Clinical Study on the Application of a Specimen Retrieving Bag to Reduce the Polyp Fragmentation Rate

Sponsor
Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05189912
Collaborator
(none)
196
1
2
6.4
30.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

It is necessary to retrieve the resected polyp to determine the pathological nature of polyp and to judge the completeness of resection in polypectomy. For polyps with a larger diameter (>5mm), the most reliable way to retrieve them is to suck them out with the colonoscope. However, this method requires multiple colonoscope insertions, resulting in prolonged operation time and increased patient suffering. Therefore, clinicians often receive polyps by pressing the colonoscope suction valve. But it is difficult to receive polyps or even fail to receive. Even if the polyps were successfully received by this method, many polyps were fragmented. When the polyp is fragmented, the pathologist cannot be sure of the completeness of the polyp removal.

By removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port, the polyp fragmentation rate was reduced greatly. To further reduce the polyp fragmentation rate, while reducing the operation time and colon insertions, we applied the polyp receiving bag in colonoscopy operations. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the polyp retrieving bag to reduce the polyp fragmentation rate.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Specimen retrieving bag
  • Behavioral: Sucking polyps to the instrument channel port
N/A

Detailed Description

After polyp resection, it is necessary to retrieve the resected polyp to determine the pathological nature of polyp and to judge the completeness of resection in polypectomy. For polyps with a small diameter (≤5mm), usually by pressing the suction valve button of the colonoscope, polyps could be completely retrieved through a trap. For polyps with a larger diameter (>5mm), the most reliable way to retrieve them is to suck them out with the colonoscope. However, this method requires multiple colonoscope insertions, resulting in prolonged operation time and increased patient suffering. Therefore, clinicians often receive resected polyps with larger diameters by pressing the colonoscope suction valve. However, it is difficult to receive polyps or even fail to receive. Even if the polyps were successfully received, many polyps were fragmented, and the polyp fragmentation rate can be as high as 36.6%~ 60.3%. When the polyp is fragmented, the pathologist cannot be sure of the completeness of the polyp removal. Due to the possibility of malignant transformation in some polyps, the completeness of polyp resection is essential to guide the following treatment.

Some effective methods were developed to reduce polyp fragmentation, including removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port. The resulting polyp fragmentation rates are 22.4-43.0% and 18.5%, respectively. To further reduce the polyp fragmentation rate, while reducing the operation time and improving the efficiency of the operation, we applied the polyp receiving bag in colonoscopy operations. In a previous pilot study, the polyp receiving bag has been applied in clinical practice, and its polyp fragmentation rate and polyp recovery failure rate are quite low. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the Polyp retrieving bag to reduce the polyp fragmentation rate.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
196 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Masking Description:
Patients were not informed about their randomization allocation in order to increase reliability during follow-up.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Clinical Study on the Application of a Specimen Retrieving Bag in Endoscopic Polypectomy to Reduce the Polyp Fragmentation Rate
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 17, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Specimen retrieving bag group

Resected polyps were retrieved by specimen retrieving bag. This group was set as a experimental group.

Device: Specimen retrieving bag
Specimen retrieving bag was used to retrieve resected polyps.

Active Comparator: Suction group

Resected polyps were retrieved by removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port. This group was set as a control group.

Behavioral: Sucking polyps to the instrument channel port
Remove the colonoscope suction valve and connect a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Polyp fragmentation rate [1 day]

    The proportion of fragmented polyps to all polyps.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Retrieving failure rate [1 day]

    The proportion of polyps that failed to be retrieved to all polyps removed.

  2. The duration time of polyp resection [1day]

    The duration time of polyp resection to the colonoscopy withdraw from body.

  3. The insertion times of colonoscopy [1 day]

    The insertion times of colonoscopy during the operation.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Single polyp, with a diameter of 5-15mm,

  2. Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Polyps that were not removed en bloc,

  2. Underlying bleeding disorder,

  3. The platelet count less than 50×10^9/L,

  4. Serious cardio-pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease,

  5. Intolerance to endoscopy,

  6. Other high-risk conditions or disease (such as massive ascites, etc.),

  7. Pregnancy.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hosptial Beijing Beijing China 100039

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yan Liu, MD, Beijing 302 Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05189912
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Polyp bag frag
First Posted:
Jan 13, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jun 7, 2022
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 7, 2022