UPQUAL: Outreach for Patients With Uncompleted Colorectal Cancer Screening Orders

Sponsor
Northwestern University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00793455
Collaborator
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (U.S. Fed)
628
1
2
13
48.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether patient outreach is effective at increasing compliance with preventive screenings ordered by their physician. We hypothesize that educational outreach may increase completion rates.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Educational outreach
N/A

Detailed Description

We designed an intervention to focus on patients who have received and accepted a referral for colonoscopy, yet have exhibited some barriers to screening as demonstrated by a lack of screening completion. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of a multicomponent intervention (patient reminder, print and multimedia materials) on colorectal screening completion among this target population.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
628 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Using Precision Performance Measurement To Conduct Focused Quality Improvement. Sub-Study 1.
Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2009

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group

Received Educational Outreach

Behavioral: Educational outreach
Participants will get a letter from their physician that explains that their records show the test has not been completed. The letter will be mailed along with an educational brochure and a DVD about colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer screening.

No Intervention: Usual Care Control Group

Participants in this arm will receive normal care until outcome assessment is performed at 6 months following the placement of the order for the preventive service. They will be sent a letter reminding them to obtain the ordered preventive service test.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion. [3 months post randomization]

    We reviewed electronic health records of participants 3 months post randomization to ascertain outcome. We looked for one or both of the following (1) note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during study period (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Participants were categorized as completing CRC screening if there was a lab result or physician note located in chart during study period. If no note or lab result was found in chart, then the participant was categorized as not completing CRC screening.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion [6 months post randomization]

    We reviewed electronic health records of participants 6 months post randomization to ascertain outcome. We looked for one or both of the following (1) note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during study period (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Participants were categorized as completing CRC screening if there was a lab result or physician note located in chart during study period. If no note or lab result was found in chart, then the participant was categorized as not completing CRC screening.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patient's physician has ordered a preventive screening test

  • Patient has not completed this test in 3 months

  • Patient of Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation General Internal Medicine Clinic.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patient has been given a more recent order for the same screening test.

  • Patient has significant life stress as noted in the Electronic Health Record (EHR)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation General Internal Medicine Clinic Chicago Illinois United States 60611

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Northwestern University
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kenzie A Cameron, PhD, MPH, Northwestern University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Kenzie Cameron, Research Associate Professor, Northwestern University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00793455
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1R18HS017163-01
First Posted:
Nov 19, 2008
Last Update Posted:
Dec 1, 2011
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2011
Keywords provided by Kenzie Cameron, Research Associate Professor, Northwestern University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details This trial took place at a large urban academic primary care internal medicine practice in Chicago, IL. This trial was enrolling patients between October 2008 and May 2009.
Pre-assignment Detail We used data contained in the clinic's electronic health record to identify eligible patients. All eligible patients were randomly assigned in equal numbers to either the control or intervention arms. All eligible patients were randomized and assigned to groups until we reached target study size.
Arm/Group Title Intervention Group Usual Care Control Group
Arm/Group Description Participants assigned to this group received a one-time educational intervention within one week of randomization. Educational intervention consisted of a letter from patient's physician, a brochure about colorectal cancer screening, and a DVD about colorectal cancer screening. Participants in this arm will receive normal care until outcome assessment is performed at 6 months following the placement of the order for the preventive service. They will be sent a letter reminding them to obtain the ordered preventive service test.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 314 314
COMPLETED 314 314
NOT COMPLETED 0 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Intervention Group Usual Care Control Group Total
Arm/Group Description Participants assigned to this group received a one-time educational intervention within one week of randomization. Educational intervention consisted of a letter from patient's physician, a brochure about colorectal cancer screening, and a DVD about colorectal cancer screening. Participants in this arm will receive normal care until outcome assessment is performed at 6 months following the placement of the order for the preventive service. They will be sent a letter reminding them to obtain the ordered preventive service test. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 314 314 628
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
57.90
(7.1)
58.03
(6.6)
58.0
(6.9)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
197
62.7%
192
61.1%
389
61.9%
Male
117
37.3%
122
38.9%
239
38.1%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number]
White
144
45.9%
132
42%
276
43.9%
Black
79
25.2%
77
24.5%
156
24.8%
Hispanic
9
2.9%
14
4.5%
23
3.7%
Other/unknown
82
26.1%
91
29%
173
27.5%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
314
100%
314
100%
628
100%
Number of visits in past 2 years (Number) [Number]
1-2
69
22%
79
25.2%
148
23.6%
3
80
25.5%
79
25.2%
159
25.3%
4
54
17.2%
48
15.3%
102
16.2%
>=5
111
35.4%
108
34.4%
219
34.9%
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) screening history (Number) [Number]
Ever screened
22
7%
24
7.6%
46
7.3%
Never screened
292
93%
290
92.4%
582
92.7%
Insurance Status (Number) [Number]
Private
245
78%
236
75.2%
481
76.6%
Medicare
56
17.8%
63
20.1%
119
18.9%
Medicaid
10
3.2%
10
3.2%
20
3.2%
Uninsured
3
1%
5
1.6%
8
1.3%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion.
Description We reviewed electronic health records of participants 3 months post randomization to ascertain outcome. We looked for one or both of the following (1) note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during study period (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Participants were categorized as completing CRC screening if there was a lab result or physician note located in chart during study period. If no note or lab result was found in chart, then the participant was categorized as not completing CRC screening.
Time Frame 3 months post randomization

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was based on intention to treat.
Arm/Group Title Usual Care Control Group Intervention Group
Arm/Group Description Usual Care Received Educational Outreach
Measure Participants 314 314
Did not Complete Screening
304
96.8%
283
90.1%
Completed Screening
10
3.2%
31
9.9%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Usual Care Control Group, Intervention Group
Comments We compared the outcomes in the intervention and control groups using rate ratios and chi square test at 3 and 6 months, a 2 sided test with a p value < .05 was used to determine significance. The study was powered to detect a 10-percentage point difference in screening completion between intervention and control groups if the control rate of completion as 20% or less with 80% power.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Rate Ratio
Estimated Value 3.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.5 to 6.2
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion
Description We reviewed electronic health records of participants 6 months post randomization to ascertain outcome. We looked for one or both of the following (1) note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during study period (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Participants were categorized as completing CRC screening if there was a lab result or physician note located in chart during study period. If no note or lab result was found in chart, then the participant was categorized as not completing CRC screening.
Time Frame 6 months post randomization

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was based on intention to treat.
Arm/Group Title Usual Care Control Group Intervention Group
Arm/Group Description Usual Care Received outreach intervention
Measure Participants 314 314
Completed Screening
38
12.1%
57
18.2%
Did not Complete Screening
276
87.9%
257
81.8%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Usual Care Control Group, Intervention Group
Comments Same as primary outcome.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Rate Ratio
Estimated Value 1.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.03 to 2.2
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description This was a minimal risk trial assessing an educational intervention which was approved by our Institutional Review Board with a waiver of consent. Serious and/or other adverse events were not collected or assessed.
Arm/Group Title Intervention Group Usual Care Control Group
Arm/Group Description Participants assigned to this group received a one-time educational intervention within one week of randomization. Educational intervention consisted of a letter from patient's physician, a brochure about colorectal cancer screening, and a DVD about colorectal cancer screening. Participants in this arm will receive normal care until outcome assessment is performed at 6 months following the placement of the order for the preventive service. They will be sent a letter reminding them to obtain the ordered preventive service test.
All Cause Mortality
Intervention Group Usual Care Control Group
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Intervention Group Usual Care Control Group
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/0 (NaN) 0/0 (NaN)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Intervention Group Usual Care Control Group
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/0 (NaN) 0/0 (NaN)

Limitations/Caveats

This study does not identify the timing of the intervention that would have the most impact. Mailings occurred 3 months or more after the order was placed, contacting patients sooner may have been more effective.

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Kenzie A. Cameron, PhD, MPH
Organization Northwestern University
Phone 312-503-3910
Email k-cameron@northwestern.edu
Responsible Party:
Kenzie Cameron, Research Associate Professor, Northwestern University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00793455
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1R18HS017163-01
First Posted:
Nov 19, 2008
Last Update Posted:
Dec 1, 2011
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2011