A Study to Compare Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Versus Adefovir Dipivoxil for the Treatment of HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Participants will receive TDF or ADV for 48 weeks (double-blind). After 48 weeks, eligible participants switched to open-label TDF for up to 480 weeks.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: TDF-TDF TDF plus ADV placebo (double-blind period), followed by TDF (open-label period). Participants may add FTC (as part of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) FDC tablet) to their treatment regimen in the open-label period. |
Drug: TDF
300 mg tablet administered orally once daily
Other Names:
Drug: ADV placebo
Tablet administered orally once daily
Drug: FTC/TDF
200/300 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet administered orally once daily
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: ADV-TDF ADV plus TDF placebo (double-blind period), followed by TDF (open-label period). Participants may add FTC (as part of FTC/TDF FDC tablet) to their treatment regimen in the open-label period. |
Drug: TDF
300 mg tablet administered orally once daily
Other Names:
Drug: ADV
10 mg tablet administered orally once daily
Other Names:
Drug: TDF placebo
Tablet administered orally once daily
Drug: FTC/TDF
200/300 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet administered orally once daily
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48 [Baseline; Week 48]
Complete response was a composite endpoint defined as histological response and HBV DNA < 400 copies/mL. Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4. A participant was a nonresponder for the primary endpoint if either biopsy (baseline or end-of-treatment) was missing or if there was not an HBV DNA value available at or beyond Week 40.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 48 [Week 48]
- Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 96 [Week 96]
- Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384 [Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384]
- Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480 [Weeks 432 and 480]
- Change From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 [Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480]
- Change From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 [Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480]
- Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48 [Baseline; Week 48]
Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.
- Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240 [Baseline; Week 240]
Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.
- Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48 [Baseline; Week 48]
The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).
- Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240 [Baseline; Week 240]
The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).
- Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48 [Baseline; Week 48]
Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.
- Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240 [Baseline; Week 240]
Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.
- Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 48 [Baseline; Week 48]
ALT normalization was defined as ALT > upper limit of normal (ULN) at baseline and within the normal range at the end of blinded treatment. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
- Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 96 [Baseline; Week 96]
ALT normalization was defined as ALT > ULN at baseline and within the normal range at Week 96. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
- Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384 [Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384]
ALT normalization was defined as ALT > ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
- Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480 [Baseline; Weeks 432 and 480]
ALT normalization was defined as ALT > ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
- Change From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 [Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480]
- Change From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 [Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480]
- Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss/Seroconversion at Week 48 [Baseline; Week 48]
HBeAg loss was defined as HBeAg positive at baseline and HBeAg negative at Week 48. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 48.
- Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBe at Week 96 [Baseline; Week 96]
HBeAg loss was defined as HBeAg positive at baseline and HBeAg negative at Week 96. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 96.
- Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion at Week 48 [Baseline; Week 48]
HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at Week 48. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 48.
- Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96 [Baseline; Week 96]
HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at the subsequent time point. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at the subsequent time point.
- Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 [Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480]
HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at the subsequent time point. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at the subsequent time point.
- Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance) [Baseline; Week 48]
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, those with viral breakthrough, and those who discontinued after Week 24 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL.
- Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance) [Baseline; Weeks 49 to 96]
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 96 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 48 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
- Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance) [Baseline; Weeks 97 to 144]
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 144 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 96 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 96 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
- Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance) [Baseline; Weeks 145 to 192]
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 192 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 144 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 144 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
- Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance) [Baseline; Weeks 193 to 240]
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 240 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 192 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 192 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
- Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance) [Baseline; Weeks 241 to 288]
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 288 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 240 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 240 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
- Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance) [Baseline; Weeks 289 to 336]
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 336 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 288 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 288 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
- Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance) [Baseline; Weeks 337 to 384]
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 384 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 336 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 336 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
- Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance) [Baseline; Weeks 385 to 432]
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 432 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 384 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 384 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
- Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance) [Baseline; Weeks 433 to 480]
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 480 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 432 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 432 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
A patient must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for participation in this study:
-
Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, defined as positive serum hepatitis B s-antigen (HBsAg) for more than 6 months
-
18 through 69 years of age, inclusive
-
Active hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic HBV infection, with all of the following:
-
HBeAg positive at screening
-
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels > 2 × ULN and ≤ 10 × the upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
-
Serum HBV DNA > 1 million copies/mL at screening
-
creatinine clearance ≥ 70 mL/min
-
hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL
-
neutrophils ≥ 1,000 /mL
-
Knodell necroinflammatory score ≥ 3 and a Knodell fibrosis score < 4; however, up to 96 patients with cirrhosis, ie, a Knodell fibrosis score equal to 4, will be eligible for enrollment
-
Negative serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)
-
Nucleotide naïve, ie, no prior nucleotide (TDF or ADV) therapy for > 12 weeks
-
Nucleoside naïve, ie, no prior nucleoside (any nucleoside) therapy for > 12 weeks
-
Willing and able to provide written informed consent
-
Liver biopsy performed within 6 months of baseline and has readable biopsy slides or agrees to have a biopsy performed prior to baseline
Key Exclusion Criteria:
A patient who meets any of the following exclusion criteria is not to be enrolled in this study:
-
Pregnant women, women who are breast feeding or who believe they may wish to become pregnant during the course of the study
-
Males and females of reproductive potential who are unwilling to use an effective method of contraception during the study; for males, condoms should be used and for females, a barrier contraception method should be used
-
Decompensated liver disease defined as conjugated bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN, prothrombin time (PT) > 1.5 x ULN, platelets < 75,000/mL, serum albumin < 3.0 g/dL, or prior history of clinical hepatic decompensation (eg, ascites, jaundice, encephalopathy, variceal hemorrhage)
-
Received any nucleoside, nucleotide (TDF or ADV) or interferon (pegylated or not) therapy within 6 months prior to the pre-treatment biopsy
-
Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ie, α-fetoprotein >50 ng/mL
-
Coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or hepatitis delta virus (HDV)
-
Significant renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease
-
Received solid organ or bone marrow transplantation
-
Is currently receiving therapy with immunomodulators (eg, corticosteroids, etc.), investigational agents, nephrotoxic agents, or agents susceptible of modifying renal excretion
-
Has proximal tubulopathy
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orange | California | United States | 92868 | |
2 | Pasadena | California | United States | 91105 | |
3 | San Diego | California | United States | 92105 | |
4 | San Jose | California | United States | 95116 | |
5 | Miami | Florida | United States | 33136 | |
6 | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30308 | |
7 | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30309 | |
8 | Honolulu | Hawaii | United States | 96817 | |
9 | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21229 | |
10 | Ann Arbor | Michigan | United States | 48109 | |
11 | Detroit | Michigan | United States | 48202 | |
12 | St. Louis | Missouri | United States | 63104 | |
13 | Flushing | New York | United States | 11355 | |
14 | New York | New York | United States | 10021 | |
15 | New York | New York | United States | 10029 | |
16 | New York | New York | United States | 10032 | |
17 | Fairfax | Virginia | United States | 22031 | |
18 | Falls Church | Virginia | United States | 22042 | |
19 | Richmond | Virginia | United States | 23298 | |
20 | Seattle | Washington | United States | 98101 | |
21 | Camperdown | New South Wales | Australia | 2050 | |
22 | Concord | New South Wales | Australia | 2139 | |
23 | Westmead | New South Wales | Australia | 2145 | |
24 | Woolloongabba | Queensland | Australia | 4102 | |
25 | Clayton | Victoria | Australia | 3168 | |
26 | Footscray | Victoria | Australia | 3011 | |
27 | Parkville | Victoria | Australia | 3050 | |
28 | Prahran | Victoria | Australia | 3004 | |
29 | Fitzroy | Australia | 3065 | ||
30 | Perth | Australia | 6000 | ||
31 | Sofia | Bulgaria | 1407 | ||
32 | Sofia | Bulgaria | 1431 | ||
33 | Varna | Bulgaria | 9010 | ||
34 | Calgary | Alberta | Canada | T2N4Z6 | |
35 | Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada | V5Z1H2 | |
36 | Winnepeg | Manitoba | Canada | R3E3P4 | |
37 | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | M5G 2C4 | |
38 | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | M5T 2S8 | |
39 | Brno | Czech Republic | 62500 | ||
40 | Hradec Kralove | Czech Republic | |||
41 | Prague | Czech Republic | 140 21 | ||
42 | Praha 6- Stresovice | Czech Republic | 169 02 | ||
43 | Clichy | France | 92110 | ||
44 | Grenoble | France | 38043 | ||
45 | Lille | France | 59037 | ||
46 | Lyon | France | 69317 | ||
47 | Nancy | France | 54500 | ||
48 | Paris | France | 75651 | ||
49 | Strasbourg | France | 67901 | ||
50 | Berlin | Germany | 10969 | ||
51 | Duesseldorf | Germany | 40237 | ||
52 | Dusseldorf | Germany | 40225 | ||
53 | Essen | Germany | 45122 | ||
54 | Hamburg | Germany | 20099 | ||
55 | Hannover | Germany | 30623 | ||
56 | Herne | Germany | 44623 | ||
57 | Homburg/Saar | Germany | 66421 | ||
58 | Kiel | Germany | 24105 | ||
59 | Mainz | Germany | 55131 | ||
60 | Munchen | Germany | 81377 | ||
61 | Tubingen | Germany | 72076 | ||
62 | Athens | Greece | 11526 | ||
63 | Thessaloniki | Greece | 54642 | ||
64 | Thessaloniki | Greece | 56429 | ||
65 | Bologna | Italy | 40138 | ||
66 | Rotterdam | Netherlands | 3015 | ||
67 | Auckland | New Zealand | |||
68 | Hamilton | New Zealand | |||
69 | Wellington | New Zealand | |||
70 | Whakatane | New Zealand | |||
71 | Bialystok | Poland | 15-540 | ||
72 | Bydgoszcz | Poland | 85-030 | ||
73 | Chorzow | Poland | 41-500 | ||
74 | Kielce | Poland | 25-317 | ||
75 | Krakow | Poland | 31-501 | ||
76 | Warszawa | Poland | 01-201 | ||
77 | Wroclaw | Poland | 50-136 | ||
78 | Barcelona | Spain | 08025 | ||
79 | Barcelona | Spain | 08035 | ||
80 | Barcelona | Spain | 08907 | ||
81 | Valencia | Spain | 46009 | ||
82 | Ankara | Turkey | 06100 | ||
83 | Bursa | Turkey | |||
84 | Istanbul | Turkey | |||
85 | Izmir | Turkey | |||
86 | Birmingham | United Kingdom | B15 2TH | ||
87 | London | United Kingdom | NW1 2BU |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Gilead Sciences
Investigators
- Study Director: Gilead Study Director, Gilead Sciences
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- GS-US-174-0103
- 2004-005120-41
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants were enrolled at study sites in North America, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand. The first participant was screened on 09 June 2005. The last study visit occurred on 28 January 2016. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 603 participants were screened. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg plus placebo to match adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added emtricitabine (FTC) to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Period Title: Double-blind Period Through Week 48 | ||
STARTED | 176 | 90 |
COMPLETED | 165 | 85 |
NOT COMPLETED | 11 | 5 |
Period Title: Double-blind Period Through Week 48 | ||
STARTED | 154 | 84 |
COMPLETED | 144 | 83 |
NOT COMPLETED | 10 | 1 |
Period Title: Double-blind Period Through Week 48 | ||
STARTED | 144 | 83 |
COMPLETED | 133 | 74 |
NOT COMPLETED | 11 | 9 |
Period Title: Double-blind Period Through Week 48 | ||
STARTED | 133 | 74 |
COMPLETED | 123 | 68 |
NOT COMPLETED | 10 | 6 |
Period Title: Double-blind Period Through Week 48 | ||
STARTED | 123 | 68 |
COMPLETED | 110 | 64 |
NOT COMPLETED | 13 | 4 |
Period Title: Double-blind Period Through Week 48 | ||
STARTED | 110 | 64 |
COMPLETED | 104 | 64 |
NOT COMPLETED | 6 | 0 |
Period Title: Double-blind Period Through Week 48 | ||
STARTED | 104 | 64 |
COMPLETED | 98 | 57 |
NOT COMPLETED | 6 | 7 |
Period Title: Double-blind Period Through Week 48 | ||
STARTED | 98 | 57 |
COMPLETED | 90 | 56 |
NOT COMPLETED | 8 | 1 |
Period Title: Double-blind Period Through Week 48 | ||
STARTED | 59 | 30 |
COMPLETED | 57 | 30 |
NOT COMPLETED | 2 | 0 |
Period Title: Double-blind Period Through Week 48 | ||
STARTED | 57 | 29 |
COMPLETED | 53 | 29 |
NOT COMPLETED | 4 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added emtricitabine (FTC) to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 176 | 90 | 266 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
3
1.7%
|
1
1.1%
|
4
1.5%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
173
98.3%
|
89
98.9%
|
262
98.5%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
34
(11.3)
|
34
(12.2)
|
34
(11.6)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
57
32.4%
|
26
28.9%
|
83
31.2%
|
Male |
119
67.6%
|
64
71.1%
|
183
68.8%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
30
17%
|
14
15.6%
|
44
16.5%
|
Greece |
1
0.6%
|
2
2.2%
|
3
1.1%
|
Spain |
7
4%
|
2
2.2%
|
9
3.4%
|
Turkey |
10
5.7%
|
4
4.4%
|
14
5.3%
|
Italy |
0
0%
|
1
1.1%
|
1
0.4%
|
United Kingdom |
6
3.4%
|
1
1.1%
|
7
2.6%
|
France |
11
6.3%
|
3
3.3%
|
14
5.3%
|
Czech Republic |
3
1.7%
|
5
5.6%
|
8
3%
|
Canada |
17
9.7%
|
10
11.1%
|
27
10.2%
|
Poland |
16
9.1%
|
8
8.9%
|
24
9%
|
Australia |
22
12.5%
|
6
6.7%
|
28
10.5%
|
Bulgaria |
17
9.7%
|
11
12.2%
|
28
10.5%
|
Germany |
20
11.4%
|
8
8.9%
|
28
10.5%
|
Netherlands |
6
3.4%
|
4
4.4%
|
10
3.8%
|
New Zealand |
10
5.7%
|
11
12.2%
|
21
7.9%
|
Baseline Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) above the Upper Limit of the Normal (ULN) Range (participants) [Number] | |||
Yes |
169
96%
|
90
100%
|
259
97.4%
|
No |
7
4%
|
0
0%
|
7
2.6%
|
Prior Lamivudine or FTC Treatment (participants) [Number] | |||
Yes |
8
4.5%
|
1
1.1%
|
9
3.4%
|
No |
168
95.5%
|
89
98.9%
|
257
96.6%
|
Baseline Hepatitis B Deoxyribonucleic Acid (HBV DNA) (log10 copies/mL) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [log10 copies/mL] |
8.64
(1.076)
|
8.88
(0.930)
|
8.72
(1.033)
|
Baseline Knodell Necroinflammatory Score (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
8.3
(2.11)
|
8.5
(2.07)
|
8.4
(2.09)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48 |
---|---|
Description | Complete response was a composite endpoint defined as histological response and HBV DNA < 400 copies/mL. Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4. A participant was a nonresponder for the primary endpoint if either biopsy (baseline or end-of-treatment) was missing or if there was not an HBV DNA value available at or beyond Week 40. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 48 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Randomized and Treated Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 176 | 90 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
66.5
37.8%
|
12.2
13.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | |
Comments | With a sample size of 160 subjects in the TDF group and 80 subjects in the ADV group, a two group large-sample normal approximation test of proportions with a one-sided 0.025 significance level would have 95% power to reject the null hypothesis that the TDF treatment was inferior to the ADV treatment (the difference in proportions was less than -0.080) in favor of the alternative hypothesis that the TDF treatment was not inferior. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | P-value corresponds to a Z-test of the null hypothesis that the stratum-adjusted (baseline ALT ≤ 4 x upper limit of the normal range [ULN] or > 4 x ULN) difference is 0. | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI), stratified by baseline ALT was used to evaluate difference between groups in proportion of complete responders. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 54.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 44.6 to 63.6 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 4.8 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 48 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Week 48 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Randomized and Treated Analysis Set; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 176 | 90 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
76.1
43.2%
|
13.3
14.8%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | P-value corresponds to a Z-test of the null hypothesis that the stratum-adjusted difference in zero. | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | Difference, standard error of the difference, and the CI are stratum adjusted based on baseline ALT category (≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 63.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 53.8 to 72.3 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 4.7 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 96 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Week 96 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. Data included for participants who discontinued study unless the discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 165 | 86 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
77.6
44.1%
|
77.9
86.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.801 |
Comments | P-value corresponds to a Z-test of the null hypothesis that the stratum-adjusted difference is zero. | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | Two-sided 95% CIs, stratified by baseline ALT (baseline ALT ≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN), were used to evaluate treatment group differences. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | -1.4 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -12.0 to 9.3 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 5.4 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Randomized and Treated Analysis Set. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria. Participants with missing values related to protocol criteria or who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 166 | 88 |
Week 144 |
71.7
40.7%
|
70.5
78.3%
|
Week 192 |
67.9
38.6%
|
71.6
79.6%
|
Week 240 |
63.4
36%
|
66.3
73.7%
|
Week 288 |
61.3
34.8%
|
64.8
72%
|
Week 336 |
59.4
33.8%
|
62.1
69%
|
Week 384 |
56.1
31.9%
|
60.5
67.2%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Weeks 432 and 480 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added emtricitabine to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added emtricitabine (FTC) to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 57 | 29 |
Week 432 |
93.0
52.8%
|
100.0
111.1%
|
Week 480 |
98.0
55.7%
|
96.6
107.3%
|
Title | Change From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period.. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 160 | 85 |
Week 48 |
-6.17
(1.067)
|
-3.93
(1.728)
|
Week 96 |
-6.26
(1.137)
|
-6.38
(1.184)
|
Week 144 |
-6.32
(1.098)
|
-6.31
(1.407)
|
Week 192 |
-6.30
(1.203)
|
-6.49
(1.028)
|
Week 240 |
-6.22
(1.217)
|
-6.45
(0.986)
|
Week 288 |
-6.27
(1.248)
|
-6.49
(1.003)
|
Week 336 |
-6.35
(1.208)
|
-6.46
(1.017)
|
Week 384 |
-6.38
(1.167)
|
-6.28
(1.450)
|
Week 432 |
-6.13
(1.306)
|
-6.45
(1.008)
|
Week 480 |
-6.18
(1.300)
|
-6.37
(1.159)
|
Title | Change From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 144 | 80 |
Week 96 |
-0.10
(0.422)
|
-2.43
(1.724)
|
Week 144 |
-0.19
(0.475)
|
-2.27
(1.866)
|
Week 192 |
-0.20
(0.565)
|
-2.41
(1.662)
|
Week 240 |
-0.14
(0.706)
|
-2.49
(1.599)
|
Week 288 |
-0.18
(0.762)
|
-2.62
(1.679)
|
Week 336 |
-0.25
(0.618)
|
-2.59
(1.622)
|
Week 384 |
-0.29
(0.643)
|
-2.34
(1.821)
|
Week 432 |
-0.13
(0.854)
|
-2.32
(1.694)
|
Week 480 |
-0.24
(0.630)
|
-2.16
(1.882)
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48 |
---|---|
Description | Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 48 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Randomized and Treated Analysis Set; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 176 | 90 |
Yes |
74.4
42.3%
|
67.8
75.3%
|
No |
25.6
14.5%
|
32.2
35.8%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.320 |
Comments | P-value corresponds to a Z-test of the null hypothesis that the stratum-adjusted difference in zero. Difference, standard error of the difference, and the CI are stratum adjusted based on baseline ALT category (≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN). | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 5.8 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -5.6 to 17.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 5.8 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240 |
---|---|
Description | Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 240 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 76 | 48 |
Yes |
88.2
50.1%
|
89.6
99.6%
|
No |
11.8
6.7%
|
10.4
11.6%
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48 |
---|---|
Description | The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst). |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 48 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with measurements at Baseline and Week 48 were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 157 | 79 |
Knodell Necroinflammatory Score |
-3.6
(2.30)
|
-3.2
(2.35)
|
Ishak Necroinflammatory Score |
-2.7
(1.70)
|
-2.6
(1.94)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240 |
---|---|
Description | The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst). |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 240 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 76 | 48 |
Knodell Necroinflammatory Score |
-4.8
(2.34)
|
-5.1
(2.43)
|
Ishak Necroinflammatory Score |
-4.1
(2.14)
|
-4.5
(2.32)
|
Title | Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48 |
---|---|
Description | Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 48 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Randomized and Treated Analysis Set; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 176 | 90 |
Improvement - Necroinflammation |
81.3
46.2%
|
78.9
87.7%
|
No Change - Necroinflammation |
4.5
2.6%
|
3.3
3.7%
|
Worsening - Necroinflammation |
3.4
1.9%
|
5.6
6.2%
|
Missing Data - Necroinflammation |
10.8
6.1%
|
12.2
13.6%
|
Improvement - Fibrosis |
19.9
11.3%
|
20.0
22.2%
|
No Change - Fibrosis |
63.6
36.1%
|
61.1
67.9%
|
Worsening - Fibrosis |
5.1
2.9%
|
6.7
7.4%
|
Missing Data - Fibrosis |
11.4
6.5%
|
12.2
13.6%
|
Title | Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240 |
---|---|
Description | Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 240 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 76 | 48 |
Improvement - Necroinflammation |
96.1
54.6%
|
97.9
108.8%
|
No Change - Necroinflammation |
3.9
2.2%
|
2.1
2.3%
|
Worsening - Necroinflammation |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Improvement - Fibrosis |
56.6
32.2%
|
58.3
64.8%
|
No Change - Fibrosis |
39.5
22.4%
|
39.6
44%
|
Worsening - Fibrosis |
3.9
2.2%
|
2.1
2.3%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 48 |
---|---|
Description | ALT normalization was defined as ALT > upper limit of normal (ULN) at baseline and within the normal range at the end of blinded treatment. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 48 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT > ULN at baseline were analyzed; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 169 | 90 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
68.0
38.6%
|
54.4
60.4%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.032 |
Comments | P-value corresponds to a Z-test. Statistical tests were not adjusted for baseline ALT stratum. | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | Difference, standard error of the difference, and CI are stratum adjusted (baseline ALT ≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 13.6 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.1 to 26.1 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 6.4 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 96 |
---|---|
Description | ALT normalization was defined as ALT > ULN at baseline and within the normal range at Week 96. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 96 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT > ULN at baseline. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria; data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 158 | 86 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
65.2
37%
|
74.4
82.7%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.100 |
Comments | P-value corresponds to a Z-test of the null hypothesis that the ALT stratum-adjusted difference is zero. | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | Difference, standard error of the difference, and CI are stratum adjusted (baseline ALT ≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | -9.8 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -21.5 to 1.9 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 6.0 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384 |
---|---|
Description | ALT normalization was defined as ALT > ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT > ULN at baseline and available data were analyzed. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria; data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 161 | 87 |
Week 144 |
60.2
34.2%
|
67.8
75.3%
|
Week 192 |
59.6
33.9%
|
69.4
77.1%
|
Week 240 |
50.0
28.4%
|
65.9
73.2%
|
Week 288 |
51.3
29.1%
|
70.1
77.9%
|
Week 336 |
46.2
26.3%
|
67.9
75.4%
|
Week 384 |
52.6
29.9%
|
67.1
74.6%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480 |
---|---|
Description | ALT normalization was defined as ALT > ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 432 and 480 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT > ULN at baseline and with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 54 | 29 |
Week 432 |
79.6
45.2%
|
78.6
87.3%
|
Week 480 |
75.0
42.6%
|
82.8
92%
|
Title | Change From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 160 | 84 |
Week 48 |
-107.2
(109.44)
|
-106.1
(118.90)
|
Week 96 |
-107.8
(108.07)
|
-120.4
(138.03)
|
Week 144 |
-100.7
(105.96)
|
-126.2
(150.46)
|
Week 192 |
-101.4
(108.63)
|
-139.6
(137.95)
|
Week 240 |
-95.9
(117.03)
|
-134.8
(135.59)
|
Week 288 |
-102.3
(111.68)
|
-130.9
(123.08)
|
Week 336 |
-101.9
(112.72)
|
-132.3
(125.81)
|
Week 384 |
-108.1
(118.05)
|
-133.7
(128.57)
|
Week 432 |
-105.0
(139.61)
|
-162.1
(157.83)
|
Week 480 |
-92.3
(83.56)
|
-157.5
(159.96)
|
Title | Change From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 141 | 81 |
Week 96 |
-2.0
(17.94)
|
-6.9
(59.64)
|
Week 144 |
-0.4
(21.94)
|
-0.7
(82.70)
|
Week 192 |
-1.3
(19.57)
|
-7.8
(27.07)
|
Week 240 |
3.7
(32.48)
|
-8.1
(22.92)
|
Week 288 |
-1.6
(19.91)
|
-10.3
(25.26)
|
Week 336 |
-1.2
(19.72)
|
-9.3
(22.69)
|
Week 384 |
-4.4
(24.87)
|
-6.9
(31.76)
|
Week 432 |
-4.3
(24.27)
|
-11.6
(27.09)
|
Week 480 |
-5.5
(19.28)
|
-7.1
(39.76)
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss/Seroconversion at Week 48 |
---|---|
Description | HBeAg loss was defined as HBeAg positive at baseline and HBeAg negative at Week 48. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 48. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 48 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who were HBeAg-positive at baseline and with available data were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 153 | 80 |
HBeAg Loss |
22.2
12.6%
|
17.5
19.4%
|
HBeAg Seroconversion |
20.9
11.9%
|
17.5
19.4%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | This information pertains to HBeAg loss. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.245 |
Comments | P-value above for HBeAg loss corresponds to a Z-test of the null hypothesis that stratum-adjusted difference is zero. | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | Difference, standard error of the difference, and Cl are stratum adjusted based on baseline ALT category (≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 6.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -4.2 to 16.4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 5.3 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | This information pertains to HBeAg seroconversion. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.363 |
Comments | P-value for HBeAg seroconversion corresponds to Z-test of the null hypothesis that stratum-adjusted difference is zero. | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | Difference, standard error of difference, and Cl are stratum adjusted based on baseline ALT category (≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 4.7 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -5.5 to 14.9 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 5.2 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBe at Week 96 |
---|---|
Description | HBeAg loss was defined as HBeAg positive at baseline and HBeAg negative at Week 96. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 96. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 96 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who were HBeAg-positive at baseline and with available data were analyzed. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 158 | 82 |
HBeAg Loss |
25.9
14.7%
|
25.6
28.4%
|
Seroconversion to Anti-HBe |
22.8
13%
|
22.0
24.4%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | This information pertains to HBeAg loss. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.963 |
Comments | P-value above for HBeAg loss corresponds to a Z-test of the null hypothesis that stratum-adjusted difference is zero. | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | Difference, standard error of the difference, and Cl are stratum adjusted based on baseline ALT category (≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 0.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -11.3 to 11.9 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 5.9 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | This information pertains to seroconversion to anti-HBe. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.904 |
Comments | P-value above for HBeAg loss corresponds to a Z-test of the null hypothesis that stratum-adjusted difference is zero. | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | Difference, standard error of the difference, and Cl are stratum adjusted based on baseline ALT category (≤ 4 x ULN or >4 x ULN). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 0.7 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -10.4 to 11.7 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 5.6 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion at Week 48 |
---|---|
Description | HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at Week 48. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 48. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 48 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 158 | 82 |
HBsAg Loss |
3.2
1.8%
|
0
0%
|
HBsAg Seroconversion |
1.3
0.7%
|
0
0%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | This information pertains to HBsAg loss. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.018 |
Comments | P-value corresponds to a Z-test of the null hypothesis that the ALT stratum-adjusted difference is zero. Difference, standard error of the difference, and confidence interval (CI) are stratum adjusted (baseline ALT ≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN). | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 10.9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.9 to 19.9 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 4.6 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | This information pertains to HBsAg seroconversion. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.148 |
Comments | P-value corresponds to a Z-test of the null hypothesis that the ALT stratum-adjusted difference is zero. Difference, standard error of the difference, and confidence interval (CI) are stratum adjusted (baseline ALT ≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN). | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 4.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.5 to 10.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 3.0 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96 |
---|---|
Description | HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at the subsequent time point. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at the subsequent time point. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 96 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. Data is included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 171 | 86 |
HBsAg Loss |
5.3
3%
|
5.8
6.4%
|
Anti-HBs Seroconversion |
4.1
2.3%
|
4.7
5.2%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | This information pertains to HBsAg loss. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.757 |
Comments | P-value above for HBsAg loss corresponds to a Z-test of the null hypothesis that stratum-adjusted difference is zero. Difference, standard error of the difference, and CI are stratum adjusted based on baseline ALT category (≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN). | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 0.9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -4.8 to 6.5 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 2.9 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | TDF-TDF, ADV 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | This information pertains to seroconversion to anti-HBs. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.733 |
Comments | P-value above corresponds to Z-test of the null hypothesis that stratum-adjusted difference is zero. Difference, standard error of the difference, and CI are stratum adjusted based on baseline ALT category (≤ 4 x ULN or > 4 x ULN). | |
Method | Z-test | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Difference in proportions |
Estimated Value | 0.9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -4.2 to 5.9 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 2.6 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 |
---|---|
Description | HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at the subsequent time point. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at the subsequent time point. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Randomized and Treated Analysis Set. Data is included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria. Participants with missing values related to protocol criteria or who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 174 | 89 |
HBsAg Loss - Week 144 |
7.5
4.3%
|
8.0
8.9%
|
Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 144 |
5.2
3%
|
6.8
7.6%
|
HBsAg Loss - Week 192 |
9.4
5.3%
|
7.9
8.8%
|
Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 192 |
6.4
3.6%
|
6.7
7.4%
|
HBsAg Loss - Week 240 |
9.2
5.2%
|
8.0
8.9%
|
Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 240 |
6.3
3.6%
|
8.0
8.9%
|
HBsAg Loss - Week 288 |
9.2
5.2%
|
8.0
8.9%
|
Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 288 |
6.4
3.6%
|
8.0
8.9%
|
HBsAg Loss - Week 336 |
10.3
5.9%
|
7.9
8.8%
|
Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 336 |
7.5
4.3%
|
7.9
8.8%
|
HBsAg Loss - Week 384 |
11.0
6.3%
|
9.0
10%
|
Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 384 |
8.1
4.6%
|
7.9
8.8%
|
HBsAg Loss - Week 432 |
10.9
6.2%
|
10.2
11.3%
|
Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 432 |
7.6
4.3%
|
8.0
8.9%
|
HBsAg Loss - Week 480 |
10.9
6.2%
|
10.1
11.2%
|
Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 480 |
8.0
4.5%
|
7.9
8.8%
|
Title | Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance) |
---|---|
Description | Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, those with viral breakthrough, and those who discontinued after Week 24 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 48 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | ADV-TDF |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 176 | 90 |
Participants evaluated |
31
17.6%
|
75
83.3%
|
Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase |
2
1.1%
|
8
8.9%
|
Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase |
13
7.4%
|
17
18.9%
|
No genotypic changes (wild-type virus) |
7
4%
|
43
47.8%
|
Unable to be genotyped |
9
5.1%
|
7
7.8%
|
Title | Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance) |
---|---|
Description | Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 96 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 48 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 49 to 96 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 48 (ie, entered the open-label phase) were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | TDF-TDF With Addition of FTC | ADV-TDF | ADV-TDF With Addition of FTC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 154 | 15 | 84 | 13 |
Participants evaluated |
18
10.2%
|
13
14.4%
|
16
6%
|
10
NaN
|
Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase |
2
1.1%
|
0
0%
|
2
0.8%
|
3
NaN
|
Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase |
3
1.7%
|
1
1.1%
|
1
0.4%
|
2
NaN
|
No genotypic changes (wild-type virus) |
10
5.7%
|
5
5.6%
|
12
4.5%
|
3
NaN
|
Unable to be genotyped |
3
1.7%
|
7
7.8%
|
1
0.4%
|
2
NaN
|
Title | Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance) |
---|---|
Description | Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 144 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 96 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 96 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 97 to 144 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 96 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | TDF-TDF With Addition of FTC | ADV-TDF | ADV-TDF With Addition of FTC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 126 | 17 | 69 | 13 |
Participants evaluated |
2
1.1%
|
7
7.8%
|
5
1.9%
|
5
NaN
|
Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase |
1
0.6%
|
2
2.2%
|
2
0.8%
|
0
NaN
|
Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
3
3.3%
|
3
1.1%
|
0
NaN
|
No genotypic changes (wild-type virus) |
1
0.6%
|
2
2.2%
|
0
0%
|
3
NaN
|
Unable to be genotyped |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
NaN
|
Title | Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance) |
---|---|
Description | Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 192 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 144 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 144 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 145 to 192 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 144 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | TDF-TDF With Addition of FTC | ADV-TDF | ADV-TDF With Addition of FTC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 115 | 15 | 61 | 10 |
Participants evaluated |
2
1.1%
|
5
5.6%
|
1
0.4%
|
1
NaN
|
Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase |
1
0.6%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
1
NaN
|
No genotypic changes (wild-type virus) |
0
0%
|
1
1.1%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Unable to be genotyped |
1
0.6%
|
3
3.3%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Title | Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance) |
---|---|
Description | Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 240 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 192 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 192 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 193 to 240 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 192 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | TDF-TDF With Addition of FTC | ADV-TDF | ADV-TDF With Addition of FTC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 103 | 13 | 55 | 12 |
Participants evaluated |
3
1.7%
|
3
3.3%
|
0
0%
|
1
NaN
|
Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
NaN
|
Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase |
2
1.1%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
No genotypic changes (wild-type virus) |
1
0.6%
|
2
2.2%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Unable to be genotyped |
0
0%
|
1
1.1%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Title | Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance) |
---|---|
Description | Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 288 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 240 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 240 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 241 to 288 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 240 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | TDF-TDF With Addition of FTC | ADV-TDF | ADV-TDF With Addition of FTC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 92 | 11 | 52 | 12 |
Participants evaluated |
3
1.7%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
No genotypic changes (wild-type virus) |
2
1.1%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Unable to be genotyped |
1
0.6%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Title | Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance) |
---|---|
Description | Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 336 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 288 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 288 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 289 to 336 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 288 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | TDF-TDF With Addition of FTC | ADV-TDF | ADV-TDF With Addition of FTC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 93 | 12 | 53 | 12 |
Participants evaluated |
1
0.6%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
0
NaN
|
Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
No genotypic changes (wild-type virus) |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
0
NaN
|
Unable to be genotyped |
1
0.6%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Title | Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance) |
---|---|
Description | Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 384 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 336 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 336 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 337 to 384 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 336 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | TDF-TDF With Addition of FTC | ADV-TDF | ADV-TDF With Addition of FTC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 87 | 12 | 50 | 10 |
Participants evaluated |
1
0.6%
|
0
0%
|
2
0.8%
|
2
NaN
|
Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
0
NaN
|
Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
1
NaN
|
No genotypic changes (wild-type virus) |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
NaN
|
Unable to be genotyped |
1
0.6%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Title | Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance) |
---|---|
Description | Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 432 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 384 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 384 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 385 to 432 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 384 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | TDF-TDF With Addition of FTC | ADV-TDF | ADV-TDF With Addition of FTC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 49 | 10 | 26 | 4 |
Participants evaluated |
1
0.6%
|
3
3.3%
|
0
0%
|
1
NaN
|
Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase |
1
0.6%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
No genotypic changes (wild-type virus) |
0
0%
|
3
3.3%
|
0
0%
|
1
NaN
|
Unable to be genotyped |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Title | Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance) |
---|---|
Description | Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 480 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 432 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 432 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Weeks 433 to 480 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 432 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated. |
Arm/Group Title | TDF-TDF | TDF-TDF With Addition of FTC | ADV-TDF | ADV-TDF With Addition of FTC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group did not add FTC to their study regimen in the open-label period. | ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants in this reporting group added FTC (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) to their study regimen in the open-label period. |
Measure Participants | 47 | 10 | 26 | 3 |
Participants evaluated |
0
0%
|
3
3.3%
|
1
0.4%
|
0
NaN
|
Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase |
0
0%
|
1
1.1%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
No genotypic changes (wild-type virus) |
0
0%
|
2
2.2%
|
1
0.4%
|
0
NaN
|
Unable to be genotyped |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Baseline to Week 480 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Randomized and Treated Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug. | |||||
Arm/Group Title | Double-Blind TDF | Double-Blind ADV | Open-Label TDF | |||
Arm/Group Description | Adverse events this reporting group include those occurring in the TDF-TDF group during the double-blind period only (baseline to Week 48). TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period). | Adverse events this reporting group include those occurring in the ADV-TDF group during the double-blind period only (baseline to Week 48). ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period). | Adverse events for this reporting group include those occurring during the open-label TDF 300 mg period (Week 49 up to Week 480), regardless of which group they were randomized to in the double-blind period. TDF 300 mg + ADV placebo or ADV 10 mg + TDF placebo (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period. | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Double-Blind TDF | Double-Blind ADV | Open-Label TDF | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Double-Blind TDF | Double-Blind ADV | Open-Label TDF | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 15/176 (8.5%) | 7/90 (7.8%) | 41/238 (17.2%) | |||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||||
Thrombocytopenia | 1/176 (0.6%) | 0/90 (0%) | 0/238 (0%) | |||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||
Acute myocardial infarction | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Angina pectoris | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Myocarditis | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | ||||||
Congenital anomaly in offspring | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Inguinal hernia | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
General disorders | ||||||
Chest pain | 0/176 (0%) | 1/90 (1.1%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||
Cholecystitis chronic | 0/176 (0%) | 1/90 (1.1%) | 0/238 (0%) | |||
Cholelithiasis | 1/176 (0.6%) | 0/90 (0%) | 0/238 (0%) | |||
Hepatitis | 1/176 (0.6%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Abscess soft tissue | 1/176 (0.6%) | 0/90 (0%) | 0/238 (0%) | |||
Diverticulitis | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Epididymitis | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Gastroenteritis | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Groin abscess | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Hepatitis B | 1/176 (0.6%) | 0/90 (0%) | 0/238 (0%) | |||
Orchitis | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Respiratory tract infection | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Sepsis | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Skin infection | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Urinary tract infection | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||
Arthropod bite | 0/176 (0%) | 1/90 (1.1%) | 0/238 (0%) | |||
Lower limb fracture | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Procedural dizziness | 1/176 (0.6%) | 0/90 (0%) | 0/238 (0%) | |||
Skull fracture | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Subdural haematoma | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Ulna fracture | 1/176 (0.6%) | 0/90 (0%) | 0/238 (0%) | |||
Investigations | ||||||
Alanine aminotransferase increased | 6/176 (3.4%) | 4/90 (4.4%) | 6/238 (2.5%) | |||
Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 2/176 (1.1%) | 1/90 (1.1%) | 2/238 (0.8%) | |||
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Glucose urine present | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 2/238 (0.8%) | |||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||
Musculoskeletal chest pain | 0/176 (0%) | 1/90 (1.1%) | 0/238 (0%) | |||
Osteoarthritis | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Osteoporosis | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Synovial cyst | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||
Breast cancer | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Colon adenoma | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Hepatic cancer | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Hepatic cancer metastatic | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Hepatic neoplasm | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Hepatocellular carcinoma | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 2/238 (0.8%) | |||
Hodgkin's disease | 1/176 (0.6%) | 0/90 (0%) | 0/238 (0%) | |||
Lung cancer metastatic | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Lymphoma | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Prostate cancer | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 2/238 (0.8%) | |||
Tonsillar neoplasm | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Diabetic neuropathy | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Facial spasm | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Seizure | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Subarachnoid haemorrhage | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Transient ischaemic attack | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 2/238 (0.8%) | |||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||
Drug dependence | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||
Calculus ureteric | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 3/238 (1.3%) | |||
Tubulointerstitial nephritis | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||||
Ovarian cyst ruptured | 1/176 (0.6%) | 0/90 (0%) | 0/238 (0%) | |||
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||||
Abortion induced | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Vascular disorders | ||||||
Thrombosis | 0/176 (0%) | 0/90 (0%) | 1/238 (0.4%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Double-Blind TDF | Double-Blind ADV | Open-Label TDF | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 97/176 (55.1%) | 49/90 (54.4%) | 165/238 (69.3%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Abdominal pain | 6/176 (3.4%) | 3/90 (3.3%) | 22/238 (9.2%) | |||
Abdominal pain upper | 15/176 (8.5%) | 4/90 (4.4%) | 25/238 (10.5%) | |||
Diarrhoea | 12/176 (6.8%) | 3/90 (3.3%) | 12/238 (5%) | |||
Nausea | 26/176 (14.8%) | 1/90 (1.1%) | 9/238 (3.8%) | |||
General disorders | ||||||
Fatigue | 22/176 (12.5%) | 8/90 (8.9%) | 20/238 (8.4%) | |||
Influenza like illness | 9/176 (5.1%) | 3/90 (3.3%) | 14/238 (5.9%) | |||
Immune system disorders | ||||||
Seasonal allergy | 4/176 (2.3%) | 1/90 (1.1%) | 17/238 (7.1%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Bronchitis | 2/176 (1.1%) | 4/90 (4.4%) | 13/238 (5.5%) | |||
Influenza | 8/176 (4.5%) | 5/90 (5.6%) | 25/238 (10.5%) | |||
Nasopharyngitis | 22/176 (12.5%) | 13/90 (14.4%) | 43/238 (18.1%) | |||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 7/176 (4%) | 6/90 (6.7%) | 21/238 (8.8%) | |||
Investigations | ||||||
Creatinine renal clearance decreased | 1/176 (0.6%) | 1/90 (1.1%) | 12/238 (5%) | |||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||
Arthralgia | 5/176 (2.8%) | 6/90 (6.7%) | 17/238 (7.1%) | |||
Back pain | 13/176 (7.4%) | 3/90 (3.3%) | 18/238 (7.6%) | |||
Musculoskeletal pain | 2/176 (1.1%) | 3/90 (3.3%) | 15/238 (6.3%) | |||
Myalgia | 8/176 (4.5%) | 5/90 (5.6%) | 11/238 (4.6%) | |||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Dizziness | 12/176 (6.8%) | 2/90 (2.2%) | 11/238 (4.6%) | |||
Headache | 31/176 (17.6%) | 14/90 (15.6%) | 30/238 (12.6%) | |||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||
Cough | 10/176 (5.7%) | 5/90 (5.6%) | 30/238 (12.6%) | |||
Oropharyngeal pain | 8/176 (4.5%) | 5/90 (5.6%) | 18/238 (7.6%) | |||
Vascular disorders | ||||||
Hypertension | 3/176 (1.7%) | 1/90 (1.1%) | 24/238 (10.1%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Institution and investigator may publish or present the results of the trial generated there with prior written consent of Gilead; or 2 years after the trial has ended at all institutions. Proposed publications/target venue must go to Gilead 30 days (manuscripts) or 15 days (abstracts/presentations) prior. Any Gilead confidential information in the document(s) must be deleted, or if requested publication delayed for up to 45 days to permit Gilead to obtain intellectual property protection.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Clinical Trial Disclosures |
---|---|
Organization | Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
Phone | |
ClinicalTrialDisclosures@gilead.com |
- GS-US-174-0103
- 2004-005120-41