STALL vs Sole Local Wound Infiltration in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This trial is a prospective randomized superiority trial comparing sole ropivacaine based local trocar site infiltration to local infiltration combined with laparoscopic ropivacaine TAP block (STALL) in LCC.
There are only a few randomized trials comparing sole local anesthesia to additional laparoscopic TAP block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and they have yet failed to show evidence in favor of TAP block.
We hypothesize STALL (Single Transversus Abdominis Laparoscopy-guided plane block combined with Local trocar site ropivacaine infiltration) is superior to local port site infiltration, provided that the sample size is sufficiently big.
The aim of this randomized study is to compare the efficacy of sole local anesthesia of trocar sites to STALL in LCC.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Daycare: STALL Local ropivacaine infiltration + laparoscopically controlled TAP (transversus abdominis plane block). Daycare patients. |
Procedure: single transversus abdominis laparoscopy-guided plane block
please see arm/group descriptions
Other Names:
Procedure: local trocar site ropivacaine infiltration
please see arm/group descriptions
|
Active Comparator: Daycare: local only Local ropivacaine infiltration only. Daycare patients. |
Procedure: local trocar site ropivacaine infiltration
please see arm/group descriptions
|
Experimental: In-patient: STALL Local ropivacaine infiltration + laparoscopically controlled TAP. In-patient surgery. |
Procedure: single transversus abdominis laparoscopy-guided plane block
please see arm/group descriptions
Other Names:
Procedure: local trocar site ropivacaine infiltration
please see arm/group descriptions
|
Active Comparator: In-patient: local only Local ropivacaine infiltration only. In-patient surgery. |
Procedure: local trocar site ropivacaine infiltration
please see arm/group descriptions
|
Experimental: Emergency: STALL Local ropivacaine infiltration + laparoscopically controlled TAP. Emergency patients. |
Procedure: single transversus abdominis laparoscopy-guided plane block
please see arm/group descriptions
Other Names:
Procedure: local trocar site ropivacaine infiltration
please see arm/group descriptions
|
Active Comparator: Emergency: local only Local ropivacaine infiltration only. Emergency patients. |
Procedure: local trocar site ropivacaine infiltration
please see arm/group descriptions
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- cumulative opioid consumption during the stay at the recovery [duration of stay at the recovery (estimated 1-4 hours)]
all groups; mg, morphine equivalent
Secondary Outcome Measures
- maximum NRS score during the day of surgery, after discharge (daycare / outpatient) [30 min after surgery, every 60 min afterwards; 2 days]
NRS (Numerical Rating Scale): 0-10
- cumulative opioid consumption (emergency and inpatient surgery) [while admitted; est. 2 days]
mg, morphine equivalent
Other Outcome Measures
- maximum NRS score during the stay at the recovery [until the patient is either discharged to ward or home (day surgery patients), est. 1-4 hours]
0-10
- average NRS score during the stay at the recovery [duration of stay at the recovery, est. 1-4 hours]
0-10
- NRS score in multiple time points [every hour until discharge and at discharge = "ready to go" / "ready for transfer" (during in-hospital care), est. 48 hours]
if awake
- procedure time [minutes; est. 60 - 180 minutes]
min
- time necessary in recovery room [minutes; est. 60 - 260 min]
min, (= "patient ready to be discharged" timestamp OR "patient ready for transfer")
- complications related to the use of local anesthetics [est. 0 - 7 days]
TAP + port site infiltration complications (as per trial plan) + other complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification
- patient general satisfaction with pain management [prespecified: about 4 hours, 2 days, 7 days, 30 days]
using questionnaires, multiple timepoints: recovery stay, hospital stay, discharge, feedback after 7 days
- time from surgery to discharge [est. 2 - 48 hours]
min
- number of patients contacting the hospital regarding inadequate pain management [after discharge and before day 30]
n
- prevalence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and difference in subgroups [est. 0 - 4 (8) hours]
n; %
- difference in NRS (if any) between patients received remifentanil or fentanyl intraoperatively [0 - 4 hours]
delta
- difference in NRS (if any) between patients received propofol or sevoflurane maintenance. [0- 4 hours]
delta
- pain-control failure & possible causes [acute: 0 - 2 days; chronic: t+30 days]
APS (acute pain service) contact, admission of DS subgroup patient to the ward due to pain, failure to discharge
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients scheduled for elective or emergency LCC, aged over 18 and able to give an informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 years, chronic daily opioid and/or pain tolerance / pain threshold -modifying medication use (abuse), pregnancy, known allergy to local anesthetics, diagnosed severe coagulopathy and incapability to give informed consent for whatever reason.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Helsinki University Central Hospital
Investigators
- Study Director: Henna Sammalkorpi, MD, PhD, Helsinki UCH
- Study Director: Hanna Lampela, MD, PhD, Helsinki UCH
- Study Director: Jukka Harju, MD, PhD, Doc, Helsinki UCH
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Bava EP, Ramachandran R, Rewari V, Chandralekha, Bansal VK, Trikha A. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local anesthetic infiltration in adult patients undergoing single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):561-567. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186620.
- Breazu CM, Ciobanu L, Hadade A, Bartos A, Mitre C, Mircea PA, Ionescu D. The efficacy of oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a prospective, placebo controlled study. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016 Apr;23(1):12-18. doi: 10.21454/rjaic.7518.231.obq.
- Bumblyte V, Rasilainen SK, Ehrlich A, Scheinin T, Kontinen VK, Sevon A, Vaaraniemi H, Schramko AA. Purely ropivacaine-based TEA vs single TAP block in pain management after elective laparoscopic colon surgery within an upgraded institutional ERAS program. Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3323-3331. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08647-z. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
- Elamin G, Waters PS, Hamid H, O'Keeffe HM, Waldron RM, Duggan M, Khan W, Barry MK, Khan IZ. Efficacy of a Laparoscopically Delivered Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Technique during Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
- Loizides S, Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M, Rossi M, Guerrini GP, Davidson BR. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 12;(3):CD007049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007049.pub2.
- Ortiz J, Suliburk JW, Wu K, Bailard NS, Mason C, Minard CG, Palvadi RR. Bilateral transversus abdominis plane block does not decrease postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy when compared with local anesthetic infiltration of trocar insertion sites. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;37(2):188-92. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318244851b.
- Peng K, Ji FH, Liu HY, Wu SR. Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(3):237-46. doi: 10.1159/000444688. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
- Peng W, Huang S, Zhou S, Yang N, Zuo M. Case report: life-threatening coronary artery spasm under transversus abdominis plane block in combination with general anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0616-3.
- Ravichandran NT, Sistla SC, Kundra P, Ali SM, Dhanapal B, Galidevara I. Laparoscopic-assisted Tranversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Ultrasonography-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Postlaparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pain Relief: Randomized Controlled Trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):228-232. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000405.
- Ruiz-Tovar J, Garcia A, Ferrigni C, Gonzalez J, Levano-Linares C, Jimenez-Fuertes M, Llavero C, Duran M. Laparoscopic-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of Multimodal Analgesia in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Obes Surg. 2018 Nov;28(11):3374-3379. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3376-8.
- Salaria ON, Kannan M, Kerner B, Goldman H. A Rare Complication of a TAP Block Performed after Caesarean Delivery. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2017;2017:1072576. doi: 10.1155/2017/1072576. Epub 2017 Oct 29.
- Siriwardana RC, Kumarage SK, Gunathilake BM, Thilakarathne SB, Wijesinghe JS. Local infiltration versus laparoscopic-guided transverse abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: double-blinded randomized control trial. Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):179-183. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6291-0. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
- Tolchard S, Davies R, Martindale S. Efficacy of the subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparison with conventional port-site infiltration. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;28(3):339-43. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.98331.
- 7351