Standardizing Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer

Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04889456
Collaborator
Prof. dr. P.J. Tanis, colorectal surgeon (Other), Dr. B.R. Toorenvliet, colorectal surgeon (Other), D. Miskovic, St Marks hospital London, UK (Other), S. Benz, Klinikverbund SuedWest, Böblingen, Germany (Other), F. Aigner, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Bruder, Graz, Austria (Other), C.A. Bertelsen, Hillerød University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (Other), Drs. A.A.J. Grüter (Other), Dr. U.K. Coblijn (Other), Dr. H.L. van Westreenen (Other), Dr. C. Sietses (Other), Prof. dr. E.C.J. Consten (Other), Dr. A.W.H. van de Ven (Other), Dr. P. van Duijvendijk (Other), Dr. S. van Aalten (Other), Dr. F. den Boer (Other), Dr. J.W.A. Leijtens (Other), Dr. C. Hoff (Other), Dr. O. van Ruler (Other), Dr. G. D. Slooter (Other), Prof. dr. J. Lange (Other), Prof. dr. G.J. Kleinrensink (Other)
930
1
3
72
12.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

A surgical intervention might be highly variable amongst surgeons and centers. This variability has a potential relevance concerning clinical outcomes.

For right-sided colon cancer, the laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRHC) knows substantial variation. Especially since the surgical technique has been evolving during the latest decade with the introduction of intracorporeal anastomosis, a dissection technique within the correct embryological planes (complete mesocolic excision) and central vascular ligation of the segmental branches at its origin, resulting in an optimal lymph node dissection.

Given the insights from recent studies showing the association between quality of surgery and relevant clinical outcomes, there is a great need for a formative quality assessment of LRHC. Detailed objective assessment of the LRHC is currently not performed in clinical practice nor in surgical training. Quality assessment of LRHC has great potential to improve surgical training and furthermore, implementation of a standardized technique will ultimately lead to better quality of care for patients suffering from right-sided colon cancer.

The main objective of this study is to improve surgical outcomes for patient with right-sided colon cancer by a prospective sequential interventional cohort study that aims to standardize the surgical technique with subsequent controlled implementation after standardized review of the current practice in a nationwide multicenter setting. The primary endpoint is the 30-day morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with proctoring
  • Procedure: Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy without proctoring
N/A

Detailed Description

  1. Prospective mapping of current practice with surgical variations in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (total duration of inclusion 3 months) N= 40 centers N = 310 videos

  2. METC approval for the use of anonymized videos of a laparoscopic procedure and collection of corresponding clinical outcomes.

  3. Approaching hospitals for participation (high volume centers (50+ colon cancers).

  4. Prospective inclusion of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in the participating hospitals in three months.

  5. Development of Standard Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: an (inter)national Delphi study

  6. Approaching specialists to participate in the Delphi method (from participating hospitals in step 1).

  7. Identification of crucial steps and measures according to literature and expert's opinion (Delphi method).

  8. Documentation of steps and the order in which they need to be performed, development of a competency assessment tool (CAT).

  9. Skills center training facility

  1. Training the participating surgeons in the method of the standardized laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, as consented in the Delphi method.
  1. Implementation of the standardized laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with proctoring during another period with prospective inclusion of consecutive patients with collection of surgical videos in all participating hospitals (N=40 centers, total 310 videos)

  2. Rating videos.

  3. Comparing with pre-implementation performance based on outcome measures reflecting oncological quality of surgery, and 30-day clinical outcomes.

  4. Comparing with pre-implementation performance based on the long-term outcomes. (3-year DFS and 5-year OS).

  5. Implementing standardised lap right hemicolectomy (after learning curve without proctoring)

  6. Consecutive inclusion of patients (n=310)

  7. CT imaging

  8. Video analysis

  9. Competency analysis

  10. Variation analysis

  11. Clinico pathological data

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
930 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Sequential Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
A prospective interventional sequential cohort study with a transition periodA prospective interventional sequential cohort study with a transition period
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Implementation of Optimized and Standardized Surgical Technique for Right Sided Colon Cancer: a Prospective Interventional Sequential Cohort Study With a Transition Period
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Surgical variations laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

Active Comparator: Implementing standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with proctoring

Procedure: Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with proctoring
Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with proctoring

Active Comparator: Implementing standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy without proctoring

Procedure: Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy without proctoring
Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy without proctoring

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. 30-day morbidity with Clavien-Dindo grading [30 days]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Intraoperative complications (i.e. vascular injury) [1 day]

  2. Conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery [1 day]

  3. Operative time [1 day]

  4. Blood loss [1 day]

  5. Validated assessment of plane of dissection [1 day]

    Assessment according to a competency assessment tool (CAT) for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. This tool will be created during phase 2 using the Delphi method.

  6. Validated assessment of level of vascular ligation [1 day]

    Assessment according to a competency assessment tool (CAT) for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. This tool will be created during phase 2 using the Delphi method.

  7. Grading of the resection specimen according to Benz et al. 2019 [1 day]

  8. Total lymph node count [1 day]

  9. Number of resected positive lymph nodes [1 day]

  10. Resection margins [1 day]

    Radicality of resection margin of the specimen, as assessed by the pathologist.

  11. Completeness of mesocolic excision based on postoperative CT imaging [1 day]

  12. Locoregional recurrence [3 years]

  13. Distant metastasis [3 years]

  14. 3-year disease free survival (DFS) [3 years]

  15. 5-year overall survival (OS) [5 years]

  16. Long term morbidity: incisional hernia, adhesion related small bowel obstruction, readmissions, reinterventions [3 years]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Planned laparoscopic (extended) right hemicolectomy for colon cancer of the caecum, ascending colon or hepatic flexure;

  • Age above 18 years;

  • cTNM stage 1-3 (CT-staged);

  • No prior midline or transverse laparotomy;

  • ASA1-3;

  • No immune modulating medication.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • cT4b;

  • Perforated disease;

  • Acute obstruction;

  • Emergency operation;

  • Appendiceal cancer;

  • Other primary malignancy treated within 5 years from diagnosis of colon cancer, except for curatively treated prostate, breast, skin and cervical cancer.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc Amsterdam Noord-Holland Netherlands 1081 HV

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
  • Prof. dr. P.J. Tanis, colorectal surgeon
  • Dr. B.R. Toorenvliet, colorectal surgeon
  • D. Miskovic, St Marks hospital London, UK
  • S. Benz, Klinikverbund SuedWest, Böblingen, Germany
  • F. Aigner, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Bruder, Graz, Austria
  • C.A. Bertelsen, Hillerød University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Drs. A.A.J. Grüter
  • Dr. U.K. Coblijn
  • Dr. H.L. van Westreenen
  • Dr. C. Sietses
  • Prof. dr. E.C.J. Consten
  • Dr. A.W.H. van de Ven
  • Dr. P. van Duijvendijk
  • Dr. S. van Aalten
  • Dr. F. den Boer
  • Dr. J.W.A. Leijtens
  • Dr. C. Hoff
  • Dr. O. van Ruler
  • Dr. G. D. Slooter
  • Prof. dr. J. Lange
  • Prof. dr. G.J. Kleinrensink

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jurriaan B. Tuynman, Dr, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04889456
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2021.0273
First Posted:
May 17, 2021
Last Update Posted:
May 17, 2021
Last Verified:
May 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 17, 2021