EndoRings Colonoscopy vs Standard Colonoscopy

Sponsor
Indiana University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03418662
Collaborator
US Endoscopy (Industry)
592
1
2
7.8
76

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study aims to compare the results between a standard colonoscopy to a colonoscopy with an attachment on the distal end of the colonoscope.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: EndoRings device
N/A

Detailed Description

This will be a prospective, randomized controlled study. Subjects referred for screening or surveillance colonoscopy will be prospectively enrolled. This study aims to compare the adenoma detection rates between EndoRings colonoscopy (EC) and Standard colonoscopy (SC). It is assumed that the proportion of patients with at least one adenoma would be 25% with SC and 35% with EC.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
592 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Screening
Official Title:
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Adenoma Detection Rates Between EndoRings Colonoscopy (EC) and Standard Colonoscopy (SC).
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 19, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 13, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 13, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)

Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.

Experimental: EndoRings Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope.

Device: EndoRings device
Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Adenoma Detection Rates [During colonoscopy procedure]

    Number of participants with at least one adenoma detected, during Standard Colonoscopy compared with colonoscopy with EndoRings.

  2. Number of Adenomas Per Colonoscopy [During colonoscopy procedure]

    Comparison of the number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy between standard colonoscopy and EndoRings colonoscopy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Polyp Detection Rate [During colonoscopy procedure]

    Number of subjects with at least one polyp detected with Standard Colonoscopy compared to colonoscopy with EndoRings.

  2. Number of Detections Per Colonoscopy [During colonoscopy procedure]

    Comparison of the number of polyps detected per colonoscopy between EndoRings colonoscopy and Standard colonoscopy.

  3. Total Number of Detections [During colonoscopy procedure]

    Comparison of the total number of polyps detected and the total number of adenomas detected between EndoRings colonoscopy and Standard colonoscopy.

  4. Cecal Intubation Rate [During colonoscopy procedure]

    Comparison of cecal intubation rate (the number of procedures where the colonoscope was able to be inserted all the way to the cecum) between standard colonoscopy and EndoRings colonoscopy.

  5. Time Comparison for Each Method [During colonoscopy procedure]

    Comparison of the time required to reach the cecum, withdrawal time, and total procedure time. Insertion time: time required to reach the cecum Withdrawal time: time calculated from when withdrawing is started in the cecum till the colonoscope is removed. This includes time spent washing, inspecting the colon and removing polyps. Total procedure time: This is the sum of insertion and withdrawal times along with any time spent washing or removing polyps while in the cecum (before starting withdrawal).

  6. Patient Comfort Score [After colonoscopy was completed while patient was in recovery area of endoscopy unit]

    Comparison of patient comfort between Standard colonoscopy and EndoRings colonoscopy on a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain (best outcome) and 10 being worst imaginable pain (worst outcome).

  7. Problems Encountered With Equipment [During colonoscopy procedure]

    Occurrences of slippage of EndoRings or of device being removed on insertion.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy

  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Known narrow colon or colon stenosis

  • Personal history of Colorectal cancer

  • History of inflammatory bowel disease

  • Familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome (FAP)

  • Hyperplastic polyposis syndrome

  • Referral for incomplete colonoscopy or polyp clearance

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana United States 46202

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Indiana University
  • US Endoscopy

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Douglas K Rex, MD, Indiana University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Douglas K. Rex, Professor of Medicine, Indiana University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03418662
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1711224972
First Posted:
Feb 1, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Sep 20, 2019
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes
Keywords provided by Douglas K. Rex, Professor of Medicine, Indiana University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details 592 patients were enrolled in the study, but 17 were excluded before randomization for not meeting inclusion criteria. 569 patients were randomized.
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 287 282
COMPLETED 284 278
NOT COMPLETED 3 4

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy) Total
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 284 278 562
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
61.9
(8.1)
61.0
(7.9)
61.5
(9.1)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
131
46.1%
142
51.1%
273
48.6%
Male
153
53.9%
136
48.9%
289
51.4%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
White
233
82%
222
79.9%
455
81%
Other
51
18%
56
20.1%
107
19%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
284
100%
278
100%
562
100%
Indication for Colonoscopy (Count of Participants)
Patients who had a screening colonoscopy
143
50.4%
162
58.3%
305
54.3%
Patients who had a surveillance colonoscopy
141
49.6%
116
41.7%
257
45.7%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Adenoma Detection Rates
Description Number of participants with at least one adenoma detected, during Standard Colonoscopy compared with colonoscopy with EndoRings.
Time Frame During colonoscopy procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.
Measure Participants 284 278
Count of Participants [Participants]
143
50.4%
124
44.6%
2. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Adenomas Per Colonoscopy
Description Comparison of the number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy between standard colonoscopy and EndoRings colonoscopy.
Time Frame During colonoscopy procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.
Measure Participants 284 278
Mean (Standard Deviation) [adenomas per colonoscopy]
1.46
(2.69)
1.06
(1.83)
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Polyp Detection Rate
Description Number of subjects with at least one polyp detected with Standard Colonoscopy compared to colonoscopy with EndoRings.
Time Frame During colonoscopy procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.
Measure Participants 284 278
Count of Participants [Participants]
199
70.1%
188
67.6%
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Detections Per Colonoscopy
Description Comparison of the number of polyps detected per colonoscopy between EndoRings colonoscopy and Standard colonoscopy.
Time Frame During colonoscopy procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.
Measure Participants 284 278
Mean (Standard Deviation) [polyps per colonoscopy]
2.29
(3.09)
1.82
(2.19)
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Total Number of Detections
Description Comparison of the total number of polyps detected and the total number of adenomas detected between EndoRings colonoscopy and Standard colonoscopy.
Time Frame During colonoscopy procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.
Measure Participants 284 278
Polyps
415
295
Adenomas
650
506
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Cecal Intubation Rate
Description Comparison of cecal intubation rate (the number of procedures where the colonoscope was able to be inserted all the way to the cecum) between standard colonoscopy and EndoRings colonoscopy.
Time Frame During colonoscopy procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.
Measure Participants 284 278
Count of Participants [Participants]
281
98.9%
277
99.6%
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Time Comparison for Each Method
Description Comparison of the time required to reach the cecum, withdrawal time, and total procedure time. Insertion time: time required to reach the cecum Withdrawal time: time calculated from when withdrawing is started in the cecum till the colonoscope is removed. This includes time spent washing, inspecting the colon and removing polyps. Total procedure time: This is the sum of insertion and withdrawal times along with any time spent washing or removing polyps while in the cecum (before starting withdrawal).
Time Frame During colonoscopy procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.
Measure Participants 284 278
Insertion Time
6.3
(4.4)
5.5
(3.4)
Total Withdrawal Time
11.8
(6.1)
12.8
(5.9)
Total Procedure Time
19.4
(8.2)
19.5
(7.9)
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Patient Comfort Score
Description Comparison of patient comfort between Standard colonoscopy and EndoRings colonoscopy on a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain (best outcome) and 10 being worst imaginable pain (worst outcome).
Time Frame After colonoscopy was completed while patient was in recovery area of endoscopy unit

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.
Measure Participants 284 278
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
0.47
(1.1)
0.36
(0.9)
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Problems Encountered With Equipment
Description Occurrences of slippage of EndoRings or of device being removed on insertion.
Time Frame During colonoscopy procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
This outcome measure is not applicable for patients randomized to the standard arm because there is no device attached in the standard arm of the study. For this reason, 0 patients are reported for the standard arm for this specific outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.
Measure Participants 284 0
Procedures with slippage of device
17
6%
Procedures where device was removed
25
8.8%

Adverse Events

Time Frame During the colonoscopy procedure and while the patient was in the recovery section of the endoscopy suite immediately after the procedure.
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Arm/Group Description Colonoscopy with EndoRings device attached to the distal end of the scope. EndoRings device: Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with the EndoRings device will have the device placed on the colonoscope that will be used during their procedure. Standard colonoscopy with no device attachment.
All Cause Mortality
EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/284 (0%) 0/278 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/284 (0%) 0/278 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
EndoRings Colonoscopy Control Arm (Standard Colonoscopy)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/284 (0%) 0/278 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

Single center design; Inability to blind endoscopists to device randomization; Most patients were sedated with propofol so it would not reasonably be expected to have a difference in patient comfort score

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Rachel Lahr
Organization Indiana University
Phone 317-948-0724
Email rlahr@iu.edu
Responsible Party:
Douglas K. Rex, Professor of Medicine, Indiana University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03418662
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1711224972
First Posted:
Feb 1, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Sep 20, 2019
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2019