Avoiding the Hippocampus During Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Brain Metastases

Sponsor
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01227954
Collaborator
National Cancer Institute (NCI) (NIH), NRG Oncology (Other)
113
63
1
69.1
1.8
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well avoiding the hippocampus during whole-brain radiation therapy works in treating patients with brain metastases.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Radiation: intensity-modulated radiation therapy
Phase 2

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Evaluate delayed recall as assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) at 4 months after hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) in patients with brain metastasis.

Secondary

  • Evaluate auditory and visual learning and memory, as assessed by two CogState tests (International Shopping List Test and One Card Learning Test), after HA-WBRT in these patients.

  • Compare psychometric properties of the 2 CogState tests to the HVLT-R for the assessment of memory decline after HA-WBRT in these patients.

  • Evaluate health-related quality of life [as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy with Brain Subscale (FACT-BR) and the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)] after HA-WBRT in these patients.

  • Evaluate time to radiographic progression after HA-WBRT in these patients.

  • Evaluate overall survival of these patients after HA-WBR.

  • Evaluate the adverse events of HA-WBR.

  • Evaluate predictive biomarkers of cognitive function.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.

Patients undergo 10 fractions of intensity-modulated whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), avoiding hippocampal (HA) regions, once daily, 5 days a week, for 2-2½ weeks.

Patients neurocognitive functions (delayed recall, auditory and visual learning, and memory) are evaluated by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVTL-R), The One Card Learning Test (OCLT), and the International Shopping List Test (ISLT) at baseline and periodically during study.

Patients may undergo serum, plasma, or whole blood collection at baseline and at 4 months after completion of HA-WBRT for correlative studies.

Patients may complete the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy with Brain Subscale (FACT-BR), and the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and periodically during study and follow up.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up periodically.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
113 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase II Trial of Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: WBRT with Hippocampal Avoidance

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)

Radiation: intensity-modulated radiation therapy
30 Gy in 10 fractions to the whole brain using intensity-modulated radiation therapy excluding the hippocampal avoidance area. Bilateral hippocampal contours manually generated on the fused planning MRI CT image set by the treating physician according to protocol-specified contouring instructions. Hippocampal avoidance regions generated by three-dimensionally expanding the hippocampal contours by 5 mm.
Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Percent Change in Delayed Recall at 4 Months as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) [Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment]

      Change in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised delayed recall (HVLT_R DR) score from baseline to 4 months after the start of treatment calculated as (baseline score - 4 month score)/ baseline score. A positive change indicates a decline in function. The HVLT-R assesses verbal learning and memory. It incorporates 6 different forms, helping to mitigate practice effects of repeated administrations. Each form includes 12 nouns (targets) with 4 words drawn from 3 semantic categories, which differ across the 6 forms. Delayed recall involves recalling a list of 12 targets after a 20-minute delay. The score is the sum of the number of targets correctly recalled. Percent change calculated as 100*[(baseline score - 4 month score)/ baseline score]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Percent Change at 4 Months in Auditory Learning Measured by Cogstate's International Shopping List Test (ISLT) [Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment]

      The score is the total number of correct responses made in remembering the list on three consecutive trials in a single session. A higher score indicates a better performance. Each patient served as her or his own control, and the percent change in ISLT score from baseline to 4 months was calculated as 100*[(baseline score - 4 month score)/ baseline score].

    2. Percent Change at 4 Months in Visual Learning Measured by Cogstate's One Card Learning Test (OCLT) [Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment]

      The score is the arcsine of the square root of the proportion of correct responses. A higher score indicates a better performance. Each patient served as her or his own control, and the percent change in OCLT score from baseline to 4 months was calculated as 100*[(baseline score - 4 month score)/ baseline score].

    3. Quality of Life as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) [Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment]

      The FACT-Br is a 19-item self-report instrument designed to measure multidimensional quality of life in patients with brain cancer. It is to be administered with the FACT-General. The FACT-G is a validated, 27-item measure where a higher score represents higher QOL. In addition to a total QOL score, subscale scores for physical, functional, social and emotional well-being are produced. There are 5 responses options, 0=Not a lot to 4=Very much. All subscale items are added together, multiplied by the number of items in the subscale, then divided by the number of items answered to obtain subscale totals. Scores range 0-108 for FACT-G total, 0-28 for physical, social, functional subscales, 0-24 for emotional subscale, 0-76 for brain subscale. Certain items must be reversed before it is added by subtracting the response from 4. Subscale requires >= 50% of items to be completed while the overall response rate must be > 80%. If items are missing, the subscale scores can be prorated.

    4. Quality of Life as Measured by the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) [Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment]

      The Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is a 10-item assessment. Patient scores on the ADL range from 0 to 20 with lower scores indicating declining functional status.

    5. Overall Survival [Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 4 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)]

      Overall survival was measured from registration to the date of death or last known follow-up (censored). Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to median survival time and 95% confidence interval.

    6. Progression-free Survival [Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 4 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)]

      Progression (radiographic) is defined as an increase in perpendicular bidimensional tumor area (at lease 50% for lesions < 1cm, at least 25% for lesions >=1cm) for any of the 1-3 tracked brain metastases, or the appearance of any new brain metastasis on a follow-up MRI. Progression-free survival was calculated instead of time to progression. Progression-free survival time was measured from registration to the date of progression, death, or last known follow-up (censored). The Kaplan-Meier method used to determine median time (along with 95% confidence intervals).

    7. The Frequency of Patients With Grade 3 and Higher Adverse Events (AE) Related to Treatment [From start of treatment to 12 months from start of treatment]

      For each patient the highest grade adverse event related to treatment was calculated. Those with their highest grade of 3 or higher were counted. Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v4.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE

    8. ApoE4 Genotype and Other Potentially Predictive Biomarkers of Cognitive Function [Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment]

      Per the protocol, the feasibility of the proposed translational studies were to be assessed following completion of accrual and sample collection. The decision was made not to pursue this outcome measure. No assays were performed and no data were collected for this Outcome Measure

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 120 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    INCLUSION CRITERIA:
    • Histologically or cytologically confirmed non-hematopoietic malignancy within the past 5 years

    • If histologic proof of malignancy is from > 5 years ago, then a more recent pathological confirmation is required (e.g., from systemic metastatic or brain metastasis)

    • Patients with metastasis of unknown primary tumor are permitted

    • Measurable brain metastasis outside a 5-mm margin around either hippocampus on gadolinium contrast-enhanced MRI obtained within the past 30 days

    • Have not been or will not be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgical resection

    • These treatment options are allowed only at relapse

    • Patients who have brain metastases at initial presentation allowed and do not need to demonstrate 3 months of stable scans

    • At least 1 week since open biopsy

    • Karnofsky performance status 70-100%

    • Fertile patients must use effective contraception

    • Negative pregnancy test 2 weeks or less prior to study entry

    • Patients must be English proficient, with patients who speak English as a second language eligible

    EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
    • Small cell lung cancer or germ cell malignancy

    • Leptomeningeal metastases

    • Non-small cell lung cancer-associated brain metastases with ≥ 2 organ sites of extracranial metastases

    • Radiologic evidence of hydrocephalus

    • Serum creatinine > 1.4 mg/dL within 30 days prior to study entry

    • Pregnant or nursing

    • Contraindication to MRI imaging such as implanted metal devices or foreign bodies or severe claustrophobia

    • Severe, active co-morbidity including any of the following:

    • Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the past 6 months

    • Transmural myocardial infarction within the past 6 months

    • Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics

    • Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects

    • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy

    • Uncontrolled, clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias

    • Prior radiotherapy to the brain

    • Plan for chemotherapy or targeted therapies during WBRT or during the subsequent 7 days

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center Birmingham Alabama United States 35294
    2 Arizona Center for Cancer Care - Peoria Peoria Arizona United States 85381
    3 Mayo Clinic Scottsdale Scottsdale Arizona United States 85259-5499
    4 Arizona Oncology - Tucson Tucson Arizona United States 85704
    5 Arizona Cancer Center at University of Arizona Health Sciences Center Tucson Arizona United States 85724-5024
    6 Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Long Beach Long Beach California United States 90822
    7 Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California United States 90048
    8 Radiological Associates of Sacramento Medical Group, Incorporated Sacramento California United States 95815
    9 University of California Davis Cancer Center Sacramento California United States 95817
    10 CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services Newark Delaware United States 19713
    11 Baptist Cancer Institute - Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida United States 32207
    12 University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center - Miami Miami Florida United States 33136
    13 Baptist-South Miami Regional Cancer Program Miami Florida United States 33176
    14 Florida Cancer Center - Palatka Palatka Florida United States 32177
    15 Piedmont Hospital Atlanta Georgia United States 30309
    16 Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois United States 60612
    17 OSF St. Francis Medical Center Peoria Illinois United States 61637
    18 Center for Cancer Care at Goshen General Hospital Goshen Indiana United States 46526
    19 Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center Indianapolis Indiana United States 46202-5289
    20 Methodist Cancer Center at Methodist Hospital Indianapolis Indiana United States 46202
    21 Greenebaum Cancer Center at University of Maryland Medical Center Baltimore Maryland United States 21201
    22 NSMC Cancer Center - Peabody Danvers Massachusetts United States 01923
    23 Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan United States 48201-1379
    24 Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Rochester Minnesota United States 55905
    25 Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110
    26 Billings Clinic - Downtown Billings Montana United States 59107-7000
    27 Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Nebraska United States 68198
    28 St. Barnabas Medical Center Cancer Center Livingston New Jersey United States 07039
    29 New York Oncology Hematology, PC at Albany Regional Cancer Care Albany New York United States 12206
    30 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina United States 27599-7295
    31 Summa Center for Cancer Care at Akron City Hospital Akron Ohio United States 44309-2090
    32 Adena Regional Medical Center Chillicothe Ohio United States 45601
    33 Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Cleveland Ohio United States 44106-5065
    34 Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center Cleveland Ohio United States 44195
    35 Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbus Ohio United States 43210-1240
    36 Southwest General Health Center Middleburg Heights Ohio United States 44130
    37 Oklahoma University Cancer Institute Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States 73104
    38 Willamette Valley Cancer Center - Eugene Eugene Oregon United States 97401
    39 Providence Cancer Center at Providence Portland Medical Center Portland Oregon United States 97213-2967
    40 Rosenfeld Cancer Center at Abington Memorial Hospital Abington Pennsylvania United States 19001
    41 Bryn Mawr Hospital Bryn Mawr Pennsylvania United States 19010
    42 Regional Cancer Center - Erie Erie Pennsylvania United States 16505
    43 Adams Cancer Center Gettysburg Pennsylvania United States 17325
    44 Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Hershey Pennsylvania United States 17033-0850
    45 Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19107-5541
    46 Lankenau Cancer Center at Lankenau Hospital Wynnewood Pennsylvania United States 19096
    47 York Cancer Center at Apple Hill Medical Center York Pennsylvania United States 17405
    48 Rapid City Regional Hospital Rapid City South Dakota United States 57701
    49 Texas Oncology, PA at Harris Center HEB Bedford Texas United States 76022
    50 Klabzuba Cancer Center at Harris Methodist Fort Worth Hospital Fort Worth Texas United States 76104
    51 Memorial Hermann Hospital - Memorial City Houston Texas United States 77024
    52 M. D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas Houston Texas United States 77030-4009
    53 Texas Oncology, PA at Texas Oncology Cancer Center Sugar Land Sugar Land Texas United States 77479
    54 Jon and Karen Huntsman Cancer Center at Intermountain Medical Center Murray Utah United States 84157
    55 Val and Ann Browning Cancer Center at McKay-Dee Hospital Center Ogden Utah United States 84403
    56 Huntsman Cancer Institute at University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah United States 84112
    57 University of Virginia Cancer Center Charlottesville Virginia United States 22908
    58 Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center Richmond Virginia United States 23298-0037
    59 CCOP - Virginia Mason Research Center Seattle Washington United States 98101
    60 Cancer Care Northwest - Spokane South Spokane Washington United States 99202
    61 London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre London Ontario Canada N6A 4L6
    62 Princess Margaret Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada M5G 2M9
    63 Saskatoon Cancer Centre at the University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada S7N 4H4

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
    • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    • NRG Oncology

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Minesh P. Mehta, MD, University of Maryland Medical Systems

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01227954
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • RTOG-0933
    • CDR0000687490
    • NCT01366755
    First Posted:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2017
    Keywords provided by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 113
    COMPLETED 100
    NOT COMPLETED 13

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Overall Participants 100
    Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ]
    Median (Full Range) [years]
    61
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    52
    52%
    Male
    48
    48%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Percent Change in Delayed Recall at 4 Months as Measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R)
    Description Change in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised delayed recall (HVLT_R DR) score from baseline to 4 months after the start of treatment calculated as (baseline score - 4 month score)/ baseline score. A positive change indicates a decline in function. The HVLT-R assesses verbal learning and memory. It incorporates 6 different forms, helping to mitigate practice effects of repeated administrations. Each form includes 12 nouns (targets) with 4 words drawn from 3 semantic categories, which differ across the 6 forms. Delayed recall involves recalling a list of 12 targets after a 20-minute delay. The score is the sum of the number of targets correctly recalled. Percent change calculated as 100*[(baseline score - 4 month score)/ baseline score]
    Time Frame Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eligible patients who started treatment and had baseline and 4 month data
    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Measure Participants 42
    Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [percent change]
    7.0
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Comments To detect a minimum relative 50% improvement leading to an absolute 15% mean relative decline (MRD) in HVLT-R DR, 51 analyzable patients were required to ensure 80% statistical power with 0.05 alpha. Assuming a death rate of 40% before 4 months (based on trial NCT00003563) and a 10% nonevaluable rate, the target sample size was 102. The target MRD was determined from NCT00003563 which demonstrated 30% MRD in HVLT-R DR score from baseline to 4 months, with a standard deviation of 41%.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change at 4 Months in Auditory Learning Measured by Cogstate's International Shopping List Test (ISLT)
    Description The score is the total number of correct responses made in remembering the list on three consecutive trials in a single session. A higher score indicates a better performance. Each patient served as her or his own control, and the percent change in ISLT score from baseline to 4 months was calculated as 100*[(baseline score - 4 month score)/ baseline score].
    Time Frame Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eligible patients who started treatment and had baseline and 4 month data
    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Measure Participants 34
    Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [percent change]
    18.0
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change at 4 Months in Visual Learning Measured by Cogstate's One Card Learning Test (OCLT)
    Description The score is the arcsine of the square root of the proportion of correct responses. A higher score indicates a better performance. Each patient served as her or his own control, and the percent change in OCLT score from baseline to 4 months was calculated as 100*[(baseline score - 4 month score)/ baseline score].
    Time Frame Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eligible patients who started treatment and had baseline and 4 month data
    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Measure Participants 34
    Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [percent change]
    -8
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Quality of Life as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)
    Description The FACT-Br is a 19-item self-report instrument designed to measure multidimensional quality of life in patients with brain cancer. It is to be administered with the FACT-General. The FACT-G is a validated, 27-item measure where a higher score represents higher QOL. In addition to a total QOL score, subscale scores for physical, functional, social and emotional well-being are produced. There are 5 responses options, 0=Not a lot to 4=Very much. All subscale items are added together, multiplied by the number of items in the subscale, then divided by the number of items answered to obtain subscale totals. Scores range 0-108 for FACT-G total, 0-28 for physical, social, functional subscales, 0-24 for emotional subscale, 0-76 for brain subscale. Certain items must be reversed before it is added by subtracting the response from 4. Subscale requires >= 50% of items to be completed while the overall response rate must be > 80%. If items are missing, the subscale scores can be prorated.
    Time Frame Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eligible patients who started treatment and completed at least one FACT-Br assessment
    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Measure Participants 80
    Baseline
    121.25
    2 month
    111.94
    4 month
    115
    6 month
    126.22
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Comments A general linear fixed effects model was run with FACT-Br total score (baseline, 2, 4, 6 mo. from end of treatment) as outcome of interest. Explanatory variables: Age (>= 60 vs. <60), primary site (lung,breast,colon each vs. other), neurologic function status (no vs. some symptoms), and recursive partitioning analysis class (RPA) (I vs. II). Explanatory variables are reported separately and only if in the final model (p< 0.10, except time forced in the model.). Intercept is reported here.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments Each explanatory variable in the final model is reported separately.
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Comments A general linear fixed effects model was run with FACT-Br total score (baseline, 2, 4, 6 mo. from end of treatment) as outcome of interest. Explanatory variables in the model: Age (>= 60 vs. <60), primary site (lung,breast,colon each vs. other), neurologic function status (no vs. some symptoms), and RPA class(I vs. II). Explanatory variables are reported separately and only if they are in the final model (p< 0.10, except time forced in the model.). Time is reported here.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1961
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments Each explanatory variable in the final model is reported separately.
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Comments A general linear fixed effects model was run with FACT-Br total score (baseline, 2, 4, 6 mo. from end of treatment) as outcome of interest. Explanatory variables in the model: Age (>= 60 vs. <60), primary site (lung,breast,colon each vs. other), neurologic function status (no vs. some symptoms), and RPA class(I vs. II). Explanatory variables are reported separately and only if they are in the final model (p< 0.10, except time forced in the model.). Primary site (lung) is reported here.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0715
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments Each explanatory variable in the final model is reported separately.
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Comments A general linear fixed effects model with FACT-Br total score (baseline, 2, 4, 6 mo. from end of treatment) as outcome of interest. Explanatory variables in the model: Age (>= 60 vs. <60), primary site (lung,breast,colon each vs. other), neurologic function status (no vs. some symptoms), and RPA class(I vs. II). Explanatory variables are reported separately and only if they are in the final model (p< 0.10, except time forced in the model.). Neurologic status (no symptoms) is reported here.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0554
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments Each explanatory variable in the final model is reported separately.
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Quality of Life as Measured by the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
    Description The Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is a 10-item assessment. Patient scores on the ADL range from 0 to 20 with lower scores indicating declining functional status.
    Time Frame Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eligible patients who started treatment and completed at least one ADL assessment
    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Measure Participants 81
    Baseline
    20
    2 month
    20
    4 month
    20
    6 month
    20
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Comments A general linear fixed effects model was run with ADL (baseline, 2, 4, 6 mo. from end of treatment) as outcome of interest. Explanatory variables in the model: Age (>= 60 vs. <60), primary site (lung,breast,colon each vs. other), neurologic function status (no vs. some symptoms), and RPA class(I vs. II). Explanatory variables are reported separately and only if they are in the final model (p< 0.10, except time forced in the model.). Intercept is reported here.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments Each explanatory variable in the final model is reported separately.
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Comments A general linear fixed effects model was run with ADL (baseline, 2, 4, 6 mo. from end of treatment) as outcome of interest. Explanatory variables in the model: Age (>= 60 vs. <60), primary site (lung,breast,colon each vs. other), neurologic function status (no vs. some symptoms), and RPA class(I vs. II). Explanatory variables are reported separately and only if they are in the final model (p< 0.10, except time forced in the model.). Time is reported here.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1579
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments Each explanatory variable in the final model is reported separately.
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Comments A general linear fixed effects model was run with ADL (baseline, 2, 4, 6 mo. from end of treatment) as outcome of interest. Explanatory variables in the model: Age (>= 60 vs. <60), primary site (lung,breast,colon each vs. other), neurologic function status (no vs. some symptoms), and RPA class(I vs. II). Explanatory variables are reported separately and only if they are in the final model (p< 0.10, except time forced in the model.). Neurologic function status (some symptoms) is reported here.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0559
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments Each explanatory variable in the final model is reported separately.
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Comments A general linear fixed effects model was run with ADL (baseline, 2, 4, 6 mo. from end of treatment) as outcome of interest. Explanatory variables in the model: Age (>= 60 vs. <60), primary site (lung,breast,colon each vs. other), neurologic function status (no vs. some symptoms), and RPA class(I vs. II). Explanatory variables are reported separately and only if they are in the final model (p< 0.10, except time forced in the model.). Age (>= 60) is reported here.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0749
    Comments
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments Each explanatory variable in the final model is reported separately.
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Overall Survival
    Description Overall survival was measured from registration to the date of death or last known follow-up (censored). Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to median survival time and 95% confidence interval.
    Time Frame Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 4 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eligible patients who started study treatment
    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Measure Participants 96
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months]
    6.8
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Progression-free Survival
    Description Progression (radiographic) is defined as an increase in perpendicular bidimensional tumor area (at lease 50% for lesions < 1cm, at least 25% for lesions >=1cm) for any of the 1-3 tracked brain metastases, or the appearance of any new brain metastasis on a follow-up MRI. Progression-free survival was calculated instead of time to progression. Progression-free survival time was measured from registration to the date of progression, death, or last known follow-up (censored). The Kaplan-Meier method used to determine median time (along with 95% confidence intervals).
    Time Frame Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 4 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eligible patients who started study treatment
    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Measure Participants 96
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months]
    5.9
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title The Frequency of Patients With Grade 3 and Higher Adverse Events (AE) Related to Treatment
    Description For each patient the highest grade adverse event related to treatment was calculated. Those with their highest grade of 3 or higher were counted. Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v4.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE
    Time Frame From start of treatment to 12 months from start of treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Eligible patients who started study treatment
    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Measure Participants 96
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    2
    2%
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title ApoE4 Genotype and Other Potentially Predictive Biomarkers of Cognitive Function
    Description Per the protocol, the feasibility of the proposed translational studies were to be assessed following completion of accrual and sample collection. The decision was made not to pursue this outcome measure. No assays were performed and no data were collected for this Outcome Measure
    Time Frame Baseline and 4 months from start of treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Measure Participants 0

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Eligible patients with adverse event data are included. Subjects experiencing more than one of a given adverse event are counted only once for that adverse event.
    Arm/Group Title WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Arm/Group Description Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal avoidance using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    All Cause Mortality
    WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 13/96 (13.5%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anemia 1/96 (1%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Chest pain - cardiac 1/96 (1%)
    Pericardial effusion 1/96 (1%)
    Sinus tachycardia 1/96 (1%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Colonic perforation 2/96 (2.1%)
    Nausea 1/96 (1%)
    Vomiting 1/96 (1%)
    General disorders
    Death NOS 2/96 (2.1%)
    Infections and infestations
    Lung infection 1/96 (1%)
    Sepsis 1/96 (1%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Anorexia 1/96 (1%)
    Dehydration 2/96 (2.1%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) - Other 1/96 (1%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Cognitive disturbance 2/96 (2.1%)
    Dizziness 1/96 (1%)
    Headache 1/96 (1%)
    Nervous system disorders - Other 1/96 (1%)
    Seizure 2/96 (2.1%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dyspnea 1/96 (1%)
    Pleural effusion 1/96 (1%)
    Vascular disorders
    Thromboembolic event 2/96 (2.1%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    WBRT With Hippocampal Avoidance
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 46/96 (47.9%)
    Eye disorders
    Blurred vision 8/96 (8.3%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Constipation 5/96 (5.2%)
    Nausea 13/96 (13.5%)
    Vomiting 6/96 (6.3%)
    General disorders
    Fatigue 34/96 (35.4%)
    Gait disturbance 7/96 (7.3%)
    Investigations
    Weight loss 7/96 (7.3%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Anorexia 13/96 (13.5%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Generalized muscle weakness 5/96 (5.2%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness 6/96 (6.3%)
    Dysgeusia 6/96 (6.3%)
    Headache 17/96 (17.7%)
    Memory impairment 10/96 (10.4%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dyspnea 6/96 (6.3%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Alopecia 21/96 (21.9%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    PI's are required to abide by the sponsor's publication guidelines which require review by coauthors and subsequent review and approval by the sponsor.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Wendy Seiferheld, M.S.
    Organization NRG Oncology
    Phone
    Email seiferheldw@nrgoncology.org
    Responsible Party:
    Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01227954
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • RTOG-0933
    • CDR0000687490
    • NCT01366755
    First Posted:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2017