A Two-Part, Single-Blind, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Patiromer for the Treatment of Hyperkalemia (OPAL)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of patiromer (investigational drug) in the treatment of hyperkalemia (high serum potassium). The study also evaluated the effect of withdrawing patiromer treatment and assessed whether chronic treatment with patiromer prevented the recurrence of hyperkalemia. The safety of patiromer treatment was also evaluated.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
There were two parts in the study, Part A and Part B.
Part A was an assessment of 4 weeks of dosing with patiromer in the treatment of hyperkalemia; Part B was a randomized, placebo-controlled, 8-week assessment of the withdrawal of patiromer in participants with a baseline serum potassium at the beginning of Part A ≥ 5.5 mEq/L who responded to the 4 weeks of treatment with patiromer during Part A.
All participants received patiromer during Part A; Part B participants were randomized to continue patiromer or switch to placebo. Total study participation was up to 14 weeks (including up to 2 weeks of follow up).
The dose of patiromer could be titrated based on participant's serum potassium response.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Patiromer Patiromer was administered twice a day as a powder mixed with water. |
Drug: Patiromer
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Placebo was administered twice a day as a powder mixed with water. |
Drug: Placebo
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in Serum Potassium From Part A Baseline to Part A Week 4 [Part A Baseline to Part A Week 4]
The primary analysis endpoint is the change from Baseline at Week 4. The estimate of the change at Week 4 is from a repeated measures model, which includes data from Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. The analysis includes all intent to treat participants who had a serum potassium result at baseline and at least one weekly post-baseline visit (i.e. Part A Week 1 or later) and excludes six participants who had no result collected after Day 3).
- Change in Serum Potassium From Part B Baseline [Part B Baseline to Part B Week 4 or first local laboratory serum potassium < 3.8 mEq/L or ≥ 5.5 mEq/L]
Change in Serum Potassium from Part B Baseline to either: Part B Week 4 visit, if the participant's serum potassium remained ≥ 3.8 mEq/L and < 5.5 mEq/L up to the Part B Week 4 visit or the earliest Part B visit at which the participant's serum potassium was < 3.8 mEq/L or ≥ 5.5 mEq/L.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium Levels in the Target Range of 3.8 to < 5.1 mEq/L at Part A Week 4 [Week 4]
- Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium That Was ≥ 5.5 mEq/L in Part B [Part B Baseline to Part B Week 8]
- Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium ≥ 5.1 mEq/L in Part B [Part B Baseline to Part B Week 8]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Males and females ages 18 - 80
-
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) - eGFR 15 to < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 at screening
-
Hyperkalemia, defined as a serum potassium value of 5.1 to < 6.5 mEq/L at screening
-
Taking either an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor, an Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an aldosterone antagonist (AA) medication
-
Informed consent given
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Participants with auto-immune related chronic kidney disease such as lupus nephritis or renal scleroderma/scleroderma renal crisis, or mixed connective tissue disease with renal involvement
-
Participants with uncontrolled Type 1 diabetes, defined as or a HbA1c > 10.0 %, or hospitalization to treat hyper- or hypo-glycemia in the past 3 months within the previous 6 months in participants with Type 2 diabetes
-
Participants with severe heart failure, defined as NYHA (New York Heart Association) class IV
-
Participants with major surgery including thoracic and cardiac, in the past 3 months, or participants with heart or kidney transplant
-
Participants with significant cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events in the past 2 months, such as cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, or stroke
-
Participants with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Investigator Site 3121 | Azusa | California | United States | 91702 |
2 | Investigator Site 3133 | Los Angeles | California | United States | 90025 |
3 | Investigator Site 3103 | Sacramento | California | United States | 95825 |
4 | Investigator Site 3129 | Santa Barbara | California | United States | 93110 |
5 | Investigator Site 3130 | Ventura | California | United States | 93003 |
6 | Investigator Site 3105 | Edgewater | Florida | United States | 32132 |
7 | Investigator Site 3113 | Hollywood | Florida | United States | 33021 |
8 | Investigator Site 3106 | Port Charlotte | Florida | United States | 33952 |
9 | Investigator Site 3120 | Augusta | Georgia | United States | 30909 |
10 | Investigator Site 3102 | Farmington | Missouri | United States | 63640 |
11 | Investigator Site 3104 | Kansas City | Missouri | United States | 64111 |
12 | Investigator Site 3134 | Flushing | New York | United States | 11355 |
13 | Investigator Site 3107 | Bethlehem | Pennsylvania | United States | 18017 |
14 | Investigator Site 3110 | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78229 |
15 | Investigator Site 1103 | Karlovac | Croatia | 47000 | |
16 | Investigator Site 1102 | Osijek | Croatia | 31000 | |
17 | Investigator Site 1104 | Zagreb | Croatia | 10000 | |
18 | Investigator Site 1105 | Zagreb | Croatia | 10000 | |
19 | Investigator Site 1106 | Zagreb | Croatia | 10000 | |
20 | Investigator Site 1205 | Znojmo | Czechia | 66 902 | |
21 | Investigator Site 2103 | Aarhus N | Denmark | 8200 | |
22 | Investigator Site 2107 | Fredericia | Denmark | 7000 | |
23 | Investigator Site 2101 | Roskilde | Denmark | 4000 | |
24 | Investigator Site 2105 | Viborg | Denmark | 8800 | |
25 | Investigator Site 1308 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0102 | |
26 | Investigator Site 1312 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0144 | |
27 | Investigator Site 1301 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0159 | |
28 | Investigator Site 1302 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0159 | |
29 | Investigator Site 1304 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0159 | |
30 | Investigator Site 1305 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0159 | |
31 | Investigator Site 1306 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0159 | |
32 | Investigator Site 1307 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0159 | |
33 | Investigator Site 1309 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0159 | |
34 | Investigator Site 1310 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0159 | |
35 | Investigator Site 1311 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0159 | |
36 | Investigator Site 1303 | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0186 | |
37 | Investigator Site 1410 | Balatonfured | Hungary | H-8230 | |
38 | Investigator Site 1415 | Budapest | Hungary | H-1133 | |
39 | Investigator Site 1401 | Gyor | Hungary | H-9024 | |
40 | Investigator Site 1406 | Hatvan | Hungary | H-3000 | |
41 | Investigator Site 1405 | Jaszbereny | Hungary | H-5100 | |
42 | Investigator Site 1411 | Kistarcsa | Hungary | H-2143 | |
43 | Investigator Site 1407 | Veszprem | Hungary | H-8200 | |
44 | Investigator Site 2201 | Pavia | Italy | 27100 | |
45 | Investigator Site 1703 | Belgrade | Serbia | 11000 | |
46 | Investigator Site 1710 | Vrsac | Serbia | 26300 | |
47 | Investigator Site 1707 | Zrenjanin | Serbia | 23000 | |
48 | Investigator Site 1802 | Celje | Slovenia | 3000 | |
49 | Investigator Site 1803 | Jesenice | Slovenia | 4270 | |
50 | Investigator Site 1915 | Ivano-Frankivsk | Ukraine | 76018 | |
51 | Investigator Site 1904 | Kharkiv | Ukraine | 61007 | |
52 | Investigator Site 1903 | Kharkiv | Ukraine | 61018 | |
53 | Investigator Site 1908 | Kharkiv | Ukraine | 61039 | |
54 | Investigator Site 1909 | Kyiv | Ukraine | 04114 | |
55 | Investigator Site 1911 | Kyiv | Ukraine | 3680 | |
56 | Investigator Site 1914 | Lugansk | Ukraine | 91045 | |
57 | Investigator Site 1907 | Zaporizhzhia | Ukraine | 69001 | |
58 | Investigator Site 1906 | Zaporizhzhia | Ukraine | 69118 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Relypsa, Inc.
Investigators
- Study Director: Director Clinical Operations, Relypsa, Inc.
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- RLY5016-301
- 2012-001956-20
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Part A Patiromer | Part B Patiromer | Part B Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were administered patiromer starting dose of 8.4 g or 16.8 g daily as a divided dose twice a day, orally, for 4 weeks. | Participants continued on the same daily patiromer dose as administered at the time of the Part A Week 4 Visit for 8 weeks. | Participants were administered placebo orally twice a day for 8 weeks. |
Period Title: Part A Treatment Period | |||
STARTED | 243 | 0 | 0 |
COMPLETED | 219 | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 24 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Part A Treatment Period | |||
STARTED | 0 | 55 | 52 |
COMPLETED | 0 | 45 | 30 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 10 | 22 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Part A Patiromer |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were administered patiromer starting dose of 8.4 g or 16.8 g daily as a divided dose twice a day, orally, for 4 weeks. |
Overall Participants | 243 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
112
46.1%
|
>=65 years |
131
53.9%
|
Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ] | |
Median (Full Range) [years] |
64.2
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
103
42.4%
|
Male |
140
57.6%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium Levels in the Target Range of 3.8 to < 5.1 mEq/L at Part A Week 4 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Proportion of participants with serum potassium level in the target range at Part A Week 4 |
Arm/Group Title | Part A Patiromer |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were administered patiromer starting dose of 8.4 g or 16.8 g daily as a divided dose twice a day, orally, for 4 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 243 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
76
31.3%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Part A Patiromer |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Proportion |
Estimated Value | 0.76 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.7 to 0.81 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium That Was ≥ 5.5 mEq/L in Part B |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Part B Baseline to Part B Week 8 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Part B Placebo | Part B Patiromer |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were administered placebo orally twice a day for 8 weeks. | Participants continued on the same daily patiromer dose as administered at the time of the Part A Week 4 Visit for 8 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 52 | 55 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
60
24.7%
|
15
NaN
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Part A Patiromer, Part B Patiromer |
---|---|---|
Comments | Test for difference between treatment groups in proportion with serum potassium ≥ 5.5 mEq/L | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mantel Haenszel | |
Comments |
Title | Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium ≥ 5.1 mEq/L in Part B |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Part B Baseline to Part B Week 8 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Percentages were estimated not as simple ratios, but by using a stratified method, in order to account for differences between the patiromer and placebo groups in terms of whether participants had type 2 diabetes mellitus and whether they entered the study with serum potassium < 5.8 mEq/L or serum potassium ≥ 5.8 mEq/L. |
Arm/Group Title | Part B Placebo | Part B Patiromer |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were administered placebo orally twice a day for 8 weeks. | Participants continued on the same daily patiromer dose as administered at the time of the Part A Week 4 Visit for 8 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 52 | 55 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
91
37.4%
|
43
NaN
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Part A Patiromer, Part B Patiromer |
---|---|---|
Comments | Test for difference between treatment groups in proportion with serum potassium ≥ 5.1 mEq/L | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mantel Haenszel | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Serum Potassium From Part A Baseline to Part A Week 4 |
---|---|
Description | The primary analysis endpoint is the change from Baseline at Week 4. The estimate of the change at Week 4 is from a repeated measures model, which includes data from Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. The analysis includes all intent to treat participants who had a serum potassium result at baseline and at least one weekly post-baseline visit (i.e. Part A Week 1 or later) and excludes six participants who had no result collected after Day 3). |
Time Frame | Part A Baseline to Part A Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Part A Patiromer |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were administered patiromer starting dose of 8.4 g or 16.8 g daily as a divided dose twice a day, orally, for 4 weeks. The dose of patiromer could be titrated based on participant's serum potassium response. |
Measure Participants | 237 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [mEq/L] |
-1.01
(0.031)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Part A Patiromer |
---|---|---|
Comments | Estimation of mean change in serum potassium from Part A Baseline to Part A Week 4 and test mean change different from zero. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Longitudinal mixed models | |
Comments | Test that the mean change is significantly different from zero. |
Title | Change in Serum Potassium From Part B Baseline |
---|---|
Description | Change in Serum Potassium from Part B Baseline to either: Part B Week 4 visit, if the participant's serum potassium remained ≥ 3.8 mEq/L and < 5.5 mEq/L up to the Part B Week 4 visit or the earliest Part B visit at which the participant's serum potassium was < 3.8 mEq/L or ≥ 5.5 mEq/L. |
Time Frame | Part B Baseline to Part B Week 4 or first local laboratory serum potassium < 3.8 mEq/L or ≥ 5.5 mEq/L |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Part B Placebo | Part B Patiromer |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were administered placebo orally twice a day for 8 weeks. | Participants continued on the same daily patiromer dose as administered at the time of the Part A Week 4 Visit for 8 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 52 | 55 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mEq/L] |
0.72
|
0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Part A Patiromer, Part B Patiromer |
---|---|---|
Comments | Test for difference between treatment groups in serum potassium change in Part B | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 2 weeks after Week 4 for Part A subjects who did not continue in Part B and 2 weeks after Week 12 for Part B. | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Participants who received at least one dose of trial medication | |||||
Arm/Group Title | Part A Patiromer | Part B Patiromer | Part B Placebo | |||
Arm/Group Description | Participants were administered patiromer starting dose of 8.4 g or 16.8 g daily as a divided dose twice a day, orally, for 4 weeks. | Participants continued on the same daily patiromer dose as administered at the time of the Part A Week 4 Visit for 8 weeks. | Participants were administered placebo orally twice a day for 8 weeks. | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Part A Patiromer | Part B Patiromer | Part B Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Part A Patiromer | Part B Patiromer | Part B Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 3/243 (1.2%) | 0/55 (0%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | |||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||
Atrial fibrillation | 1/243 (0.4%) | 0/55 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Thrombosis mesenteric vessel | 0/243 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | 1/52 (1.9%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Escherichia bacteraemia | 1/243 (0.4%) | 0/55 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | |||
Urinary tract infection | 1/243 (0.4%) | 0/55 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | |||
Endocarditis enterococcal | 1/243 (0.4%) | 0/55 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | |||
Investigations | ||||||
Anticoagulation drug level below therapeutic | 1/243 (0.4%) | 0/55 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | |||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||
Renal failure chronic | 1/243 (0.4%) | 0/55 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Part A Patiromer | Part B Patiromer | Part B Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 33/243 (13.6%) | 5/55 (9.1%) | 8/52 (15.4%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Constipation | 26/243 (10.7%) | 2/55 (3.6%) | 0/52 (0%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Influenza | 1/243 (0.4%) | 1/55 (1.8%) | 3/52 (5.8%) | |||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Headache | 2/243 (0.8%) | 2/55 (3.6%) | 4/52 (7.7%) | |||
Vascular disorders | ||||||
Hypertension | 4/243 (1.6%) | 0/55 (0%) | 3/52 (5.8%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Our agreements generally provide that PI cannot publish single site data before publication of the multi-site publication, unless 1 year has elapsed since completion of the study at all sites. Thereafter, PI may publish provided that PI shall: provide a copy of the publication to sponsor at least 60 days in advance of submission for publication; delete sponsor's confidential information as requested; and delay publication up to an additional 90 days to permit protection of intellectual property.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Medical Information |
---|---|
Organization | Relypsa, Inc. |
Phone | 1-844-relypsa |
medinfo@relypsa.com |
- RLY5016-301
- 2012-001956-20