Compare Preperitoneal Analgesia to Epidural Analgesia for Pain Control After Colon and Rectal Surgery

Sponsor
Saint Joseph Mercy Health System (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01552226
Collaborator
(none)
137
1
2
61.9
2.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomized study of 114 patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of two standard methods of analgesia for pain control in patients undergoing elective colon and rectal surgery, as measured by the Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) and by the need for supplemental narcotic analgesics. This study is designed to determine if postoperative pain control by local analgesics delivered through preperitoneally placed ON-Q Silver SoakerTM catheters (CPA) is equivalent to continuous epidural analgesia (CEA).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia
  • Device: Continuous Epidural Analgesia
N/A

Detailed Description

Background Perioperative analgesia is a vital part of the management of patients undergoing colon and rectal surgery, affecting well being and length of hospital stay. Neuraxial anesthetics infused through epidural or spinal catheters have become commonplace pain management agents for patients. These techniques, however, are labor-intensive and expensive. Alternatively, local analgesics may be administered directly to the surgical wound via silver catheters.

Aim Two standard methods of analgesia for pain control for colon and rectal surgery will be evaluated systematically to determine if these two approaches are equivalent in terms of patient pain scores and supplemental narcotic use.

Study Design This is a prospective randomized study of 114 participants undergoing elective colon and rectal surgery at an independent academic medical center. The primary outcomes are post-operative pain control and supplemental narcotic usage.

Other variables of interest

  • Surgical site infections

  • The post-operative time to return of bowel function

  • The hospital expenses/cost differences

  • Quality of life measured with the SF- 36 questionnaire

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
137 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia to Continuous Epidural Analgesia for Pain Control After Colon and Rectal Surgery
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2010
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2015
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia

Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia for pain management

Device: Continuous Preperitoneal Analgesia
Preperitoneal catheter placed at the completion of surgery in the standard fashion.
Other Names:
  • On-Q Silver Soaker(tm)
  • Active Comparator: Continuous Epidural Analgesia

    Continuous Epidural Analgesia for pain management

    Device: Continuous Epidural Analgesia
    Epidural catheter placed prior to the operation in the standard fashion.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Post-operative pain control day 1 [Post-operative day 1]

      Measured by the patient using the numerical pain scale.

    2. Post-operative pain control day 2 [Post-operative day 2]

      Measured by patient using the numerical pain scale.

    3. Post-operative pain control day 3 [Post-operative day 3]

      Measured by patient using the numerical pain scale.

    4. Post-operative pain control day 4 [Post-operative day 4]

      Measured by patient using the numerical pain scale.

    5. Post-operative pain control day 5 [Post-operative day 5]

      Measured by patient using the numerical pain scale.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Patient use of supplemental narcotic analgesia day 1 [Post-operative day 1]

      Measured in morphine equivalents

    2. Patient use of supplemental narcotic analgesia day 2 [Post-operative day 2]

      Measured in morphine equivalents

    3. Patient use of supplemental narcotic analgesia day 3 [Post-operative day 3]

      Measured in morphine equivalents

    4. Patient use of supplemental narcotic analgesia day 4 [Post-operative day 4]

      Measured in morphine equivalents

    5. Patient use of supplemental narcotic analgesia day 5 [Post-operative day 5]

      Measured in morphine equivalents

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age > = 18 years

    • Scheduled for elective colon or rectal surgery

    • Surgical procedure either through open laparotomy or via minimal invasive approach (laparoscopic)

    • Able to provide informed consent

    • Able to complete patient questionnaire

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Documented allergic reaction to morphine, hydromorphone, lidocaine, bupivicaine and/or fentanyl

    • Contra-indication to placement of epidural catheter (spinal stenosis, spinal fusion, etc)

    • Urgent surgery precluding epidural catheter placement

    • Systemic Infection contraindicating epidural catheter placement

    • Unwillingness to participate in follow up assessments

    • Prisoners

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor Michigan United States 48106

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Saint Joseph Mercy Health System

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Robert Cleary, MD, Saint Joseph Mercy Health System

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Saint Joseph Mercy Health System
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01552226
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • RCNM 114
    First Posted:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 23, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2014

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 23, 2014