Feasibility of a Mobile Application to Support Reflection and Dialog About Strengths in People With Chronic Illness

Sponsor
Oslo University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03437863
Collaborator
South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (Other), Diakonhjemmet Hospital (Other)
12
1
1
5.1
2.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Self-management of chronic illness can be highly demanding and people need to mobilize their personal strengths in order to live well with their condition. A mobile application was designed in collaboration with people with chronic illness and health care providers with the aims to support awareness of patients' strengths and patient-provider dialogues that include strengths. The aim of the present study is to evaluate with mixed methods the perceived usefulness and usability of the application and potential effects of the application on patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Mobile application
N/A

Detailed Description

In this pre-post design pilot study participants will be recruited from self-management courses for people with rheumatic diseases. Before using the application participants will be asked to report their strengths in a written format. After using the mobile application to reflect on their strengths the participants will be interviewed about their experience of using the application and on the task of reflecting on their strengths. They will also be asked to fill out a questionnaire on perceived usefulness and user-friendliness. Before and after using the application the participants fill out questionnaires on emotions (Positive and Negative Affective Scale) and self-efficacy (The Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale). All interviews will be audio-taped and analyzed with a qualitative approach. Descriptive analysis will be applied for quantitative data.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
12 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Participants will be recruited to a pre-post design study.Participants will be recruited to a pre-post design study.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Device Feasibility
Official Title:
Capitalizing on the Strengths of Persons With Rheumatoid Arthritis to Improve Health and Wellness
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 18, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 20, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 20, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Mobile application

Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals.

Device: Mobile application
Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Perceived Usefulness of the Application [Within an hour after using the application]

    Study-specific questions on perceived usefulness of the application

  2. The System Usability Scale [Within an hour after using the application]

    This 10 item questionnaire measures usability. Each item has 5 response options with total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher values represent a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. [Pre-intervention and post-intervention, within an hour after using the application]

    This scale measures positive and negative affect with two subscales (positive affect and negative affect). Positive affect subscale scores can range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. Negative affect subscale scores can range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

  2. The Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale [Pre-intervention and post-intervention, within an hour after using the application]

    This scale measures self-efficacy with two subscales with 5 response options. The "pain" subscale has 5 items and a score range from 0 to 20. The "other symptoms" subscale has 6 items and a score range from 0 to 24. Higher scores equal higher levels of self-efficacy.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Setting 1:
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age of 18 years or older

  • Can read and speak Norwegian language

  • Diagnosed with a chronic condition

  • Participating or having recently participated in a learning and mastery or an outpatient rehabilitation program

No exclusion criteria

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Diakonhjemmet Hospital Oslo Norway 0370

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Oslo University Hospital
  • South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
  • Diakonhjemmet Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olöf B Kristjansdottir, PhD, Oslo University Hospital, Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Elin Borosund, Principal Investigator, Oslo University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03437863
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2015065
First Posted:
Feb 19, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Nov 16, 2021
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Elin Borosund, Principal Investigator, Oslo University Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Mobile Application
Arm/Group Description Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 12
COMPLETED 12
NOT COMPLETED 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Mobile Application
Arm/Group Description Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
Overall Participants 12
Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ]
Median (Full Range) [years]
50.0
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
11
91.7%
Male
1
8.3%
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants)

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Perceived Usefulness of the Application
Description Study-specific questions on perceived usefulness of the application
Time Frame Within an hour after using the application

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Mobile Application
Arm/Group Description Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
Measure Participants 12
Agree or strongly agree
12
100%
Disagree or strongly disagree
0
0%
Neutral
0
0%
Mssing
0
0%
Agree or strongly agree
9
75%
Disagree or strongly disagree
1
8.3%
Neutral
2
16.7%
Mssing
0
0%
Agree or strongly agree
10
83.3%
Disagree or strongly disagree
0
0%
Neutral
2
16.7%
Mssing
0
0%
Agree or strongly agree
5
41.7%
Disagree or strongly disagree
2
16.7%
Neutral
4
33.3%
Mssing
1
8.3%
Agree or strongly agree
6
50%
Disagree or strongly disagree
0
0%
Neutral
5
41.7%
Mssing
1
8.3%
Agree or strongly agree
7
58.3%
Disagree or strongly disagree
0
0%
Neutral
4
33.3%
Mssing
1
8.3%
Agree or strongly agree
8
66.7%
Disagree or strongly disagree
0
0%
Neutral
4
33.3%
Mssing
0
0%
Agree or strongly agree
2
16.7%
Disagree or strongly disagree
9
75%
Neutral
1
8.3%
Mssing
0
0%
Agree or strongly agree
1
8.3%
Disagree or strongly disagree
11
91.7%
Neutral
0
0%
Mssing
0
0%
Agree or strongly agree
7
58.3%
Disagree or strongly disagree
2
16.7%
Neutral
3
25%
Mssing
0
0%
Agree or strongly agree
9
75%
Disagree or strongly disagree
0
0%
Neutral
3
25%
Mssing
0
0%
2. Primary Outcome
Title The System Usability Scale
Description This 10 item questionnaire measures usability. Each item has 5 response options with total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time Frame Within an hour after using the application

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Mobile Application
Arm/Group Description Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
Measure Participants 12
Median (Full Range) [score on a scale]
86.3
3. Secondary Outcome
Title The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule.
Description This scale measures positive and negative affect with two subscales (positive affect and negative affect). Positive affect subscale scores can range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. Negative affect subscale scores can range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.
Time Frame Pre-intervention and post-intervention, within an hour after using the application

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Mobile Application
Arm/Group Description Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
Measure Participants 12
Positive emotion sub scale (pre-intervention)
34.0
Positive emotion sub scale (post-intervention)
35.0
Negative emotion subscale (pre-intervention)
12.0
Negative emotion (post-intervention)
11.0
4. Secondary Outcome
Title The Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale
Description This scale measures self-efficacy with two subscales with 5 response options. The "pain" subscale has 5 items and a score range from 0 to 20. The "other symptoms" subscale has 6 items and a score range from 0 to 24. Higher scores equal higher levels of self-efficacy.
Time Frame Pre-intervention and post-intervention, within an hour after using the application

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Mobile Application
Arm/Group Description Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
Measure Participants 12
Pain sub scale (pre-intervention)
12.0
Pain sub scale (post-intervention)
14.0
Other symptoms sub scale (pre-intervention)
16.0
Other symptoms subscale (post-intervention)
17.0

Adverse Events

Time Frame Within about 1 hour from testing the application.
Adverse Event Reporting Description Observations.
Arm/Group Title Mobile Application
Arm/Group Description Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
All Cause Mortality
Mobile Application
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/12 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Mobile Application
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/12 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Mobile Application
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/12 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Head of Research and Development
Organization Department of Digital Health Research (previously Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research)
Phone +47 23 03 31 67
Email elin.borosund@rr-research.no
Responsible Party:
Elin Borosund, Principal Investigator, Oslo University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03437863
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2015065
First Posted:
Feb 19, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Nov 16, 2021
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2021