The Effects of the Chin Cup on Temporomandibular Joint and Mandibular Dimensions
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This in vivo comparative study will evaluate the changes in the mandibular dimensions and the glenoid fossa after skeletal class III subjects' therapy by chincup appliance and compare it with an untreated class III control group. Pre and post-treatment low-dose computed tomography images will be taken before and after achieving positive overjet and undergoing 16 months of active treatment/ observation. Dimensional and volumetric changes in the mandible, condyles, and glenoid fossa will be calculated and compared to those observed in the control group.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Chincup is a usual treatment strategy for growing subjects with skeletal Class III malocclusions due to the mandibular overgrowth. However, the review of the literature reveals controversies and contradictions regarding the efficacy of chincup therapy in the retardation of mandibular growth. Moreover, the adaption of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) following this treatment isn't clear yet. Two recent systematic reviews recommended the need for high-quality studies.
Computed tomography has been considered an ideal tool for evaluating the TMJ with the possibility of determining the real dimensions of the structures under study. Low-dose computed tomography was introduced as an alternative procedure with an effective dose proximately equal to traditional radiographs. Moreover, the volumetric analysis afforded by 3D imaging has proven reliable and accurate in the evaluation of mandibular and condylar sizes. Therefore, the objective of this randomized control trial is to evaluate the dimensional changes in the mandible, condyles, and glenoid fossa after chin cup therapy for children with mandibular prognathism in comparison with untreated Class III patients
Methods: patients ages between 6 and 8 with anterior crossbite, Class III relationships of the permanent first molars or mesial step relationships of the primary second molars, and short-faced pattern, will be selected from the orthodontic department in the faculty of dentistry at Damascus university. Thirty-eight subjects will be enrolled on the study, who will meet the following radiological inclusion criteria based on cephalometric images: Mild to moderate skeletal class III (4- <the sagittal skeletal angle< 0 degree), due to mandibular protrusion (SNB > 80°), and normal or horizontal growth pattern (Bjork's sum ≤396° ±5°).
Patients in the experimental group will receive an individual fabricated bonded bite block and occipital chincup. A 400-500g/side retroactive force will be applied in the direction of the condyles. Patients or panthers will be instructed to wear the appliance /14-16/ hours a day. Pre-(T1) and post-treatment (T2) low-dose computed tomography images will be taken after a positive overjet of 2-4 mm is obtained and undergoing 16 months of active treatment/ observation. The changes in condyle-mandibular volumes and superficial areas and relative positions of the condyles and glenoid fossa will be calculated and compared with those of untreated. Statistical analysis will be done by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Windows version 26.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests will be used for intragroup comparisons. For the intergroup comparisons, independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests will be carried out.The confidence level is 95% (P< 0.05).
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Chincup Patients will be treated with occipital chincup and bonded bite block. |
Device: Chincup
Patients will receive an individual fabricated bonded bite block and occipital chincup. A 400-500g/side retroactive force will be applied in the direction of the condyles. Patients or panthers will be instructed to wear the appliance /14-16/ hours a day.
|
| Active Comparator: Untreated subjects Patients will not undergone any treatment for 16 months. |
Other: Control group
The changes in condyle-mandibular volumes and superficial areas and relative positions of the condyles and glenoid fossa will be calculated after 16 months of observation.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in the mandibular volume and superficial area [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
After a semiautomatic segmentation will be utilized to isolate the mandibular bone, the mandible will be rendered in high-quality 3D model. Then, the crowns of the teeth will be removed by a plane passing through 1 mm inferior to the alveolar bone and 10 mm distal to the second primary molars. The mandible volumes and surface sizes will be automatically calculated by the software in mm3 and mm2, respectively.
- Changes in the condylar volume and superficial area [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
The condyles will be cut from 3D rendered mandibular model at neck level using a plane parallel to the Frankfort horizontal plane at the most inferior part of the sigmoid notch, the condyle volumes and surface sizes will be automatically calculated by the software in mm3 and mm2, respectively.
- Change in the mandibular body (Go-Gn) [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
Distance between the Gonion point and the Gnathion point.
- Change in the ramus height (Co-Go) [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
Distance between the Condylion point and the Gonion point.
- Change in the total body length (Co-Gn) [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
Distance between the Condylion point and the Gnathion point.
- Change in the mandibular angle (GN-Go-CO) [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
The angle between the Condylion point, the Gonion point and Gnathion point.
- Change in the vertical position of the condyle (CP-FH) [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
The measurement will be made on the corrected sagittal view: Distance of Condylar posterior point from Frankfort horizontal plane.
- Change in the sagittal position of the condyle (CP-Y) [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
The measurement will be made on the corrected sagittal view: Distance of Condylar posterior point from Perpendicular plane (Y).
- change in the vertical position of the mandibular fossa (FP-FH) [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
The measurement will be made on the corrected sagittal view: Distance of Fossa posterior point from Frankfort horizontal plane (FH).
- Change in the sagittal position of the mandibular fossa (FP-Y) [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
The measurement will be made on the corrected sagittal view: Distance of point Fossa posterior point from Perpendicular plane (Y).
- Quantitative changes of displacement of superimposed 3D mode [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
The T1 and T2 3D volumes will be superimposed manually followed by automatic global registration. The point-based analysis will be performed to assess the changes in 3D mandibular models between T1 and T2, and a colour map will be produced. Quantitative mean, minimum, and maximum values of part analyses will be reported for comparative analyses.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in the anterior joint space (AJS) [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
The measurement will be made on the corrected sagittal view: Distance between Condylar anterior point and Fossa anterior point.
- Chang in the superior joint space (SJS) [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
The measurements will be made on the corrected sagittal view: Distance between Condylar posterior point and Fossa superior point.
- Chang in the posterior joint space (PJS) [(T1) baseline measurement at seven days before the beginning of treatment and (T2) at seven days following the end of treatment]
The measurements will be made on the corrected sagittal view: Distance between Condylar posterior point and Fossa posterior point.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical Inclusion criteria:
-
Children ages 6-8 years with anterior crossbite or edge-to-edge incisor relationship.
-
Class III relationships of the permanent first molars or mesial step relationships of the primary second molars.
-
the absence of centric relation and maximum intercuspation discrepancy
-
short-face pattern, adequate overbite.
Radiological Inclusion criteria:
-
Mild to moderate skeletal class III (4- <the sagittal skeletal angle (ANB)< 0 degree), due to mandibular protrusion (SNB > 80°).
-
normal or horizontal growth pattern (Bjork's sum ≤396° ±5°)
Exclusion Criteria:
-
temporomandibular joint disorders
-
craniofacial anomalies
-
history of previous orthodontic treatment
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Damascus | Damascus | Syrian Arab Republic |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Damascus University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amr H Husson, DDS,MSc,PhD, Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
- Study Director: Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS,MSc,PhD, Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
- Study Director: Ahamd S Burhan, DDS,MSc,PhD, Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
- Study Director: Fehmieh R Nawaya, DDS,MSc,PhD, Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Chatzoudi MI, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Papadopoulos MA. Clinical effectiveness of chin cup treatment for the management of Class III malocclusion in pre-pubertal patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2014 Dec 2;15:62. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0062-9. Review.
- Cordasco G, Portelli M, Militi A, Nucera R, Lo Giudice A, Gatto E, Lucchese A. Low-dose protocol of the spiral CT in orthodontics: comparative evaluation of entrance skin dose with traditional X-ray techniques. Prog Orthod. 2013 Sep 10;14:24. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-24.
- Ikeda K, Kawamura A. Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.021.
- Liu ZP, Li CJ, Hu HK, Chen JW, Li F, Zou SJ. Efficacy of short-term chincup therapy for mandibular growth retardation in Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2011 Jan;81(1):162-68. doi: 10.2319/050510-244.1. Review.
- Lo Giudice A, Ronsivalle V, Grippaudo C, Lucchese A, Muraglie S, Lagravère MO, Isola G. One Step before 3D Printing-Evaluation of Imaging Software Accuracy for 3-Dimensional Analysis of the Mandible: A Comparative Study Using a Surface-to-Surface Matching Technique. Materials (Basel). 2020 Jun 21;13(12). pii: E2798. doi: 10.3390/ma13122798.
- Swennen GR, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):410-6.
- Zurfluh MA, Kloukos D, Patcas R, Eliades T. Effect of chin-cup treatment on the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2015 Jun;37(3):314-24. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju048. Epub 2014 Sep 1. Review.
- UDDS-Ortho-09-2022