ACCELERATE: Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Precision SCS Systems Adapted for High-Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Precision Spinal Cord Stimulator Systems Adapted for High-Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation as an aid in the management of chronic intractable pain
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of high rate spinal cord stimulation (HR-SCS) therapy as an aid in the management of chronic intractable pain of the trunk using the Boston Scientific (BSC) PRECISION Spinal Cord Stimulator Systems Adapted for High-Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: High Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation PRECISION SCS Adapted for High-Rate SCS |
Device: PRECISION SCS Adapted for High-Rate SCS
Comparison of spinal cord stimulation parameters
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Commercial Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation PRECISION SCS Adapted for High-Rate SCS |
Device: PRECISION SCS Adapted for High-Rate SCS
Comparison of spinal cord stimulation parameters
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Proportion of Responders as Determined by the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of Response Rates [3 months post-activation]
Cummulative distribution function (CDF) of response rates from 0% - 100% numerical rating score (NRS) to derive the entire range of possible responder definitions. This allows us to determine the range of success for all responder rates without the need to identify a certain cutoff (for example, use a 50% responder rate). A comparison between the two CDF's was performed by comparing the area under the curves since area between CDFs is equal to the mean difference in low back pain reduction for CR-SCS and HR-SCS. Hence, it can be used to estimate the true underlying difference in responder rates between CR-SCS and HR-SCS
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Have been diagnosed with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk (NRS ≥ 5) which has been refractory to conservative therapy for a minimum of 90 days.
-
Be an appropriate candidate for the surgical procedures required in this study based on the clinical judgment of the implanting physician
-
Be 22 years of age or older at the time of enrollment
-
Be willing and capable of giving informed consent
-
Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Have a medical condition or pain in other area(s), not intended to be treated with SCS, that could interfere with study procedures, accurate pain reporting, and/or confound evaluation of study endpoints, as determined by the Investigator
-
Have evidence of an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance of intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome, as determined by a psychologist
-
Have previous spinal cord stimulation trial or is already implanted with an active implantable device(s) (e.g. pacemaker, drug pump, implantable pulse generator)
-
Have a current systemic infection, or local infection in close proximity to anticipated surgical field
-
Pregnant or plan to get pregnant during the course of the study or not using adequate contraception.
-
Be participating in another clinical study that may influence the data collected for the study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hope Research Institute | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | 85018 |
2 | Coastal Pain & Spinal Diagnostics | Carlsbad | California | United States | 92009 |
3 | UCSD Medical Center - Jacobs Medical Center | La Jolla | California | United States | 92037 |
4 | San Diego Pain Institute | San Diego | California | United States | 92111 |
5 | Compass Research, LLC | Orlando | Florida | United States | 32806 |
6 | Rush University Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60612 |
7 | Willis-Knighton River Cities Clinical Research Center | Shreveport | Louisiana | United States | 71105 |
8 | MAPS Applied Research Center | Edina | Minnesota | United States | 55433 |
9 | Mayo Clinic Foundation | Rochester | Minnesota | United States | 55905 |
10 | Mercy Medical Research Institute | Springfield | Missouri | United States | 65804 |
11 | Hope Research Institute | Las Vegas | Nevada | United States | 89128 |
12 | Premier Pain Centers, LLC | Shrewsbury | New Jersey | United States | 07702 |
13 | The Center for Clinical Research, LLC | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States | 27103 |
14 | University Hospitals of Cleveland | Cleveland | Ohio | United States | 44106 |
15 | Pacific Sports and Spine, LLC | Eugene | Oregon | United States | 97401 |
16 | Pain Consultants of Oregon | Eugene | Oregon | United States | 97401 |
17 | Oregon Health Sciences University | Portland | Oregon | United States | 97239 |
18 | Oregon Neurosurgery | Springfield | Oregon | United States | 97477 |
19 | Precision Spine Care | Tyler | Texas | United States | 75701 |
20 | Pacific Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | United States | 98104 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Boston Scientific Corporation
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mark Wallace, M.D., University of California, San Diego
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- A4007
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | After subjects were enrolled, they were evaluated per study eligibility criteria. Only those who met all criteria proceeded to receive implant and randomized in the study (as applicable). |
Arm/Group Title | High Rate SCS Followed by Commercial SCS | Commercial SCS Settings Followed by High Rate SCS | High Rate Settings Only |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | High Rate SCS Settings followed by Commercial Settings | Commercial SCS Settings followed by High Rate SCS programming settings | High Rate settings only |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 98 | 90 | 68 |
COMPLETED | 91 | 80 | 65 |
NOT COMPLETED | 7 | 10 | 3 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | High Rate SCS Followed by Commercial SCS | Commercial SCS Settings Followed by High Rate SCS | High Rate Settings Only | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | High Rate SCS Settings followed by Commercial Settings | Commercial SCS Settings followed by High Rate SCS programming settings | High Rate settings only | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 98 | 90 | 68 | 256 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
54.9
(11.6)
|
53.6
(13.1)
|
58.5
(11.4)
|
55.6
(12)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
59
60.2%
|
49
54.4%
|
27
39.7%
|
135
52.7%
|
Male |
39
39.8%
|
41
45.6%
|
41
60.3%
|
121
47.3%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | ||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
1
1%
|
2
2.2%
|
0
0%
|
3
1.2%
|
Asian |
1
1%
|
1
1.1%
|
1
1.5%
|
3
1.2%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
7
7.1%
|
3
3.3%
|
7
10.3%
|
17
6.6%
|
White |
83
84.7%
|
76
84.4%
|
57
83.8%
|
216
84.4%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
2
2.2%
|
0
0%
|
2
0.8%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
6
6.1%
|
6
6.7%
|
3
4.4%
|
15
5.9%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Proportion of Responders as Determined by the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of Response Rates |
---|---|
Description | Cummulative distribution function (CDF) of response rates from 0% - 100% numerical rating score (NRS) to derive the entire range of possible responder definitions. This allows us to determine the range of success for all responder rates without the need to identify a certain cutoff (for example, use a 50% responder rate). A comparison between the two CDF's was performed by comparing the area under the curves since area between CDFs is equal to the mean difference in low back pain reduction for CR-SCS and HR-SCS. Hence, it can be used to estimate the true underlying difference in responder rates between CR-SCS and HR-SCS |
Time Frame | 3 months post-activation |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Subjects with a successful trial (High rate settings only) or simulated trial responders (High rate SCS followed by Commercial SCS or vice versa) |
Arm/Group Title | Commercial SCS | High Rate SCS | High Rate Settings Only |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Commercial SCS (as part of crossover) | High Rate SCS (as part of crossover) | High Rate settings only |
Measure Participants | 30 | 38 | 65 |
Number [probability] |
0.47
|
0.53
|
0.4
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | All adverse events were collected through end of crossover phase (High Rate SCS followed by Commercial SCS or vice versa group) or up to 3 months post activation (HR settings only group) for subjects who started the study (n = 256) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | All adverse events were collected through end of crossover phase (High Rate SCS followed by Commercial SCS or vice versa group) or up to 3 months post activation (HR settings only group) for subjects who started the study (n = 256) | |||||
Arm/Group Title | High Rate SCS | Commercial SCS | High Rate Settings Only | |||
Arm/Group Description | High Rate SCS Settings | Commercial SCS Settings | High Rate settings only | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
High Rate SCS | Commercial SCS | High Rate Settings Only | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/188 (0.5%) | 0/188 (0%) | 0/68 (0%) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
High Rate SCS | Commercial SCS | High Rate Settings Only | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 8/188 (4.3%) | 3/188 (1.6%) | 2/68 (2.9%) | |||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||
Sick Sinus Syndrome | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Colitis | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Small Intestinal Obstruction | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
General disorders | ||||||
Chest Pain | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Pnuemonia | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Viral Infection | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Appendicitis | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Clostridium difficile colitis | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Gastroentritis | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Urinary Tract Infection | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Implant Site Infection | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||
Hip Fracture | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Cerebral Heamorhhage | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Cerebrovascular accident | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Ischemic Stroke | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 1/68 (1.5%) | 1 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||
Chronic Renal Failure | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||
Acute Respiratory Failure | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Chronic Bronchitis | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 2/188 (1.1%) | 2 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Dyspnoea | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Vascular disorders | ||||||
Hypertension | 1/188 (0.5%) | 1 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
High Rate SCS | Commercial SCS | High Rate Settings Only | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 11/188 (5.9%) | 13/188 (6.9%) | 4/68 (5.9%) | |||
General disorders | ||||||
Implant Site Pain | 11/188 (5.9%) | 12 | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 4/68 (5.9%) | 4 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||
Back Pain | 0/188 (0%) | 0 | 13/188 (6.9%) | 13 | 0/68 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Director of Clinical Sciences |
---|---|
Organization | Boston Scientific |
Phone | 6619494350 |
roshini.jain@bsci.com |
- A4007