Clinical and Sociodemographic Characterization of Multiple Myeloma Participants With Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Disease in Spain (CharisMMa Study)

Sponsor
Takeda (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03188536
Collaborator
(none)
282
30
18.2
9.4
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to characterize the multiple myeloma (MM) participants with symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in Spain.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: No Intervention

Detailed Description

Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM who have received at least one previous treatment line and have experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who are still in follow-up at the time of the study visit will be observed in this study.

The study will look into sociodemographic data, current clinical and therapeutic data, clinical data relative to the latest relapse and clinical data at diagnosis and previous relapses will be collected.

The study will enroll approximately 350 patients.

This multi-center trial will be conducted in a total of 30 public sites in Spain. The overall time to collect data will be approximately 1 year from June 2017 to May 2018.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
282 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
Clinical and Sociodemographic Characterization of Multiple Myeloma Patients With Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Disease in Spain
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 26, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 15, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 30, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants

Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM who received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.

Other: No Intervention
As it was an observational study, no intervention was administered in this study.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at Diagnosis [Day 1]

    Sociodemographic variables included age(in years), sex(male or female), body mass index(BMI), residence(rural or urban), educational level(illiterate,no studies(can only read/write),primary studies,secondary studies,higher studies), work status(unemployed,active employment,temporarily/ permanently disabled, retired, other), cohabitation(lives-alone,with relatives,alone with help from a caregiver), need for financial assistance (yes/no), degree of dependence(independent,dependent:grade I-requires help to perform activities of daily living [ADL] at least once a day,grade II-needs help to perform ADLs 2 or 3 times a day or grade III-needs help to perform ADLs several times a day), healthy habits (high[jogging;climbing;cycling;swimming;sports;intensive work;moving >20 kg loads], moderate[walking;dancing;domestic chores;sports with children,walking house pets;general construction work;moving <20 kg loads] physical activity or inactive, smoking habit (yes/no), alcohol use (yes/no).

  2. Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Diagnosis [Day 1]

    Clinical variables at Diagnosis included age,MM type(heavy/light chain/Bence-Jones protein), international staging system(ISS),disease stage(I:low risk,β2-Microglobulin<3.5mg/L and albumin≥3.5g/dL,II:not stage I or III,III:high risk,β2-Microglobulin≥5.5mg/L),calcium,renal insufficiency,anemia or bone lesions(CRAB) signs(serum calcium>0.25mmol/L upper limit of normal,renal failure-creatinine clearance<40mL/min/serum creatinine>117μmol/L, anemia:reduction of hemoglobin(Hb)>2g/dL below lower limit of normal or Hb<10g/dL,bone lesions 1/more osteolytic lesion,cytogenetic abnormalities(t[4;14],t[11;14],t[14;16],t[14;20],t[6;14],trisomies,d[17p],g[1q]/others), risk according to cytogenetic profile(standard:trisomies,t[11;14];t[6;14],intermediate:t[4;14],g[1q], high:d[17p],t[14;16],t[14;20],other), eastern cooperative oncology group(ECOG) status (0:fully active,1:restricted physical activity,2:ambulatory,unable to carry out any work,3:capable of limited selfcare,4:completely disabled,5:dead).

  3. Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Episode [Day 1]

    Clinical variables include date of latest symptomatic relapse and/or refractory episode, ISS disease stage, CRAB signs, other clinical variables (plasmacytomas: medullary or extramedullary, diffuse osteopenia, fractures, neurological symptoms, infections, concomitant diseases like diabetes, neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease, liver failure, psychiatric and/or neurological disorders, any other secondary disorders, cytogenetic abnormalities, risk according to cytogenetic profile at relapse(standard:trisomies,t[11;14];t[6;14],intermediate:t[4;14],g[1q], high:d[17p],t[14;16],t[14;20],other), treatment started after latest symptomatic relapse and/or refractory episode.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Episode [Day 1]

    Clinical and Sociodemographic variables categorized by treatment selection(immunomodulators[IMiDs],proteasome inhibitor[PI]+IMiDs,PI,monoclonal antibodies[mAb]): Age,sex(male/female),prior treatment lines(0,1,2,3 or more),prior relapses(0,1,2,3 or more),ISS disease stage(I:low risk,β2-Microglobulin<3.5mg/L,albumin≥3.5g/dL,II:not stage I or III,III:high risk,β2-Microglobulin≥5.5mg/L),CRAB signs(serum calcium>0.25mmol/L upper limit of normal,renal failure-creatinine clearance<40mL/min/serum creatinine>117μmol/L,anemia:reduction of hemoglobin(Hb)>2g/dL below lower limit of normal or Hb<10g/dL,bone lesions 1/more osteolytic lesion),risk according to cytogenetic profile(standard:trisomies,t[11;14];t[6;14];high:d[17p],t[14;16],t[14;20],other),other clinical variables:medullary/extramedullary plasmacytomas,osteopenia,fractures,neurological symptoms,infections,concomitant diseases:diabetes, neuropathy, COPD, cardiovascular disease, liver failure, psychiatric, neurological disorders.

  2. Number of New Relevant Variables That Are Not Currently Collected in Clinical Records and That Could Influence in the Disease Management at Relapse [Day 1]

  3. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30 [Day 1]

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status/QOL scale. Most of the 30 items have 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much), with 2 questions relying on a 7-point numeric rating scale with a recall period of the previous week. Raw scores are converted into scale scores ranging from 0 to 100. For the functional scales and the global health status/QOL scale, higher scores represent better QOL; for the symptom scales, lower scores represent better QOL.

  4. HRQOL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Subscale Score [Day 1]

    The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment) with a recall period of previous week. Scores from each subscale were transformed from 0 to 100. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening.

  5. HRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) [Day 1]

    The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment) with a recall period of previous week. Scores from each subscale were transformed from 0 to 100. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening. Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module included 4 factors, each factor corresponds to questions related to the particular component of the scale. Factor I indicate symptoms. Factor II indicates future perspectives. Factor III indicate adverse effects of the treatment. Factor IV indicates adverse effects of the treatment and body image. Each of these factors were used for the clinical validity of the scale.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU) [Day 1]

    Healthcare resources used during medical encounters include intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, hospital admissions, visits to the emergency room, days admitted.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Have a diagnosis of MM and has received at least one previous treatment line.

  • Have experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the 6 months before the study.

  • Has continued in follow-up at the time of the study visit.

  • Is currently treated in the site who have clinical records available.

  • Is capable of understanding and completing the questions in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), and EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY20) questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Participants who do not agree to participate in the study or who do not give written informed consent.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 H Universitario Puerta del Mar Cadiz Andalucia Spain 11009
2 H Virgen de las Nieves Granada Andalucia Spain 18014
3 Hospital Juan Ramon Jimenez Huelva Andalucia Spain 21005
4 H Jerez Jerez de la Frontera Andalucia Spain 11408
5 Hospital Costa del Sol Marbella Andalucia Spain 29603
6 H. Nuestra Senora de Valme Sevilla Andalucia Spain 41014
7 Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa Zaragoza Aragon Spain 50009
8 H Universitario de Cabuenes Gijon Asturias Spain 33394
9 H U Canarias San Cristobal de La Laguna Canarias Spain 38320
10 H Marques de Valdecilla Santander Cantabria Spain 39008
11 H U de Guadalajara Guadalajara Castilla La Mancha Spain 19002
12 Complejo Hospitalario Toledo Toledo Castilla La Mancha Spain 45071
13 Hospital de Burgos Burgos Castilla Y Leon Spain 9006
14 Hospital de Leon Leon Castilla Y Leon Spain 24001
15 Hospital de Salamanca Salamanca Castilla Y Leon Spain 37007
16 Complejo Asistencial de Segovia Segovia Castilla Y Leon Spain 40002
17 Hospital Clinico de Barcelona Barcelona Cataluna Spain 8036
18 Hospital Doctor Trueta ICO Girona Girona Cataluna Spain 17007
19 ICO Bellvitge Hospitalet de Llobregat Cataluna Spain 8908
20 H Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII Tarragona Cataluna Spain 43005
21 Hospital Lucus Agusti Lugo Galicia Spain 27003
22 H Clinico Universitario de Santiago Santiago de Compostela Galicia Spain 15706
23 H Son Espases Palma Islas Baleares Spain 7120
24 Hospital Son Llatzer Palma Islas Baleares Spain 7198
25 Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra Pamplona Navarra Spain 31008
26 H de Donosti Donostia Pais Vasco Spain 20014
27 Hospital de Txagorritxu Vitoria-Gasteiz Pais Vasco Spain 1009
28 H Infanta Leonor Madrid Spain 28031
29 H 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain 28041
30 H Clinico de Valencia Valencia Spain 46010

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Takeda

Investigators

  • Study Director: Medical Monitor Clinical Science, Takeda

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Takeda
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03188536
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RRMM-5012
  • TAK-MMR-2017-01
First Posted:
Jun 15, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Oct 12, 2020
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details Participants took part in the study at 30 investigative sites in Spain from 26 July 2017 to 30 January 2019.
Pre-assignment Detail Participants with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma with symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease were observed to collect the retrospective data on Day 1.
Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 282
COMPLETED 276
NOT COMPLETED 6

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
Overall Participants 276
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
67.4
(10.5)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
129
46.7%
Male
147
53.3%
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants)
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
Spain
276
100%
Body Mass Index (BMI) (Kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Kg/m^2]
27.5
(5.1)

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Sociodemographic Variables at Diagnosis
Description Sociodemographic variables included age(in years), sex(male or female), body mass index(BMI), residence(rural or urban), educational level(illiterate,no studies(can only read/write),primary studies,secondary studies,higher studies), work status(unemployed,active employment,temporarily/ permanently disabled, retired, other), cohabitation(lives-alone,with relatives,alone with help from a caregiver), need for financial assistance (yes/no), degree of dependence(independent,dependent:grade I-requires help to perform activities of daily living [ADL] at least once a day,grade II-needs help to perform ADLs 2 or 3 times a day or grade III-needs help to perform ADLs several times a day), healthy habits (high[jogging;climbing;cycling;swimming;sports;intensive work;moving >20 kg loads], moderate[walking;dancing;domestic chores;sports with children,walking house pets;general construction work;moving <20 kg loads] physical activity or inactive, smoking habit (yes/no), alcohol use (yes/no).
Time Frame Day 1

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All participants eligible for analyses were included. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specific category. Percentages were rounded off.
Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
Measure Participants 276
Age, Adults (27-90 years)
100
36.2%
Sex, Male
53.3
19.3%
Sex, Female
46.7
16.9%
BMI, 15 to 52 kg/m^2
100
36.2%
Area of Residence, Rural
24.3
8.8%
Area of Residence, Urban
75.7
27.4%
Educational level, Illiteracy
0.7
0.3%
Educational level, No Studies (just read/write)
10.4
3.8%
Educational level, Primary studies
43.3
15.7%
Educational level, Secondary studies
34.1
12.4%
Educational level, Higher studies
11.5
4.2%
Work Status, Unemployed
5.5
2%
Work Status, Active
5.1
1.8%
Work Status, Temporary/permanent disability
20.0
7.2%
Work Status, Retired
65.1
23.6%
Work Status, Other
4.4
1.6%
Cohabitation status, Living Alone
12.4
4.5%
Cohabitation status, Living with Relatives
85.8
31.1%
Cohabitation, Living Alone with Assistance
1.8
0.7%
Need of Financial Support, No
93.8
34%
Level of Dependence, Independent
71.3
25.8%
Level of Dependence, Grade I
14.5
5.3%
Level of Dependence, Grade II
12.7
4.6%
Level of Dependence, Grade III
1.5
0.5%
Physical Activity, High
1.8
0.7%
Physical Activity, Moderate
45.8
16.6%
Physical Activity, Inactive
52.4
19%
Current smoking habit, Yes
3.6
1.3%
Current smoking habit, No
96.4
34.9%
Alcohol Use, Yes
6.5
2.4%
Alcohol Use, No
93.5
33.9%
2. Primary Outcome
Title Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Diagnosis
Description Clinical variables at Diagnosis included age,MM type(heavy/light chain/Bence-Jones protein), international staging system(ISS),disease stage(I:low risk,β2-Microglobulin<3.5mg/L and albumin≥3.5g/dL,II:not stage I or III,III:high risk,β2-Microglobulin≥5.5mg/L),calcium,renal insufficiency,anemia or bone lesions(CRAB) signs(serum calcium>0.25mmol/L upper limit of normal,renal failure-creatinine clearance<40mL/min/serum creatinine>117μmol/L, anemia:reduction of hemoglobin(Hb)>2g/dL below lower limit of normal or Hb<10g/dL,bone lesions 1/more osteolytic lesion,cytogenetic abnormalities(t[4;14],t[11;14],t[14;16],t[14;20],t[6;14],trisomies,d[17p],g[1q]/others), risk according to cytogenetic profile(standard:trisomies,t[11;14];t[6;14],intermediate:t[4;14],g[1q], high:d[17p],t[14;16],t[14;20],other), eastern cooperative oncology group(ECOG) status (0:fully active,1:restricted physical activity,2:ambulatory,unable to carry out any work,3:capable of limited selfcare,4:completely disabled,5:dead).
Time Frame Day 1

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All participants eligible for analyses were included. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specific category. Participants are repeated for multiple CRAB signs and cytogenic abnormalities. Percentages were rounded off.
Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
Measure Participants 276
Age, Adults (27-90 years)
100
36.2%
MM Type, Heavy chain, IgA
24.1
8.7%
MM Type, Heavy chain, IgD
1.9
0.7%
MM Type, Heavy chain, IgG
56.8
20.6%
MM Type, Heavy chain, IgM
0.8
0.3%
MM Type, Heavy chain, No Heavy Chain
16.5
6%
MM Type, Light Chain, No Light Chain
3.3
1.2%
MM Type, Light Chain, Kappa
59.8
21.7%
MM Type, Light Chain, Lambda
37.0
13.4%
MM Type, Bence Jones Protein, Yes
53.6
19.4%
ISS Disease Stage I
28.8
10.4%
ISS Disease Stage II
28.1
10.2%
ISS Disease Stage III
43.1
15.6%
CRAB Signs, None
12.7
4.6%
CRAB Signs, Some, Increase in blood calcium levels
12.0
4.3%
CRAB Signs, Some, Renal failure
18.7
6.8%
CRAB Signs, Some, Anemia
52.7
19.1%
CRAB Signs, Some, Bone lesions
76.3
27.6%
Cytogenetic abnormalities, t (4;14)
11.3
4.1%
Cytogenetic abnormalities, t (11;14)
14.2
5.1%
Cytogenetic abnormalities, t (14;16)
1.9
0.7%
Cytogenetic abnormalities, Trisomies
3.8
1.4%
Cytogenetic abnormalities, d (17p)
17.9
6.5%
Cytogenetic abnormalities, g (1q)
21.7
7.9%
Cytogenetic abnormalities, Other
66.0
23.9%
Risk, High
19.8
7.2%
Risk, Standard
12.3
4.5%
Risk, Intermediate
23.6
8.6%
Risk, Other
44.3
16.1%
ECOG Status, 0
29.7
10.8%
ECOG Status, 1
41.5
15%
ECOG Status, 2
22.6
8.2%
ECOG Status, 3
6.2
2.2%
3. Primary Outcome
Title Percentage of MM Participants Categorized by Clinical Variables at Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Episode
Description Clinical variables include date of latest symptomatic relapse and/or refractory episode, ISS disease stage, CRAB signs, other clinical variables (plasmacytomas: medullary or extramedullary, diffuse osteopenia, fractures, neurological symptoms, infections, concomitant diseases like diabetes, neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease, liver failure, psychiatric and/or neurological disorders, any other secondary disorders, cytogenetic abnormalities, risk according to cytogenetic profile at relapse(standard:trisomies,t[11;14];t[6;14],intermediate:t[4;14],g[1q], high:d[17p],t[14;16],t[14;20],other), treatment started after latest symptomatic relapse and/or refractory episode.
Time Frame Day 1

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All participants eligible for analyses were included. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specific category. Participants are repeated across multiple categories. Percentages were rounded off.
Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
Measure Participants 276
Relapse Within 6 Months of Last Relapse
61.6
22.3%
ISS Disease Stage I
37.4
13.6%
ISS Disease Stage II
35.5
12.9%
ISS Disease Stage III
27.0
9.8%
CRAB Signs, None
25.7
9.3%
CRAB Signs, Some-Increase in blood calcium levels
9.3
3.4%
CRAB Signs, Some-Renal Failure
20.5
7.4%
CRAB Signs, Some-Anemia
43.9
15.9%
CRAB Signs, Some-Bone lesions
65.9
23.9%
Cytogenetic Abnormalities, t(4;14)
11.5
4.2%
Cytogenetic Abnormalities, t(11;14)
8.0
2.9%
Cytogenetic Abnormalities, t(14;16)
5.7
2.1%
Cytogenetic Abnormalities, Trisomies
4.6
1.7%
Cytogenetic Abnormalities, d (17p)
19.5
7.1%
Cytogenetic Abnormalities, g (1q)
27.96
10.1%
Cytogenetic Abnormalities, other
64.4
23.3%
Risk, High
38.8
14.1%
Risk, Standard
12.2
4.4%
Risk, Intermediate
49.0
17.8%
Diffuse osteopathy
15.4
5.6%
Fractures
15.2
5.5%
Neurological symptoms
8.0
2.9%
Infections
15.2
5.5%
Comorbidities, Diabetes
24.6
8.9%
Comorbidities, Neuropathy
20.6
7.5%
Comorbidities, Nephropathy
15.4
5.6%
Comorbidity, COPD
11.4
4.1%
Comorbidities, Cardiovascular disease
48.6
17.6%
Comorbidities, Liver failure
1.7
0.6%
Comorbidities,Psychiatric or Neurological Disorder
14.3
5.2%
Comorbidities, Other secondary disorders
45.7
16.6%
Medullary Plasmacytoma
15.3
5.5%
Extramedullary Plasmacytoma
15.6
5.7%
Anti-CD38 mAb Monotherapy, Second Line
0.9
0.3%
Anti-CD38 mAb Monotherapy, Third Line
13.2
4.8%
Anti-CD38 mAb Monotherapy, Fourth Line or Later
20.3
7.4%
Double PI Therapy+Steroids/Alkylating Agent,2 Line
9.8
3.6%
Double PI therapy+Steroids/Alkylating Agent,3 Line
10.3
3.7%
DoublePI Therapy+Steroids/Alkylating Agent,>=4Line
6.3
2.3%
Autologous transplant, Second Line
2.5
0.9%
Autologous transplant, Third Line
7.0
2.5%
Autologous transplant, Fourth Line or Later
1.2
0.4%
Allogeneic transplant, Second Line
0.8
0.3%
Allogeneic transplant, Third Line
1.4
0.5%
Allogeneic transplant, Fourth Line or Later
2.4
0.9%
Autologous or Allogeneic Transplant, Second Line
2.5
0.9%
Autologous or Allogeneic Transplant, Third Line
8.5
3.1%
Autologous or Allogeneic Transplant, >=4 Lines
3.5
1.3%
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of MM Participants With Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics Categorized by Treatment Selection at the Latest Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Episode
Description Clinical and Sociodemographic variables categorized by treatment selection(immunomodulators[IMiDs],proteasome inhibitor[PI]+IMiDs,PI,monoclonal antibodies[mAb]): Age,sex(male/female),prior treatment lines(0,1,2,3 or more),prior relapses(0,1,2,3 or more),ISS disease stage(I:low risk,β2-Microglobulin<3.5mg/L,albumin≥3.5g/dL,II:not stage I or III,III:high risk,β2-Microglobulin≥5.5mg/L),CRAB signs(serum calcium>0.25mmol/L upper limit of normal,renal failure-creatinine clearance<40mL/min/serum creatinine>117μmol/L,anemia:reduction of hemoglobin(Hb)>2g/dL below lower limit of normal or Hb<10g/dL,bone lesions 1/more osteolytic lesion),risk according to cytogenetic profile(standard:trisomies,t[11;14];t[6;14];high:d[17p],t[14;16],t[14;20],other),other clinical variables:medullary/extramedullary plasmacytomas,osteopenia,fractures,neurological symptoms,infections,concomitant diseases:diabetes, neuropathy, COPD, cardiovascular disease, liver failure, psychiatric, neurological disorders.
Time Frame Day 1

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All participants eligible for analyses were included. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specific category. Percentages were rounded off.
Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
Measure Participants 276
Age, 38-85 years, IMiDs
100
36.2%
Age, 43-76 years, PI + IMiDs
100
36.2%
Age, 47-84 years, PI
100
36.2%
Age, 39-80 years, mAb
100
36.2%
Age, 53-90 years, Other
100
36.2%
Sex, Male, IMiDs
49.4
17.9%
Sex, Female, IMiDs
50.6
18.3%
Sex, Male, PI + IMiDs
61.2
22.2%
Sex, Female, PI + IMiDs
38.8
14.1%
Sex, Male, PI
47.1
17.1%
Sex, Female, PI
52.9
19.2%
Sex, Male, mAb
55.7
20.2%
Sex, Female, mAb
44.3
16.1%
Sex, Male, Other
57.7
20.9%
Sex, Female, Other
42.3
15.3%
Prior lines of treatment, 1, IMiDs
50.6
18.3%
Prior lines of treatment, 2, IMiDs
28.1
10.2%
Prior lines of treatment, 3 or more, IMiDs
21.3
7.7%
Prior lines of treatment, 1, PI + IMiDs
63.3
22.9%
Prior lines of treatment, 2, PI + IMiDs
16.3
5.9%
Prior lines of treatment, 3 or more, PI + IMiDs
20.4
7.4%
Prior lines of treatment, 1, PI
44.1
16%
Prior lines of treatment, 2, PI
35.3
12.8%
Prior lines of treatment, 3 or more, PI
20.6
7.5%
Prior lines of treatment, 1, mAb
26.2
9.5%
Prior lines of treatment, 2, mAb
29.5
10.7%
Prior lines of treatment, 3 or more, mAb
44.3
16.1%
Prior lines of treatment, 1, Other
11.5
4.2%
Prior lines of treatment, 2, Other
26.9
9.7%
Prior lines of treatment, 3 or more, Other
61.5
22.3%
Number of prior relapses, 0, IMiDs
43.8
15.9%
Number of prior relapses, 1, IMiDs
31.5
11.4%
Number of prior relapses, 2, IMiDs
12.4
4.5%
Number of prior relapses, 3 and more, IMiDs
12.4
4.5%
Number of prior relapses, 0, PI + IMiDs
49.0
17.8%
Number of prior relapses, 1, PI + IMiDs
36.7
13.3%
Number of prior relapses, 2, PI + IMiDs
2.0
0.7%
Number of prior relapses, 3 or more, PI + IMiDs
12.2
4.4%
Number of prior relapses, 0, PI
47.1
17.1%
Number of prior relapses, 1, PI
32.4
11.7%
Number of prior relapses, 2, PI
2.9
1.1%
Number of prior relapses, 3 or more, PI
17.6
6.4%
Number of prior relapses, 0, mAb
27.9
10.1%
Number of prior relapses, 1, mAb
26.2
9.5%
Number of prior relapses, 2, mAb
18.0
6.5%
Number of prior relapses, 3 or more, mAb
27.9
10.1%
Number of prior relapses, 0, Other
11.5
4.2%
Number of prior relapses, 1, Other
26.9
9.7%
Number of prior relapses, 2, Other
23.1
8.4%
Number of prior relapses, 3 or more, Other
38.5
13.9%
ISS Disease Stage I, IMiDs
38.5
13.9%
ISS Disease Stage II, IMiDs
38.5
13.9%
ISS Disease Stage III, IMiDs
23.1
8.4%
ISS Disease Stage I, PI + IMiDs
51.3
18.6%
ISS Disease Stage II, PI + IMiDs
28.2
10.2%
ISS Disease Stage III, PI + IMiDs
20.5
7.4%
ISS Disease Stage I, PI
20.8
7.5%
ISS Disease Stage II, PI
54.2
19.6%
ISS Disease Stage III, PI
25.0
9.1%
ISS Disease Stage I, mAb
40.0
14.5%
ISS Disease Stage II, mAb
32.0
11.6%
ISS Disease Stage III, mAb
28.0
10.1%
ISS Disease Stage I, Other
23.8
8.6%
ISS Disease Stage II, Other
23.8
8.6%
ISS Disease Stage III, Other
52.4
19%
CRAB Signs, None, IMiDs
29.2
10.6%
CRAB Signs, Some, IMiDs
70.8
25.7%
CRAB Signs, None, PI + IMiDs
14.3
5.2%
CRAB Signs, Some, PI + IMiDs
85.7
31.1%
CRAB Signs, None, PI
20.6
7.5%
CRAB Signs, Some, PI
79.4
28.8%
CRAB Signs, None, mAb
31.1
11.3%
CRAB Signs, Some, mAb
68.9
25%
CRAB Signs, None, Other
23.1
8.4%
CRAB Signs, Some, Other
76.9
27.9%
Comorbidities, None, IMiDs
41.6
15.1%
Comorbidities, Some, IMiDs
58.4
21.2%
Comorbidities, None, PI + IMiDs
49.0
17.8%
Comorbidities, Some, PI + IMiDs
51.0
18.5%
Comorbidities, None, PI
35.3
12.8%
Comorbidities, Some, PI
64.7
23.4%
Comorbidities, None, mAb
32.8
11.9%
Comorbidities, Some, mAb
67.2
24.3%
Comorbidities, None, Other
23.1
8.4%
Comorbidities, Some, Other
76.9
27.9%
Risk, High, IMiDs
50.0
18.1%
Risk, Standard, IMiDs
50.0
18.1%
Risk, High, PI + IMiDs
41.7
15.1%
Risk, Standard, PI + IMiDs
58.3
21.1%
Risk, High, PI
50.0
18.1%
Risk, Standard, PI
50.0
18.1%
Risk, High, mAb
60.0
21.7%
Risk, Standard, mAb
40.0
14.5%
Risk, High, Other
50.0
18.1%
Risk, Standard, Other
50.0
18.1%
Medullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, IMiDs
15.5
5.6%
Medullary Plasmacytoma, No, IMiDs
84.5
30.6%
Medullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, PI + IMiDs
25.0
9.1%
Medullary Plasmacytoma, No, PI + IMiDs
75.0
27.2%
Medullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, PI
14.7
5.3%
Medullary Plasmacytoma, No, PI
85.3
30.9%
Medullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, mAb
8.6
3.1%
Medullary Plasmacytoma, No, mAb
91.4
33.1%
Medullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, Other
16.0
5.8%
Medullary Plasmacytoma, No, Other
84.0
30.4%
Extramedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, IMiDs
12.8
4.6%
Extramedullary Plasmacytoma, No, IMiDs
87.2
31.6%
Extramedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, PI + IMiDs
33.3
12.1%
Extramedullary Plasmacytoma, No, PI + IMiDs
66.7
24.2%
Extramedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, PI
11.8
4.3%
Extramedullary Plasmacytoma, No, PI
88.2
32%
Extramedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, mAb
6.7
2.4%
Extramedullary Plasmacytoma, No, mAb
93.3
33.8%
Extramedullary Plasmacytoma, Yes, Other
24.0
8.7%
Extramedullary Plasmacytoma, No, Other
76.0
27.5%
Osteopenia, Yes, IMiDs
23.9
8.7%
Osteopenia, No, IMiDs
76.1
27.6%
Osteopenia, Yes, PI + IMiDs
6.3
2.3%
Osteopenia, No, PI + IMiDs
93.8
34%
Osteopenia, Yes, PI
8.8
3.2%
Osteopenia, No, PI
91.2
33%
Osteopenia, Yes, mAb
13.3
4.8%
Osteopenia, No, mAb
86.7
31.4%
Osteopenia, Yes, Other
23.1
8.4%
Osteopenia, No, Other
76.9
27.9%
Fractures, Yes, IMiDs
15.7
5.7%
Fractures, No, IMiDs
84.3
30.5%
Fractures, Yes, PI + IMiDs
18.4
6.7%
Fractures, No, PI + IMiDs
81.6
29.6%
Fractures, Yes, PI
11.8
4.3%
Fractures, No, PI
88.2
32%
Fractures, Yes, mAb
14.8
5.4%
Fractures, No, mAb
85.2
30.9%
Fractures, Yes, Other
15.4
5.6%
Fractures, No, Other
84.6
30.7%
Neurological Symptoms, Yes, IMiDs
10.1
3.7%
Neurological Symptoms, No, IMiDs
89.9
32.6%
Neurological Symptoms, Yes, PI + IMiDs
10.2
3.7%
Neurological Symptoms, No, PI + IMiDs
89.8
32.5%
Neurological Symptoms, Yes, PI
5.9
2.1%
Neurological Symptoms, No, PI
94.1
34.1%
Neurological Symptoms, Yes, mAb
1.6
0.6%
Neurological Symptoms, No, mAb
98.4
35.7%
Neurological Symptoms, Yes, Other
11.5
4.2%
Neurological Symptoms, No, Other
88.5
32.1%
MM Related Neurological Symptoms, Yes, IMiDs
5.6
2%
MM Related Neurological Symptoms, No, IMiDs
94.4
34.2%
MM Related Neurological Symptoms, Yes, PI + IMiDs
8.2
3%
MM Related Neurological Symptoms, No, PI + IMiDs
91.8
33.3%
MM Related Neurological Symptoms, Yes, PI
5.9
2.1%
MM Related Neurological Symptoms, No, PI
94.1
34.1%
MM Related Neurological Symptoms, Yes, mAb
0.0
0%
MM Related Neurological Symptoms, No, mAb
100.0
36.2%
MM Related Neurological Symptoms, Yes, Other
7.7
2.8%
MM Related Neurological Symptoms, No, Other
92.3
33.4%
Infections, Yes, IMiDs
14.6
5.3%
Infections, No, IMiDs
85.4
30.9%
Infections, Yes, PI + IMiDs
20.4
7.4%
Infections, No, PI + IMiDs
79.6
28.8%
Infections, Yes, PI
14.7
5.3%
Infections, No, PI
85.3
30.9%
Infections, Yes, mAb
11.5
4.2%
Infections, No, mAb
88.5
32.1%
Infections, Yes, Other
11.5
4.2%
Infections, No, Other
88.5
32.1%
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of New Relevant Variables That Are Not Currently Collected in Clinical Records and That Could Influence in the Disease Management at Relapse
Description
Time Frame Day 1

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Data was not collected for this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
Measure Participants 0
Measure Variables 0
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30
Description The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status/QOL scale. Most of the 30 items have 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much), with 2 questions relying on a 7-point numeric rating scale with a recall period of the previous week. Raw scores are converted into scale scores ranging from 0 to 100. For the functional scales and the global health status/QOL scale, higher scores represent better QOL; for the symptom scales, lower scores represent better QOL.
Time Frame Day 1

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All participants eligible for analyses were included. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants with data available for analyses.
Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
Measure Participants 273
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
53.5
(23.9)
7. Secondary Outcome
Title HRQOL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Subscale Score
Description The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment) with a recall period of previous week. Scores from each subscale were transformed from 0 to 100. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening.
Time Frame Day 1

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All participants eligible for analyses were included. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants with data available for analyses.
Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
Measure Participants 273
Future perspective
58.4
(27.7)
Body image
72.9
(34.4)
Symptoms of the disease
30.7
(23.2)
Adverse effects of the treatment
25.4
(17.2)
8. Secondary Outcome
Title HRQOL Based on the Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)
Description The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment) with a recall period of previous week. Scores from each subscale were transformed from 0 to 100. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening. Spanish Translated Version of EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module included 4 factors, each factor corresponds to questions related to the particular component of the scale. Factor I indicate symptoms. Factor II indicates future perspectives. Factor III indicate adverse effects of the treatment. Factor IV indicates adverse effects of the treatment and body image. Each of these factors were used for the clinical validity of the scale.
Time Frame Day 1

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All participants eligible for analyses were included. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specific category.
Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
Measure Participants 276
Future perspective, Factors I-II
60.3
(28.2)
Future perspective, Factors III
53.9
(24.9)
Body image, Factors I-II
73.9
(35.5)
Body image, Factors III
73.0
(32.7)
Symptoms of the disease, Factors I-II
31.9
(23.6)
Symptoms of the disease, Factors III
27.3
(22.1)
Adverse effects of the treatment, Factors I-II
24.3
(16.9)
Adverse effects of the treatment, Factors III
29.0
(17.5)
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants With Health Care Resource Utilization (HU)
Description Healthcare resources used during medical encounters include intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, hospital admissions, visits to the emergency room, days admitted.
Time Frame Day 1

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All participants eligible for analyses were included.
Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
Measure Participants 276
Admitted at some healthcare service
56.2
20.4%
Admitted to Hospital
59.4
21.5%
Used ambulance to attend to the hospital
7.0
2.5%
Used their own transport
67.8
24.6%
Consultation with the primary care physician
21.7
7.9%
Consultation with the oncologist
2.5
0.9%
Consultation with the psychologist
3.6
1.3%
Attended psychologist
60
21.7%
Attended hematologist
89.1
32.3%
Required some test
82.2
29.8%
Had undergone X-ray test
43.2
15.7%

Adverse Events

Time Frame From enrollment on 26 July 2017 to last date of assessment 30 January 2019 (Up to 1.5 years)
Adverse Event Reporting Description Data of adverse events or adverse drug reactions were not collected as part of the study database.
Arm/Group Title Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Arm/Group Description Adult participants with a diagnosis of MM received at least one previous treatment line (standard care of treatment) and experienced symptomatic relapse and/or refractory disease in the previous 6 months, who were followed-up at the time of the study visit. No intervention was administered in this study.
All Cause Mortality
Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/276 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/0 (NaN)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Multiple Myeloma (MM) Participants
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/0 (NaN)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Medical Director
Organization Takeda
Phone +1-877-825-3327
Email trialdisclosures@takeda.com
Responsible Party:
Takeda
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03188536
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RRMM-5012
  • TAK-MMR-2017-01
First Posted:
Jun 15, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Oct 12, 2020
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2020