ENPICME: Electrophysiological-based Estimation of Cochlear Implant Fitting

Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02748915
Collaborator
(none)
49
1
3
52.3
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this research is to evaluate the relationships between multiple data from cochlear implant (CI) adult users to and to estimate predictive models of their fitting parameters. In a group of patients, the Electrically-evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAP) will be collected intra-operatively and the correlation with demographic data (deafness duration, age deafness onset, etiology, duration of cochlear implant use of CI), auditory performances and subjective measures used for implant fitting (hearing threshold and most comfortable level) will be calculated. In a second group of experienced users (more than 9months of use of their CI), ECAP and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response (EABR) will be collected after 9 months of CI experience and after 12 months or more of use. Correlation analyzes with demographic data, performance and fitting parameters will be performed as well. Statistical predictive models for both fitting at the activation or in experienced users should be developed according to the correlation analysis.

The secondary objective is to evaluate the effects of simultaneous stimulation on hearing performances. Simultaneous stimulations will be delivered in one ear (bimodal condition) in patients using an Electro-Acoustic Stimulation device (EAS) or in the two ears (binaural condition) for bilateral CI users. ECAP, EABR and speech perception will be measured and compared in the different conditions.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Electrophysiological and psychoacoustic tests
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
49 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Estimation of Perceptual Levels Used in Cochlear Implant Fitting Based on Electrophysiological Measures
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 26, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 4, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 4, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Patients using cochlear implants

All patients using cochlear implants included in the study will take electrophysiological and psychoacoustic tests to measure auditive parameters regarding the study objectives : ECAP, EABR, speech recognition and MCL.

Other: Electrophysiological and psychoacoustic tests

Experimental: Patients using EAS device

Patients using EAS device for more than 11 months will take electrophysiological and psychoacoustic tests with the implant functioning only with electrical pulses or in bimodal mode to measure ECAP, EABR, speech recognition and MCL ; this will allow to perform bimodal comparison.

Other: Electrophysiological and psychoacoustic tests

Experimental: Patients with bilateral cochlear implant

Patients with bilateral cochlear implant for more than 11 months will take electrophysiological and psychoacoustic tests to measure ECAP, EABR, speech recognition, and MCL. The binaural interaction component will also be measured ; this will allow to perform binaural comparison.

Other: Electrophysiological and psychoacoustic tests

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. ECAP threshold [from 11 months after cochlear implant activation]

    ECAP amplitude growth function (AGF) will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for more than 11 months. ECAP thresholds (in current unit) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed. These records could also be compared to ECAP AGF recorded in clinical routine/during control visit before these 11 months that includes intra-operative records when available. The ECAP threshold recorded with and without acoustic stimulations will be compared in patients using EAS devices.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. ECAP threshold [9 months after cochlear implant activation]

    ECAP AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for 9 months. ECAP thresholds (in current unit) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed.

  2. ECAP maximal amplitude [from 11 months after cochlear implant activation]

    ECAP AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for more than 11 months. ECAP maximal amplitudes (in µV) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed. These records could also be compared to ECAP AGF recorded in clinical routine/during control visit before these 11 months that includes intra-operative records when available. The ECAP amplitude recorded with and without acoustic stimulations will be compared in patients using EAS devices.

  3. ECAP maximal amplitude [9 months after cochlear implant activation]

    ECAP AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for 9 months. ECAP maximal amplitudes (in µV) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed.

  4. ECAP latency [from 11 months after cochlear implant activation]

    ECAP AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for more than 11 months. ECAP latencies (in µs) of the ECAP recorded with the highest stimulation level will be determine , compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed. These records could also be compared to ECAP AGF recorded in clinical routine/during control visit before these 11 months that includes intra-operative records when available. The ECAP latencies recorded with and without acoustic stimulations will be compared in patients using EAS devices.

  5. ECAP latency [9 months after cochlear implant activation]

    ECAP AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for 9 months. ECAP latencies (in µs) of the ECAP recorded with the highest stimulation level will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed.

  6. ECAP AGF slope [from 11 months after cochlear implant activation]

    ECAP AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for more than 11 months. ECAP AGF slopes (µV/qu) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed. These records could also be compared to ECAP AGF recorded in clinical routine/during control visit before these 11 months that includes intra-operative records when available. The ECAP AGF slopes recorded with and without acoustic stimulations will be compared in patients using EAS devices.

  7. ECAP AGF slope [9 months after cochlear implant activation]

    ECAP AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for 9 months. ECAP AGF slopes (µV/qu) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed.

  8. EABR wave V maximal amplitude [from 11 months after cochlear implant activation]

    EABR AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for more than 11 months. EABR wave V maximal amplitudes (µV) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed. These records could also be compared to EABR AGF recorded in clinical routine/during control visit before these 11 months.

  9. EABR wave V maximal amplitude [9 months after cochlear implant activation]

    EABR AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for 9 months. EABR wave V maximal amplitudes (µV) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed.

  10. EABR wave V latency [from 11 months after cochlear implant activation]

    EABR AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for more than 11 months. EABR wave V latencies (ms) recorded with the highest stimulation level will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed. These records could also be compared to EABR AGF recorded in clinical routine/during control visit before these 11 months.

  11. EABR wave V latency [9 months after cochlear implant activation]

    EABR AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for 9 months. EABR wave V latencies (ms) recorded with the highest stimulation level will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed.

  12. EABR wave V threshold [from 11 months after cochlear implant activation]

    EABR AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for more than 11 months. EABR wave V thresholds (current unit) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed. These records could also be compared to EABR AGF recorded in clinical routine/during control visit before these 11 months.

  13. EABR wave V threshold [9 months after cochlear implant activation]

    EABR AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for 9 months. EABR wave V thresholds (current unit) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed.

  14. EABR wave V AGF slope [from 11 months after cochlear implant activation]

    EABR AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for more than 11 months. EABR wave V AGF slopes (µV/qu) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed. These records could also be compared to EABR AGF recorded in clinical routine/during control visit before these 11 months.

  15. EABR wave V AGF slope [9 months after cochlear implant activation]

    EABR AGF will be recorded on three cochlear sites (basal, medial, apical) in all patients using their implants for 9 months. EABR wave V AGF slopes (µV/qu) will be determined, compared according to the stimulation sites and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed.

  16. EABR binaural interaction component (BIC) [from 11 months after cochlear implant activation]

    In bilaterally implanted patients using both of their implants for more than 11 months, EABR BIC will be recorded with a reference electrode of either the older implant or the one associated with the best hearing performances and all the electrodes of the second implant. EABR BIC amplitude (µV) will be determined, compared according to the electrode pairing and correlation tests with the other measures will be performed.

  17. Most Comfort Level (MCL) [from 11 months after cochlear implant activation]

    The MCL (current unit) will be evaluated for each electrode/cochlear site tested during the same recording session than the ECAP threshold evaluated after 11 months. These subjective limits will be compared according to the stimulation sites and correlated to ECAP and/or EABR characteristics.

  18. Most Comfort Level (MCL) [9 months after implant cochlear implant activation]

    The MCL (current unit) will be evaluated for each electrode/cochlear site tested during the same recording session than the ECAP threshold evaluated at 9 months. These subjective limits will be compared according to the stimulation sites and correlated to ECAP and/or EABR characteristics.

  19. Speech recognition score [from 11 months after implant cochlear implant activation]

    The percentage of speech recognition will be measured at 60 decibels (dB) in open space with implant(s) well fitted during the same recording session than the ECAP threshold evaluated after 11 months. This performance level will be correlated to the ECAP and/or EABR characteristics. In the bimodal and binaural groups, performances will be compared between hearing conditions (monaural = 1 implant vs. bimodal or binaural hearing). During these audiometry tests, the recognition score will be also measured at 40 and 50 dB and a pure tone audiometry will be performed.

  20. Speech recognition score [9 months after implant cochlear implant activation]

    The percentage of speech recognition will be measured at 60 dB in open space with implant(s) well fitted during the same recording session than the ECAP threshold evaluated at 9 months. This performance level will be correlated to the ECAP and/or EABR characteristics. During these audiometry tests, the recognition score will be also measured at 40 and 50 dB and a pure tone audiometry will be performed.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Good general health status including no neuropsychological diseases affecting intellectual capacities

  • Users of cochlear implant or electro-acoustic stimulation devices

  • Normal otoscopy

  • No excessive sound exposure within 48h before the measure

Exclusion Criteria:
  • For women, possibility of pregnancy (absence of effective contraception or confirmed menopause);

  • Concomitant use of ototoxic or psychotropic treatment with anxiolytic and / or antipsychotic

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Service ORL Pavillon U Lyon France 69437

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hospices Civils de Lyon

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric TRUY, Professor, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Hospices Civils de Lyon
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02748915
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 69HCL15_0309
First Posted:
Apr 22, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Sep 14, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by Hospices Civils de Lyon
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 14, 2021