Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening

Sponsor
Norgine (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00427089
Collaborator
(none)
360
12
2
8
30
3.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To compare the efficacy, acceptability and safety of the new 2 liter gut cleansing solution (Moviprep) and NaP preparation in routine colon cleansing prior to tumor screening colonoscopies

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Macrogol 3350 Na sulphate NaCl KCl Ascorbic Acid Na Ascorbate
  • Drug: Sodium Phosphate solution (NaP)
Phase 3

Detailed Description

This was a randomized and multicenter phase III study in ambulatory subjects undergoing an elective colonoscopy for colon cancer screening. Gut cleansing was performed using either the 2 liters of Moviprep gut lavage solution or the 90 ml NaP-containing preparation prior to colonoscopy. Efficacy, acceptability and safety assessments was performed.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
360 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Parallel Group Comparison of the New 2 Liter Gut Cleansing Solution NRL 994 Versus Sodium Phosphate Preparation in Routine Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening.
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2004
Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2005

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: 1

2L gut cleansing solution

Drug: Macrogol 3350 Na sulphate NaCl KCl Ascorbic Acid Na Ascorbate
2L gut lavage solution
Other Names:
  • MOVIPREP®
  • Active Comparator: 2

    Drug: Sodium Phosphate solution (NaP)
    45 ml solution; BID

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Efficacy was measured as the degree of cleansing using a 5 grades scale for each of the predefined colon areas resulting into a final grading of the overall quality of gut preparation (A or B: "success" versus C or D: "failure"). []

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. the "overall" judgment of the investigator for the colon preparation was documented. []

    2. Subject satisfaction/acceptance with the gut lavage procedure was recorded on a VAS scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm. []

    3. The taste of the solutions was assessed. []

    4. Acceptability and tolerance for the subject was compared. []

    5. All Adverse Events were recorded to evaluate the safety. []

    6. Laboratory tests (such as blood chemistry and hematology) were conducted to support the safety data as well as measurement of body weight, blood pressure and pulse rate, but also tolerance. []

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 85 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. The subject's written informed consent had to be obtained prior to inclusion.

    2. Male or female ambulatory subjects with an age of 18 to 85 years planned to undergo a complete colonoscopy for colon cancer screening

    3. Willing, able and competent to complete the entire procedure and to comply with study instructions

    4. Females of childbearing potential had to employ an adequate method of contraception

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Ileus

    2. Intestinal obstruction or perforation

    3. Toxic megacolon

    4. History of colonic resection

    5. Requirement for permanent medication and associated stable serum concentrations (e.g. neuroleptic drugs)

    6. Congestive heart failure (NYHA III + IV)

    7. Acute life threatening cardiovascular disease

    8. Untreated or uncontrolled arterial hypertension (max. > 170 mmHg and min > 100 mmHg)

    9. Known moderate to severe renal insufficiency

    10. Severe renal failure

    11. Severe liver failure

    12. Known glucose 6 phosphatase dehydrogenase deficiency

    13. Known phenylketonuria

    14. Known hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols, NaP and/or Vitamin C

    15. Concurrent participation in an investigational drug study or participation within 30 days of study entry

    16. Females who were pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy. Females of child bearing potential not using reliable methods of contraception

    17. Subject had a condition or was in a situation, which in the investigators opinion might have put the subject at significant risk, might confound the study results, or might interfere significantly.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Klinikum Aschaffenburg Am Hasenkopf 1 Aschaffenburg Bayern Germany 63739
    2 Schiessgrabenstr. 34 Augsburg Bayern Germany 86150
    3 Spardorfer Str. 39 Erlangen Bayern Germany 91054
    4 Heiligengrabstr. 22 Hof Bayern Germany 95028
    5 Rätestr. 20 Kirchheim Bayern Germany 85551
    6 Sternbergstr. 8 Regensburg Bayern Germany 93047
    7 Dieburger Str. 29 Darmstadt Hessen Germany 64287
    8 Unter den Eichen 26 Oldenburg Niedersachsen Germany 26122
    9 Erzbergstr. 113 Ludwigshafen Rheinland-Pfalz Germany 67063
    10 Kath. Krankenhaus St. Johann Nepomuk Abt. für Endoskopie Haarbergstr. 72 Erfurt Thüringen Germany 99097
    11 Uferstr. 3 Minden Westfalen-Lippe Germany 32423
    12 Israelitische Krankenhaus Abt. innere Medizin Orchideenstieg 14 Hamburg Germany 22297

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Norgine

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Christian Ell, Prof Dr med, Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken GmbH

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00427089
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • NRL 994-01/2004 (HSG)
    First Posted:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2008

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 16, 2008