CHIROPMEV: Impact of Mulstidisciplinary Medication Assessment Review in Surgery Departments

Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03827031
Collaborator
(none)
297
3
3
4.5
99
22.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The presence of a clinical pharmacist (for their pharmacological expertise) and a general practitioner (for their somatic expertise) in surgery departments would contribute to improve the management of medications in elderly patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Mutlidisciplinary medication Review (MMR)
  • Other: Mutlidisciplinary medication Review (MMR) with community pharmacist follow-up
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
297 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Implementation and Impact of Multidisciplinary Medication Review in Surgery Departments on Medication Management of Elderly Patients
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 18, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Control group

Experimental: B1 interventional group

Other: Mutlidisciplinary medication Review (MMR)
The clinical pharmacist performs medication reconciliation and pharmaceutical analysis. The physician performs a clinical examination and analysis of the medical record. Both participate in a collaborative interview. The hospital physician calls the community pharamcist to discuss proposed changes on the order and to establish a new prescription. At the end of the stay, the clinical pharmacist will conduct an exit interview with the patient. Three months after discharge, the patient's community pharmacist will be contacted to assess whether the changes proposed in the MMR were accepted

Experimental: B2 interventional group

Other: Mutlidisciplinary medication Review (MMR)
The clinical pharmacist performs medication reconciliation and pharmaceutical analysis. The physician performs a clinical examination and analysis of the medical record. Both participate in a collaborative interview. The hospital physician calls the community pharamcist to discuss proposed changes on the order and to establish a new prescription. At the end of the stay, the clinical pharmacist will conduct an exit interview with the patient. Three months after discharge, the patient's community pharmacist will be contacted to assess whether the changes proposed in the MMR were accepted

Other: Mutlidisciplinary medication Review (MMR) with community pharmacist follow-up
Multidisciplinary medication review (MMR) The clinical pharmacist performs medication reconciliation and pharmaceutical analysis. The physician performs a clinical examination and analysis of the medical record. Both participate in a collaborative interview. The hospital physician calls the community physician to discuss proposed changes on the order and to establish a new prescription. At the end of the stay, the clinical pharmacist will conduct an exit interview with the patient. Community follow-up A summary of the follow-up report stating the therapeutic modifications (called below multidisciplinary correspondence documents) will be sent to the community pharmacist and physician. Within 2 months of discharge, the pharmacist performs a follow-up of medication changes accepted and not accepted by the community physician. Three months after discharge, the patient's community pharmacist will be contacted to assess whether the changes proposed in the MMR were accepted.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in iatrogenic drug risk in intervention groups versus control group [3 months after hospitalization]

    Proportion of patients transitioning from intermediate or high to low risk according to Trivalle score (a score between 0-10. A score 0-1 constitutes a low ADE risk (12%), score 2-5 represents an average risk (32%), and a score 6-10 represents a high risk (53%)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Proportion of proposed medication modifications made by the clinical pharmacist accepted by the clinical doctor during the Multidisciplinary Medication Review in the experimental groups [Hospital discharge (maximum 30 days)]

    Number of modifications accepted/number of modifications proposed

  2. Number of potentially inappropriate medications per patient in each group [Hospital discharge (maximum 30 days)]

  3. Proportion of proposed medication modifications made by the collaborative team accepted and/or made permanent [3 months after hospital discharge]

    Number of modifications accepted/number of modifications proposed

  4. Number of potentially inappropriate medications per patient in each group [3 months after hospital discharge]

  5. Time required for Multidisciplinary Medication Review in the interventional groups (B1 and B2) [Hospital discharge (maximum 30 days)]

    Hours

  6. Time required for ransmitting multidisciplinary correspondence documents in B2 group [Hospital discharge (maximum 30 days)]

    Hours

  7. Number of multidisciplinary correspondence documents sent to the community acotors in B2 group [Hospital discharge (maximum 30 days)]

  8. Description of mode of diffusion of multidisciplinary correspondence documents in the B2 group [Hospital discharge (maximum 30 days)]

    email, fax or letter

  9. Description of reason for non-transmission of multidisciplinary correspondence documents in the B2 group [Hospital discharge (maximum 30 days)]

  10. Rate of patients for whom a follow-up review of proposed medication changes has been performed by the pharmacist in the B2 group [2 months post discharge]

  11. Number of multidisciplinary correspondence documents transmitted by community pharmacist in group B2 [2 months post hospital discharge]

  12. Rate of patients with at least one rehospitalization in each group [3 months after hospital discharge]

  13. Mortality rate in each group [3 months after hospital discharge]

  14. Healthcare team satisfaction in interventional groups (B1, B2) [3 months after hospital discharge]

    Custom-built 7-part questionnaire

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
65 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • The patient (or their representative) has given his consent and signed the consent form.

  • The patient is affiliated to a health insurance programme.

  • The patient is at least 65 years old (≥) treated by at least (≥) five medications for at least (≥) 6 months

  • The patient is available for a follow-up of 3 months.

  • The patient is hospitalized in the surgery department.

  • Patient with a Trivalle score greater than or equal to 2 (≥).

  • Patient living in a nursing home or going back home after hospitalization.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • The subject is participating in another category I interventional study.

  • The subject is in an exclusion period determined by another study.

  • The subject is under safeguard of justice.

  • It is not possible to give the patient (or his/her trusted-person) informed information.

  • Palliative care

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU de Montpellier Montpellier France
2 Nimes University Hospital Nîmes France 30029
3 CHU de Toulouse Toulouse France

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Marie Kinowski, Nîmes University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03827031
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • NIMAO/2017-02/JMK-01
First Posted:
Feb 1, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Jul 22, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 22, 2022