Study of Efficacy and Safety of Xolair® (Omalizumab) in Chinese Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03328897
Collaborator
(none)
418
27
3
28.9
15.5
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab, compared with placebo, as an add-on to H1 antihistamines (H1AH) therapy in adult patients suffering from Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) who remained symptomatic despite H1AH therapy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

This was a randomized, multicenteric, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab as an add-on therapy for the treatment of patients of refractory CSU who remained symptomatic despite approved-dosed H1AH treatment.

The study consisted of three distinct epochs over 24 weeks: Screening epoch (Day -28 to Day -1), Randomized treatment epoch (Day 1 to Week 12) and Post-treatment follow-up epoch (Week 12 to Week 20). Patients were randomized into three treatment groups (omalizumab 300 mg s.c. omalizumab 150 mg s.c. and placebo) in a 2:2:1 ratio, stratified by latent tuberculosis (TB) status at Baseline (Yes/No).

On Day 1, eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive omalizumab (150 mg or 300 mg) or placebo by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection every 4 weeks (on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8) during the 12-week double-blind randomized-treatment epoch. Patients visited the study center at 4-week intervals. Patients were instructed to stay on the same CSU H1AH treatment at stable dose that they were using during the pre-randomization period during the randomized treatment epoch. They were allowed to use diphenhydramine as rescue medication during all epochs. The last dose of the study drug during the randomized-treatment epoch was administered at Week 8 study visit, however, the last assessment was done at Week 12.

After the completion of the 12-week randomized-treatment epoch, all patients entered an 8-week post-treatment follow-up epoch.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
418 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Xolair® (Omalizumab) in Chinese Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) Who Remain Symptomatic Despite Antihistamine Treatment
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 26, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 23, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 24, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Omalizumab 300mg

patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)

Drug: Omalizumab
injection of 150mg or 300 mg
Other Names:
  • IGE025
  • Experimental: Omalizumab 150mg

    patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)

    Drug: Omalizumab
    injection of 150mg or 300 mg
    Other Names:
  • IGE025
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo

    patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)

    Drug: Placebo
    Injection of placebo

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change From Baseline of the Itch Severity Score (ISS7) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment [Baseline, Week 12]

      The severity of the itch was recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). Baseline ISS7 was calculated 7 days prior to the first treatment date. A weekly score (ISS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21, where 0 is the best score and 21 is the worst score. The complete itch response was defined as ISS7 = 0. Itch (Pruritus) Severity Score Scale: 0 = None = Mild (minimal awareness, easily tolerated) = Moderate (definite awareness, bothersome but tolerable) = Severe (difficult to tolerate)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change From Baseline of Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment [Baseline, Week 12]

      UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement.

    2. Change From Baseline of Number of Hives Score (NHS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment [Baseline, Week 12]

      Hives Severity Score (HSS), defined by number of hives, were recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). A weekly number of hives score (NHS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21. The complete hives response was defined as NHS7 = 0. Hives Severity Score scale: 0 - None Mild (1-6 hives/12 hours) Moderate (7-12 hives/12 hours) Severe (>12 hives/12 hours)

    3. Percentage of Patients With UAS7≤6 at Week 12 [Week 12]

      UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement. Week 12 responders were defined as patients who achieved an absolute UAS7 ≤ 6 at Week 12. A patient with missing data at Week 12 was imputed as a responder if the patient was a responder at Week 10 and Week 11, otherwise as a non-responder.

    4. Percentage of Complete Responders (UAS7 = 0) at Week 12 [Week 12]

      UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement. Complete responders are defined as participants who achieved UAS7 = 0.

    5. Percentage of Patients With ISS7 Minimally Important Difference (MID) at Week 12 [Week 12]

      The severity of the itch was recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). Baseline ISS7 was calculated 7 days prior to the first treatment date. A weekly score (ISS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21, where 0 is the best score and 21 is the worst score. The complete itch response was defined as ISS7 = 0. Itch (Pruritus) Severity Score Scale: 0 = None = Mild (minimal awareness, easily tolerated) = Moderate (definite awareness, bothersome but tolerable) = Severe (difficult to tolerate) The ISS7 MID response was defined as a reduction from Baseline in ISS7 of ≥ 5 points.

    6. Change From Baseline of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment [Week 12]

      Dermatology life quality index (DLQI) is a 10-item dermatology- specific health-related quality of life measure. Patients rated their dermatology symptoms as well as the impact of their skin condition on various aspects of their lives. An overall score was calculated as well as separate scores for the following domains: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, treatment. Each domain had 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). "Not relevant" is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.

    7. Time to ISS7 MID Response by Week 12 [12 weeks]

      The ISS7 MID response was defined as a reduction from Baseline in ISS7 of ≥ 5 points. Time to ISS7 MID response was the time (in weeks) from the date of the first dose to the date where ISS7 MID response was first achieved during Week 1 to Week 12.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Main Inclusion Criteria:
    • Symptomatic CSU patients with CSU diagnosis for at least 6 months.

    • Patients must have been on an approved dose of an H1AH for CSU for at least the 3 consecutive days immediately prior to the Day -14 screening visit

    • Patients must have documented current use on the day of the initial screening visit

    Main Exclusion Criteria

    • Clearly defined underlying etiology for chronic urticarias other than CSU (main manifestation being physical urticaria)

    • Other skin disease associated with itch Urticarial vasculitis, urticaria pigmentosa, erythema multiforme, mastocytosis, hereditary or acquired angioedema, lymphoma, leukemia, or generalized cancer

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Novartis Investigative Site Beijing Beijing China 100039
    2 Novartis Investigative Site Fuzhou Fujian China 350025
    3 Novartis Investigative Site Guangzhou Guangdong China 510630
    4 Novartis Investigative Site Nanning Guangxi China 530021
    5 Novartis Investigative Site Harbin Heilongjiang China 150001
    6 Novartis Investigative Site Wuhan Hubei China 430022
    7 Novartis Investigative Site Wuhan Hubei China 430030
    8 Novartis Investigative Site Changsha Hunan China 410008
    9 Novartis Investigative Site Nanjing Jiangsu China 210029
    10 Novartis Investigative Site Suzhou Jiangsu China 215006
    11 Novartis Investigative Site Wuxi Jiangsu China
    12 Novartis Investigative Site Shenyang Liaoning China 110000
    13 Novartis Investigative Site Chengdu Sichuan China 610041
    14 Novartis Investigative Site Urumqi Xinjiang China 830001
    15 Novartis Investigative Site Hangzhou Zhejiang China 310003
    16 Novartis Investigative Site Hangzhou Zhejiang China 310006
    17 Novartis Investigative Site Hangzhou Zhejiang China 310016
    18 Novartis Investigative Site Beijing China 100034
    19 Novartis Investigative Site Beijing China 100050
    20 Novartis Investigative Site Beijing China 100191
    21 Novartis Investigative Site Chongqing China 400011
    22 Novartis Investigative Site Chongqing China 400038
    23 Novartis Investigative Site Guangzhou China 510000
    24 Novartis Investigative Site Nanjing China 210042
    25 Novartis Investigative Site Shanghai China 200025
    26 Novartis Investigative Site Shanghai China 200040
    27 Novartis Investigative Site Shanghai China 200433

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03328897
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CIGE025E2305
    First Posted:
    Nov 1, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 4, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Patients were recruited from 27 sites across China.
    Pre-assignment Detail Patients were randomized into three treatment groups (omalizumab 300 mg s.c., omalizumab 150 mg s.c. and placebo) in a 2:2:1 ratio.
    Arm/Group Title Omalizumab 300mg Omalizumab 150mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)
    Period Title: Randomized-treatment Epoch
    STARTED 168 167 83
    Full Analysis Set (FAS) 167 167 83
    COMPLETED 152 162 81
    NOT COMPLETED 16 5 2
    Period Title: Randomized-treatment Epoch
    STARTED 161 163 81
    COMPLETED 153 160 79
    NOT COMPLETED 8 3 2

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Omalizumab 300mg Omalizumab 150mg Placebo Total
    Arm/Group Description patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 168 167 83 418
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    40.4
    (12.29)
    38.8
    (12.18)
    42.8
    (12.32)
    40.2
    (12.31)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    115
    68.5%
    108
    64.7%
    53
    63.9%
    276
    66%
    Male
    53
    31.5%
    59
    35.3%
    30
    36.1%
    142
    34%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    Asian
    168
    100%
    167
    100%
    83
    100%
    418
    100%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    Chinese
    168
    100%
    167
    100%
    83
    100%
    418
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline of the Itch Severity Score (ISS7) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment
    Description The severity of the itch was recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). Baseline ISS7 was calculated 7 days prior to the first treatment date. A weekly score (ISS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21, where 0 is the best score and 21 is the worst score. The complete itch response was defined as ISS7 = 0. Itch (Pruritus) Severity Score Scale: 0 = None = Mild (minimal awareness, easily tolerated) = Moderate (definite awareness, bothersome but tolerable) = Severe (difficult to tolerate)
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full Analysis Set
    Arm/Group Title Omalizumab 300mg Omalizumab 150mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)
    Measure Participants 167 167 83
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Score on a scale]
    -10.11
    (0.430)
    -9.66
    (0.424)
    -5.87
    (0.604)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 300mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -4.23
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -5.70 to -2.77
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.746
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 150mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -3.79
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -5.24 to -2.33
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.738
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline of Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment
    Description UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full Analysis Set
    Arm/Group Title Omalizumab 300mg Omalizumab 150mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)
    Measure Participants 167 167 83
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Score on a scale]
    -21.82
    (0.895)
    -20.74
    (0.882)
    -11.62
    (1.258)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 300mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -10.19
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -13.25 to -7.14
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 1.555
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 150mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -9.12
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -12.14 to -6.10
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 1.535
    Estimation Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline of Number of Hives Score (NHS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment
    Description Hives Severity Score (HSS), defined by number of hives, were recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). A weekly number of hives score (NHS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21. The complete hives response was defined as NHS7 = 0. Hives Severity Score scale: 0 - None Mild (1-6 hives/12 hours) Moderate (7-12 hives/12 hours) Severe (>12 hives/12 hours)
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Omalizumab 300mg Omalizumab 150mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)
    Measure Participants 167 167 83
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Score on a scale]
    -11.68
    (0.492)
    -11.11
    (0.485)
    -5.76
    (0.690)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 300mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -5.92
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -7.59 to -4.24
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.853
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 150mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -5.35
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -7.00 to -3.69
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.842
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Patients With UAS7≤6 at Week 12
    Description UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement. Week 12 responders were defined as patients who achieved an absolute UAS7 ≤ 6 at Week 12. A patient with missing data at Week 12 was imputed as a responder if the patient was a responder at Week 10 and Week 11, otherwise as a non-responder.
    Time Frame Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Omalizumab 300mg Omalizumab 150mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)
    Measure Participants 167 167 83
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    81
    48.2%
    79
    47.3%
    9
    10.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 300mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Regression, Logistic
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 7.02
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    3.27 to 15.06
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 150mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Regression, Logistic
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 7.03
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    3.29 to 15.06
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Complete Responders (UAS7 = 0) at Week 12
    Description UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement. Complete responders are defined as participants who achieved UAS7 = 0.
    Time Frame Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Omalizumab 300mg Omalizumab 150mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)
    Measure Participants 167 167 83
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    62
    36.9%
    39
    23.4%
    4
    4.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 300mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Regression, Logistic
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 11.21
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    3.88 to 32.37
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 150mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.001
    Comments
    Method Regression, Logistic
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 5.88
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    2.01 to 17.17
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Patients With ISS7 Minimally Important Difference (MID) at Week 12
    Description The severity of the itch was recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). Baseline ISS7 was calculated 7 days prior to the first treatment date. A weekly score (ISS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21, where 0 is the best score and 21 is the worst score. The complete itch response was defined as ISS7 = 0. Itch (Pruritus) Severity Score Scale: 0 = None = Mild (minimal awareness, easily tolerated) = Moderate (definite awareness, bothersome but tolerable) = Severe (difficult to tolerate) The ISS7 MID response was defined as a reduction from Baseline in ISS7 of ≥ 5 points.
    Time Frame Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Omalizumab 300mg Omalizumab 150mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)
    Measure Participants 167 167 83
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    125
    74.4%
    125
    74.9%
    49
    59%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 300mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Regression, Logistic
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 2.73
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    1.51 to 4.95
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 150mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.002
    Comments
    Method Regression, Logistic
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 2.53
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    1.41 to 4.56
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment
    Description Dermatology life quality index (DLQI) is a 10-item dermatology- specific health-related quality of life measure. Patients rated their dermatology symptoms as well as the impact of their skin condition on various aspects of their lives. An overall score was calculated as well as separate scores for the following domains: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, treatment. Each domain had 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). "Not relevant" is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.
    Time Frame Week 12

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Omalizumab 300mg Omalizumab 150mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)
    Measure Participants 167 167 83
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Score on a scale]
    -10.4
    (0.50)
    -9.9
    (0.49)
    -6.5
    (0.69)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 300mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -4.0
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -5.7 to -2.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.85
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 150mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -3.5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -5.1 to -1.8
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.85
    Estimation Comments
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to ISS7 MID Response by Week 12
    Description The ISS7 MID response was defined as a reduction from Baseline in ISS7 of ≥ 5 points. Time to ISS7 MID response was the time (in weeks) from the date of the first dose to the date where ISS7 MID response was first achieved during Week 1 to Week 12.
    Time Frame 12 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Omalizumab 300mg Omalizumab 150mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8) patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)
    Measure Participants 167 167 83
    First Response: >0 to <=4 weeks
    114
    67.9%
    109
    65.3%
    42
    50.6%
    First Response: >4 to <=8 weeks
    18
    10.7%
    25
    15%
    10
    12%
    First Response: >8 to <=12 weeks
    10
    6%
    10
    6%
    7
    8.4%
    No response
    25
    14.9%
    23
    13.8%
    24
    28.9%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 300mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Regression, Cox
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.71
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    1.25 to 2.33
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Omalizumab 150mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.001
    Comments
    Method Regression, Cox
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.66
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    1.22 to 2.25
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Adverse events were collected from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment (Day 1 to week 12) plus 8 weeks post-treatment follow-up epoch (week 12 to week 20).
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Omalizumab 300 mg Omalizumab 150 mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Participants received omalizumab 300 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 12 week treatment period. Participants received omalizumab 150 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 12 week treatment period. patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)
    All Cause Mortality
    Omalizumab 300 mg Omalizumab 150 mg Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/167 (0%) 0/167 (0%) 0/83 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Omalizumab 300 mg Omalizumab 150 mg Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 5/167 (3%) 5/167 (3%) 3/83 (3.6%)
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Vertigo positional 1/167 (0.6%) 0/167 (0%) 0/83 (0%)
    Infections and infestations
    Pelvic inflammatory disease 0/167 (0%) 1/167 (0.6%) 0/83 (0%)
    Upper respiratory tract infection 1/167 (0.6%) 0/167 (0%) 0/83 (0%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Lumbar vertebral fracture 0/167 (0%) 0/167 (0%) 1/83 (1.2%)
    Meniscus injury 0/167 (0%) 0/167 (0%) 1/83 (1.2%)
    Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
    Ectopic pregnancy 0/167 (0%) 1/167 (0.6%) 0/83 (0%)
    Pregnancy 1/167 (0.6%) 1/167 (0.6%) 0/83 (0%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Cervical dysplasia 0/167 (0%) 1/167 (0.6%) 0/83 (0%)
    Rectocele 0/167 (0%) 1/167 (0.6%) 0/83 (0%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Urticaria chronic 1/167 (0.6%) 0/167 (0%) 0/83 (0%)
    Vascular disorders
    Embolism venous 0/167 (0%) 0/167 (0%) 1/83 (1.2%)
    Hypertension 1/167 (0.6%) 1/167 (0.6%) 0/83 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Omalizumab 300 mg Omalizumab 150 mg Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 84/167 (50.3%) 79/167 (47.3%) 43/83 (51.8%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal discomfort 0/167 (0%) 4/167 (2.4%) 2/83 (2.4%)
    Diarrhoea 2/167 (1.2%) 4/167 (2.4%) 1/83 (1.2%)
    General disorders
    Pyrexia 5/167 (3%) 4/167 (2.4%) 1/83 (1.2%)
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Hepatic function abnormal 0/167 (0%) 2/167 (1.2%) 3/83 (3.6%)
    Infections and infestations
    Herpes zoster 1/167 (0.6%) 4/167 (2.4%) 0/83 (0%)
    Influenza 7/167 (4.2%) 7/167 (4.2%) 1/83 (1.2%)
    Nasopharyngitis 7/167 (4.2%) 8/167 (4.8%) 7/83 (8.4%)
    Pharyngitis 1/167 (0.6%) 4/167 (2.4%) 3/83 (3.6%)
    Upper respiratory tract infection 36/167 (21.6%) 25/167 (15%) 12/83 (14.5%)
    Urinary tract infection 4/167 (2.4%) 1/167 (0.6%) 2/83 (2.4%)
    Investigations
    Alanine aminotransferase increased 1/167 (0.6%) 6/167 (3.6%) 1/83 (1.2%)
    Blood creatine phosphokinase increased 1/167 (0.6%) 5/167 (3%) 0/83 (0%)
    Blood glucose increased 2/167 (1.2%) 0/167 (0%) 2/83 (2.4%)
    Blood uric acid increased 5/167 (3%) 5/167 (3%) 4/83 (4.8%)
    Lymphocyte count increased 0/167 (0%) 0/167 (0%) 2/83 (2.4%)
    Platelet count decreased 0/167 (0%) 2/167 (1.2%) 2/83 (2.4%)
    Red blood cells urine positive 0/167 (0%) 2/167 (1.2%) 2/83 (2.4%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hyperuricaemia 4/167 (2.4%) 3/167 (1.8%) 1/83 (1.2%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 6/167 (3.6%) 4/167 (2.4%) 0/83 (0%)
    Back pain 1/167 (0.6%) 1/167 (0.6%) 2/83 (2.4%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness 1/167 (0.6%) 2/167 (1.2%) 2/83 (2.4%)
    Headache 4/167 (2.4%) 4/167 (2.4%) 0/83 (0%)
    Hypoaesthesia 2/167 (1.2%) 0/167 (0%) 2/83 (2.4%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough 11/167 (6.6%) 3/167 (1.8%) 2/83 (2.4%)
    Dry throat 0/167 (0%) 0/167 (0%) 2/83 (2.4%)
    Oropharyngeal pain 4/167 (2.4%) 1/167 (0.6%) 3/83 (3.6%)
    Rhinorrhoea 4/167 (2.4%) 2/167 (1.2%) 1/83 (1.2%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Dermatitis 2/167 (1.2%) 1/167 (0.6%) 3/83 (3.6%)
    Eczema 5/167 (3%) 4/167 (2.4%) 1/83 (1.2%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 4/167 (2.4%) 2/167 (1.2%) 0/83 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (ie, data from all sites) in the clinical trial.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Study Director
    Organization Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    Phone 862-778-8300
    Email Novartis.email@novartis.com
    Responsible Party:
    Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03328897
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CIGE025E2305
    First Posted:
    Nov 1, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 4, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2020