CIDP: Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Three Different Dosages of NewGam in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Poly (Radiculo) Neuropathy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Study to evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Dosages of NewGam in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Poly(radiculo)neuropathy
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Dosages of NewGam in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Poly(radiculo)neuropathy ("ProCID trial")
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 0.5 g/kg NewGam All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Drug: NewGam
In the Dose-evaluation Phase, all patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). If a patient is randomized to receive the low or medium NewGam dose, the same volume with the same infusion rate as would have been applied in case the patient would have been randomized to 2.0 g/kg NewGam will be used, thus supplemented with an authorized 0.9% w/v isotonic sodium chloride solution as appropriate and detailed in the following infusion bag split to maintain the blinding
Other Names:
|
Experimental: 1.0 g/kg NewGam All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Drug: NewGam
In the Dose-evaluation Phase, all patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). If a patient is randomized to receive the low or medium NewGam dose, the same volume with the same infusion rate as would have been applied in case the patient would have been randomized to 2.0 g/kg NewGam will be used, thus supplemented with an authorized 0.9% w/v isotonic sodium chloride solution as appropriate and detailed in the following infusion bag split to maintain the blinding
Other Names:
|
Experimental: 2.0 g/kg NewGam All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Drug: NewGam
In the Dose-evaluation Phase, all patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). If a patient is randomized to receive the low or medium NewGam dose, the same volume with the same infusion rate as would have been applied in case the patient would have been randomized to 2.0 g/kg NewGam will be used, thus supplemented with an authorized 0.9% w/v isotonic sodium chloride solution as appropriate and detailed in the following infusion bag split to maintain the blinding
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Decrease in the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability Score [at Week 24]
Efficacy - Proportion of responders in the 1.0 g/kg NewGam arm at Week 24 (Termination Visit) relative to baseline (Week 0). A responder being defined as a patient with a decrease of at least 1 point on the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score (a scale from 0 to 10, from healthy to unable to make any purposeful movements with arms and/or legs)
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Decrease in the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability Score [at Week 24]
Proportion of responders in the 0.5 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg NewGam arms at Week 24 relative to baseline compared to the 1.0 g/kg arm, based on the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score
- Grip Strength Score [at Week 24]
Proportion of responders in the 0.5 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg NewGam arms at Week 24 relative to baseline at Week 0 compared to the 1.0 g/kg arm, based on the grip strength (Martin Vigorimeter) using the previously published minimum clinically important difference (MCID) cut-off of 8 kilopascal (kPa)
- Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS Score) [at Week 24]
Proportion of responders in the 0.5 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg NewGam arms at Week 24 relative to baseline at Week 0 compared to the 1.0 g/kg arm, based on the Inflammatory Rasch-built overall disability scale (I-RODS Score) using the MCID concept related to the varying standard errors (MCID-SE) as recently demonstrated
- Worsening in the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability Score [Week 24]
Time to first confirmed worsening on the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scale by at least 1 point from the value at baseline (Week 0)
- Mean Change in Grip Strength [Up to 24 weeks]
Mean change from baseline (Week 0) to Termination Visit in grip strength of both hands (assessed by Martin vigorimeter). The reported change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point.
- Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) [Up to 24 weeks]
Mean change from baseline (Week 0) to Termination Visit in Inflammatory Rasch-built overall disability sum score (I-RODS using the concept of MCID-SE as recently reported) and number of improvers. The reported change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point. A scale from 0 to 48, from "Not possible to perform" to "Possible without any difficulty". Higher values represent a better outcome.
- Motor Nerves [Up to 24 weeks]
Mean change from baseline (Week 0) to Termination Visit in sum of the distal evoked amplitude of 4 right sided and 4 left sided motor nerves (peroneal, tibial, ulnar and median). The reported change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point.
- Mean Change in Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS Scale) [Up to 24 weeks]
Mean change from baseline (Week 0) to Termination Visit in Pain Intensity Numeric Rating Scale (PI-NRS). The reported change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point. The Pain Intensity Numeric Rating Scale (PI-NRS, a numeric scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain. A higher value represents a worse outcome.
- Worsening on the Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS Scale) [24 weeks]
Time to first confirmed worsening on the I-RODS scale. The reported change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point. A scale from 0 to 48, from "Not possible to perform" to "Possible without any difficulty". Higher values represent a better outcome. Worsening is determined using the concept of MCID (minimum clinically important difference) using the individually obtained standard errors (MCID-SE).
- 1 Point Decrease in the INCAT Disability Score [24 weeks]
Time to 1 point decrease (improvement of disability) in adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score
- Decrease in Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS Scale) [24 weeks]
Time to decrease in Inflammatory Rasch-built overall disability scale (I-RODS) scores
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with diagnosis of definite or probable Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) Guideline 2010 [van den Bergh et al., 2010]; including patients with Multifocal Acquired Demyelinating Sensory And Motor Neuropathy (MADSAM) or pure motor Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP )
-
Patients currently depending on treatment with immunoglobulins or corticosteroids
-
Patients with active disease, i.e. not being in remission, who are progressive or relapsing prior to trial start or during the Wash-out Phase
-
Weakness of at least 2 limbs
-
18 to <80 years of age
-
Adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score between 2 and 9 (with a score of 2 coming exclusively from leg disability)
-
Voluntarily given, fully informed written consent obtained from patient before any study-related procedures are conducted
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Unifocal forms of Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)
-
Pure sensory Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)
-
Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) with conduction block [van den Bergh et al., 2010]
-
Patients who previously failed immunoglobulin treatment
-
Treatment with immunomodulatory/suppressive agents (cyclosporin, methotrexate, mitoxantrone, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine) during the six months prior to baseline visit
-
Patients on or treated with rituximab, alemtuzumab, cyclophosphamide, or other intensive chemotherapeutic regimens, previous lymphoid irradiation or stem cell transplantation during the 12 months prior to baseline visit
-
Respiratory impairment requiring mechanical ventilation
-
Myelopathy or evidence of central nervous system demyelination or significant persisting neurological deficits from stroke, or central nervous system (CNS) trauma
-
Clinical evidence of peripheral neuropathy from another cause such as
-
connective tissue disease or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
-
HIV infection, hepatitis, Lyme disease
-
cancer (with the exception of basal cell skin cancer)
-
IgM paraproteinemia with anti-myelin associated glycoprotein antibodies
-
Diabetic neuropathy
-
Cardiac insufficiency (New York Heart Association [NYHA] III/IV), cardiomyopathy, significant cardiac dysrhythmia requiring treatment, unstable or advanced ischemic heart disease
-
Severe liver disease (ALAT 3x > normal value)
-
Severe kidney disease (creatinine 1.5x > normal value)
-
Hepatitis B, hepatitis C or HIV infection
-
Thromboembolic events: patients with a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) within the last year prior to baseline visit or pulmonary embolism ever; patients with susceptibility to embolism or deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
-
Body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2
-
Patients with uncompensated hypothyroidism (abnormally high Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone [TSH] and abnormally low Thyroxine [T4]) or known vitamin B12 deficiency if patients don't receive adequate substitution therapy
-
Medical conditions whose symptoms and effects could alter protein catabolism and/or Immunoglobulin G (IgG) utilization (e.g. protein-losing enteropathies, nephrotic syndrome)
-
Known Immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency with antibodies to Immunoglobulin A (IgA)
-
History of severe hypersensitivity, e.g. anaphylaxis or severe systemic response to immuno-globulin, blood or plasma derived products, or any component of NewGam
-
Known blood hyperviscosity, or other hypercoagulable states
-
Use of other blood or plasma-derived products within three months prior to Visit 2
-
Patients with a past or present history of drug abuse or alcohol abuse within the preceding five years prior to baseline visit
-
Patients unable or unwilling to understand or comply with the study protocol
-
Participation in another interventional clinical study with investigational medicinal product (IMP) treatment currently or during the three months prior to Visit 2
-
Women who are breast feeding, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, or are unwilling to use an effective birth control method (such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices (IUDs), sexual abstinence or vasectomized partner) while on study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MHAT Puls EOOD | Blagoevgrad | Bulgaria | 2700 | |
2 | St. Naum Hospital | Sofia | Bulgaria | 1797 | |
3 | Toronto General Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | M5G 2C4 |
4 | Octapharma Research Site | Montréal | Canada | H3A2B4 | |
5 | Outpatient Clinic of Neurology | Hradec Králové | Czechia | 500 03 | |
6 | Regional Hospital Pardubice | Pardubice | Czechia | 532 03 | |
7 | Thomayer Faculty Hospital | Prague | Czechia | 140 00 | |
8 | University Medical Center Goettigen | Goettigen | Germany | 37075 | |
9 | Jahn Ferenc Del Pesti Korhaz | Budapest | Hungary | 1204 | |
10 | Szegedi Tudományegyetem ÁOK Neurológiai Klinika | Szeged | Hungary | 6725 | |
11 | Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 w Lublinie Klinika Neurologii | Lublin | Poland | 20-954 | |
12 | Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny W Olsztynie | Olsztyn | Poland | 10-561 | |
13 | Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny | Wrocław | Poland | 50-556 | |
14 | Theo Health S.R.L. | Braşov | Romania | 500091 | |
15 | Institutul Clinic Fundeni | Bucharest | Romania | 022328 | |
16 | Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta "Sf.Apostol Andrei" Constanta | Constanţa | Romania | 900591 | |
17 | Republican Clinical Neurological Centre | Kazan' | Russian Federation | 420021 | |
18 | Neurology Research Centre | Moscow | Russian Federation | 125367 | |
19 | Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital N.A. N.A.Semashko | Nizhny Novgorod | Russian Federation | 603126 | |
20 | National Medical Research Centre of Psychiatry and Neurology n.a. V.M.Bekhterev | Saint Petersburg | Russian Federation | 192019 | |
21 | City Multifield Hospital #2 | Saint Petersburg | Russian Federation | 194354 | |
22 | Ivano Frankivsk National Medical University | Ivano-Frankivs'k | Ukraine | 76008 | |
23 | National Medical Academy Of Postgraduate Education Named After P.L. Shupyk | Kyiv | Ukraine | 4112 | |
24 | Volyn Regional Clinical Hospital | Luts'k | Ukraine | 4300 | |
25 | Vinnytsia National Medical University | Vinnytsia | Ukraine | 21005 | |
26 | Municipal Institution Zaporizhzhya Regional Clinical Hospital | Zaporizhzhya | Ukraine | 69600 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Octapharma
Investigators
- Study Director: Wolfgang Frenzel, MD, Octapharma
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- NGAM-08
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 35 | 69 | 38 |
COMPLETED | 28 | 61 | 34 |
NOT COMPLETED | 7 | 8 | 4 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 35 | 69 | 38 | 142 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
52.49
(14.449)
|
56.32
(14.616)
|
58.05
(13.764)
|
55.84
(14.398)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
13
37.1%
|
31
44.9%
|
14
36.8%
|
58
40.8%
|
Male |
22
62.9%
|
38
55.1%
|
24
63.2%
|
84
59.2%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | ||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
White |
35
100%
|
69
100%
|
38
100%
|
142
100%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Weight (kg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg] |
84.09
(16.511)
|
81.74
(16.333)
|
77.68
(75.50)
|
81.23
(79.00)
|
Height (cm) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [cm] |
173.46
(9.506)
|
172.81
(8.304)
|
171.61
(9.030)
|
172.65
(8.770)
|
BMI (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2] |
27.92
(4.873)
|
27.27
(4.588)
|
26.33
(5.231)
|
27.18
(4.837)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Decrease in the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability Score |
---|---|
Description | Efficacy - Proportion of responders in the 1.0 g/kg NewGam arm at Week 24 (Termination Visit) relative to baseline (Week 0). A responder being defined as a patient with a decrease of at least 1 point on the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score (a scale from 0 to 10, from healthy to unable to make any purposeful movements with arms and/or legs) |
Time Frame | at Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat Set (ITTS): The ITTS consist of all patients of the Safety Data Set for whom any data was collected post infusion of IMP. Three patients (one in the 0.5 g/kg group and two in the 2.0 g/kg group) were excluded from the ITTS as no data were collected post-infusion of IMP. Therefore n=139 for the ITTS. Every treated subject will be considered in the analysis according to his randomized treatment/dose assignment. |
Arm/Group Title | 1.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 69 |
Number [proportion of subjects] |
.7971
|
Title | Decrease in the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability Score |
---|---|
Description | Proportion of responders in the 0.5 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg NewGam arms at Week 24 relative to baseline compared to the 1.0 g/kg arm, based on the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score |
Time Frame | at Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat Set (ITTS): The ITTS consist of all patients of the Safety Data Set for whom any data was collected post infusion of IMP. Three patients (one in the 0.5 g/kg group and two in the 2.0 g/kg group) were excluded from the ITTS as no data were collected post-infusion of IMP. Therefore n=139 for the ITTS. Every treated subject will be considered in the analysis according to his randomized treatment/dose assignment. |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 34 | 69 | 36 |
Number [Proportion of responders] |
.6471
|
.7971
|
.9167
|
Title | Grip Strength Score |
---|---|
Description | Proportion of responders in the 0.5 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg NewGam arms at Week 24 relative to baseline at Week 0 compared to the 1.0 g/kg arm, based on the grip strength (Martin Vigorimeter) using the previously published minimum clinically important difference (MCID) cut-off of 8 kilopascal (kPa) |
Time Frame | at Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat Set (ITTS): The ITTS consist of all patients of the Safety Data Set for whom any data was collected post infusion of IMP. Three patients (one in the 0.5 g/kg group and two in the 2.0 g/kg group) were excluded from the ITTS as no data were collected post-infusion of IMP. Therefore n=139 for the ITTS. Every treated subject will be considered in the analysis according to his randomized treatment/dose assignment. |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 34 | 69 | 36 |
Number [Proportion of responders] |
.5588
|
.6522
|
.8333
|
Title | Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS Score) |
---|---|
Description | Proportion of responders in the 0.5 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg NewGam arms at Week 24 relative to baseline at Week 0 compared to the 1.0 g/kg arm, based on the Inflammatory Rasch-built overall disability scale (I-RODS Score) using the MCID concept related to the varying standard errors (MCID-SE) as recently demonstrated |
Time Frame | at Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat Set (ITTS): The ITTS consist of all patients of the Safety Data Set for whom any data was collected post infusion of IMP. Three patients (one in the 0.5 g/kg group and two in the 2.0 g/kg group) were excluded from the ITTS as no data were collected post-infusion of IMP. Therefore n=139 for the ITTS. Every treated subject will be considered in the analysis according to his randomized treatment/dose assignment. |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 34 | 69 | 36 |
Number [Proportion of responders] |
.3824
|
.5507
|
.7222
|
Title | Worsening in the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Disability Score |
---|---|
Description | Time to first confirmed worsening on the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scale by at least 1 point from the value at baseline (Week 0) |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
There was only 1 patient with worsening (in the 1.0 g/kg group), thus an analysis of the time to first worsening was not possible. |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 34 | 69 | 36 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [days] |
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
Title | Mean Change in Grip Strength |
---|---|
Description | Mean change from baseline (Week 0) to Termination Visit in grip strength of both hands (assessed by Martin vigorimeter). The reported change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point. |
Time Frame | Up to 24 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat Set (ITTS): The ITTS consist of all patients of the Safety Data Set for whom any data was collected post infusion of IMP. Three patients (one in the 0.5 g/kg group and two in the 2.0 g/kg group) were excluded from the ITTS as no data were collected post-infusion of IMP. Therefore n=139 for the ITTS. Every treated subject will be considered in the analysis according to his randomized treatment/dose assignment. |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 34 | 69 | 36 |
Dominant Hand |
23.91
(25.290)
|
19.38
(20.377)
|
26.06
(25.030)
|
Non-dominant Hand |
23.94
(24.600)
|
17.43
(19.916)
|
24.53
(22.247)
|
Title | Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) |
---|---|
Description | Mean change from baseline (Week 0) to Termination Visit in Inflammatory Rasch-built overall disability sum score (I-RODS using the concept of MCID-SE as recently reported) and number of improvers. The reported change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point. A scale from 0 to 48, from "Not possible to perform" to "Possible without any difficulty". Higher values represent a better outcome. |
Time Frame | Up to 24 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat Set (ITTS): The ITTS consist of all patients of the Safety Data Set for whom any data was collected post infusion of IMP. Three patients (one in the 0.5 g/kg group and two in the 2.0 g/kg group) were excluded from the ITTS as no data were collected post-infusion of IMP. Therefore n=139 for the ITTS. Every treated subject will be considered in the analysis according to his randomized treatment/dose assignment. |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 34 | 69 | 36 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
11.38
(12.485)
|
10.32
(10.836)
|
13.86
(11.981)
|
Title | Motor Nerves |
---|---|
Description | Mean change from baseline (Week 0) to Termination Visit in sum of the distal evoked amplitude of 4 right sided and 4 left sided motor nerves (peroneal, tibial, ulnar and median). The reported change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point. |
Time Frame | Up to 24 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat Set (ITTS): The ITTS consist of all patients of the Safety Data Set for whom any data was collected post infusion of IMP. Three patients (one in the 0.5 g/kg group and two in the 2.0 g/kg group) were excluded from the ITTS as no data were collected post-infusion of IMP. Therefore n=139 for the ITTS. Every treated subject will be considered in the analysis according to his randomized treatment/dose assignment. |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 34 | 68 | 36 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mV] |
2.16
(6.332)
|
2.69
(6.688)
|
3.93
(9.298)
|
Title | Mean Change in Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS Scale) |
---|---|
Description | Mean change from baseline (Week 0) to Termination Visit in Pain Intensity Numeric Rating Scale (PI-NRS). The reported change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point. The Pain Intensity Numeric Rating Scale (PI-NRS, a numeric scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain. A higher value represents a worse outcome. |
Time Frame | Up to 24 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat Set (ITTS): The ITTS consist of all patients of the Safety Data Set for whom any data was collected post infusion of IMP. Three patients (one in the 0.5 g/kg group and two in the 2.0 g/kg group) were excluded from the ITTS as no data were collected post-infusion of IMP. Therefore n=139 for the ITTS. Every treated subject will be considered in the analysis according to his randomized treatment/dose assignment. |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 34 | 69 | 36 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
-2.29
(3.040)
|
-2.19
(2.907)
|
-2.17
(3.256)
|
Title | Worsening on the Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS Scale) |
---|---|
Description | Time to first confirmed worsening on the I-RODS scale. The reported change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point. A scale from 0 to 48, from "Not possible to perform" to "Possible without any difficulty". Higher values represent a better outcome. Worsening is determined using the concept of MCID (minimum clinically important difference) using the individually obtained standard errors (MCID-SE). |
Time Frame | 24 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
There was 1 patient with worsening in the 0.5 g/kg group and 2 in the 1.0 g/kg group; an analysis of the time to first worsening was not possible |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 34 | 69 | 36 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [days] |
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
Title | 1 Point Decrease in the INCAT Disability Score |
---|---|
Description | Time to 1 point decrease (improvement of disability) in adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score |
Time Frame | 24 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat Set (ITTS): The ITTS consist of all patients of the Safety Data Set for whom any data was collected post infusion of IMP. Three patients (one in the 0.5 g/kg group and two in the 2.0 g/kg group) were excluded from the ITTS as no data were collected post-infusion of IMP. Therefore n=139 for the ITTS. Every treated subject will be considered in the analysis according to his randomized treatment/dose assignment. |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 34 | 69 | 36 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [days] |
22.0
|
26.0
|
23.0
|
Title | Decrease in Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS Scale) |
---|---|
Description | Time to decrease in Inflammatory Rasch-built overall disability scale (I-RODS) scores |
Time Frame | 24 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat Set (ITTS): The ITTS consist of all patients of the Safety Data Set for whom any data was collected post infusion of IMP. Three patients (one in the 0.5 g/kg group and two in the 2.0 g/kg group) were excluded from the ITTS as no data were collected post-infusion of IMP. Therefore n=139 for the ITTS. Every treated subject will be considered in the analysis according to his randomized treatment/dose assignment. |
Arm/Group Title | 0.5 g/kg NewGam | 1.0 g/kg NewGam | 2.0 g/kg NewGam |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (0.5g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (1.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). | All patients will receive a loading dose of 2.0 g/kg Newgam (administered over two consecutive days), followed by seven infusions of the maintenance dose the patient has been randomized to (2.0g/kg NewGam), also administered over two consecutive days every 3 weeks (±4 days). |
Measure Participants | 34 | 69 | 36 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [days] |
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Up to 36 weeks | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient receiving an IMP and which does not have to have a causal relationship with treatment. At each visit AEs will be elicited using a standard non-leading question like "How have you been since the last visit / during the previous study period?" Patient diaries will also be checked. Safety Data Set (SDS): The SDS was based on all randomized patients who received at least part of one infusion of IMP. Therefore n=142 for the SDS. | |||||||
Arm/Group Title | NGAM 0.5 g/kg | NGAM 1.0 g/kg | NGAM 2.0 g/kg | Total | ||||
Arm/Group Description | NGAM 0.5 g/kg | NGAM 1.0 g/kg | NGAM 2.0 g/kg | Total of all three treatment arms. | ||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||
NGAM 0.5 g/kg | NGAM 1.0 g/kg | NGAM 2.0 g/kg | Total | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/35 (0%) | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1/38 (2.6%) | 2/142 (1.4%) | ||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||
NGAM 0.5 g/kg | NGAM 1.0 g/kg | NGAM 2.0 g/kg | Total | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/35 (2.9%) | 4/69 (5.8%) | 1/38 (2.6%) | 6/142 (4.2%) | ||||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||||
Cardio-respiratory Arrest | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||||||
Deafness unilateral | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||
Vomiting | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||||
Osteomyelitis | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Pneumonia | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Encephalitis | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||
Osteonecrosis | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||||
Meningioma | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||
Headache | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||
Aspiration | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||
NGAM 0.5 g/kg | NGAM 1.0 g/kg | NGAM 2.0 g/kg | Total | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 20/35 (57.1%) | 45/69 (65.2%) | 24/38 (63.2%) | 88/142 (62%) | ||||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||||||
Leukopenia | 1/35 (2.9%) | 2 | 5/69 (7.2%) | 5 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 6/142 (4.2%) | 7 |
Anaemia | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 2 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 2 | 3/142 (2.1%) | 4 |
Thrombocytopenia | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 2 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 2 |
Eosinophilia | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Lymphadenitis | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Neutropenia | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Thrombocytosis | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Cardiac disorders | ||||||||
Tachycardia | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 4 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 4/142 (2.8%) | 6 |
Bradycardia | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Left atrial dilatation | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||||||
Tinnitus | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Eye disorders | ||||||||
Conjunctival oedema | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||
Nausea | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 2 | 3/38 (7.9%) | 5 | 5/142 (3.5%) | 8 |
Diarrhoea | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 2 | 2/38 (5.3%) | 2 | 4/142 (2.8%) | 4 |
Vomiting | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 2 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 3 |
Abdominal pain | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 2 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 2 |
Abdominal pain lower | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Abdominal pain upper | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Dysphagia | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Hiatus hernia | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
General disorders | ||||||||
Pyrexia | 3/35 (8.6%) | 4 | 6/69 (8.7%) | 6 | 2/38 (5.3%) | 3 | 11/142 (7.7%) | 13 |
Chills | 3/35 (8.6%) | 4 | 3/69 (4.3%) | 3 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 7/142 (4.9%) | 8 |
Influenza like illness | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 3/69 (4.3%) | 3 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 3/142 (2.1%) | 3 |
Asthenia | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 2 |
Chest pain | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 2 |
Catheter site pain | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Chest discomfort | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 2 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 2 |
Infusion site coldness | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 2 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 2 |
Infusion site discomfort | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Oedema peripheral | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Peripheral swelling | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||||
Autoimmune hepatitis | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Gallbladder disorders | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||||
Nasopharyngitis | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 2 | 2/38 (5.3%) | 2 | 5/142 (3.5%) | 5 |
Respiratory tract infection viral | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 2 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 4/142 (2.8%) | 4 |
Urinary tract infection | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 2 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 4/142 (2.8%) | 4 |
Eczema infected | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Infective exacerbation of bronchiectasis | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 2 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 2 |
Influenza | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Pharyngitis | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Sinusitis | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Upper respiratory tract infection | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Viral pharyngitis | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Viral upper respiratory tract infection | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||
Contusion | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Fall | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Laceration | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Ligament injury | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Investigations | ||||||||
Blood pressure increased | 3/35 (8.6%) | 7 | 6/69 (8.7%) | 7 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 9/142 (6.3%) | 14 |
Body temperature increased | 2/35 (5.7%) | 2 | 4/69 (5.8%) | 7 | 3/38 (7.9%) | 3 | 9/142 (6.3%) | 12 |
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 5/69 (7.2%) | 5 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 5/142 (3.5%) | 5 |
Heart rate decreased | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 2 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 3/142 (2.1%) | 3 |
Transaminases increased | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 2 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 3/142 (2.1%) | 3 |
Alanine aminotransferase increased | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 3 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 3 |
Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 3 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 3 |
Blood uric acid increased | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Fibrin D dimer increased | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Haemoglobin decreased | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Weight decreased | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||||
Dehydration | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Dyslipidaemia | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Electrolyte imbalance | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Type 2 diabetes mellitus | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||
Back pain | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 4/69 (5.8%) | 4 | 2/38 (5.3%) | 2 | 6/142 (4.2%) | 6 |
Pain in extremity | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 2 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 3/142 (2.1%) | 3 |
Arthralgia | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||
Headache | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 9/69 (13%) | 11 | 8/38 (21.1%) | 12 | 19/142 (13.4%) | 25 |
Somnolence | 2/35 (5.7%) | 3 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 3/142 (2.1%) | 4 |
Dizziness | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 2 |
Tension headache | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 4 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 3 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 7 |
Carpal tunnel syndrome | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Neuralgia | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Paraesthesia | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Restless legs syndrome | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||||
Micturition urgency | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||
Cough | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 2 |
Dyspnoea | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Tachypnoea | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 4 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 4 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||||||
Dermatitis allergic | 4/35 (11.4%) | 4 | 5/69 (7.2%) | 10 | 4/38 (10.5%) | 5 | 13/142 (9.2%) | 19 |
Skin exfoliation | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 2/69 (2.9%) | 3 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 4/142 (2.8%) | 5 |
Urticaria | 3/35 (8.6%) | 4 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 3/142 (2.1%) | 4 |
Pruritus | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 2/38 (5.3%) | 3 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 3 |
Rash | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 5 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 6 |
Seborrhoeic dermatitis | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 2/142 (1.4%) | 2 |
Decubitis ulcer | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Dermatitis atopic | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Erythema | 1/35 (2.9%) | 2 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 2 |
Rash erythematous | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Vascular disorders | ||||||||
Hypertension | 0/35 (0%) | 0 | 3/69 (4.3%) | 3 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 3/142 (2.1%) | 3 |
Hypotension | 1/35 (2.9%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/38 (0%) | 0 | 1/142 (0.7%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Mikaela Raymond |
---|---|
Organization | CRMG |
Phone | 866-337-1868 |
ctgov@clinicalresearchmgt.com |
- NGAM-08