MERIT-1: Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Macitentan in Subjects With Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Sponsor
Actelion (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02021292
Collaborator
(none)
80
36
2
25.3
2.2
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Study to evaluate if macitentan is efficient, safe and tolerable enough to be used for treatment of inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, 24-week Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Macitentan in Subjects With Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 20, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 28, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 28, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Macitentan

Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily.

Drug: Macitentan
Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
Other Names:
  • ACT-064992
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo

    Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.

    Drug: Placebo
    Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) at Rest. [From baseline to Week 16]

      The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as the PVR at rest at Week 16 expressed as percent of baseline PVR at rest.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD). [From baseline to Week 24]

      The purpose of the six minute walk is to test exercise tolerance and capacity. The test measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes.

    2. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Borg Dyspnea Index Collected at the End of the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT). [From baseline to Week 24]

      This outcome measures the difference in the Borg dyspnea index collected at the end of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at Week 24 compared to baseline. The Borg dyspnea index rates the severity of dyspnea (difficult or labored breathing) on a scale from 0 ('Nothing at all') to 10 ('Very, very severe - maximal'). A decrease in the Borg dyspnea index indicates an improvement.

    3. Proportion of Subjects With Worsening in WHO Functional Class (FC) From Baseline to Week 24 [From baseline to Week 24]

      WHO functional classes are defined as follows: 1) class I: no symptoms with exercise or at rest. No limitation of activity. 2) class II: No symptoms at rest but slight limitation with ordinary activities causing symptoms (e.g. short of breath with climbing a flight of stairs, grocery shopping, or making the bed). 3) class III: may not have symptoms at rest but activities greatly limited by shortness of breath, fatigue, or near fainting. 4) class IV: symptoms at rest (such as dyspnea and/or fatigue) and inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms (e.g. may faint especially while bending over with their heads lowered). Patients in class IV manifest signs of right heart failure. Shifting to a higher class (e.g. from class III to class IV) represents a 'worsening' while shifting to a lower class (e.g. from class III to class II) means an 'improvement'.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 84 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Written informed consent

    • Subject with CTEPH (WHO Group 4) judged as inoperable due to the localization of the obstruction being surgically inaccessible (i.e., distal disease).

    • Female of childbearing potential must have a negative pre-treatment serum pregnancy test, be advised on appropriate methods of contraception, and agree to use 2 reliable methods of contraception.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Previous pulmonary endarterectomy.

    • Recurrent thromboembolism despite sufficient oral anticoagulants.

    • Symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism in the 6-month period prior to randomization.

    • Known moderate-to-severe restrictive lung disease (i.e., TLC < 60% of predicted value) or obstructive lung disease (i.e., FEV1 < 70% of predicted, with FEV1/FVC < 65%) or known significant chronic lung disease diagnosed by chest imaging (e.g., interstitial lung disease, emphysema).

    • Acute or chronic conditions (other than dyspnea) that limit the ability to comply with study requirements in the 3-month period prior to Screening visit or during the Screening period.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University Hospital Gasthuisberg / Interne Geneeskunde - I.G. Pneumologie Leuven Belgium 3000
    2 Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital-Department of Respiration Beijing China 100020
    3 Cardiovascular institute & Fuwai Hospital- Thrombus Center Beijing China 100037
    4 The first affiliated hospital of guangzhou medical university-respiratory department Guangzhou China 510120
    5 ngShanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Department of Pulmonary Circulation Shanghai China 200433
    6 The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region,Congenital Heart Disease Department Shenyang China 110016
    7 Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital Wuhan China 430022
    8 Centre for PPH, Charles University , II Interni klinika1.LF a VFN Praha Czechia 128 08
    9 CHU de Bicêtre Le Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex France 94275
    10 Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou Service de Pneumologie, soins intensifs et endoscopies bronchiques Paris cedex 15 France 75908
    11 CHU de Toulouse Hopital Larrey Toulouse Cedex 9 France 31059
    12 Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Giessen Germany 35392
    13 Thoraxklinik am Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany 69126
    14 Missionsärztliche Klinik gGmbH Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg Germany 97074
    15 Semmelweis Egyetem Budapest Hungary 1125
    16 Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- és Egészségtudományi Centrum, Kardiológiai Klinika Debrecen Hungary 4032
    17 Severance Hospital, YonSei University Health System Seoul Korea, Republic of 3722
    18 Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universiteto Ligoninės Kauno Klinikos Pulmonologijos-Imunologijos Klinika Kaunas Lithuania 50161
    19 Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia (INC) Ignacio Chavez Mexico City Mexico 14080
    20 Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny w Lublinie im. Stefana Kardynała Wyszyńskiego SPZOZ Oddział Kardiologii - Pododdział Intensywnego Nadzoru Kardiologicznego Lublin Poland 20-718
    21 Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny we Wrocawiu Wrocaw Poland 51-124
    22 Federal State Budgetary Institution "Scientific Research Institute of Systemic Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases", Siberian branch of RAMS Kemerovo Russian Federation 650002
    23 Federal State Budgetary Institution "Russian Cardiology Scientific and Production Complex" of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation Moscow Russian Federation 121552
    24 E.N.Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute Of Circulation Pathology Rosmedtechnology Novosibirsk Russian Federation 630055
    25 Federal State Institution "Federal center of Heart, Blood and Endocrinology named after V.A.Almazov Rosmedtekhnologies" St. Petersburg Russian Federation 197341
    26 Federal State Budgetary Institution "Research Institute for Cardiology" of Siberian Branch under the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences / Cardiovascular Surgery Department Tomsk Russian Federation 634012
    27 University Hospital Zürich Zürich Switzerland 8091
    28 King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Division of Respiratory and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine Bangkok Thailand 10330
    29 Siriraj Hospital, Division of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis Bangkok Thailand 10700
    30 MAHARAJ NAKORN CHIANG MAI HOSPITAL, Department of Internal Medicine Chiang Mai Thailand 50200
    31 Istanbul University İstanbul Faculty Medicine Pulmonology Department Capa_Istanbul Turkey 34093
    32 State Institute of Phthisiology and Pulmonology n.a. F.G. Yanovskiy of AMS Ukraine Kyiv Ukraine 03680
    33 Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital, Cardiosurgery Department Lviv Ukraine 79014
    34 Papworth Hospital NHS Trust, Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Unit Cambridge United Kingdom CB23 3RE
    35 Hammersmith Hospital London United Kingdom W12 0HS
    36 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Pulmonary Vascular Medicine Sheffield United Kingdom S10 2RX

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Actelion

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Kelly Papadakis, MD, Actelion

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Actelion
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02021292
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AC-055E201
    First Posted:
    Dec 27, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 4, 2020
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2020
    Keywords provided by Actelion
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details A total of 48 sites in 20 countries screened subjects for recruitment. The study was conducted (i.e., randomized subjects) in a total of 36 sites across 16 countries: Belgium, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Thailand, Turkey, South Korea, Switzerland, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom).
    Pre-assignment Detail Target screening period from Visit 1 up to Randomization was maximum of 30 days, but longer period (up to 60 days) was permitted with pre-approval from Actelion. Total of 186 subjects were screened. Of these, 80 subjects were randomized in 1:1 ratio to macitentan 10 milligram (mg) (n = 40) and placebo (n = 40). All randomized subjects were treated.
    Arm/Group Title Macitentan Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily. Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 40 40
    COMPLETED 40 37
    NOT COMPLETED 0 3

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Macitentan Placebo Total
    Arm/Group Description Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily. Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 40 40 80
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    26
    65%
    26
    65%
    52
    65%
    >=65 years
    14
    35%
    14
    35%
    28
    35%
    Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ]
    Median (Full Range) [years]
    60.0
    58.0
    59.0
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    26
    65%
    25
    62.5%
    51
    63.8%
    Male
    14
    35%
    15
    37.5%
    29
    36.3%
    Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
    Asia
    15
    37.5%
    14
    35%
    29
    36.3%
    Eastern Europe
    17
    42.5%
    19
    47.5%
    36
    45%
    Latin America
    1
    2.5%
    1
    2.5%
    2
    2.5%
    Western Europe
    7
    17.5%
    6
    15%
    13
    16.3%
    Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m^2) [Median (Full Range) ]
    Median (Full Range) [kg/m^2]
    25.7
    26.0
    25.7
    Time since diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    1.7
    (2.36)
    1.2
    (1.95)
    1.5
    (2.16)
    6-minute walk distance (6MWD) (meter) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [meter]
    353.0
    (87.90)
    351.2
    (73.79)
    352.1
    (80.64)
    Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (dynes*sec/cm^5) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [dynes*sec/cm^5]
    929.2
    (379.65)
    984.3
    (487.06)
    956.8
    (434.78)
    WHO functional class (Count of Participants)
    class I
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    class II
    12
    30%
    6
    15%
    18
    22.5%
    class III
    28
    70%
    33
    82.5%
    61
    76.3%
    class IV
    0
    0%
    1
    2.5%
    1
    1.3%
    Use of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) medication (Count of Participants)
    NO
    16
    40%
    15
    37.5%
    31
    38.8%
    YES
    24
    60%
    25
    62.5%
    49
    61.3%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) at Rest.
    Description The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as the PVR at rest at Week 16 expressed as percent of baseline PVR at rest.
    Time Frame From baseline to Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set included all subjects assigned to a study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Macitentan Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily
    Measure Participants 40 40
    Geometric Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [percent of baseline PVR]
    73.0
    87.2
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Macitentan, Placebo
    Comments The null hypothesis (change of PVR at rest in Week 16 in percent of baseline PVR in subjects treated with placebo or macitentan is the same) is tested on the primary endpoint by means of an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on the log(e) transformed % of baseline PVR at rest at Week 16.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0410
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments ANCOVA model on log-transformed % of baseline PVR at Week 16 adjusted by treatment as a factor and log transformed PVR at baseline as a covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter ratio of geometric means
    Estimated Value 0.84
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.70 to 0.99
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD).
    Description The purpose of the six minute walk is to test exercise tolerance and capacity. The test measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes.
    Time Frame From baseline to Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Macitentan Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily. Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
    Measure Participants 40 40
    6MWD (m) at baseline
    353.0
    (87.90)
    351.2
    (73.79)
    6MWD (m) at Week 24
    388.0
    (83.31)
    352.2
    (121.29)
    Change in 6MWD (m) from baseline to Week 24
    35.0
    (52.52)
    1.0
    (83.24)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Macitentan, Placebo
    Comments The null hypothesis is that the mean change from baseline in 6MWD at Week 24 is the same in the placebo and the macitentan group. Statistical model is ANCOVA including 6MWD at baseline as a covariate, with treatment as factor in the model.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0326
    Comments To control multiplicity across all endpoints, secondary endpoints were analyzed in sequence using hierarchical approach based on order and significance as pre-specified in protocol eliminating further adjustment for multiple comparisons.
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter least squares (LS) mean difference
    Estimated Value 34.04
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    2.9 to 65.2
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Borg Dyspnea Index Collected at the End of the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT).
    Description This outcome measures the difference in the Borg dyspnea index collected at the end of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at Week 24 compared to baseline. The Borg dyspnea index rates the severity of dyspnea (difficult or labored breathing) on a scale from 0 ('Nothing at all') to 10 ('Very, very severe - maximal'). A decrease in the Borg dyspnea index indicates an improvement.
    Time Frame From baseline to Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Macitentan Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily. Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
    Measure Participants 40 40
    Borg dyspnea index score at baseline
    4.2
    (2.52)
    4.2
    (2.14)
    Borg dyspnea index score at Week 24
    4.1
    (2.52)
    4.4
    (2.45)
    Change from baseline to Week 24
    -0.1
    (1.86)
    0.3
    (2.04)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Macitentan, Placebo
    Comments The null hypothesis is that the mean change from baseline is the same in the placebo and the macitentan group. Statistical model is Analysis of Covariance including Borg dyspnea index at baseline as a covariate, with Treatment as factor in the model.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3492
    Comments To control multiplicity across all endpoints, secondary endpoints were analyzed in sequence using hierarchical approach based on order and significance as pre-specified in protocol eliminating further adjustment for multiple comparisons.
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter least squares (LS) mean difference
    Estimated Value -0.39
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -1.21 to 0.43
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Proportion of Subjects With Worsening in WHO Functional Class (FC) From Baseline to Week 24
    Description WHO functional classes are defined as follows: 1) class I: no symptoms with exercise or at rest. No limitation of activity. 2) class II: No symptoms at rest but slight limitation with ordinary activities causing symptoms (e.g. short of breath with climbing a flight of stairs, grocery shopping, or making the bed). 3) class III: may not have symptoms at rest but activities greatly limited by shortness of breath, fatigue, or near fainting. 4) class IV: symptoms at rest (such as dyspnea and/or fatigue) and inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms (e.g. may faint especially while bending over with their heads lowered). Patients in class IV manifest signs of right heart failure. Shifting to a higher class (e.g. from class III to class IV) represents a 'worsening' while shifting to a lower class (e.g. from class III to class II) means an 'improvement'.
    Time Frame From baseline to Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set
    Arm/Group Title Macitentan Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily. Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
    Measure Participants 40 40
    WHO functional class I at baseline
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    WHO functional class II at baseline
    12
    30%
    6
    15%
    WHO functional class III at baseline
    28
    70%
    33
    82.5%
    WHO functional class IV at baseline
    0
    0%
    1
    2.5%
    WHO functional class I at Week 24
    3
    7.5%
    1
    2.5%
    WHO functional class II at Week 24
    15
    37.5%
    10
    25%
    WHO functional class III at Week 24
    22
    55%
    26
    65%
    WHO functional class IV at Week 24
    0
    0%
    3
    7.5%
    Worsened
    0
    0%
    3
    7.5%
    Not worsened - total
    40
    100%
    37
    92.5%
    Not Worsened - unchanged
    31
    77.5%
    29
    72.5%
    Not worsened - improved
    9
    22.5%
    8
    20%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Macitentan, Placebo
    Comments The null hypothesis is the odds of worsening are the same in the placebo and the macitentan group. Logistic regression is used for Treatment Group vs. Placebo comparison to generate odds ratio, confidence levels, and p-values with treatment and WHO functional class at baseline as factors in the model.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0962
    Comments To control multiplicity across all endpoints, secondary endpoints were analyzed in sequence using hierarchical approach based on order and significance as pre-specified in protocol eliminating further adjustment for multiple comparisons.
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 0.212
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.001 to 1.464
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    5. Post-Hoc Outcome
    Title Post-hoc Analysis of Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) at Rest Including Subjects With Corrected Hemodynamic Values
    Description The main analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint of PVR was repeated after the voluntary right heart catheterization source data verification (SDV) and independent medical review of hemodynamic data corrected for 13 subjects reported after the clinical database closure.
    Time Frame From baseline to Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set for this post-hoc analysis included all subjects assigned to a study treatment with SDV values.
    Arm/Group Title Macitentan Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily. Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
    Measure Participants 40 40
    Geometric Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent of baseline PVR]
    71.5
    87.6
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Macitentan, Placebo
    Comments The same statistical model as for the predefined analysis (ANCOVA) was applied, including 13 subjects with corrected hemodynamic values.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0098
    Comments This is the post-hoc analysis and p-value is an exploratory p-value.
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments ANCOVA model on log-transformed % of baseline PVR at Week 16 adjusted by treatment as a factor and log transformed PVR at baseline as a covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Model-adjusted geometric mean ratio
    Estimated Value 0.81
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.70 to 0.95
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    6. Post-Hoc Outcome
    Title Post-hoc Analysis of Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) at Rest Excluding Subjects With Corrected Hemodynamic Values
    Description The main analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint of PVR was repeated which excluded data for 13 subjects with corrected hemodynamic values. The hemodynamic values were reported after the SDV assessment clinical database closure.
    Time Frame From baseline to Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set excluding subjects with corrected hemodynamic values.
    Arm/Group Title Macitentan Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily. Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
    Measure Participants 33 34
    Geometric Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent of baseline PVR]
    68.4
    86.1
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Macitentan, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0061
    Comments This is the post-hoc analysis and p-value is an exploratory p-value.
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments ANCOVA model on log-transformed % of baseline PVR at Week 16 adjusted by treatment as a factor and log transformed PVR at baseline as a covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Model-adjusted geometric mean ratio
    Estimated Value 0.79
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.68 to 0.93
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    7. Post-Hoc Outcome
    Title Post-hoc Analysis of Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) at Rest Excluding Subjects With Implausible Hemodynamic Findings
    Description The main analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint of PVR was repeated which excluded 14 subjects with implausible hemodynamic findings.
    Time Frame From baseline to Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set excluding subjects with implausible hemodynamic findings.
    Arm/Group Title Macitentan Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily. Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
    Measure Participants 32 34
    Geometric Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent of baseline PVR]
    73.9
    86.6
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Macitentan, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0414
    Comments This is the post-hoc analysis and p-value is an exploratory p-value.
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments ANCOVA model on log-transformed % of baseline PVR at Week 16 adjusted by treatment as a factor and log transformed PVR at baseline as a covariate.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Geometric mean ratio
    Estimated Value 0.85
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.73 to 0.99
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    8. Post-Hoc Outcome
    Title Post-hoc Analysis of Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD) Excluding Subjects With Implausible Hemodynamic Findings
    Description The same analysis for the secondary endpoint, 6MWD, is repeated on the full analysis set excluding 14 subjects with implausible hemodynamic findings.
    Time Frame From baseline to Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set excluding subjects with implausible hemodynamic findings.
    Arm/Group Title Macitentan Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily. Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
    Measure Participants 32 34
    Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [meter]
    37.41
    0.23
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Macitentan, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0468
    Comments This is the post-hoc analysis and p-value is an exploratory p-value.
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments Statistical model is ANCOVA including 6MWD at baseline as a covariate, with treatment as factor in the model.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter least squares (LS) mean difference
    Estimated Value 37.19
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.54 to 73.83
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame From double-blind study treatment initiation up to 30 days after study treatment discontinuation
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Macitentan Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily. Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
    All Cause Mortality
    Macitentan Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/40 (0%) 2/40 (5%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Macitentan Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 3/40 (7.5%) 7/40 (17.5%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute right ventricular failure 1/40 (2.5%) 1 0/40 (0%) 0
    Cardiac failure 0/40 (0%) 0 1/40 (2.5%) 2
    Right ventricular failure 0/40 (0%) 0 2/40 (5%) 2
    Supraventricular tachycardia 0/40 (0%) 0 1/40 (2.5%) 1
    General disorders
    Oedema peripheral 1/40 (2.5%) 1 0/40 (0%) 0
    Infections and infestations
    Sepsis 0/40 (0%) 0 1/40 (2.5%) 1
    Investigations
    Weight increased 1/40 (2.5%) 1 0/40 (0%) 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain 0/40 (0%) 0 1/40 (2.5%) 1
    Nervous system disorders
    Haemorrhagic stroke 0/40 (0%) 0 1/40 (2.5%) 1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dyspnoea 0/40 (0%) 0 1/40 (2.5%) 1
    Pulmonary hypertension 0/40 (0%) 0 2/40 (5%) 2
    Vascular disorders
    Embolism 0/40 (0%) 0 1/40 (2.5%) 1
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Macitentan Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 22/40 (55%) 19/40 (47.5%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Ventricular extrasystoles 0/40 (0%) 0 2/40 (5%) 2
    General disorders
    Fatigue 2/40 (5%) 2 0/40 (0%) 0
    Oedema peripheral 8/40 (20%) 10 4/40 (10%) 4
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis 1/40 (2.5%) 1 4/40 (10%) 4
    Pharyngitis 2/40 (5%) 3 0/40 (0%) 0
    Respiratory tract infection 0/40 (0%) 0 2/40 (5%) 2
    Upper respiratory tract infection 3/40 (7.5%) 4 0/40 (0%) 0
    Urinary tract infection 2/40 (5%) 2 1/40 (2.5%) 1
    Investigations
    Alanine aminotransferase increased 0/40 (0%) 0 3/40 (7.5%) 4
    Aspartate aminotransferase increased 0/40 (0%) 0 3/40 (7.5%) 4
    Haemoglobin decreased 6/40 (15%) 7 0/40 (0%) 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hypomagnesaemia 0/40 (0%) 0 2/40 (5%) 2
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 1/40 (2.5%) 1 3/40 (7.5%) 3
    Back pain 0/40 (0%) 0 2/40 (5%) 2
    Bone pain 2/40 (5%) 3 0/40 (0%) 0
    Pain in extremity 3/40 (7.5%) 3 0/40 (0%) 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness 2/40 (5%) 2 1/40 (2.5%) 1
    Syncope 0/40 (0%) 0 3/40 (7.5%) 3
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough 2/40 (5%) 2 3/40 (7.5%) 3
    Dyspnoea 2/40 (5%) 2 1/40 (2.5%) 1
    Epistaxis 1/40 (2.5%) 1 2/40 (5%) 2
    Pulmonary hypertension 0/40 (0%) 0 2/40 (5%) 2
    Vascular disorders
    Hypotension 0/40 (0%) 0 2/40 (5%) 2

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    Any study-related publication written independently by investigators must be submitted to Actelion for review at least 30 days prior to submission for publication or presentation. Upon review, Actelion may provide comments, and may also request alterations and/or deletions for the sole purpose of protecting its confidential information and/or patent rights.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Clinical Trial Disclosure Desk
    Organization Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
    Phone
    Email clinical-trials-disclosure@actelion.com
    Responsible Party:
    Actelion
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02021292
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AC-055E201
    First Posted:
    Dec 27, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 4, 2020
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2020