Clinical Efficacy of Two Erythropoietin Drug in Participants With Secondary Anemia to Chronic Kidney Disease.

Sponsor
Azidus Brasil (Industry)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT01695759
Collaborator
Blau Farmaceutica S.A. (Industry)
92
10
2
49
9.2
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, parallel, placebo-controlled, phase III study for evaluation of clinical efficacy and immunogenicity of drug Eritromax® - (rHuEPO Blau Farmacêutica S/A.) compared to Eprex® (Janssen-Cilag rHuEPO) for the treatment of patients with secondary anemia to chronic kidney disease (CKD), throughout the correction phase by assessing the change in hemoglobin levels.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

This is a phase III study, in which participants with secondary anemia to chronic kidney disease will receive two subcutaneous injection of 50 UI/Kg of the investigational product (Eritromax®) or Eprex® per week. After four weeks of treatment, the dose of drugs will be change by clinical judged throughout study according to laboratory results. The evidence of efficacy will be evaluated by hemoglobin levels alteration throughout the correction phase (first four weeks). Secondary efficacy and safety endpoints will be assessed by: maintenance of hemoglobin levels (baseline vs. end of treatment) over maintenance phase; dose of EPO required during correction and maintenance phase; Transfusion needs; report of adverse events (including type, frequency, intensity, serioussness, severity and relation to the investigation product) throughouht 12 months of follow-up. Additionally, the immunological response of products over study will be evaluated by quantification of anti-erythropoietin every six months.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
92 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy and Immunogenicity of Drug Eritromax® at Blau Farmacêutica S.A. Compared to Eprex®, Produced by Janssen-Cilag Laboratory in Participants With Secondary Anemia to Chronic Kidney Disease.
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Epoetin alpha

Participants assigned to this arm will receive two subcutaneous administrations per week of 50 UI/kg of Epoetin alpha (Eritromax), totaling 100 UI/kg/week. After the first four weeks of treatment, once a month throughout the study the medication dose can be adjusted by the study Investigator according to the laboratory results.

Drug: Epoetin alpha
Participants assigned to this arm will receive two subcutaneous administrations per week of 50 UI/kg of Epoetin alpha (Eritromax), totaling 100 UI/kg/week. After the first four weeks of treatment, once a month throughout the study the medication dose can be adjusted by the study Investigator according to the laboratory results.

Active Comparator: Eprex

Participants assigned to this arm will receive two subcutaneous administrations per week of 50 UI/kg of Epoetin alpha (Eprex), totaling 100 UI/kg/week. After the first four weeks of treatment, once a month throughout the study the medication dose can be adjusted by the study Investigator according to the laboratory results.

Drug: Eprex
Participants assigned to this arm will receive two subcutaneous administrations per week of 50 UI/kg of Epoetin alpha (Eprex), totaling 100 UI/kg/week. After the first four weeks of treatment, once a month throughout the study the medication dose can be adjusted by the study Investigator according to the laboratory results.
Other Names:
  • Epoetin alpha
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change of hemoglobin levels at correction phase (baseline vs end of treatment) [until 6 months]

      In the correction phase, change in serum Hb levels (baseline vs. end of initial treatment (EOIT) = levels of Hb presented before the V0 treatment compared to the Hb levels presented at the end of the correction phase) will be evaluated for a maximum period of 6 months after starting treatment. This one parameter will be demonstrated through: Percentage of participants achieving Hb levels within the target (≥ 10.5 to ≤ 12 g / dL).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Maintenance of hemoglobin levels [until the end of 12 months]

      Will be evaluated by porcentage of participants whose Hb levels remained within the therapeutic range (≥10,5 a ≤ 12 g/dL).

    2. Adjustment of EPO dose required during correction and/or maintenance phase [until the end of 12 months]

      Will be evaluated by mean dose of EPO used between groups and number of participants that needed of dose adjustment over correction and/or maintenance phase.

    3. Transfusion needs [until the end of 12 months]

      Will be evaluated by porcentage of participants that needed of blood transfusion throughout the study.

    4. Report of Adverse Events [until the end of 12 months]

      Will be evaluated by report of adverse events throughout the study. The Adverse events will be classified about the type, frequency, intensity, seriousness, severity and relation to the investigational product.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Immunological Response [every six months]

      The immunological response induced by epoetin alpha will be evaluated by quantification of anti-erithropoetin antibodies, every six months.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 70 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Voluntary participation and agree to all the purposes of the study by signing and dating ICF;

    2. Male or female participantes, regardless of race or social class;

    3. Participants aged ≥18 and ≤70 years;

    4. Bearer dialysis-dependent CKD (hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis *);

    5. Clinical diagnosis of anemia, characterized as hemoglobin levels <10g/dL before the start of the study;

    6. Adequate dialysis: Kt / V ≥ 1.2 for hemodialysis patients (based on the calculation of Daugirdas II) and ≥ 1.7 for patients on peritoneal dialysis;

    7. Adequate iron stores (TSAT> 20% and serum ferritin> 100ng/ml) prior to initiation of treatment with erythropoietin.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Participation in clinical trials in the 12 months preceding the survey;

    2. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension, with mean above 180/100mmHg and whose requiring hospitalization in the last 6 months;

    3. Presence of other causes of anemia than CKD, such as bleeding, hemolysis, pernicious anemia and hemoglobinopathies;

    4. Patients who present changes or clinical abnormalities, qualified as interfering changes, such as severe hyperparathyroidism (iPTH> 1000 pg / mL), severe congestive heart failure (NYHA Class IV), acute myocardial infarction within the last 3 months, or active neoplasia in follow-up, severe liver disease, active infection (leukocyte changes), history of aluminum toxicity or scheduled surgery, pregnancy or lactation;

    5. Patients who have a known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation and to products derived from mammalian cells;

    6. Prior therapies with erythropoietin for less than 3 months;

    7. Realization transfusion for less than 3 months;

    8. Any situation at the discretion of the Principal Investigator interfere with study data.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Clínica Senhor do Bomfim Ltda Feira de Santana Bahia Brazil 44001-584
    2 Instituto Scribner de Ensino, Pesquisa, Ciência e Tecnologia Curitiba Parana Brazil
    3 Fundação Universitária de Caxias do Sul - Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica para Estudos Multicêntricos Caxias do Sul Rio Grande Do Sul Brazil 95070-561
    4 Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Rio Grande Do Sul Brazil
    5 União Brasileira de Educação e Assistência Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS Porto Alegre Rio Grande Do Sul Brazil
    6 Fundação Pró-Rim Joinville Santa Catarina Brazil
    7 Hospital de Ensino Padre Anchieta São Bernardo do Campo São Paulo Brazil
    8 CMIN - Clínica De Medicina Interna E Nefrologia São Paulo Brazil 05001-000
    9 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão) São Paulo Brazil
    10 Real e Benemérita Associação Portuguesa de Beneficência São Paulo (Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa) São Paulo Brazil

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Azidus Brasil
    • Blau Farmaceutica S.A.

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Regiane Braga, Analyst, Blau Farmaceutica S.A.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Azidus Brasil
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01695759
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • EPOBLA1011
    • Emenda 04 - 11/May/2015
    First Posted:
    Sep 28, 2012
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 20, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2018
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Azidus Brasil
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 20, 2018