Clinical Outcomes of 3L+ Therapies Among Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Those With T315I Mutation

Sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals (Industry)

Overall Status

Completed

CT.gov ID

NCT05611216

Collaborator

(none)

164

Enrollment

Location

12.7

Actual Duration (Months)

12.9

Patients Per Site Per Month

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study was a retrospective, non-interventional patient chart review and used a panel of oncologists/hematologists from the US to collect real-world clinical outcomes of patients with CML-CP in 3L+ and those with the T315I mutation.

Condition or Disease	Intervention/Treatment	Phase
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Detailed Description

This study included two distinct cohorts of CML-CP patients; that is, patients with CML-CP who initiated 3L for CML-CP (i.e., 3L cohort) and patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation (i.e., T315I cohort).

Study design for the analyses of the 3L cohort:

The index date: date of initiation of 3L therapy for CML-CP
The study period: period of ≥ 24 months following the index date unless the patient died before
Patient characteristics were measured at CML diagnosis and at the index date
The clinical outcomes of interest were measured during the study period

Study design for the analyses of the T315I cohort:

The index date: date of initiation of a line of therapy identified as the T315I line of interest (i.e., identification of T315I mutation before initiation or over the course of line of therapy)
The study period: period of ≥ 24 months following the index date unless the patient died before
Patient characteristics were measured at CML diagnosis and at the index date.
The clinical outcomes of interest were measured during the study period

Study Design

Study Type:

Observational

Actual Enrollment :

164 participants

Observational Model:

Cohort

Time Perspective:

Retrospective

Official Title:

Assessing Real-world Clinical Outcomes of 3L+ Therapies Among Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Those With T315I Mutation in the United States (ARC Study)

Actual Study Start Date :

Dec 1, 2020

Actual Primary Completion Date :

Dec 23, 2021

Actual Study Completion Date :

Dec 23, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/Treatment
Third-line (3L) Cohort patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia - Chronic Phase (CML-CP) who initiated 3L for CML-CP
T315I Cohort patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of lines of therapy [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP who were previously treated with TKI or other CML treatments and were relapsed/refractory to/were intolerant/had other reasons for switching of CML therapy
Number of patients with total number of lines [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP who were previously treated with TKI or other CML treatments and were relapsed/refractory to/were intolerant/had other reasons for switching of CML therapy
Number of patients: Treatment received [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP who were previously treated with TKI or other CML treatments and were relapsed/refractory to/were intolerant/had other reasons for switching of CML therapy
Number of patients: Calendar year of line of therapy initiation [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP who were previously treated with TKI or other CML treatments and were relapsed/refractory to/were intolerant/had other reasons for switching of CML therapy
Duration of line of therapy [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP who were previously treated with TKI or other CML treatments and were relapsed/refractory to/were intolerant/had other reasons for switching of CML therapy
Number of patients with most frequent treatment sequences from first- to third-line of therapy [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP who were previously treated with TKI or other CML treatments and were relapsed/refractory to/were intolerant/had other reasons for switching of CML therapy
Number of patients who died after initiation of third-line therapy [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP who were previously treated with TKI or other CML treatments and were relapsed/refractory to/were intolerant/had other reasons for switching of CML therapy
Number of patients who progressed to AP/BC after initiation of third-line therapy [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP who were previously treated with TKI or other CML treatments and were relapsed/refractory to/were intolerant/had other reasons for switching of CML therapy
Number of patients who underwent HSCT after initiation of third-line therapy [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP who were previously treated with TKI or other CML treatments and were relapsed/refractory to/were intolerant/had other reasons for switching of CML therapy
Number of patients developed graft versus host disease after undergoing HSCT3 [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP who were previously treated with TKI or other CML treatments and were relapsed/refractory to/were intolerant/had other reasons for switching of CML therapy
Number of patients who were still on the third-line therapy as of the data collection date [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP who were previously treated with TKI or other CML treatments and were relapsed/refractory to/were intolerant/had other reasons for switching of CML therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of patients who achieved molecular response during third-line therapy [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate the effectiveness of TKIs and other CML treatments used in 3L+ settings in patients with CML-CP
Number of patients who achieved cytogenic response during third-line therapy [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate the effectiveness of TKIs and other CML treatments used in 3L+ settings in patients with CML-CP
Number of patients who achieved complete hematologic response during third-line therapy [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate the effectiveness of TKIs and other CML treatments used in 3L+ settings in patients with CML-CP
Number of patients who achieved molecular response during the line of therapy identified as the T315I line of interest [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate the effectiveness of TKIs and other treatments used in a line of therapy identified as the T315I line of interest in patients with CML-CP
Number of patients who achieved cytogenic response during the line of therapy identified as the T315I line of interest [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate the effectiveness of TKIs and other treatments used in a line of therapy identified as the T315I line of interest in patients with CML-CP
Number of patients who achieved complete hematologic response during the line of therapy identified as the T315I line of interest [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate the effectiveness of TKIs and other treatments used in a line of therapy identified as the T315I line of interest in patients with CML-CP
Number of lines of therapy in T315I cohort [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Number of patients: Total number of lines in T315I cohort [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Number pf patients: Line identified as the T315I line of interest [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Number of patients: Treatment received in T315I Cohort [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Number of patients: Calendar year of line of therapy initiation in T315I Cohort [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Duration of line of therapy in T315I Cohort [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Most frequent treatment sequences in T315I Cohort [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Number of patients who died after initiation of the line identified as the T315I line of interest [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Number of patients who progressed to AP/BC after initiation of the line identified as the T315I line of interest [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Number of patients who underwent HSCT after initiation of the line identified as the T315I line of interest [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Number of patients developed graft versus host disease after undergoing HSCT [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Number of patients who were still on the line identified as the T315I line of interest as of the data collection date [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate treatment patterns in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation
Number of patients with BCR-ABL testing in 3L cohort [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate real-world BCR-ABL testing frequency per the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines in 3L settings in patients with CML-CP
Number of patients with BCR-ABL testing in T315I cohort [throughout the study period, approximately 5 years (On or after January 1st, 2013 and no later than November 30th, 2018)]
To evaluate real-world BCR-ABL testing frequency per the latest NCCN guidelines in patients with CML-CP with T315I mutation

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:

18 Years and Older

Sexes Eligible for Study:

All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

Inclusion Criteria:

Physician selection

Physicians were eligible to participate in the study if they fulfilled all of the following criteria:

Completed medical subspecialty training
Reported hematology, medical oncology, or any other oncology subspecialties as the primary medical subspecialty
Were responsible for treatment decisions and follow-up for ≥ 1 adult patient with Ph+ CML-CP who received a 3L or those with the T315I mutation since January 2013 (the date from which molecular monitoring response on the International Scale (IS) became a more standard procedure/commonly available
Had access to molecular monitoring results reported on the IS, and with a sensitivity level of precision for molecular response of MR3 (BCR ABL1/ABL1 ≤ 0.1% or 3-log reduction) or better

Patient selection Participating physicians were directed to provide information on patients who were included into the following separate cohorts. Each participating physician contributed up to 5 patient medical charts from each cohort.

For the 3L cohort:

Adult patients diagnosed with Ph+ CML-CP who initiated a 1L therapy, switched to a 2L therapy, and initiated a 3L therapy for CML-CP
All lines of therapy (TKIs or other CML treatments) received outside of an interventional clinical trial setting
3L therapy was initiated on or after January 1st, 2013 (when molecular monitoring became a common practice in CML monitoring) and no later than November 30th, 2018, to have a minimum of 2 years of follow-up after therapy initiation, except if the patient died before

For the T315I cohort:

Adult patients diagnosed with Ph+ CML-CP who initiated ≥ 1 line of therapy for Ph+ CML-CP and T315I mutation was identified
All lines of therapy (TKIs or other CML treatments) received outside of an interventional clinical trial setting
Line of therapy identified as the T315I line of interest was initiated on or after January 1st, 2013, and no later than November 30th, 2018, to have a minimum of 2 years of follow-up after therapy initiation, except if the patient died before

For both cohorts:

Patients with Ph+ CML-CP for whom the physician had complete information on the CML related care from CML diagnosis and for ≥ 2 years after the initiation of line of therapy of interest (i.e., 3L or line of therapy identified as the T315I line of interest), unless the patient died before. Complete information included: CML treatments, treatment duration, routine laboratory (e.g., complete blood count (CBC), BCR-ABL), CML status (e.g., SOKAL risk score, CP/accelerated phase (AP)/ blast crisis (BC)), medications, and clinical status (e.g., history, physical exam)
The physician had access to molecular monitoring results reported on the IS from initiation of the line of therapy of interest and with a sensitivity level of precision for molecular response of MR3 (BCR-ABL1/ABL1≤0.1% or 3-log reduction) or better Of note, the cohorts were not mutually exclusive such that patients included in the 3L cohort with T315I mutation was included in the T315I cohort. Thereafter, there was an oversampling of patients with T315I mutation. Patients from the T315I cohort from the oversampling with a 3L were not included in the 3L cohort.