ERAS-Colon: ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) Protocol Implementation in Piedmont Region for Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The study assesses the impact on quality of care of implementing the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol for colorectal cancer surgery in the network of public hospitals in the Regione Piemonte (North-West Italy). Every hospital is a cluster entering the study treating patients according to its current clinical practice. On the basis of a randomized order, each hospital switches from current clinical practice to the adoption of the ERAS protocol.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol is a multimodal perioperative care pathways designed to achieve early recovery after surgical procedures by maintaining preoperative organ function and reducing the profound stress response following surgery. Even if efficacy and safety of ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery is well-established in the literature, its implementation is limited to few selected centres in Piemonte. The aim of the study is to extend the implementation of the ERAS protocol to whole regional network of hospitals. Specific objectives are to estimate its impact on different dimensions of quality of care, including length of stay, complications and patient satisfaction, and to identify possible barriers or facilitating factors.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| No Intervention: Usual care Perioperative care for colorectal cancer cancer is managed according to current hospital clinical practice. |
|
| Experimental: ERAS protocol Perioperative care for colorectal cancer surgery is managed according to ERAS protocol. |
Procedure: ERAS protocol
In colorectal cancer surgery, the ERAS protocol involves an accurate interview with the patient in the preoperative phase aimed at smoking and alcohol cessation, the reduction of preoperative fasting with administration of oral carbohydrates before surgery, use of intestinal preparation for selected cases only (rectal surgery), the prophylaxis of thromboembolism, a correct antibiotic prophylaxis, the prevention of intraoperative hypothermia, prevention of volume overload, preference for minimally invasive surgery, prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting, very limited use of the nasogastric tube, early removal of the urinary catheter, multimodal analgesia to minimize opiate consumption, early postoperative mobilization and early post-operative feeding, to promote rapid recovery of gastro-intestinal functions.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Length of stay [12 days after admission]
Mean length of stay calculated as difference between date of discharge and date of admission of the hospitalization for surgery, excluding length of stay >12 days (98th percentile of the expected distribution).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Length of stay >12 days [30 days after admission]
Rate of patients with a length of stay >12 days
- Recovery after surgery [24 hours after surgery]
Score of quality of recovery at 24 hours after surgery, assessed with the questionnaire Quality of Recovery (QoR-15), a 15-items instrument, with responses recorded on a 11-point Likert-type scale form 0 (worst scenario) to 10 (best scenario) and an overall score ranging from 0 (poor recovey) to 150 (excellent recovery). A visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 10 (worst imaginable health state) is also supplied as summary evaluation.
- Complications [30 days after discharge]
Rate of surgical and medical complication after surgery For surgical complications: Comprehensive Complication Index
- Transfer to intensive care unit [30 days after surgery]
Rate of transfers to intensive care unit after surgery
- Emergency visits after discharge [30 days after discharge]
Rate of emergency visit in the first month after discharge
- Hospital admissions after discharge [30 days after discharge]
Rate of new admissions in the first month after discharge
- Reintervention [30 days after surgery]
Rate of reintervention in the first month after surgery, excluding planned interventions
- Patients' satisfaction [15 days after discharge]
Score of patients' satisfaction measured 2 weeks after discharge, assessed with the questionnaire Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ8) supplied by telephone. SSQ8 is a 8-items instrument, with responses recorded on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 0 (worst scenario) to 4 (best scenario) and an overall score ranging from 0 (very unsatisfied) to 32 (very satisfied).
- Healthcare costs [30 days after discharge]
Mean healthcare costs from pre admission visit to 30 days after discharge
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
All the hospital wards within the Piemonte Region performing colorectal cancer surgery
-
All the patients receiving an elective surgery for colorectal cancer, with or without protective stoma.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Hospital wards performing less than 30 expected cases per year
-
Emergency surgery
-
High severity cases not allowing ERAS protocol implementation (i.e. American Society of Anesthesiologists score: ASA V).
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ospedale Santa Croce-Carle Cuneo | Cuneo | Italy | 12100 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ospedale Santa Croce-Carle Cuneo
- Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
- Ministry of Health, Italy
- Regione Piemonte
Investigators
- Study Chair: Giovannino Ciccone, MD, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Braga M, Borghi F, Scatizzi M, Missana G, Guicciardi MA, Bona S, Ficari F, Maspero M, Pecorelli N; PeriOperative Italian Society. Impact of laparoscopy on adherence to an enhanced recovery pathway and readiness for discharge in elective colorectal surgery: Results from the PeriOperative Italian Society registry. Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4393-4399. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5486-0. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
- Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1531-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2416-8. Review.
- Greer NL, Gunnar WP, Dahm P, Lee AE, MacDonald R, Shaukat A, Sultan S, Wilt TJ. Enhanced Recovery Protocols for Adults Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Sep;61(9):1108-1118. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001160.
- Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, Rockall TA, Young-Fadok TM, Hill AG, Soop M, de Boer HD, Urman RD, Chang GJ, Fichera A, Kessler H, Grass F, Whang EE, Fawcett WJ, Carli F, Lobo DN, Rollins KE, Balfour A, Baldini G, Riedel B, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):659-695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y. Review.
- Kehlet H. Fast-track surgery-an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Jun;396(5):585-90. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0790-y. Epub 2011 Apr 6. Review.
- ERAS-Colon-Piemonte