Comparing Proton Therapy to Photon Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This trial studies how well proton beam radiation therapy compared with intensity modulated photon radiotherapy works in treating patients with stage I-IVA esophageal cancer. Proton beam radiation therapy uses a beam of protons (rather than x-rays) to send radiation inside the body to the tumor without damaging much of the healthy tissue around it. Intensity modulated photon radiotherapy uses high-energy x-rays to deliver radiation directly to the tumor without damaging much of the healthy tissue around it. It is not yet known whether proton beam therapy or intensity modulated photon radiotherapy will work better in treating patients with esophageal cancer.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
-
To determine if overall survival (OS) is improved with proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) treatment as compared to intensity modulated photon radiation therapy (IMRT) as part of planned protocol treatment for patients with esophageal cancer.
-
To determine if OS with PBT is non-inferior to IMRT as part of planned protocol treatment and that there will be less grade 3+ cardiopulmonary toxicity with PBT than with IMRT.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
-
To compare the symptom burden and impact on functioning of patients between treatment modalities based on Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) measures of symptoms using MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue.
-
To compare the Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) using EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ5D) as a health outcome between PBT and IMRT, if the protocol primary endpoint is met.
-
To assess the pathologic response rate between PBT and IMRT. IV. To assess the cost-benefit economic analysis of treatment between radiation modalities.
-
To compare the length of hospitalization after protocol surgery between PBT and IMRT.
-
To compare the incidence of grade 4 lymphopenia during chemoradiation between PBT and IMRT.
-
To compare lymphocyte nadir at first follow-up visit after completion of chemoradiation between PBT & IMRT.
-
To estimate the locoregional failure, distant metastatic free survival, and progression-free survival of patients treated with PBT versus IMRT.
-
To compare incidence of both early (< 90 days from treatment start) and late (≥ 90 days from treatment start) cardiovascular and pulmonary events between PBT versus IMRT.
-
To compare the Total Toxicity Burden (TTB) of IMRT versus PBT based on a composite index of 9 individual cardiopulmonary toxicities.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
- To collect biospecimens for future analyses, for example to assess cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers in association with treatment complications.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.
GROUP I: Patients undergo PBT over 28 fractions 5 days a week for 5.5 weeks. Patients also receive paclitaxel intravenously (IV) and carboplatin IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36 while undergoing PBT.
GROUP II: Patients undergo IMRT over 28 fractions 5 days a week for 5.5 weeks. Patients also receive paclitaxel IV and carboplatin IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36 while undergoing IMRT.
In both groups, within 4-8 weeks after completion of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, patients may undergo an esophagectomy per physician discretion.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3-6 months for 3 years and then annually thereafter.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group I (PBT, Chemotherapy, Esophagectomy) Patients undergo PBT over 28 fractions 5 days a week for 5.5 weeks to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. Patients also receive chemotherapy (Choice of 3 regimens: 1. Carboplatin/Paclitaxel, 2. FOLFOX/CAPOX or 3. Docetaxel/5-FU [with capecitabine as an acceptable substitute for 5-FU]) per institutional standards while undergoing PBT. Within 4-8 weeks after completion of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, patients may undergo an esophagectomy per physician discretion. |
Drug: Carboplatin
Given IV
Other Names:
Procedure: Esophagectomy
Undergo esophagectomy
Other Names:
Drug: Paclitaxel
Given IV
Other Names:
Radiation: Proton Beam Radiation Therapy
Undergo PBT
Other Names:
Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Drug: FOLFOX regimen
Folinic acid, flurouracil and oxaliplatin
Other Names:
Drug: CAPOX regimen
Capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin
Other Names:
Drug: Docetaxel
Chemotherapy
Other Names:
Drug: 5FU
Chemotherapy
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Group II (IMRT, Chemotherapy, Esophagectomy) Patients undergo IMRT over 28 fractions 5 days a week for 5.5 weeks to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. Patients also receive chemotherapy (Choice of 3 regimens: 1. Carboplatin/Paclitaxel, 2. FOLFOX/CAPOX or 3. Docetaxel/5-FU [with capecitabine as an acceptable substitute for 5-FU]) per institutional standards while undergoing IMRT. Within 4-8 weeks after completion of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, patients may undergo an esophagectomy per physician discretion. |
Drug: Carboplatin
Given IV
Other Names:
Procedure: Esophagectomy
Undergo esophagectomy
Other Names:
Radiation: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
Undergo IMRT
Other Names:
Drug: Paclitaxel
Given IV
Other Names:
Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Drug: FOLFOX regimen
Folinic acid, flurouracil and oxaliplatin
Other Names:
Drug: CAPOX regimen
Capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin
Other Names:
Drug: Docetaxel
Chemotherapy
Other Names:
Drug: 5FU
Chemotherapy
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Overall survival (OS) [From the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or date of last follow-up for patients without an OS event reported. This analysis occurs after 173 deaths; estimated to occur 4 years after accrual completion]
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The distributions of OS between treatment arms will be compared using the log rank test.
- Incidence of specific grade 3+ cardiopulmonary adverse events (AEs) that are definitely, probably, or possibly related to protocol treatment [From baseline up to 8 years]
Will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0. Difference in proportion of defined cardiopulmonary AEs will be analyzed with a chi-squared test.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Pathologic response rate [At time of surgery]
A Chi-square test will be used to compare the pathologic response rates between the treatment arms.
- Grade 4 lymphopenia during chemoradiation [From the start of chemoradiation to the end of chemoradiation treatment assessed up to 31 days]
Will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0. The proportion of patients experiencing grade 4 lymphopenia during chemoradiation will be compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test.
- Lymphocyte counts [From the last date of chemoradiation up to 8 weeks post chemoradiation]
Mean lymphocyte counts at first post chemoradiation follow-up will be compared between treatment arms using a t-test. If the data do not satisfy the normality assumption, a Wilcoxin test may be used instead.
- Locoregional failure (LRF) [From the date of randomization to the date of first LRF or date of last follow-up for patients without an LRF event reported, assessed up to 8 years]
Will be defined as local/regional recurrence or progression. Will be estimated by the cumulative incidence method, with death as a competing risk. The distribution of LRF estimates between the two arms will be compared using Gray?s test. The Fine-Gray regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with LRF.
- Distant metastatic-free survival (DMFS) [From the date of randomization to the date of first DMFS failure or last follow-up for patients without a reported DMFS event, assessed up to 8 years]
Will be defined as appearance of distant metastasis or death due to any cause. Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and estimates between the two treatment arms will be compared using the log rank test. The Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with DMFS.
- Progression-free survival [From the date of randomization to the date of first PFS failure or last follow-up for patients without a reported PFS event, assessed up to 8 years]
Will be defined as appearance of local/regional/distant failure or death due to any cause. Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and estimates between the two treatment arms will be compared using the log rank test. The Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with PFS.
- Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) [Assessed up to 8 years]
Will be evaluated and compared using EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) only if the primary endpoint is met.
- Cost-benefit economic analysis of treatment [Assessed up to 8 years]
Will be calculated by the visual analog scale (VAS) and index scores form the EQ-5D-5L only be done if primary endpoint is met. Will be compared between treatment arms using a t-test with a 2-sided significance level of 0.05. If there are significant differences, then a cost analysis will be conducted.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
PRIOR TO STEP 1 REGISTRATION:
-
Histologically proven diagnosis of adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (Siewert I-II)
-
Stage I-IVA, excluding T4b, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition based on the following diagnostic workup:
-
History/physical examination
-
Whole-body fludeoxyglucose F-18 (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with or without (+/-) contrast (preferred) or chest/abdominal (include pelvic if clinically indicated) CT with contrast
-
For patients who DID NOT receive induction chemotherapy, scan must occur within 30 days prior to Step 1 registration
-
For patients who DID receive induction chemotherapy, scan must occur:
-
Within 30 days after final induction chemotherapy dose; OR
-
Within 30 days prior to Step 1 registration
-
Note: Patients who had prior endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with a diagnosis of AJCC stage I-IVA, excluding T4b, esophageal cancer are eligible
-
Surgical consultation to determine whether or not the patient is a candidate for resection after completion of chemoradiation
-
Induction chemotherapy for the current malignancy prior to concurrent chemoradiation allowed if last dose is no more than 90 days and no less than 10 days prior to Step 1 registration. Only FOLFOX will be allowed as the induction chemotherapy regimen.
-
Zubrod performance status 0, 1, or 2
-
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (within 30 days prior to Step 1 registration)
-
For patients who DID NOT receive induction chemotherapy: ANC >= 1,500 cells/mm^3
-
For patients who DID receive induction chemotherapy: ANC >= 1,000 cells/mm^3
-
Platelets (within 30 days prior to Step 1 registration)
-
For patients who DID NOT receive induction chemotherapy: Platelets >= 100,000/uL
-
For patients who DID receive induction chemotherapy: Platelets >= 75,000/uL
-
Hemoglobin >= 8.0 g/dl (Note: The use of transfusion or other intervention to achieve Hgb >= 8.0 g/dl is acceptable) (within 30 days prior to Step 1 registration)
-
Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or Creatinine clearance > 40 mL/min estimated by Cockcroft-Gault formula (within 30 days prior to Step 1 registration)
-
Total bilirubin =< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (within 30 days prior to Step 1 registration)
-
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) =< 3 x ULN (within 30 days prior to Step 1 registration)
-
Negative pregnancy test (serum or urine) within 14 days prior to Step 1 registration for women of child bearing potential
-
The patient or a legally authorized representative must provide study-specific informed consent prior to study entry
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Cervical esophageal cancers arisen from 15-18 cm from the incisors
-
Patients with T4b disease according to the AJCC 8th edition
-
Definitive clinical or radiologic evidence of metastatic disease
-
Any active malignancy within 2 years of study registration that may alter the course of esophageal cancer treatment
-
Prior thoracic radiotherapy that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields
-
Severe, active co-morbidity defined as follows:
-
Active uncontrolled infection requiring IV antibiotics at the time of Step 1 registration
-
Uncontrolled symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina, or cardiac arrhythmia not controlled by any device or medication at the time of Step 1 registration
-
Myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to Step 1 registration
-
Pregnant and/or nursing females
-
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive with CD4 count < 200 cells/microliter. Note that patients who are HIV positive are eligible, provided they are under treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and have a CD4 count >= 200 cells/microliter within 30 days prior to registration. Note also that HIV testing is not required for eligibility for this protocol. This exclusion criterion is necessary because the treatments involved in this protocol may be significantly immunosuppressive
-
PRIOR TO STEP 2 REGISTRATION:
-
Unable to obtain confirmation of payment coverage (insurance or other) for either possible radiation treatment
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Mayo Clinic Hospital in Arizona | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | 85054 |
2 | Mayo Clinic in Arizona | Scottsdale | Arizona | United States | 85259 |
3 | UM Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at Coral Gables | Coral Gables | Florida | United States | 33146 |
4 | UM Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at Deerfield Beach | Deerfield Beach | Florida | United States | 33442 |
5 | University of Miami Miller School of Medicine-Sylvester Cancer Center | Miami | Florida | United States | 33136 |
6 | Miami Cancer Institute | Miami | Florida | United States | 33176 |
7 | Orlando Health Cancer Institute | Orlando | Florida | United States | 32806 |
8 | Emory Proton Therapy Center | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30308 |
9 | Emory University Hospital Midtown | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30308 |
10 | Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30322 |
11 | Emory Saint Joseph's Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30342 |
12 | Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Kishwaukee | DeKalb | Illinois | United States | 60115 |
13 | Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Delnor | Geneva | Illinois | United States | 60134 |
14 | Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville | Warrenville | Illinois | United States | 60555 |
15 | Maryland Proton Treatment Center | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21201 |
16 | University of Maryland/Greenebaum Cancer Center | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21201 |
17 | UM Upper Chesapeake Medical Center | Bel Air | Maryland | United States | 21014 |
18 | Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02114 |
19 | Beaumont Hospital - Dearborn | Dearborn | Michigan | United States | 48124 |
20 | William Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak | Royal Oak | Michigan | United States | 48073 |
21 | William Beaumont Hospital - Troy | Troy | Michigan | United States | 48085 |
22 | Mayo Clinic Health System in Albert Lea | Albert Lea | Minnesota | United States | 56007 |
23 | Unity Hospital | Fridley | Minnesota | United States | 55432 |
24 | Mayo Clinic Health Systems-Mankato | Mankato | Minnesota | United States | 56001 |
25 | Minnesota Oncology Hematology PA-Maplewood | Maplewood | Minnesota | United States | 55109 |
26 | Hennepin County Medical Center | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | 55415 |
27 | Mayo Clinic Radiation Therapy-Northfield | Northfield | Minnesota | United States | 55057 |
28 | Mayo Clinic in Rochester | Rochester | Minnesota | United States | 55905 |
29 | Siteman Cancer Center at West County Hospital | Creve Coeur | Missouri | United States | 63141 |
30 | Washington University School of Medicine | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | 63110 |
31 | Siteman Cancer Center-South County | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | 63129 |
32 | Siteman Cancer Center at Christian Hospital | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | 63136 |
33 | Siteman Cancer Center at Saint Peters Hospital | Saint Peters | Missouri | United States | 63376 |
34 | Memorial Sloan Kettering Basking Ridge | Basking Ridge | New Jersey | United States | 07920 |
35 | Memorial Sloan Kettering Monmouth | Middletown | New Jersey | United States | 07748 |
36 | Memorial Sloan Kettering Bergen | Montvale | New Jersey | United States | 07645 |
37 | Memorial Sloan Kettering Commack | Commack | New York | United States | 11725 |
38 | Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester | Harrison | New York | United States | 10604 |
39 | New York Proton Center | New York | New York | United States | 10035 |
40 | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center | New York | New York | United States | 10065 |
41 | Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau | Uniondale | New York | United States | 11553 |
42 | UHHS-Chagrin Highlands Medical Center | Beachwood | Ohio | United States | 44122 |
43 | Geauga Hospital | Chardon | Ohio | United States | 44024 |
44 | University of Cincinnati Cancer Center-UC Medical Center | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States | 45219 |
45 | Case Western Reserve University | Cleveland | Ohio | United States | 44106 |
46 | Mercy Cancer Center-Elyria | Elyria | Ohio | United States | 44035 |
47 | UH Seidman Cancer Center at Landerbrook Health Center | Mayfield Heights | Ohio | United States | 44124 |
48 | UH Seidman Cancer Center at Lake Health Mentor Campus | Mentor | Ohio | United States | 44060 |
49 | UH Seidman Cancer Center at Southwest General Hospital | Middleburg Heights | Ohio | United States | 44130 |
50 | University Hospitals Parma Medical Center | Parma | Ohio | United States | 44129 |
51 | University Hospitals Portage Medical Center | Ravenna | Ohio | United States | 44266 |
52 | UH Seidman Cancer Center at Firelands Regional Medical Center | Sandusky | Ohio | United States | 44870 |
53 | University Hospitals Sharon Health Center | Wadsworth | Ohio | United States | 44281 |
54 | University of Cincinnati Cancer Center-West Chester | West Chester | Ohio | United States | 45069 |
55 | UH Seidman Cancer Center at Saint John Medical Center | Westlake | Ohio | United States | 44145 |
56 | UHHS-Westlake Medical Center | Westlake | Ohio | United States | 44145 |
57 | University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | 73104 |
58 | MD Anderson in The Woodlands | Conroe | Texas | United States | 77384 |
59 | M D Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | United States | 77030 |
60 | MD Anderson West Houston | Houston | Texas | United States | 77079 |
61 | MD Anderson League City | League City | Texas | United States | 77573 |
62 | MD Anderson in Sugar Land | Sugar Land | Texas | United States | 77478 |
63 | Inova Schar Cancer Institute | Fairfax | Virginia | United States | 22031 |
64 | University of Washington Medical Center - Montlake | Seattle | Washington | United States | 98195 |
65 | Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Clinic | Eau Claire | Wisconsin | United States | 54701 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- NRG Oncology
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Steven Lin, NRG Oncology
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- NRG-GI006
- NCI-2018-03378
- NRG-GI006
- NRG-GI006
- U10CA180822
- U10CA180868