Endoscopic Assessment of Polyp Histology
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Polyps found during screening colonoscopy have to be removed or at least biopsied. Attempts to save costs include endoscopic assessment of polyps with regards to differential diagnoses between adenomas (which have to be removed) and hyperplastic polyps (could be left in place or removed and not examined histologically). Such a concept would only be feasible if endoscopy can make the differential diagnosis with high accuracy. Such high accuracy rates - between 80% and 95% - have been reported from reference centers with specific scientific interest. The investigators want to test whether these results a) can be reproduced in the private practice setting performing large-volume screening colonoscopies and b) whether latest generation endoscopes provide benefit in terms of better accuracy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Patients undergoing screening colonoscopy will be randomized to the use of two different colonoscopes, namely the latest generation (Pentax iScan, Hi Line) versus the previous generation (Classic Line). On withdrawal, all polyps found will be diagnosed according to their pit pattern (classification scheme mit example images provided) and a differential diagnosis made during the live examination. Pit patterns I/II will be classified as hyperplastic polyps, patterns III-V as adenomas (in a subgroup IV and V will be classified as pre-/malignant). All polyps will be photographed from near distance to allow for later blinded review which will be done on patients with only one polyp (to avoid mix-up of polyps) by 3 examiners and 2 independent hospital experts.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Hi Line This arm is examined with latest generation HDTV colonoscopes |
Device: Latest generation colonoscopy as diagnostic instrument
this endoscope is used as compared to an older generations cope (classic line) currently in use
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Classic Line control group undergoing colonoscopy with older generation scope currently in use in most centers |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) of HDTV/iScan image technology (Hi Line) versus conventional colonoscopy (classic Line) in the diagnosis of adenomas versus hyperplastic polyps [14 months]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Comparison of online accuracy during colonoscopy with later blinded image assessment in the differential diagnosis of adenomas versus hyperplastic polyps [14 months]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients undergoing screening colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Missing consent
-
No screening colonoscopy (diagnostic colonoscopy because of symptoms)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf | Hamburg | Germany | 22453 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thomas Rösch, MD, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- iScan study-1