Clinical Implication of DAC (Detrusor After-contraction)

Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01154946
Collaborator
(none)
2,309
1
23
100.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aims of this study are

  • to confirm whether detrusor after-contraction (DAC) is a true contraction or not with a new approach

  • and to understand clinical implication of DAC

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    The definition of detrusor after-contraction (DAC) is usually accepted as the increase of detrusor pressure (Pdet), whether it is sudden or not, after cessation of urinary flow. The amount of increase in Pdet is sometimes included in the definition of DAC (14, 15, 20 cmH2O or at least two times the level of the maximal Pdet during the voiding phase). However, it is clear that the lack of a well-established definition may induce much bias in the interpretation of the clinical implication of DAC. The previous studies showed a wide range of prevalence.1-4 DAC seemed to occur more frequently in children and the occurrence rate usually decreased with age in urodynamic studies.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    2309 participants
    Observational Model:
    Case-Control
    Time Perspective:
    Retrospective
    Official Title:
    A New Approach to Clinical Implication of Detrusor After-contraction (DAC)
    Study Start Date :
    Jan 1, 2007
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Dec 1, 2008
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Dec 1, 2008

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    DAC group

    patients who show detrusor after-contraction during voiding cystometrography (CMG)

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. to confirm whether DAC is a true contraction or not [up to 2 years (2007.Jan-2008.Dec)]

      no change of Pdet when patients cough could confirm that DAC was a true contraction. Because an artifact occurred when a catheter was pressed against bladder wall or urethra, no change of intravesical pressure and increase of abdominal pressure finally induced a negative deflection of Pdet and this change of Pdet could be regarded as an artifact.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Past medical history including neurological disorders and pelvic irradiation were also included in the database [up to 2 years (2007.Jan-2008.Dec)]

      One-way analysis of variance and the chi-square test were performed to determine whether there was a relationship between the presence of DAC and the underlying neurogenic and non-neurogenic conditions

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Indications and selection of patients for conduction of urodynamic studies (UDS) were followed as the recommendation of ICS (international continence society).
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with indwelling catheters, urinary tract infection and urinary stones were excluded from this study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Korea, Republic of 110-744

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Seoul National University Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Seung-June Oh, M.D.,Ph.D., Seoul National University Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01154946
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • DAC
    • H-0805-056-245
    First Posted:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2010

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 1, 2010