Evaluating Panitumumab (ABX-EGF) Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine that panitumumab, using the proposed regimen, will safely increase progression free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed available treatment options (i.e., patients who developed progressive disease or relapsed while on or after prior fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Panitumumab plus best supportive care Panitumumab will be administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants develop progressive disease or are unable to tolerate study drug. Participants will also receive best supportive care (BSC) as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines. |
Drug: Panitumumab
Intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks.
Other Names:
|
Other: Best Supportive Care Best supportive care will be defined in this study as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and will include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care will not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Other: Best supportive care
Best supportive care as site routine excluding: antineoplastic chemotherapy, investigational agents, anti-EGFr(Epidermal growth factor receptor) targeting agents other than ABX-EGF(Panitumumab), experimental or approved anti-tumor therapies (e.g. Avastin), chemotherapy, radiotherapy (with the exception of radiotherapy for pain control limited to bone metastases).
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Progression-free Survival Time [From randomization to the data cut-off date of 30 June 2005. The median follow-up time was 20.0 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 18.2 weeks in the BSC alone group.]
Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Overall Survival [From randomization until the data cut-off date for overall survival of 15 March 2006. The median actual follow-up time was 30 weeks for the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31 weeks for the BSC alone group.]
Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to death.
- Objective Tumor Response [From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.]
Defined as the number of participants with a confirmed complete or partial tumor response, confirmed by a scan no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial Response (PR): disappearance of all target lesions, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, with no progressive disease of non-target lesions.
- Duration of Response [From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.]
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from first confirmed objective tumor response to first observed progression of disease or death due to progression of disease (whichever comes first).
- Time to Response [From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.]
Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to first partial or complete response, subsequently confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met.
- Time to Disease Progression [From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.]
Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to disease progression or death due to disease progression (whichever occurs first)
- Time to Treatment Failure [From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.]
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to the date the decision was made to end treatment for any reason.
- Duration of Stable Disease [From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.]
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to date of first observed progression of disease or death due to progression of disease (whichever comes first) for those participants with a best response of stable disease. Stable disease defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease taking as reference the nadir longest diameter since the treatment started, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no new lesions.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Pathologic diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma (diagnostic tissue obtained by tissue biopsy)
-
Metastatic colorectal carcinoma
-
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
-
Documented evidence of disease progression during, or following treatment, with fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
-
Radiographic documentation of disease progression during or within 6 months following the most recent chemotherapy regimen
-
Unidimensionally measurable disease
-
Tumor expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) by immunohistochemistry
-
At least 2 but not more than 3 prior chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer
-
Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment
-
History or evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis
-
Use of systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 30 days prior to enrollment
-
Prior epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) targeting therapies
-
Prior anti-tumor therapies including prior experimental agents or approved anti-tumor small molecules and biologics of short (less than a week) serum half life within 30 days before enrollment, or prior experimental or approved proteins within 3 months before enrollment.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Amgen
Investigators
- Study Director: MD, Amgen
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- Bai JP, Bell R, Buckman S, Burckart GJ, Eichler HG, Fang KC, Goodsaid FM, Jusko WJ, Lesko LL, Meibohm B, Patterson SD, Puig O, Smerage JB, Snider BJ, Wagner JA, Wang J, Walton MK, Weiner R. Translational biomarkers: from preclinical to clinical a report of 2009 AAPS/ACCP Biomarker Workshop. AAPS J. 2011 Jun;13(2):274-83. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9265-x. Epub 2011 Mar 30. Erratum in: AAPS J. 2011 Sep;13(3):493.
- Odom D, Barber B, Bennett L, Peeters M, Zhao Z, Kaye J, Wolf M, Wiezorek J. Health-related quality of life and colorectal cancer-specific symptoms in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic disease treated with panitumumab. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Feb;26(2):173-81. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1112-5. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
- Peeters M, Siena S, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Hendlisz A, Cascinu S, Kalofonos H, Devercelli G, Wolf M, Amado RG. Association of progression-free survival, overall survival, and patient-reported outcomes by skin toxicity and KRAS status in patients receiving panitumumab monotherapy. Cancer. 2009 Apr 1;115(7):1544-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24088.
- Siena S, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Humblet Y, Conte P, Bajetta E, Comandini D, Bodoky G, Van Hazel G, Salek T, Wolf M, Devercelli G, Woolley M, Amado RG. Association of progression-free survival with patient-reported outcomes and survival: results from a randomised phase 3 trial of panitumumab. Br J Cancer. 2007 Dec 3;97(11):1469-74. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
- Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, Canon JL, Van Laethem JL, Maurel J, Richardson G, Wolf M, Amado RG. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1658-64.
- 20020408
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants were enrolled from 16 January 2004 through 16 March 2005. Data are up until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 231 | 232 |
Received Study Drug | 229 | 0 |
COMPLETED | 158 | 206 |
NOT COMPLETED | 73 | 26 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 231 | 232 | 463 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
61.2
(10.3)
|
61.4
(10.8)
|
61.3
(10.5)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
85
36.8%
|
84
36.2%
|
169
36.5%
|
Male |
146
63.2%
|
148
63.8%
|
294
63.5%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | |||
Japanese |
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
1
0.2%
|
Aborigine |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Other |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
2
0.9%
|
2
0.4%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
1
0.4%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.2%
|
White or Caucasian |
229
99.1%
|
228
98.3%
|
457
98.7%
|
Hispanic or Latino |
1
0.4%
|
1
0.4%
|
2
0.4%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
Central and Eastern Europe |
20
8.7%
|
19
8.2%
|
39
8.4%
|
Western Europe |
178
77.1%
|
180
77.6%
|
358
77.3%
|
Rest of World |
33
14.3%
|
33
14.2%
|
66
14.3%
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (participants) [Number] | |||
0 or 1 |
200
86.6%
|
202
87.1%
|
402
86.8%
|
2 |
31
13.4%
|
30
12.9%
|
61
13.2%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Progression-free Survival Time |
---|---|
Description | Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. |
Time Frame | From randomization to the data cut-off date of 30 June 2005. The median follow-up time was 20.0 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 18.2 weeks in the BSC alone group. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat (ITT) |
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Measure Participants | 231 | 232 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [weeks] |
8.0
|
7.3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Panitumumab Plus BSC, BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis was no difference between treatment groups | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | Stratified by baseline IVRS ECOG performance status and geographic region |
Title | Overall Survival |
---|---|
Description | Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to death. |
Time Frame | From randomization until the data cut-off date for overall survival of 15 March 2006. The median actual follow-up time was 30 weeks for the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31 weeks for the BSC alone group. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat (ITT) |
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Measure Participants | 231 | 232 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
6.4
|
6.3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Panitumumab Plus BSC, BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis was no difference between treatment groups | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.806 |
Comments | This analysis was conducted contingent on a statistically significant difference in the primary outcome, and adjusted to an a priori threshold for statistical significance at a 4% level for a multiple comparison involving objective tumor response | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | Stratified by baseline IVRS ECOG performance status and geographic region |
Title | Objective Tumor Response |
---|---|
Description | Defined as the number of participants with a confirmed complete or partial tumor response, confirmed by a scan no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial Response (PR): disappearance of all target lesions, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, with no progressive disease of non-target lesions. |
Time Frame | From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat (ITT) |
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Measure Participants | 231 | 232 |
Number [participants] |
22
9.5%
|
0
0%
|
Title | Duration of Response |
---|---|
Description | Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from first confirmed objective tumor response to first observed progression of disease or death due to progression of disease (whichever comes first). |
Time Frame | From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat participants who had a confirmed objective tumor response. No objective tumor responses were observed in the BSC alone treatment arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Measure Participants | 22 | 0 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [weeks] |
18.4
|
Title | Time to Response |
---|---|
Description | Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to first partial or complete response, subsequently confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. |
Time Frame | From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat (ITT) participants who had a confirmed objective tumor response. No objective tumor responses were observed in the BSC alone treatment arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Measure Participants | 22 | 0 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [weeks] |
7.9
|
Title | Time to Disease Progression |
---|---|
Description | Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to disease progression or death due to disease progression (whichever occurs first) |
Time Frame | From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat |
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Measure Participants | 231 | 232 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [weeks] |
8.0
|
7.3
|
Title | Time to Treatment Failure |
---|---|
Description | Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to the date the decision was made to end treatment for any reason. |
Time Frame | From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention-to-treat (ITT) |
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Measure Participants | 231 | 232 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [weeks] |
9.0
|
7.1
|
Title | Duration of Stable Disease |
---|---|
Description | Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to date of first observed progression of disease or death due to progression of disease (whichever comes first) for those participants with a best response of stable disease. Stable disease defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease taking as reference the nadir longest diameter since the treatment started, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no new lesions. |
Time Frame | From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants who had a best overall response of stable disease |
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Measure Participants | 61 | 24 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [weeks] |
24.0
|
17.6
|
Title | Progression-free Survival Time (Wild-type KRAS) |
---|---|
Description | Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression among participants with wild-type Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) status. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. |
Time Frame | From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time in patients with wild-type KRAS was 36.8 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 35.7 weeks in the BSC alone group. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Wild-type KRAS Efficacy Analysis Set, a subset of the Intention-to-Treat set with wild-type Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) status. |
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus Best Supportive Care | BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Measure Participants | 124 | 119 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [weeks] |
12.3
|
7.3
|
Title | Progression-free Survival Time (Mutant KRAS) |
---|---|
Description | Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression among participants with mutant Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) status. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. |
Time Frame | From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time in patients with mutant KRAS was 24.4 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 23.9 weeks in the BSC alone group. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Mutant KRAS Efficacy Analysis Set, a subset of the Intention-to-Treat set with mutant Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) status. |
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus Best Supportive Care | BSC Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Measure Participants | 84 | 100 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [weeks] |
7.4
|
7.3
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | First dose through maximum of safety FU or 30 days after last dose | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes the most frequent non-serious occurrences of adverse events. Safety Analysis set includes all randomized patients, analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Hence, 2 patients randomized to Panitumumab Plus BSC treatment group are analyzed in the BSC Alone group for safety. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone | ||
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug. | Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 101/229 (44.1%) | 62/234 (26.5%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
ANAEMIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
ARRHYTHMIA SUPRAVENTRICULAR | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
CARDIO-RESPIRATORY ARREST | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
CARDIOMYOPATHY | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
PERICARDITIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
TACHYCARDIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
ENDOPHTHALMITIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
ABDOMINAL DISTENSION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
ABDOMINAL PAIN | 8/229 (3.5%) | 8/234 (3.4%) | ||
ABDOMINAL PAIN LOWER | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
ASCITES | 4/229 (1.7%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
CONSTIPATION | 7/229 (3.1%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
DIARRHOEA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
DUODENAL STENOSIS | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
GASTRIC ULCER | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
GASTRITIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
GASTROINTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION | 2/229 (0.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION | 11/229 (4.8%) | 4/234 (1.7%) | ||
MELAENA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
NAUSEA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
PERITONITIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
PROCTALGIA | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
RECTAL DISCHARGE | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
RECTAL HAEMORRHAGE | 2/229 (0.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
SMALL INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
VOMITING | 4/229 (1.7%) | 5/234 (2.1%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
ASTHENIA | 4/229 (1.7%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
CATHETER RELATED COMPLICATION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
CHEST PAIN | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
FATIGUE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
GENERAL PHYSICAL HEALTH DETERIORATION | 14/229 (6.1%) | 6/234 (2.6%) | ||
HYPERTHERMIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
MUCOSAL INFLAMMATION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
MULTI-ORGAN FAILURE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
OEDEMA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
OEDEMA PERIPHERAL | 2/229 (0.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
PELVIC MASS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
PERFORMANCE STATUS DECREASED | 1/229 (0.4%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
PYREXIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 8/234 (3.4%) | ||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
BILE DUCT STENOSIS | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
CHOLANGITIS | 0/229 (0%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
CHOLELITHIASIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
CHOLESTASIS | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
HEPATIC FAILURE | 5/229 (2.2%) | 4/234 (1.7%) | ||
HEPATOMEGALY | 2/229 (0.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
HEPATORENAL FAILURE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
HYPERBILIRUBINAEMIA | 3/229 (1.3%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
JAUNDICE | 4/229 (1.7%) | 3/234 (1.3%) | ||
JAUNDICE CHOLESTATIC | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
LIVER DISORDER | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Immune system disorders | ||||
HYPERSENSITIVITY | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
ABDOMINAL ABSCESS | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
BACTERIAL SEPSIS | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
CYSTITIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
DIARRHOEA INFECTIOUS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUS INFECTION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
EYE INFECTION STAPHYLOCOCCAL | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
HAEMOPHILUS INFECTION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
LOCALISED INFECTION | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
LUNG INFECTION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
PARONYCHIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
SEPSIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
SEPTIC SHOCK | 0/229 (0%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
STAPHYLOCOCCAL SEPSIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
URINARY TRACT INFECTION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
WOUND INFECTION | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
FEMUR FRACTURE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
INCISIONAL HERNIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
LUMBAR VERTEBRAL FRACTURE | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
OVERDOSE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
TIBIA FRACTURE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
BLOOD BILIRUBIN INCREASED | 1/229 (0.4%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
BLOOD CREATININE INCREASED | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
ANOREXIA | 3/229 (1.3%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
CACHEXIA | 2/229 (0.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
DECREASED APPETITE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
DEHYDRATION | 4/229 (1.7%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
DIABETES MELLITUS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
FAILURE TO THRIVE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
HYPOKALAEMIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
HYPOMAGNESAEMIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
ARTHRALGIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
BACK PAIN | 3/229 (1.3%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
BONE PAIN | 1/229 (0.4%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
MYALGIA | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
NECK PAIN | 0/229 (0%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
PAIN IN EXTREMITY | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
BLADDER CANCER | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
CANCER PAIN | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
COLON CANCER | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
COLON CANCER METASTATIC | 1/229 (0.4%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
COLORECTAL CANCER | 16/229 (7%) | 9/234 (3.8%) | ||
COLORECTAL CANCER METASTATIC | 30/229 (13.1%) | 24/234 (10.3%) | ||
METASTASES TO CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM | 1/229 (0.4%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
METASTASES TO LIVER | 2/229 (0.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
METASTASES TO LUNG | 2/229 (0.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
METASTASES TO PERITONEUM | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
METASTASES TO PLEURA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
METASTASES TO SPINE | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
PERITONEAL CARCINOMA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
RECTAL CANCER | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
TUMOUR HAEMORRHAGE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
TUMOUR INVASION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
TUMOUR NECROSIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
COMA | 2/229 (0.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
COMA HEPATIC | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
DEPRESSED LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS | 2/229 (0.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
EPILEPSY | 2/229 (0.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
HEMIPARESIS | 2/229 (0.9%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY | 2/229 (0.9%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
LETHARGY | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
SOMNOLENCE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
STUPOR | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
TRANSIENT ISCHAEMIC ATTACK | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
ALCOHOLISM | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
CONFUSIONAL STATE | 0/229 (0%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
DEPRESSION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
DYSURIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
HAEMATURIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
HYDRONEPHROSIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
NEPHROLITHIASIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
OLIGURIA | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
RENAL FAILURE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
URETHRAL OBSTRUCTION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
FEMALE GENITAL TRACT FISTULA | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
PELVIC PAIN | 1/229 (0.4%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
PERINEAL PAIN | 0/229 (0%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
DYSPNOEA | 6/229 (2.6%) | 4/234 (1.7%) | ||
HAEMOPTYSIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
PLEURAL EFFUSION | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
PLEURISY | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
PULMONARY EMBOLISM | 3/229 (1.3%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
RESPIRATORY FAILURE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
DERMATITIS ALLERGIC | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
AXILLARY VEIN THROMBOSIS | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS | 3/229 (1.3%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
HAEMORRHAGE | 1/229 (0.4%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
JUGULAR VEIN THROMBOSIS | 2/229 (0.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Panitumumab Plus BSC | BSC Alone | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 224/229 (97.8%) | 171/234 (73.1%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
ANAEMIA | 12/229 (5.2%) | 6/234 (2.6%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
GROWTH OF EYELASHES | 13/229 (5.7%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
ABDOMINAL PAIN | 56/229 (24.5%) | 36/234 (15.4%) | ||
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER | 19/229 (8.3%) | 16/234 (6.8%) | ||
CONSTIPATION | 43/229 (18.8%) | 21/234 (9%) | ||
DIARRHOEA | 48/229 (21%) | 26/234 (11.1%) | ||
NAUSEA | 51/229 (22.3%) | 35/234 (15%) | ||
STOMATITIS | 15/229 (6.6%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
VOMITING | 41/229 (17.9%) | 27/234 (11.5%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
ASTHENIA | 28/229 (12.2%) | 25/234 (10.7%) | ||
FATIGUE | 59/229 (25.8%) | 34/234 (14.5%) | ||
GENERAL PHYSICAL HEALTH DETERIORATION | 13/229 (5.7%) | 3/234 (1.3%) | ||
MUCOSAL INFLAMMATION | 14/229 (6.1%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
OEDEMA PERIPHERAL | 27/229 (11.8%) | 13/234 (5.6%) | ||
PYREXIA | 37/229 (16.2%) | 24/234 (10.3%) | ||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
HEPATOMEGALY | 12/229 (5.2%) | 8/234 (3.4%) | ||
JAUNDICE | 13/229 (5.7%) | 7/234 (3%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
PARONYCHIA | 57/229 (24.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
WEIGHT DECREASED | 12/229 (5.2%) | 3/234 (1.3%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
ANOREXIA | 63/229 (27.5%) | 44/234 (18.8%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
BACK PAIN | 24/229 (10.5%) | 16/234 (6.8%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
ANXIETY | 14/229 (6.1%) | 7/234 (3%) | ||
INSOMNIA | 15/229 (6.6%) | 14/234 (6%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
COUGH | 34/229 (14.8%) | 17/234 (7.3%) | ||
DYSPNOEA | 36/229 (15.7%) | 28/234 (12%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
ACNE | 31/229 (13.5%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
DERMATITIS ACNEIFORM | 131/229 (57.2%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
DRY SKIN | 23/229 (10%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
ERYTHEMA | 150/229 (65.5%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
EXFOLIATIVE RASH | 41/229 (17.9%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
NAIL DISORDER | 22/229 (9.6%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
PRURITUS | 132/229 (57.6%) | 4/234 (1.7%) | ||
RASH | 51/229 (22.3%) | 2/234 (0.9%) | ||
SKIN EXFOLIATION | 21/229 (9.2%) | 0/234 (0%) | ||
SKIN FISSURES | 45/229 (19.7%) | 1/234 (0.4%) | ||
SKIN ULCER | 13/229 (5.7%) | 0/234 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Study Director |
---|---|
Organization | Amgen Inc. |
Phone | 866-572-6436 |
- 20020408