Evaluation of Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring Device
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
In patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia, the clinical utility of non-invasive hemodynamic status monitoring equipment using HemoVista is compared with invasive hemodynamic status monitoring equipment FloTrac.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
For patients who are scheduled to monitor invasive blood pressure, invasive hemodynamic monitoring using FloTrac and additional HemoVista sensors are attached and output data are obtained at the same time during general anesthesia. FloTrac is used to conduct conventional anesthesia and fluid therapy, and the accuracy of HemoVista, a non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring equipment, is compared through prospective observational studies.
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- degree of agreement in cardiac output [during surgery]
degree of agreement in cardiac output between HemoVista and FloTrac
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Adult patients aged 20 or older who undergo surgery under general anesthesia for more than two hours
-
invasive close hemodynamic monitoring with FloTrac is needed
Exclusion Criteria:
- problems in site where HemoVista is attached
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Seoul National University Hospital
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- HemoVista