Impact of Home Exercise Delivery on Compliance & Outcomes for Musculoskeletal Pain
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Patients seeking care for chronic low back or knee pain will be recruited for enrollment, and randomized within two phases (retention and compliance). Patients will consent to a 2-step study design, with independent randomization for each. The initial step will assess retention based on 4 different exercise prescription strategies. This will be assessed short-term, and then the 2nd step will consist of a second independent randomization to receive different reminder strategies to determine their influence on exercise compliance at home.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Patients seeking care for their chronic low back or knee pain will be recruited to participate in a trial investigating the value of different exercise and education prescription strategies as well as strategies to determine the influence of various exercise reminder strategies. On day 1 of enrollment, patients will be randomized and instructed in two different types and amounts of exercises, as well as two types of delivery strategies. The ability to recall and perform these exercises will be assessed 20 minutes after completion of the instructional period (retention). In phase 2, patients will be randomized to receive different reminder strategies (none, email, text, and/or video) and their compliance assessed over a 1 month period (compliance). Self-reported compliance over the first month, and health care utilization outcomes will be analyzed for the 1 year following completion of the 1 month period, in all groups.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Exercise Amount Phase 1: 2 or 4 exercises. |
Other: Number of Exercises
Subjects will receive either 2 or 4 exercises to evaluate the short-term recall and performance.
Other: Type of Instruction
The type of instruction in phase 1 will be compared: Instruction by providing a handout only vs being instructed by a provider and practiced by the patient with provider feedback.
|
| Active Comparator: Type of instruction Phase 1: Handout on paper versus handout and visual demonstration/performance. |
Other: Number of Exercises
Subjects will receive either 2 or 4 exercises to evaluate the short-term recall and performance.
Other: Type of Instruction
The type of instruction in phase 1 will be compared: Instruction by providing a handout only vs being instructed by a provider and practiced by the patient with provider feedback.
|
| Active Comparator: Delivery Type Phase 2: Handout vs electronic delivery |
Other: Delivery Type
In phase 2 subjects will be provided 4 exercises using only a handout vs delivered to them electronically with the addition of a video.
Other: Mobile Reminder
A text-message based mobile reminder tool will be utilized to engage with subjects via texting on a daily basis to provide reminders and encouragement to perform their home exercises.
|
| Experimental: Reminder Type Phase 2: Mobile reminders vs no mobile reminders |
Other: Delivery Type
In phase 2 subjects will be provided 4 exercises using only a handout vs delivered to them electronically with the addition of a video.
Other: Mobile Reminder
A text-message based mobile reminder tool will be utilized to engage with subjects via texting on a daily basis to provide reminders and encouragement to perform their home exercises.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Performance Assessment Tool [1-month]
A locally developed tool designed to meet the needs of assessing both exercise retention and compliance. It will capture the subject's ability to recall the name of an exercise, the prescribed sets and repetitions, and the ability to perform an exercise using a 4-point ordinal scale
- Compliance [1-month]
Subjects will be asked to submit self-reported daily compliance logs.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) 57 (v2.0) [1-month]
The PROMIS 57-item short form efficiently assesses several outcomes important to patients with chronic low back and knee pain including pain intensity and interference, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and social role participation using items developed with rigorous methodology and patient input.
- Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) [1-month]
the PASS as a global, dichotomized single-item score indicating if patients are satisfied with the current state of their symptoms.
- Self-perception on Physical Health and Ability to Return to Work or Full Duty [1-month]
This survey consists of a total of 9 questions, 5 of them modified from the Short Form-36. It asks questions related to the subject's perception of their physical health. The first 5 questions are related to the subject's perception of ability to return to work or full duty, the need for additional healthcare for their current condition, and function at the level that they feel is expected of them. The final 4 questions ask about their perception of general physical health.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
The primary complaint of low back pain or knee pain and is not actively seeking care for their contralateral knee.
-
The current episode for the injury is 6 weeks or greater
-
A home exercise program is appropriate as part of the management plan for their injury on the first day
-
Between the age of 18 and 65 years.
-
Own and utilize a smart phone
-
Read and speak English well enough to interact with the smart phone-based tool.
-
Able and willing to come in for follow-up at 1-month.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
History of prior surgery to the lower extremities or spine
-
Already receiving or have received treatment for this episode of pain within the past 6 months.
-
Medical "red flags" of a potentially serious condition including cauda equina syndrome, major or rapidly progressing neurological deficit, fracture, malignancy, joint infection, or systemic disease
-
If participating with low back pain, known current pregnancy or history of pregnancy in the last 6 months
-
Exiting military health system in the next 2 months, pending litigation, or pending a medical separation board.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brooke Army Medical Center | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78219 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Dan Rhon
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniel Rhon, DSc, Brooke Army Medical Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Bollen JC, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, Howe TE, Goodwin VA. A systematic review of measures of self-reported adherence to unsupervised home-based rehabilitation exercise programmes, and their psychometric properties. BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 27;4(6):e005044. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005044. Review.
- Chou R, Huffman LH; American Pain Society; American College of Physicians. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504. Review. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 5;148(3):247-8.
- Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 3;142(9):776-85. Review.
- Holcomb LS. A Taxonomic Integrative Review of Short Message Service (SMS) Methodology: A Framework for Improved Diabetic Outcomes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 30;9(6):1321-6. doi: 10.1177/1932296815585132. Review.
- Jack K, McLean SM, Moffett JK, Gardiner E. Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010 Jun;15(3):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Feb 16. Review.
- Jordan JL, Holden MA, Mason EE, Foster NE. Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD005956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005956.pub2. Review.
- C.2017.093d