COLLISION Trial - Colorectal Liver Metastases: Surgery vs Thermal Ablation

Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03088150
Collaborator
Medtronic - MITG (Industry)
618
1
2
64.6
9.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective is to prove non-inferiority of thermal ablation compared to hepatic resection in patients with at least one resectable and ablatable colorectal liver metastases (≤3cm) and no extrahepatic disease.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Thermal ablation
  • Procedure: Surgical resection
N/A

Detailed Description

Study design:

COLLISION is a single-blind prospective multi-center phase-III randomized controlled trial. We hypothesize that thermal ablation is non-inferior to surgery for the selected patient groups in terms of the primary objective (overall survival). The Cox proportional hazards model (1-sided; non-inferiority or superiority) is used for sample size calculations. Given the superior safety profile we consider a hazard ratio of 1.3 to represent the upper limit of non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin). An HR of 1.3 corresponds to a 56.5% chance of the ablated patients to die first ((P = HR/(1 + HR) = 1.3/(1 + 1.3) = 0.565 (56.5%)). With 3 years of patient accrual and five years of follow-up we will have reached 60% of events (death) in approximately 6.5 years (overall probability of event, pE =0.6). The calculated sample size therefore is 599 (NS).To account for a 10% drop-out ratio (NDO=69) prior to randomization and a 3% loss to follow-up (NLTFU=18) after randomization we need to include 687 patients (NI). A total number of 618 patients will be randomized (NR) into one of two arms: arm A will undergo surgical resection (n=309) and arm B thermal ablation (n=309) for appointed target lesions.

Study population:

Patients with ≥1 resectable and ablatable CRLM (≤3cm), no extrahepatic disease and a good performance status (WHO 0-2) are considered eligible. Supplementary resections for resectable lesions >3cm and thermal ablations for unresectable CRLM ≤3cm are allowed with a maximum number of CRLM of 10.

Intervention:

Eligible patients will be stratified into low-, intermediate- and high disease burden after assessment by an expert panel. The panel, consisting of at least two diagnostic radiologists, two interventional radiologists and two hepatobiliary and/or oncological surgeons, will appoint lesions that are resectable and ablatable as target lesions, resectable and unablatable lesions as unablatable lesions and ablatable but unresectable lesions as unresectable lesions. All unablatable lesions should be resectable and all unresectable lesions should be ≤3cm and ablatable.

With the exception of patients that are suitable for laparoscopic resection or percutaneous ablation (low disease burden), eligibility needs to be reconfirmed during the surgical procedure. Hereafter patients will be randomized to undergo surgical resection of the target lesions (allowing thermal ablation for additional unresectable lesions) or thermal ablation (allowing resection for additional unablatable lesions). For open procedures randomization will be performed shortly after surgical inspection and IOUS with the patient under general anaesthesia. Both the experimenter(s) and the participant will be unaware of the eventual treatment arm prior to the procedure; after the procedure the patient will remain unaware (single-blind).

Conferring to national guidelines follow-up will include imaging, laboratory tests including tumour markers (CEA) and clinical examination every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months hereafter. Follow-up cross-sectional imaging should include at least an abdominal ceCT or upper abdominal ceMRI at the given time-points. Participating centres are free to add 18F-FDG PET-CTs at specific time-points or to use alternating specific modalities, as long as the follow-up protocol is pre-approved by the trial coordinators and as long as follow-up imaging is identical for both treatment arms. Quality of life questionnaires will be assessed at baseline, every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months hereafter accordingly.

Patients with recurrences that are considered unsuitable for additional focal therapy will be re-referred to their medical oncologist to assess additional systemic chemotherapy. In the event of chemotherapeutic down-staging hereafter, focal therapy can be reconsidered.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
618 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
COLLISION Trial - Colorectal Liver Metastases: Surgery vs Thermal Ablation, a Phase III Single-blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 13, 2017
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Surgical resection

Patients included will undergo resection of hepatic metastases, allowing thermal ablation for additional unresectable lesions.

Procedure: Surgical resection
In case of randomization to surgical resection, the surgeon will remove all target lesions as well as all additional unablatable lesions.

Experimental: Thermal ablation

Patients included will undergo ultrasound guided thermal ablation of hepatic metastases, allowing resection for additional unablatable lesions.

Procedure: Thermal ablation
Patients will undergo either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA).
Other Names:
  • Radiofrequency ablation
  • RFA
  • Microwave ablation
  • MWA
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Overall survival (OS) [5 years]

      Counting from the date of randomization to the date of death of the patient or to the last day of follow-up.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Disease free survival [5 years]

      The time from focal therapy to the time of events.

    2. Time to progression [5 years]

      The time from focal therapy to the time of events.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Most important inclusion criteria:
    • At least one CRLM size ≤ 3 cm eligible for both surgical resection and thermal ablation (target lesions);

    • Additional unresectable CRLM should be ≤ 3 cm and ablatable (unresectable lesions);

    • Additional unablatable CRLM should be resectable (unablatable lesions);

    • Maximum number of CRLM 10;

    • Resectability and ablatability should be re-confirmed intra-operatively by US plus full exploration for hepatic, peritoneal and regional lymph node metastases;

    • ASA 1-3.

    Most important exclusion criteria:
    • No target lesions suitable for both resection and ablation;

    • Radical treatment unfeasible or unsafe (e.g. insufficient FLR);

    • The presence of extrahepatic nodal or non-nodal metastases;

    • Immunotherapy or chemotherapy ≤ 6 weeks prior to the procedure;

    • Any surgical resection or focal ablative liver therapy for CRLM prior to inclusion

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Amsterdam University Medical Center - location VUmc Amsterdam NH Netherlands 1081

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
    • Medtronic - MITG

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: MR Meijerink, MD, PhD, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, NL

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Dr. M.R. Meijerink, Dr, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03088150
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • NL58551.029.16
    First Posted:
    Mar 23, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 28, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2019
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Dr. M.R. Meijerink, Dr, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 28, 2019