monitoring intensive care unit sedation. Crit Care. 2000;4(4):217-25. Epub 2000 Jul 13. Review.
- Chen WX, Lin HJ, Zhang WF, Gu Q, Zhong XQ, Yu CH, Li YM, Gu ZY. Sedation and safety of propofol for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2005 Aug;4(3):437-40.
- Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, Benson AA, Miller KM, Durkalski V, Aisenberg J. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 May;101(5):967-74.
- Denny MA, Manson R, Della-Giustina D. Propofol and Etomidate are Safe for Deep Sedation in the Emergency Department. West J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;12(4):399-403. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.5.2099.
- Falk J, Zed PJ. Etomidate for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(7-8):1272-7. Epub 2004 Jun 1. Review.
- Fanti L, Agostoni M, Casati A, Guslandi M, Giollo P, Torri G, Testoni PA. Target-controlled propofol infusion during monitored anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep;60(3):361-6.
- Frade Mera MJ, Guirao Moya A, Esteban Sánchez ME, Rivera Alvarez J, Cruz Ramos AM, Bretones Chorro B, Viñas Sánchez S, Jacue Izquierdo S, Montane López M. [Analysis of 4 sedation rating scales in the critical patient]. Enferm Intensiva. 2009 Jul-Sep;20(3):88-94. Spanish.
- Galletly D, Forrest P, Purdie G. Comparison of the recovery characteristics of diazepam and midazolam. Br J Anaesth. 1988 Apr;60(5):520-4.
- Honan VJ. Paradoxical reaction to midazolam and control with flumazenil. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994 Jan-Feb;40(1):86-8.
- Hunt GS, Spencer MT, Hays DP. Etomidate and midazolam for procedural sedation: prospective, randomized trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2005 May;23(3):299-303.
- Jung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R, Brackertz A. Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam. Endoscopy. 2000 Mar;32(3):233-8.
- Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R, Punyathavorn S, Sitthi-Amorn C, Ponauthai Y, Prempracha N, Kullavanijaya P. Propofol infusion versus intermittent meperidine and midazolam injection for conscious sedation in ERCP. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008 Sep;17(3):291-7.
- Ladas SD, Aabakken L, Rey JF, Nowak A, Zakaria S, Adamonis K, Amrani N, Bergman JJ, Boix Valverde J, Boyacioglu S, Cremers I, Crowe J, Deprez P, Díte P, Eisen M, Eliakim R, Fedorov ED, Galkova Z, Gyokeres T, Heuss LT, Husic-Selimovic A, Khediri F, Kuznetsov K, Marek T, Munoz-Navas M, Napoleon B, Niemela S, Pascu O, Perisic N, Pulanic R, Ricci E, Schreiber F, Svendsen LB, Sweidan W, Sylvan A, Teague R, Tryfonos M, Urbain D, Weber J, Zavoral M; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey of National Endoscopy Society Members. Use of sedation for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey of National Endoscopy Society Members. Digestion. 2006;74(2):69-77. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
- Mandt MJ, Roback MG, Bajaj L, Galinkin JL, Gao D, Wathen JE. Etomidate for short pediatric procedures in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Sep;28(9):898-904. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318267c768.
- Miner JR, Martel ML, Meyer M, Reardon R, Biros MH. Procedural sedation of critically ill patients in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;12(2):124-8.
- Radaelli F, Meucci G, Terruzzi V, Spinzi G, Imperiali G, Strocchi E, Lenoci N, Terreni N, Mandelli G, Minoli G. Single bolus of midazolam versus bolus midazolam plus meperidine for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Mar;57(3):329-35.
- Reimann FM, Samson U, Derad I, Fuchs M, Schiefer B, Stange EF. Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2000 Mar;32(3):239-44.
- Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, Ceraso D, Wisemandle W, Koura F, Whitten P, Margolis BD, Byrne DW, Ely EW, Rocha MG; SEDCOM (Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared With Midazolam) Study Group. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):489-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
- Riphaus A, Rabofski M, Wehrmann T. Endoscopic sedation and monitoring practice in Germany: results from the first nationwide survey. Z Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;48(3):392-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109765. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
- Ruth WJ, Burton JH, Bock AJ. Intravenous etomidate for procedural sedation in emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;8(1):13-8.
- Sipe BW, Rex DK, Latinovich D, Overley C, Kinser K, Bratcher L, Kareken D. Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):815-25. Erratum in: Gastrointest Endosc 2002 Aug;56(2):324.
- Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Lichtenstein DR, Jagannath S, Baron TH, Anderson MA, Banerjee S, Dominitz JA, Fanelli RD, Gan SI, Harrison ME, Ikenberry SO, Shen B, Stewart L, Khan K, Vargo JJ. Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Nov;68(5):815-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.029.
- Terui T, Inomata M. Administration of additional analgesics can decrease the incidence of paradoxical reactions in patients under benzodiazepine-induced sedation during endoscopic transpapillary procedures: prospective randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc. 2013 Jan;25(1):53-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
- Yamazaki N, Ogawa K. [Dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH)]. Kokyu To Junkan. 1976 Nov;24(11):949-55. Japanese.
- Yüksel O, Parlak E, Köklü S, Ertugrul I, Tunç B, Sahin B. Conscious sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: midazolam or midazolam plus meperidine? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Nov;19(11):1002-6.
- ETOMI-1
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Eligibility was evaluated for all patients with a scheduled ERCP procedure in the Cheju Halla General Hospital during the study period from May 15 2013 to Aug 19 2013. Sample size estimated 26 of each groups for reject null hypothesis with probability (power) 0.8 and Type I error is 0.05. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 68 patients were enrolled and 35 were assigned in the MDZ group and 33 were in the ETM group. In ETM group, 1 case was dropped due to hypotension and 2 were desaturation. And 1 cases was dropped due to tachycardia and 1 were desaturation in MDZ group. |
Arm/Group Title | Etomidate | Midazolam |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Etomidate: This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus. | This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Midazolam: This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 33 | 35 |
COMPLETED | 30 | 33 |
NOT COMPLETED | 3 | 2 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Etomidate | Midazolam | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Etomidate: This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus. | This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Midazolam: This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 30 | 33 | 63 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
70.3
(15.7)
|
71.6
(11.5)
|
70.9
(13.8)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
16
53.3%
|
19
57.6%
|
35
55.6%
|
Male |
14
46.7%
|
14
42.4%
|
28
44.4%
|
Body Mass Index (kg/square of m.) (kg/square of m.) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/square of m.] |
23.7
(3.5)
|
22.6
(4.31)
|
23.1
(3.9)
|
Procedure Time (min) (min) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [min] |
27.6
(14.9)
|
32.8
(13.4)
|
30.4
(14.2)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Intervention |
---|---|
Description | The frequency of intervention which was defined as any restraint of the patient's head, arms, or legs if they became agitated, or if patient movement was not controlled with verbal instruction from the endoscopist during the whole intraoperative phases. |
Time Frame | Throughout the whole ERCP procedure |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Etomidate | Midazolam |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Etomidate: This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus. | This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Midazolam: This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 33 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Number of intervention] |
1.9
(3.1)
|
7.5
(6.8)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Etomidate, Midazolam |
---|---|---|
Comments | If the true difference in the experimental and control means is 4, total 26 experimental subjects and 26 control subjects was required to reject the null hypothesis that the means of the primary outcome values of experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 0.8. The Type I error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.05. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.05 |
Comments | For two-sided tests, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | Logistic regression model used to identify the factors related to the presence of intervention (frequency of intervention = 0, vs. ≥ 1). |
Title | Event of Hypoxia |
---|---|
Description | Hypoxia defined as peripheral blood oxygen saturation measured by pulse oxymeter < 90% |
Time Frame | Every 5min in Preoperative, intraoperative phase and 15 min in Recovery phase |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Midazolam | Etomidate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Midazolam: This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus. | This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Etomidate: This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus. |
Measure Participants | 33 | 30 |
Number [Hypoxia events] |
19
|
27
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Etomidate, Midazolam |
---|---|---|
Comments | All the continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and dichotomous categorical variables was used and the Pearson chi-square with Fisher exact test. We used the linear mixed model to compare the differences of paired data, such as mean values of RR, SpO2, MAP, HR, and RSS at different time points of the two different sedation groups. For two-sided tests, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.002 |
Comments | Logistic regression model were used in univariate and corrected multivariate analyses to identify the factors related to the primary outcome variables, such as, presence of intervention (frequency of intervention = 0, vs. ≥ 1). | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 11.09 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 2.41 to 50.94 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | BP, RR, HR, and SpO2 were monitored at 5-minute intervals after the baseline measurements until the termination of the ERCP. The baseline measurements were obtained at least 15 minutes before any medication was administered to patients. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Additional probable side events, such as, paradoxic reaction in MDZ group, and myoclonus in ETM group were counted during the whole 3 phases of procedure. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Etomidate | Midazolam | ||
Arm/Group Description | This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Etomidate: This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus. | This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Midazolam: This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders > 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Etomidate | Midazolam | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Etomidate | Midazolam | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/30 (0%) | 0/33 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Etomidate | Midazolam | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/30 (0%) | 0/33 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Byung Hyo Cha, Director of ETOMI-1 study |
---|---|
Organization | Digestive Disease Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Cheju Halla General Hospital |
Phone | +82-64-740-8050 |
drhyo@hotmail.com |
- ETOMI-1