A Comparison of Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and System of Supportive Psychotherapy (SYSP) for Early Onset Chronic Depression

Sponsor
University Hospital Freiburg (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00970437
Collaborator
(none)
268
1
2
56
4.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) with the non-specific System of Supportive Psychotherapy (SYSP)in early onset chronically depressives.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy
  • Behavioral: System of Supportive Psychotherapy
N/A

Detailed Description

Effective treatment strategies for chronic depression are urgently needed since it is not only a common and particularly disabling disorder, but is also considered treatment resistant by most clinicians. There are only a few studies on chronic depression indicating that traditional interventions are not as effective as in acute, episodic depression. In addition, most of the studies had methodological weaknesses, such as the very short courses of psychotherapy. Usually, chronic depression begins early in life, is often associated with early interpersonal trauma, and results in an even more substantial human capital loss than the late-onset group. Furthermore, it shows a weak response to medication and a high rate of relapse after an initial response. With the present multicentre study, the efficacy of the only specific psychotherapy for chronic depression (Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy/CBASP) is compared with a non-specific System of Supportive Psychotherapy/SYSP in early onset chronically depressives. CBASP faired very well in one large trial but has never been directly compared to a non-specific psychotherapeutic control. Another innovative aspect of the study is the use of an extended course of psychotherapy (32 sessions). Primary hypothesis: CBASP is more effective in reducing depressive symptoms than SYSP.

A naturalistic study following up the patients of the trial up to two years after termination of the study treatments is performed in order to investigate the long-term effectiveness of CBASP compared to the System of Supportive Psychotherapy. The primary outcome of this follow-up study is the rate of well-weeks (weeks with no or minimal depression symptoms) during the two years after termination of the study treatments as measured with the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) Interview

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
268 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Comparison of Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and System of Supportive Psychotherapy (SYSP) for Early Onset Chronic Depression
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: CBASP

CBASP as the experimental intervention will follow a manual (McCullough, 2000; German version: Schramm et al., 2006). The approach is specifically tailored for the treatment of chronic forms of depression, particularly with early-onset by focusing on the problems resulting from an inhibition of maturation in early childhood and by using the therapeutic relationship in a personal, disciplined way as well as other specific techniques (e.g. Interpersonal Discrimination Exercise, Situation Analysis). CBASP integrates behavioural, cognitive, and interpersonal strategies.

Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy
Duration of intervention per patient: 20 weeks acute treatment (n=24 sessions) followed by 28 weeks of continuation treatment (n=8 sessions) Follow-up per patient: 48 weeks after randomisation

Placebo Comparator: SYSP

The comparator for CBASP is SYSP, a system of supportive psychotherapy, an active but less specific, manualized control treatment. SYSP - defined as non-interpersonal and non-cognitive-behavioral therapy - resembles supportive clinical management, client-centered therapy, counseling, and psychoeducation about depression. There is no specific explanatory mechanism for treatment effect offered to the patient and it does not focus on specific themes.

Behavioral: System of Supportive Psychotherapy
Duration of intervention per patient: 20 weeks acute treatment (n=24 sessions) followed by 28 weeks of continuation treatment (n=8 sessions) Follow-up per patient: 48 weeks after randomisation
Other Names:
  • Brief Supportive Psychotherapy
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Depressive symptoms as measured by the HRSD (24-item Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression) [20 weeks after randomization (after acute treatment phase)]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 65 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. DSM-IV criteria for a current episode of chronic MDD, MDD superimposed on a pre-existing dysthymic disorder or recurrent MDD with incomplete remission between episodes in a patient with a current MDD and a total duration of at least 2 years.

    2. Early onset of the disorder according to DSM-IV (onset before the age of 21)

    3. Age between 18 and 65

    4. A score of at least 20 on the 24-item HRSD at screening and, after a 2-week drug-free period, at baseline

    5. Fluent in German language

    6. Provide informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Acute risk for suicide (as opposed to suicidal thoughts) assessed according to clinical practice guidelines. Suicidal patients are eligible, as long as outpatient treatment is deemed safe by the clinician.

    2. A history of psychotic symptoms, bipolar disorder, or organic brain disorders

    3. A primary diagnosis of another axis I disorder including anxiety disorders (e.g. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder), or any severe substance-related abuse or dependence disorder as evaluated with the SCID-I

    4. Antisocial, schizotypical, or borderline personality disorder (SCID-II);

    5. Severe cognitive impairment

    6. Absence of a response to previous adequate trial of CBASP, and/or SYSP

    7. Other ongoing psychotherapy or medication

    8. A serious medical condition (i.e. a history of seizures, severe head trauma, stroke or heart attack within six months before the study began)

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University Medical Center Freiburg, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Freiburg Germany 79104

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University Hospital Freiburg

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Elisabeth Schramm, PhD, University Medical Center Freiburg, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
    • Principal Investigator: Martin Härter, MD, PhD, University Medical Center Hamburg

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Elisabeth Schramm, PhD, University Hospital Freiburg
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00970437
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • UKF001906
    First Posted:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 5, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2017
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 5, 2017