A Prospective Single-Blinded Randomized Trial Comparing Colonoscopic Preparation at Different Time

Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00155415
Collaborator
(none)
120
1
5
23.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the leading cause of cancer death not only in the Western countries but also in Taiwan. Colonoscopy is now gradually accepted as one of the powerful tool for colorectal cancer screening. Not only for survey after positive fecal test, it is also applied as primary screening modality for CRC screening.Colon cleansing before colonoscopy thus becomes critically important and inadequate preparation may lead to low diagnostic yield with missed lesions, increased risk of complication and prolonged procedure time. Though the importance of good colon preparation can not be over-emphasized, diet control before colonoscopy and ingestion of large amount of lavage solution remain a significant hurdle to overcome and investigators continue to seek for the ideal colon preparation with respect to quality and examinee satisfaction. After the introduction of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) for bowel preparation before colon procedures, its safety was well documented and the efficacy of colon cleansing was proven efficient. The timing of ingesting PEG-ELS is different between institutes and some ingest PEG-ELS as a whole at the night before colonoscopic examination and some ingested in split-dose manner which ingest half of the solution at previous night and remaining on the day of examination. Some institutes ask examinee to receive lavage solution on the day of examination. The manufacturer advices start taking medication on the day before the investigation according to their printed instruction on the package of PEG-ELS. Though there were a lot of studies that conducted to describe the result of colon cleansing in different fashion, the result is still controversial. This prospective, randomized, single-blinded trail evaluated and compared the efficacy of colon preparation at two timing of colon preparation, namely, in previous night or on the day of colonoscopic examination. In this study, we enrolled those who have already colon neoplasia detected during voluntary routine health check-up and received second colonoscopic examination for either elective polypectomy or endoscopic mucosectomy (EMR). We used not only the cleansing condition as a reference of adequate preparation; we also compared the diagnostic yield of lesion number as an objective comparator between these two methods.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Different timing of taking polyethylene glycol(PEG)
N/A

Detailed Description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the leading cause of cancer death not only in the Western countries but also in Taiwan. It is now the third leading cause of cancer mortality both in men and women in Taiwan. Previous studies revealed early detection of adenomatous polyp, the precursor lesion of CRC, plays a pivotal role in CRC prevention and removal of these lesions was proven to reduce CRC mortality. Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is now the standard mass screening modality and colonoscopy is the standard procedure of choice if FOBT was positive. Nevertheless, colonoscopy is now gradually accepted as one of the powerful tool for colorectal cancer screening. Not only for survey after positive fecal test, it is also applied as primary screening modality for CRC screening.Colon cleansing before colonoscopy thus becomes critically important and inadequate preparation may lead to low diagnostic yield with missed lesions, increased risk of complication and prolonged procedure time. Though the importance of good colon preparation can not be over-emphasized, diet control before colonoscopy and ingestion of large amount of lavage solution remain a significant hurdle to overcome and investigators continue to seek for the ideal colon preparation with respect to quality and examinee satisfaction.

After the introduction of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) for bowel preparation before colon procedures, its safety was well documented and the efficacy of colon cleansing was proven efficient. The timing of ingesting PEG-ELS is different between institutes and some ingest PEG-ELS as a whole at the night before colonoscopic examination and some ingested in split-dose manner which ingest half of the solution at previous night and remaining on the day of examination. Some institutes ask examinee to receive lavage solution on the day of examination. The manufacturer advices start taking medication on the day before the investigation according to their printed instruction on the package of PEG-ELS. Though there were a lot of studies that conducted to describe the result of colon cleansing in different fashion, the result is still controversial.

This prospective, randomized, single-blinded trail evaluated and compared the efficacy of colon preparation at two timing of colon preparation, namely, in previous night or on the day of colonoscopic examination. In this study, we enrolled those who have already colon neoplasia detected during voluntary routine health check-up and received second colonoscopic examination for either elective polypectomy or endoscopic mucosectomy (EMR). We used not only the cleansing condition as a reference of adequate preparation; we also compared the diagnostic yield of lesion number as an objective comparator between these two methods.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2005
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2005
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2005

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Cleansing level of colon and detected lesion number during colonoscopy []

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:

Those who had colon neoplasia detected at screening colonoscopy and requiring polypectomy or mucosectomy

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. those who used anti-platelet agents or anticoagulants that can not be stopped,

  2. those who had minute polyps detected that had been removed at screening colonoscopy,

  3. those who had invasive cancer that require surgical intervention,

  4. those who cannot complete total colonoscopy for any reason at health check-up.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei Taiwan 100

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Han-Mo Chiu, M.D., National Taiwan University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00155415
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 9461700305
First Posted:
Sep 12, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Dec 2, 2008
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2005
Keywords provided by , ,
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 2, 2008