WalCog: The Acute Effect of a Walnut Intervention on Cognitive Performance, Brain Activation, and Serum Markers of Inflammation in Young Adults

Sponsor
University of Reading (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04075448
Collaborator
California Walnut Commission (Other), Tufts University (Other)
32
1
2
11.7
2.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study investigates the effect of acute walnut consumption on the cognitive behaviour, mood, brain activation, and markers of inflammation in young adults. In a within subjects design participants will receive a 50 g walnut or placebo intervention in a randomised order with a one week washout between interventions.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Control
  • Other: 50 g Walnut
N/A

Detailed Description

Participants will attend two test session days separated by a 7 day wash out period. The procedure on each day will be identical save for the intervention breakfast which will either be a walnut rich muesli containing 50g walnut and 50g mixed cereal ingredients (active intervention), or control muesli containing 100g mixed cereal ingredients (placebo intervention). The order of intervention will be randomised such that 50% of participants receive the active intervention during visit 1 and 50% during visit 2. Participants will be required to follow a low flavonoid diet for 48 hours in advance of testing and to fast (water only) for the final 12 hours of this period. The test day will be 8hrs in total starting at 0830.

Cognitive Measures: There will be four cognitive task battery sessions taking place at baseline, then 2, 4, and 6 hours following intervention. The cognitive battery will last for 30 minutes and include:

  • Auditory Verbal Learning Task (AVLT) - Participants hear and recall a list of 15 words on 8 occasions followed by a forced choice visual recognition task (10 minutes duration).

  • Modified Attention Network Task (MANT) - Participants view different arrays of arrows displayed on a monitor and respond by indicating the direction of the arrow closest to a central fixation point (8 minutes duration).

  • Switching Task - Participants view eight equally spaced radii of circle displayed in such a way that there are four equally spaced segments above and below a bold line. Stimulus digits selected from between 1 - 9 (excluding 5) appear in each segment in turn. Participants respond to digits above the bold line in terms of whether they are odd or even and below the bold line in terms of whether they are above or below the number 5 (10 minutes duration).

  • PANAS-NOW - This measure of trait mood will be completed at the beginning and end of each task battery giving a total of 8 measurements across the day. Participants rate the extent to which they are experiencing 20 different emotions on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'very slightly' to 'very much' (1 minute duration).

EEG: All participants will be tested in our dedicated lab within the Reading University Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics using the Brain Products EEG system with 32 channel active electrode caps. At Baseline, 2, 4 and 6 hrs waveband PSD data will be recorded during all tasks with specific attention being paid to the theta bandwidth during the AVLT and gamma bandwidth during the executive function tasks. ERP data, anchored to each trial of the executive function tasks, will also be considered with specific attention being given to latency and strength of N1 and P3 peaks.

Bloods: Participants will have bloods taken twice on each test visit with a draw being taken from each arm. The initial draw will be taken immediately prior to the baseline task battery and then immediately prior to either the 2, 4 or 6 hr session with the second draw time being randomised in such a way that 16 participants will have blood drawn at 2hrs, 16 at 4hrs, and 16 at 6hrs. Following each draw, the blood samples will be left to clot for 30-60 minutes. The serum will be separated via centrifuge and stored at at -80°C until analysis is complete. Whole blood samples will not be stored at any point during the study. Blood serum will be analysed for anti-inflammatory ability, as well as levels of BDNF, a signalling protein known to be positively related to memory function. To determine possible mechanisms of action of walnut components through which the walnut polyphenols produce their beneficial effects, microglial cells from rats will be exposed to serum from participants in both walnut and placebo conditions prior to exposure to an inflammatory challenge (LPS). Markers of inflammation will then be assessed including extracellular release of nitric oxide (NO) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) as well as intracellular levels of inducible nitrous oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). We will then determine if those subjects with the most protective serum in the cell model are those with the better cognitive performance.

Appetite Measures: Ratings of subjective appetite and fullness will be taken using visual analogue scales after baseline, breakfast, and each of the remaining test sessions. As a further measure of satiety, weighted food measurements will be taken before and after consumption of the standard low flavonoid/PUFA lunch (given immediately after task battery session 3 at 1330) to ascertain total food consumption.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
32 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Participants will be assigned to both the walnut and control conditions in a randomised order.Participants will be assigned to both the walnut and control conditions in a randomised order.
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Participants will be aware the possible contents of each treatment, however, neither the participants or investigators will be aware of which treatment the participants are receiving at the point of testing. All analysis will be performed in relation to a treatment code which will only be revealed once analysis is completed.
Primary Purpose:
Basic Science
Official Title:
The Acute Effect of a Walnut Intervention on Cognitive Performance , Brain Activation, and Serum Markers of Inflammation in Young Adults
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 8, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 30, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 30, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Control - 50g Walnut

Control condition followed by experimental condition.

Other: Control
100 grams breakfast cereal

Other: 50 g Walnut
50 grams walnuts mixed with 50 gram breakfast cereal.

Experimental: 50 g Walnut - Control

Experimental condition followed by control condition.

Other: Control
100 grams breakfast cereal

Other: 50 g Walnut
50 grams walnuts mixed with 50 gram breakfast cereal.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Delayed Recall [2 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Recall of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  2. Delayed Recall [4 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Recall of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  3. Delayed Recall [6 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Recall of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  4. Word Recognition [2 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Visual Recognition of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  5. Word Recognition [4 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Visual Recognition of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  6. Word Recognition [6 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Visual Recognition of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  7. Response interference accuracy [2 hours following intervention.]

    Accuracy performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  8. Response interference accuracy [4 hours following intervention.]

    Accuracy performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  9. Response interference accuracy [6 hours following intervention.]

    Accuracy performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  10. Response interference reaction time [2 hours following intervention]

    Reaction time performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  11. Response interference reaction time [4 hours following intervention]

    Reaction time performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  12. Response interference reaction time [6 hours following intervention]

    Reaction time performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  13. Switching Task Accuracy [2 hours following intervention]

    Accuracy performance on the switching task

  14. Switching Task Accuracy [4 hours following intervention]

    Accuracy performance on the switching task

  15. Switching Task Accuracy [6 hours following intervention]

    Accuracy performance on the switching task

  16. Switching Task reaction time [2 hours following intervention]

    Reaction time performance on the switching task

  17. Switching Task reaction time [4 hours following intervention]

    Reaction time performance on the switching task

  18. Switching Task reaction time [6 hours following intervention]

    Reaction time performance on the switching task

  19. N2 [2 hours following intervention]

    Change in ERP measure of N2 latency and amplitude

  20. N2 [4 hours following intervention]

    Change in ERP measure of N2 latency and amplitude

  21. N2 [6 hours following intervention]

    Change in ERP measure of N2 latency and amplitude

  22. P3 [2 hours following intervention]

    Change in ERP measure of P3 latency and amplitude

  23. P3 [4 hours following intervention]

    Change in ERP measure of P3 latency and amplitude

  24. P3 [6 hours following intervention]

    Change in ERP measure of P3 latency and amplitude

  25. Inflammatory Measure of nitrous oxide, tumor necorsis factor-alpha, inducible nitrous oxide synthase, and tumor necrosis facor-alpha. [2 hours following intervention]

    Change in blood serum markers of inflammation

  26. Inflammatory Measure of nitrous oxide, tumor necorsis factor-alpha, inducible nitrous oxide synthase, and tumor necrosis facor-alpha. [4 hours following intervention]

    Change in blood serum markers of inflammation

  27. Inflammatory Measure of nitrous oxide, tumor necorsis factor-alpha, inducible nitrous oxide synthase, and tumor necrosis facor-alpha. [6 hours following intervention]

    Change in blood serum markers of inflammation

  28. BDNF [2 hours following intervention]

    Change in blood serum levels of BDNF

  29. BDNF [4 hours following intervention]

    Change in blood serum levels of BDNF

  30. BDNF [6 hours following intervention]

    Change in blood serum levels of BDNF

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Visual analogue measure of hunger, satiety, fullness, and prospective food consumption (Flint et al., 2000). [2 hours following intervention.]

    Satiety Measure recorded on a 100 millimetre scale. Scores closer to 0 millimetres indicate less hunger - taken as a positive outcome, less satiety - taken as a negative outcome, less fullness - taken as a negative outcome, and less desire for prospective food consumption - taken as a positive.

  2. Visual analogue measure of hunger, satiety, fullness, and prospective food consumption (Flint et al., 2000). [4 hours following intervention.]

    Satiety Measure recorded on a 100 millimetre scale. Scores closer to 0 millimetres indicate less hunger - taken as a positive outcome, less satiety - taken as a negative outcome, less fullness - taken as a negative outcome, and less desire for prospective food consumption - taken as a positive.

  3. Visual analogue measure of hunger, satiety, fullness, and prospective food consumption (Flint et al., 2000). [6 hours following intervention.]

    Satiety Measure recorded on a 100 millimetre scale. Scores closer to 0 millimetres indicate less hunger - taken as a positive outcome, less satiety - taken as a negative outcome, less fullness - taken as a negative outcome, and less desire for prospective food consumption - taken as a positive.

  4. EEG Spectral Analysis. [2 hours following intervention.]

    Changes in Power for Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Theta bands during performance of each cognitive task.

  5. EEG Spectral Analysis. [4 hours following intervention.]

    Changes in Power for Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Theta bands during performance of each cognitive task.

  6. EEG Spectral Analysis. [6 hours following intervention.]

    Changes in Power for Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Theta bands during performance of each cognitive task.

  7. Immediate Recall [2 hours following intervention]

    AVLT - Immediate recall following first presentation of the word list

  8. Immediate Recall [4 hours following intervention]

    AVLT - Immediate recall following first presentation of the word list

  9. Immediate Recall [6 hours following intervention]

    AVLT - Immediate recall following first presentation of the word list

  10. Word Learning [2 hours following intervention]

    AVLT - Area under the curve for first five word list recalls.

  11. Word Learning [4 hours following intervention]

    AVLT - Area under the curve for first five word list recalls.

  12. Word Learning [6 hours following intervention]

    AVLT - Area under the curve for first five word list recalls.

  13. Total Recall [2 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Sum of first 5 word list recalls.

  14. Total Recall [4 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Sum of first 5 word list recalls.

  15. Total Recall [6 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Sum of first 5 word list recalls.

  16. Final Acquisition [2 hours following intervention]

    AVLT - Immediate recall following final presentation of the word list

  17. Final Acquisition [4 hours following intervention]

    AVLT - Immediate recall following final presentation of the word list

  18. Final Acquisition [6 hours following intervention]

    AVLT - Immediate recall following final presentation of the word list

  19. Interference List Recall [2 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Immediate recall of second (interference) list.

  20. Interference List Recall [4 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Immediate recall of second (interference) list.

  21. Interference List Recall [6 hours following intervention.]

    AVLT - Immediate recall of second (interference) list.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Healthy

  • Normal or corrected hearing and vision

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Smoker.

  • Allergic to treatment contents.

  • Currently on medication which may interfere with the treatment

  • Anaemic

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Reading Reading Berkshire United Kingdom RG6 6AL

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Reading
  • California Walnut Commission
  • Tufts University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claire M Williams, PhD, University of Reading

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Prof Claire Williams, Chair of Neuroscience, University of Reading
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04075448
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RDG-005
First Posted:
Aug 30, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Aug 20, 2021
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Prof Claire Williams, Chair of Neuroscience, University of Reading
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 20, 2021