UPQUAL: Outreach for Patients With Uncompleted Colorectal Cancer Screening Orders
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether patient outreach is effective at increasing compliance with preventive screenings ordered by their physician. We hypothesize that educational outreach may increase completion rates.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
We designed an intervention to focus on patients who have received and accepted a referral for colonoscopy, yet have exhibited some barriers to screening as demonstrated by a lack of screening completion. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of a multicomponent intervention (patient reminder, print and multimedia materials) on colorectal screening completion among this target population.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention Group Received Educational Outreach |
Behavioral: Educational outreach
Participants will get a letter from their physician that explains that their records show the test has not been completed. The letter will be mailed along with an educational brochure and a DVD about colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer screening.
|
No Intervention: Usual Care Control Group Participants in this arm will receive normal care until outcome assessment is performed at 6 months following the placement of the order for the preventive service. They will be sent a letter reminding them to obtain the ordered preventive service test. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion. [3 months post randomization]
We reviewed electronic health records of participants 3 months post randomization to ascertain outcome. We looked for one or both of the following (1) note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during study period (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Participants were categorized as completing CRC screening if there was a lab result or physician note located in chart during study period. If no note or lab result was found in chart, then the participant was categorized as not completing CRC screening.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion [6 months post randomization]
We reviewed electronic health records of participants 6 months post randomization to ascertain outcome. We looked for one or both of the following (1) note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during study period (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Participants were categorized as completing CRC screening if there was a lab result or physician note located in chart during study period. If no note or lab result was found in chart, then the participant was categorized as not completing CRC screening.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patient's physician has ordered a preventive screening test
-
Patient has not completed this test in 3 months
-
Patient of Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation General Internal Medicine Clinic.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patient has been given a more recent order for the same screening test.
-
Patient has significant life stress as noted in the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation General Internal Medicine Clinic | Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60611 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Northwestern University
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kenzie A Cameron, PhD, MPH, Northwestern University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 1R18HS017163-01
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | This trial took place at a large urban academic primary care internal medicine practice in Chicago, IL. This trial was enrolling patients between October 2008 and May 2009. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | We used data contained in the clinic's electronic health record to identify eligible patients. All eligible patients were randomly assigned in equal numbers to either the control or intervention arms. All eligible patients were randomized and assigned to groups until we reached target study size. |
Arm/Group Title | Intervention Group | Usual Care Control Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants assigned to this group received a one-time educational intervention within one week of randomization. Educational intervention consisted of a letter from patient's physician, a brochure about colorectal cancer screening, and a DVD about colorectal cancer screening. | Participants in this arm will receive normal care until outcome assessment is performed at 6 months following the placement of the order for the preventive service. They will be sent a letter reminding them to obtain the ordered preventive service test. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 314 | 314 |
COMPLETED | 314 | 314 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Intervention Group | Usual Care Control Group | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants assigned to this group received a one-time educational intervention within one week of randomization. Educational intervention consisted of a letter from patient's physician, a brochure about colorectal cancer screening, and a DVD about colorectal cancer screening. | Participants in this arm will receive normal care until outcome assessment is performed at 6 months following the placement of the order for the preventive service. They will be sent a letter reminding them to obtain the ordered preventive service test. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 314 | 314 | 628 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
57.90
(7.1)
|
58.03
(6.6)
|
58.0
(6.9)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
197
62.7%
|
192
61.1%
|
389
61.9%
|
Male |
117
37.3%
|
122
38.9%
|
239
38.1%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | |||
White |
144
45.9%
|
132
42%
|
276
43.9%
|
Black |
79
25.2%
|
77
24.5%
|
156
24.8%
|
Hispanic |
9
2.9%
|
14
4.5%
|
23
3.7%
|
Other/unknown |
82
26.1%
|
91
29%
|
173
27.5%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
314
100%
|
314
100%
|
628
100%
|
Number of visits in past 2 years (Number) [Number] | |||
1-2 |
69
22%
|
79
25.2%
|
148
23.6%
|
3 |
80
25.5%
|
79
25.2%
|
159
25.3%
|
4 |
54
17.2%
|
48
15.3%
|
102
16.2%
|
>=5 |
111
35.4%
|
108
34.4%
|
219
34.9%
|
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) screening history (Number) [Number] | |||
Ever screened |
22
7%
|
24
7.6%
|
46
7.3%
|
Never screened |
292
93%
|
290
92.4%
|
582
92.7%
|
Insurance Status (Number) [Number] | |||
Private |
245
78%
|
236
75.2%
|
481
76.6%
|
Medicare |
56
17.8%
|
63
20.1%
|
119
18.9%
|
Medicaid |
10
3.2%
|
10
3.2%
|
20
3.2%
|
Uninsured |
3
1%
|
5
1.6%
|
8
1.3%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion. |
---|---|
Description | We reviewed electronic health records of participants 3 months post randomization to ascertain outcome. We looked for one or both of the following (1) note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during study period (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Participants were categorized as completing CRC screening if there was a lab result or physician note located in chart during study period. If no note or lab result was found in chart, then the participant was categorized as not completing CRC screening. |
Time Frame | 3 months post randomization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis was based on intention to treat. |
Arm/Group Title | Usual Care Control Group | Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Usual Care | Received Educational Outreach |
Measure Participants | 314 | 314 |
Did not Complete Screening |
304
96.8%
|
283
90.1%
|
Completed Screening |
10
3.2%
|
31
9.9%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Usual Care Control Group, Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | We compared the outcomes in the intervention and control groups using rate ratios and chi square test at 3 and 6 months, a 2 sided test with a p value < .05 was used to determine significance. The study was powered to detect a 10-percentage point difference in screening completion between intervention and control groups if the control rate of completion as 20% or less with 80% power. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Rate Ratio |
Estimated Value | 3.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.5 to 6.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion |
---|---|
Description | We reviewed electronic health records of participants 6 months post randomization to ascertain outcome. We looked for one or both of the following (1) note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during study period (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Participants were categorized as completing CRC screening if there was a lab result or physician note located in chart during study period. If no note or lab result was found in chart, then the participant was categorized as not completing CRC screening. |
Time Frame | 6 months post randomization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis was based on intention to treat. |
Arm/Group Title | Usual Care Control Group | Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Usual Care | Received outreach intervention |
Measure Participants | 314 | 314 |
Completed Screening |
38
12.1%
|
57
18.2%
|
Did not Complete Screening |
276
87.9%
|
257
81.8%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Usual Care Control Group, Intervention Group |
---|---|---|
Comments | Same as primary outcome. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Rate Ratio |
Estimated Value | 1.5 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.03 to 2.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | This was a minimal risk trial assessing an educational intervention which was approved by our Institutional Review Board with a waiver of consent. Serious and/or other adverse events were not collected or assessed. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Intervention Group | Usual Care Control Group | ||
Arm/Group Description | Participants assigned to this group received a one-time educational intervention within one week of randomization. Educational intervention consisted of a letter from patient's physician, a brochure about colorectal cancer screening, and a DVD about colorectal cancer screening. | Participants in this arm will receive normal care until outcome assessment is performed at 6 months following the placement of the order for the preventive service. They will be sent a letter reminding them to obtain the ordered preventive service test. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Intervention Group | Usual Care Control Group | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Intervention Group | Usual Care Control Group | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Intervention Group | Usual Care Control Group | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Kenzie A. Cameron, PhD, MPH |
---|---|
Organization | Northwestern University |
Phone | 312-503-3910 |
k-cameron@northwestern.edu |
- 1R18HS017163-01