Escitalopram in Treating Depression in Patients With Advanced Lung or Gastrointestinal Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Escitalopram may help improve depression and quality of life in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer. It is not yet known whether escitalopram is more effective than a placebo in treating depression in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying the side effects of escitalopram and to see how well it works compared to a placebo in treating depression in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
-
Compare the efficacy of escitalopram oxalate vs placebo in treating major depressive disorder in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer.
-
Compare the side effect burden of escitalopram oxalate vs placebo in these patients.
-
Determine potential moderators of the efficacy of escitalopram oxalate in these patients, including medical, psychological, and social variables.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients are stratified according to stage of disease (stage IIIB with effusions vs stage IV) and current treatment (radiation vs chemotherapy vs novel agent). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
-
Arm I: Patients receive oral placebo once daily for 4 weeks followed by oral placebo once daily for another 4 weeks
-
Arm II: Patients receive oral placebo once daily for 4 weeks followed by escitalopram oxalate 10 mg once daily for 4 weeks.
-
Arm III: Patients receive oral escitalopram oxalate 10 mg once daily for 4 weeks followed by oral placebo once daily for 4 weeks.
After 8 weeks, all non-responders are offered open treatment with an antidepressant.
Depression, fatigue, quality of life, anxiety, and somatization are assessed at baseline and then at 4 and 8 weeks.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 220 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo-Placebo Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo once daily for the first 4 weeks and placebo once daily for the second 4 weeks |
Drug: Placebo
one placebo pill identical in appearance to the escitalpram pill once daily
|
Other: Placebo-Escitalopram Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo once daily for the first 4 weeks and escitalopram oxalate 10 mg once daily for the second 4 weeks |
Drug: escitalopram oxalate
escitalopram oxalate 10 mg once daily for 4 weeks
Drug: Placebo
one placebo pill identical in appearance to the escitalpram pill once daily
|
Other: Escitalopram-Placebo Participants in this arm were randomzied to receive escitalopram 10 mg once daily for the first 4 weeks and placebo once daily for the second 4 weeks |
Drug: escitalopram oxalate
escitalopram oxalate 10 mg once daily for 4 weeks
Drug: Placebo
one placebo pill identical in appearance to the escitalpram pill once daily
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Depression Response Rate of Escitalopram Oxalate 10 mg Once Daily Compared to Placebo Once Daily for Major Depressive Disorder [4 weeks]
Response rate was defined as a 50% reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) scores over 4 weeks. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range.
- Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores [4 weeks]
The change in HAM-D scores was calculated by subtracting the score at 4 weeks from the score at baseline. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Side Effect Burden [4 weeks]
Side efect burden was defined as the total score of the UKU Side Effects Rating Scale. This scale contains 48 items corresponding to side effects which are rated from 0-3, with 0 meaning not present and 1-3 rating the severity of the side effect. Higher scores represented greater side effect burden. The scale range is 0 to 144.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
-
Diagnosis of any of the following for at least 4 weeks:
-
Stage IIIB (with effusions) or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer
-
Extensive stage small cell lung cancer
-
Stage III or IV pancreatic cancer
-
Stage IV liver cancer
-
Stage III or IV gallbladder cancer
-
Stage III or IV bile duct cancer
-
Stage IV esophageal cancer
-
Stage IV gastric cancer
-
Second line stage IV colorectal cancer
-
Meets diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4th Edition and Endicott criteria for major depressive disorder
-
Duration of depressive symptoms ≥ 4 weeks
-
Hamilton Depression D 17 (HAM-D 17) Scale ≥ 14
-
No active suicidality requiring immediate care or psychiatric hospitalization
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
-
Able to swallow pills
-
No active substance abuse disorder (including alcohol abuse within the past 6 months), psychotic disorder or active psychotic symptoms, organic mental disorders, or bipolar disorder
-
No clinical or laboratory evidence of hypothyroidism
-
No hypercalcemia
-
No severe anemia, defined as hemoglobin < 10 g/dL
-
No history of multiple adverse drug reactions or allergy to study drugs
-
Not pregnant
-
No history of head trauma
-
No history of epilepsy
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- No other concurrent antidepressant medications or psychostimulants
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02114 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Investigators
- Study Chair: William F. Pirl, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CDR0000505774
- MGH-2006-P-000299
- K23CA115908
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants were recruited from the ambulatory thoracic and GI cancer clinics at MGH. Recruitment was open from 11/1/06 until 4/1/11. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | After enrollment, participants completed an assessment for major depressive disorder. 90 participants consented for study evaluation. In order to be randomized to a group, participants had to meet criteria for major depressive disorder. Of the 90 evaluated on study, only 24 were randomized. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo-Placebo | Placebo-Escitalopram | Escitalopram-Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo once daily by mouth for the first 4 weeks and placebo once daily by mouth for the second 4 weeks. | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo once daily by mouth for the first 4 weeks and escitalopram 10 mg once daily by mouth for the second 4 weeks | Participants in this arm were randomzied to receive escitalopram 10 mg once daily by mouth for the first 4 weeks and placebo once daily by mouth for the second 4 weeks |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 8 | 5 | 11 |
COMPLETED | 5 | 2 | 7 |
NOT COMPLETED | 3 | 3 | 4 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Placebo-Placebo | Placebo-Escitalopram | Escitalopram-Placebo | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo for the first 4 weeks and placebo for the second 4 weeks | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo for the first 4 weeks and escitalopram for the second 4 weeks | Participants in this arm were randomzied to receive escitalopram for the first 4 weeks and placebo for the second 4 weeks | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 8 | 5 | 11 | 24 |
Age (Count of Participants) | ||||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
7
87.5%
|
4
80%
|
8
72.7%
|
19
79.2%
|
>=65 years |
1
12.5%
|
1
20%
|
3
27.3%
|
5
20.8%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
56.63
(10.51)
|
59.40
(10.84)
|
58.36
(9.41)
|
58.00
(9.68)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
4
50%
|
3
60%
|
7
63.6%
|
14
58.3%
|
Male |
4
50%
|
2
40%
|
4
36.4%
|
10
41.7%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | ||||
United States |
8
100%
|
5
100%
|
11
100%
|
24
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Depression Response Rate of Escitalopram Oxalate 10 mg Once Daily Compared to Placebo Once Daily for Major Depressive Disorder |
---|---|
Description | Response rate was defined as a 50% reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) scores over 4 weeks. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range. |
Time Frame | 4 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The efficacy analysis was intent to treat and all randomized participants were analyzed |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo-Placebo | Placebo-Escitalopram | Escitalopram-Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo once daily by mouth for the first 4 weeks and placebo oncedaily by mouth for the second 4 weeks | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo once daily by mouth for the first 4 weeks and escitalopram 10 mg once daily by mouth for the second 4 weeks | Participants in this arm were randomzied to receive escitalopram f10 mg once daily by mouth or the first 4 weeks and placebo once daily by mouth for the second 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 8 | 5 | 11 |
Number [number of participants with response] |
3
(0.52)
37.5%
|
1
(0.47)
20%
|
6
(0.52)
54.5%
|
Title | Side Effect Burden |
---|---|
Description | Side efect burden was defined as the total score of the UKU Side Effects Rating Scale. This scale contains 48 items corresponding to side effects which are rated from 0-3, with 0 meaning not present and 1-3 rating the severity of the side effect. Higher scores represented greater side effect burden. The scale range is 0 to 144. |
Time Frame | 4 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants who completed the 4 week assessment were analyzed |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo-Placebo | Placebo-Escitalopram | Escitalopram-Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo for the first 4 weeks and placebo for the second 4 weeks | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo for the first 4 weeks and escitalopram for the second 4 weeks | Participants in this arm were randomzied to receive escitalopram for the first 4 weeks and placebo for the second 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 6 | 2 | 9 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
3.00
(2.10)
|
2.50
(0.71)
|
3.44
(1.88)
|
Title | Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores |
---|---|
Description | The change in HAM-D scores was calculated by subtracting the score at 4 weeks from the score at baseline. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range. |
Time Frame | 4 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants who had at least 1 follow up HAM-D assessment were included. Two participants died, one without a follow up assessment and one with a HAM-D at 2 weeks. For the participant who had the HAM-D at 2 weeks and then died, the last endpoint was carried forward. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo-Placebo | Placebo-Escitalopram | Escitalopram-Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo once daily by mouth for the first 4 weeks and placebo once daily by mouth for the second 4 weeks | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo once daily by mouth for the first 4 weeks and escitalopram 10 mg once daily by mouth for the second 4 weeks | Participants in this arm were randomzied to receive escitalopram 10 mg once daily by mouth for the first 4 weeks and placebo once daily by mouth for the second 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 7 | 5 | 11 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Change in HAM-D scores] |
6.23
(8.37)
|
10.60
(5.18)
|
6.45
(5.18)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||
Arm/Group Title | Placebo-Placebo | Placebo-Escitalopram | Escitalopram-Placebo | |||
Arm/Group Description | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo for the first 4 weeks and placebo for the second 4 weeks | Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo for the first 4 weeks and escitalopram for the second 4 weeks | Participants in this arm were randomzied to receive escitalopram for the first 4 weeks and placebo for the second 4 weeks | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Placebo-Placebo | Placebo-Escitalopram | Escitalopram-Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Placebo-Placebo | Placebo-Escitalopram | Escitalopram-Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/8 (12.5%) | 1/5 (20%) | 0/11 (0%) | |||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||
death | 1/8 (12.5%) | 1 | 1/5 (20%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Placebo-Placebo | Placebo-Escitalopram | Escitalopram-Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/8 (12.5%) | 0/5 (0%) | 1/11 (9.1%) | |||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||
HAM-D score increased by at least 25% | 1/8 (12.5%) | 1 | 0/5 (0%) | 0 | 1/11 (9.1%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | William F Pirl, MD |
---|---|
Organization | Massachusetts General Hospital |
Phone | 617-724-9151 |
wpirl@partners.org |
- CDR0000505774
- MGH-2006-P-000299
- K23CA115908