Feasibility of a Mobile Application to Support Reflection and Dialog About Strengths in People With Chronic Illness
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Self-management of chronic illness can be highly demanding and people need to mobilize their personal strengths in order to live well with their condition. A mobile application was designed in collaboration with people with chronic illness and health care providers with the aims to support awareness of patients' strengths and patient-provider dialogues that include strengths. The aim of the present study is to evaluate with mixed methods the perceived usefulness and usability of the application and potential effects of the application on patients.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
In this pre-post design pilot study participants will be recruited from self-management courses for people with rheumatic diseases. Before using the application participants will be asked to report their strengths in a written format. After using the mobile application to reflect on their strengths the participants will be interviewed about their experience of using the application and on the task of reflecting on their strengths. They will also be asked to fill out a questionnaire on perceived usefulness and user-friendliness. Before and after using the application the participants fill out questionnaires on emotions (Positive and Negative Affective Scale) and self-efficacy (The Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale). All interviews will be audio-taped and analyzed with a qualitative approach. Descriptive analysis will be applied for quantitative data.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Mobile application Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. |
Device: Mobile application
Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Perceived Usefulness of the Application [Within an hour after using the application]
Study-specific questions on perceived usefulness of the application
- The System Usability Scale [Within an hour after using the application]
This 10 item questionnaire measures usability. Each item has 5 response options with total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. [Pre-intervention and post-intervention, within an hour after using the application]
This scale measures positive and negative affect with two subscales (positive affect and negative affect). Positive affect subscale scores can range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. Negative affect subscale scores can range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.
- The Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale [Pre-intervention and post-intervention, within an hour after using the application]
This scale measures self-efficacy with two subscales with 5 response options. The "pain" subscale has 5 items and a score range from 0 to 20. The "other symptoms" subscale has 6 items and a score range from 0 to 24. Higher scores equal higher levels of self-efficacy.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Setting 1:
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age of 18 years or older
-
Can read and speak Norwegian language
-
Diagnosed with a chronic condition
-
Participating or having recently participated in a learning and mastery or an outpatient rehabilitation program
No exclusion criteria
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Diakonhjemmet Hospital | Oslo | Norway | 0370 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Oslo University Hospital
- South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
- Diakonhjemmet Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Olöf B Kristjansdottir, PhD, Oslo University Hospital, Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2015065
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Mobile Application |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 12 |
COMPLETED | 12 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Mobile Application |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals. |
Overall Participants | 12 |
Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ] | |
Median (Full Range) [years] |
50.0
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
11
91.7%
|
Male |
1
8.3%
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) |
Outcome Measures
Title | Perceived Usefulness of the Application |
---|---|
Description | Study-specific questions on perceived usefulness of the application |
Time Frame | Within an hour after using the application |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Mobile Application |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals. |
Measure Participants | 12 |
Agree or strongly agree |
12
100%
|
Disagree or strongly disagree |
0
0%
|
Neutral |
0
0%
|
Mssing |
0
0%
|
Agree or strongly agree |
9
75%
|
Disagree or strongly disagree |
1
8.3%
|
Neutral |
2
16.7%
|
Mssing |
0
0%
|
Agree or strongly agree |
10
83.3%
|
Disagree or strongly disagree |
0
0%
|
Neutral |
2
16.7%
|
Mssing |
0
0%
|
Agree or strongly agree |
5
41.7%
|
Disagree or strongly disagree |
2
16.7%
|
Neutral |
4
33.3%
|
Mssing |
1
8.3%
|
Agree or strongly agree |
6
50%
|
Disagree or strongly disagree |
0
0%
|
Neutral |
5
41.7%
|
Mssing |
1
8.3%
|
Agree or strongly agree |
7
58.3%
|
Disagree or strongly disagree |
0
0%
|
Neutral |
4
33.3%
|
Mssing |
1
8.3%
|
Agree or strongly agree |
8
66.7%
|
Disagree or strongly disagree |
0
0%
|
Neutral |
4
33.3%
|
Mssing |
0
0%
|
Agree or strongly agree |
2
16.7%
|
Disagree or strongly disagree |
9
75%
|
Neutral |
1
8.3%
|
Mssing |
0
0%
|
Agree or strongly agree |
1
8.3%
|
Disagree or strongly disagree |
11
91.7%
|
Neutral |
0
0%
|
Mssing |
0
0%
|
Agree or strongly agree |
7
58.3%
|
Disagree or strongly disagree |
2
16.7%
|
Neutral |
3
25%
|
Mssing |
0
0%
|
Agree or strongly agree |
9
75%
|
Disagree or strongly disagree |
0
0%
|
Neutral |
3
25%
|
Mssing |
0
0%
|
Title | The System Usability Scale |
---|---|
Description | This 10 item questionnaire measures usability. Each item has 5 response options with total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher values represent a better outcome. |
Time Frame | Within an hour after using the application |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Mobile Application |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals. |
Measure Participants | 12 |
Median (Full Range) [score on a scale] |
86.3
|
Title | The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. |
---|---|
Description | This scale measures positive and negative affect with two subscales (positive affect and negative affect). Positive affect subscale scores can range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. Negative affect subscale scores can range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. |
Time Frame | Pre-intervention and post-intervention, within an hour after using the application |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Mobile Application |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals. |
Measure Participants | 12 |
Positive emotion sub scale (pre-intervention) |
34.0
|
Positive emotion sub scale (post-intervention) |
35.0
|
Negative emotion subscale (pre-intervention) |
12.0
|
Negative emotion (post-intervention) |
11.0
|
Title | The Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale |
---|---|
Description | This scale measures self-efficacy with two subscales with 5 response options. The "pain" subscale has 5 items and a score range from 0 to 20. The "other symptoms" subscale has 6 items and a score range from 0 to 24. Higher scores equal higher levels of self-efficacy. |
Time Frame | Pre-intervention and post-intervention, within an hour after using the application |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Mobile Application |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals. |
Measure Participants | 12 |
Pain sub scale (pre-intervention) |
12.0
|
Pain sub scale (post-intervention) |
14.0
|
Other symptoms sub scale (pre-intervention) |
16.0
|
Other symptoms subscale (post-intervention) |
17.0
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Within about 1 hour from testing the application. | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Observations. | |
Arm/Group Title | Mobile Application | |
Arm/Group Description | Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals. Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Mobile Application | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/12 (0%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Mobile Application | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/12 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Mobile Application | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/12 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Head of Research and Development |
---|---|
Organization | Department of Digital Health Research (previously Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research) |
Phone | +47 23 03 31 67 |
elin.borosund@rr-research.no |
- 2015065